The tactic involves an individual claiming to own an image used in an article and demanding credit in the form of a backlink.
Solis explains how this happened to her, and that the image in question couldn’t possibly belong to the person she received an email from.
“Today, when checking the @remotersnet email I see we had a message from someone saying we had used their image in an article and therefore we needed to link back to “credit” the image…
… the thing is: I’m sure we buy the images we use on the site. I’m the person buying them with @123rf -that I can highly recommend, btw-. I checked in the 123rf site and saw when I bought it, and who’s the author of the image: definitely not the person from the message…
…then I see that the “proof” the person requesting the link to credit the image is: “Here is a link to our article with this picture:”. I checked the URL and saw is just a random article where they “inserted” the image 🤷🏻♀️ Not a real a proof of ownership 🙄🙈 …
… So, these are people building links to their Website by “trying” to deceive, saying they are the owners of images others are using (they are clearly not). Thankfully, I know where our images come from and due to my Web/SEO experience I can see through the deceit attempt… “
Several people commented on the thread saying the same thing has happened to them as well.
Eventually, the thread caught the attention of John Mueller, who says he would like to see more examples of this link building tactic.
Mueller adds that he’s “curious to check how we handle this on our (Google’s) side.”
If any of you want to send me examples, I’d be curious to check how we handle this on our side.
— 🍌 John 🍌 (@JohnMu) February 19, 2020
It’s unclear what, if any, action will be taken as a result of the investigation. If you’ve encountered this tactic yourself, you can assist by sending Mueller some examples.
Google to pay $391.5 million settlement over location tracking, state AGs say
Google has agreed to pay a $391.5 million settlement to 40 states to resolve accusations that it tracked people’s locations in violation of state laws, including snooping on consumers’ whereabouts even after they told the tech behemoth to bug off.
Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry said it is time for Big Tech to recognize state laws that limit data collection efforts.
“I have been ringing the alarm bell on big tech for years, and this is why,” Mr. Landry, a Republican, said in a statement Monday. “Citizens must be able to make informed decisions about what information they release to big tech.”
The attorneys general said the investigation resulted in the largest-ever multistate privacy settlement. Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, a Democrat, said Google’s penalty is a “historic win for consumers.”
“Location data is among the most sensitive and valuable personal information Google collects, and there are so many reasons why a consumer may opt out of tracking,” Mr. Tong said. “Our investigation found that Google continued to collect this personal information even after consumers told them not to. That is an unacceptable invasion of consumer privacy, and a violation of state law.”
Location tracking can help tech companies sell digital ads to marketers looking to connect with consumers within their vicinity. It’s another tool in a data-gathering toolkit that generates more than $200 billion in annual ad revenue for Google, accounting for most of the profits pouring into the coffers of its corporate parent, Alphabet, which has a market value of $1.2 trillion.
The settlement is part of a series of legal challenges to Big Tech in the U.S. and around the world, which include consumer protection and antitrust lawsuits.
Though Google, based in Mountain View, California, said it fixed the problems several years ago, the company’s critics remained skeptical. State attorneys general who also have tussled with Google have questioned whether the tech company will follow through on its commitments.
The states aren’t dialing back their scrutiny of Google’s empire.
Last month, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said he was filing a lawsuit over reports that Google unlawfully collected millions of Texans’ biometric data such as “voiceprints and records of face geometry.”
The states began investigating Google’s location tracking after The Associated Press reported in 2018 that Android devices and iPhones were storing location data despite the activation of privacy settings intended to prevent the company from following along.
Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich went after the company in May 2020. The state’s lawsuit charged that the company had defrauded its users by misleading them into believing they could keep their whereabouts private by turning off location tracking in the settings of their software.
Arizona settled its case with Google for $85 million last month. By then, attorneys general in several other states and the District of Columbia had pounced with their own lawsuits seeking to hold Google accountable.
Along with the hefty penalty, the state attorneys general said, Google must not hide key information about location tracking, must give users detailed information about the types of location tracking information Google collects, and must show additional information to people when users turn location-related account settings to “off.”
States will receive differing sums from the settlement. Mr. Landry’s office said Louisiana would receive more than $12.7 million, and Mr. Tong’s office said Connecticut would collect more than $6.5 million.
The financial penalty will not cripple Google’s business. The company raked in $69 billion in revenue for the third quarter of 2022, according to reports, yielding about $13.9 billion in profit.
Google downplayed its location-tracking tools Monday and said it changed the products at issue long ago.
“Consistent with improvements we’ve made in recent years, we have settled this investigation which was based on outdated product policies that we changed years ago,” Google spokesman Jose Castaneda said in a statement.
Google product managers Marlo McGriff and David Monsees defended their company’s Search and Maps products’ usage of location information.
“Location information lets us offer you a more helpful experience when you use our products,” the two men wrote on Google’s blog. “From Google Maps’ driving directions that show you how to avoid traffic to Google Search surfacing local restaurants and letting you know how busy they are, location information helps connect experiences across Google to what’s most relevant and useful.”
The blog post touted transparency tools and auto-delete controls that Google has developed in recent years and said the private browsing Incognito mode prevents Google Maps from saving an account’s search history.
Mr. McGriff and Mr. Monsees said Google would make changes to its products as part of the settlement. The changes include simplifying the process for deleting location data, updating the method to set up an account and revamping information hubs.
“We’ll provide a new control that allows users to easily turn off their Location History and Web & App Activity settings and delete their past data in one simple flow,” Mr. McGriff and Mr. Monsees wrote. “We’ll also continue deleting Location History data for users who have not recently contributed new Location History data to their account.”
• This article is based in part on wire service reports.
8 Facebook Marketing Tips To Revitalize A Boring Page
How Deep Learning Has Proved to Be Useful for Cyber Security
Before Deciding Where Your Content Team Reports, Pay Attention to This
Social media businesses look out, here comes Chat GPT
Google Helpful Content System Update, Continuous Scroll On Desktop & Topic Refinements
Crawl Errors And Crawl Budget: Are They Ranking Factors?
19 Website Copywriting Tips for Happy Visitors amd Higher Google Rankings [Infographic]
2022 YouTube and Video SERP Result Changes
12 Powerful Email Marketing Tips You Need to Know
New Report Shows That Young Users are Increasingly Turning to TikTok for News Content
B2C marketing: A guide for marketers
This Week’s Deals with Gold and Spotlight Sale, Plus Xbox Black Friday Sale
Vampire Survivors Available Today with Xbox Game Pass for Xbox Series X|S and Xbox One
Xbox Shares Community Safety Approach in Transparency Report
Identifying an Effective B2B Target Market for Ads
Deep Rock Galactic Season 03: Plaguefall Infects Xbox
8 eCommerce Marketing Strategies for 2022 and Beyond
How Metaverse is Reshaping the Tourism Industry
How to Create an SEO Content Strategy (Follow the Ahrefs’ Framework)
What is Twitter Spaces? [+Why Marketers Should Care]
SEARCHENGINES7 days ago
Google Says If Your Most Important Page Is Terrible, Then That Is A Big Deal For SEO
SEARCHENGINES3 days ago
Microsoft Advertising Adds Flyer Extensions, Retract & Restate Conversions, Ad Schedule Calendar View & More
SEO5 days ago
7 Ways To Use Google Trends For SEO & Content Marketing
SEO7 days ago
What 2022 SEO Shifts Could Mean For 2023 & Beyond [Webinar]