A Sydney woman and her pets are being forced out of their home after an “enormous rent increase” on her one-bedroom property, as Aussies continue to grapple with soaring prices.

Rosie Hitchcock has lived in the Drummoyne apartment for almost one year, but the “astronomical” jump from $420 to $550 a week means she can no longer afford it.

Ms Hitchcock told Yahoo News Australia that being forced out of the area could “be very detrimental to [her] well-being” and would mean she’d be unable to care for her pets the way she wants to. The 35-year-old has worked in client services at the local veterinary hospital for seven years and fears leaving her flat would mean she’d have to leave her job too.

“I need somewhere very close to work as I have to pop home once each day to let my beautiful dog out for some fresh air and to the toilet,” she said. “I’m a part of this community having worked at the vet for so long and supported many families with their pets and in turn, I have a loving and supportive community here for me too”.

Desperate Facebook plea for suitable property

Ms Hitchcock admits Australia’s rental crisis has been “devastating and stressful for so many” and despite being “the perfect tenant”, her landlord is “not willing to negotiate” price. She also implied the property was in poor condition and not worth the extra weekly cost.

“[The property] has no ceiling fans or air-con, an original kitchen which is falling apart and an original pink bathroom where the hot tap doesn’t work for the bath,” she said, adding “it’s so unfair”.

Ms Hitchcock addressed locals on a community Facebook page on Friday with the hope someone might have a place where she could live. She’s looking for something suitable for her “perfectly well-behaved golden retriever” and her “gorgeous cat Cleo”.

“I’m appealing to anyone who may have a granny flat, garden studio or an apartment that they’d consider leasing to me. I only need somewhere with one bedroom — I don’t need a huge place,” she wrote. “A courtyard, access to a small garden or a balcony would also be lovely if possible. I have an exemplary rental history, and I’m an ideal tenant.”

Story continues

Community support for vet worker

Her Facebook post has racked up dozens of comments, with some people agreeing her situation is extremely unfair. “It’s borderline criminal what landlords are doing to some people. It’s a shame their financial miscalculations/mismanagement have to impact people who stay within their means,” one person fumed.

Others expressed their concern for Ms Hitchcock and wished her luck in “finding an affordable and happy place to live.” Some offered up properties they knew were available but she feared they were too far away.

The vet worker said she’s happy to look for a housemate to help bear the costs but admits it’ll still be “hard”. “There is such a huge shortage of houses in the $800-$900 per week category,” she said.

Do you have a story tip? Email: [email protected].

You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and Twitter and download the Yahoo News app from the App Store or Google Play.

Newly-released communications between the Biden administration and Meta show an effort to crack down on so-called “vaccine-skeptical” content shared on the private communications platform WhatsApp. 

Independent journalist David Zweig reported on Friday that the White House went beyond Twitter to curb COVID-related posts. Emails obtained through discovery from the ongoing Missouri v Biden legal battle show email exchanges from the White House to the tech giant began just days after President Biden took office. 

Zweig stressed that unlike Facebook and Instagram, both of which are owned by Meta, WhatsApp is an encrypted direct messaging platform, Citing Meta, “90% of WhatsApp messages are from one person to another. And groups typically have fewer than 10 people.” 

WHAT ELON MUSK’S TWITTER FILES HAVE UNCOVERED ABOUT THE TECH GIANT SO FAR

In an email from March 2021, Rob Flaherty, the White House director of digital strategy, pressed Meta executives how they were “measuring reduction of harm” on WhatsApp, insisting they must have a “good mousetrap” to observe what encrypted content was being shared on the platform.

Flaherty also offered then-White House COVID senior adviser Andrew Slavitt, telling Meta he’d be “willing to get on the phone” a “couple of times per week if [it’s] necessary.” 

“Because of WhatsApp’s structure, targeted suppression or censorship of certain information did not appear possible. Instead, much of the aim of the content moderation on WhatsApp, therefore, was to ‘push’ information to users,” Zweig wrote. “The service partnered with the World Health Organization, UNICEF, and more than 100 governments and health ministries to send Covid-19 updates and vaccine-related messages to users. The company created initiatives such as a WhatsApp chatbot in Spanish to aid in making local vaccination appointments.”

MATT TAIBBI CALLS OUT ‘CENSORSHIP-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX’ IN LATEST TWITTER FILES

Days after the previous email, Flaherty continued pressing Meta about moderating content on WhatsApp. He was told that Meta’s only moderation option would be “content-agnostic product interventions” which typically monitoring messages “that didn’t originate from a close contact” which it deemed “were more likely to contain misinformation” and reduce its “forwards” as a result. 

WhatsApp one of Meta’s prominent apps including Facebook, Instagram and Messenger. (Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Flaherty asked Meta how it “measured success,” to which an employee replied by pointing to the “reduction of forwards” and that it bans accounts “that engage in mass marketing or scam behaviors – including those who seek to exploit COVID-19 misinformation.” The employee also noted that “3 billion” COVID-related messages were sent by “governments, nonprofits and international organizations” to citizens via WhatsApp chatbots “and over 300 million messages have been sent over COVID-19 vaccine helplines” during the first quarter of 2021. 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DEMANDS ELON MUSK TO ‘IDENTIFY ALL JOURNALISTS’ WHO HAD ACCESS TO TWITTER FILES

“In one of the follow up exchanges, Flaherty seemed dissatisfied with the response, and again pressed Meta to take action on vaccine hesitancy,” Zweig reported. ‘I care mostly about what actions and changes you’re making to ensure you’re not making our country’s vaccine hesitancy problem worse,’ he wrote. ‘I still don’t have a good, empirical answer on how effective you’ve been at reducing the spread of vaccine-skeptical content and misinformation to vaccine fence sitters.’”

In the email, Flaherty dinged Facebook for not having implemented an “algorithmic shift” in election-related content to prevent the Jan. 6 “insurrection” from being plotted on the platform, suggesting he doesn’t want such laid-back content moderation to occur on WhatsApp. 

The Biden White House has repeatedly urged Big Tech companies to moderate COVID-related content. (DANIEL SLIM/AFP via Getty Images)

“Flaherty wanted empirical data about the effectiveness of reducing ‘vaccine-skeptical content’ on a platform composed of non-public messages. He wanted supposed misinformation on a private messaging app to be ‘under control.’ What, exactly, was he hoping to get Meta to do?” Zweig wrote. “It was obvious from the start that WhatsApp’s interface didn’t allow for the granular control Flaherty appeared to desire. And his smiley face response suggests he well understood this. Yet he kept badgering the Meta executives anyway.”

Zweig continued, “The exchanges about WhatsApp are arresting not because of what Meta ultimately did or did not do on the platform—since the company’s options for intervention appear to be limited—but because efforts to moderate content on a private messaging service was a continued interest for a White House official at all… Fortunately, targeted censorship on a private messaging app is still out of government reach.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Fox News Digital asked the White House whether it had any concerns that such interactions with Meta have any First Amendment implications. The White House did not immediately respond.

Zweig, author of the “Silent Lunch” Substack newsletter, went viral in December with his contribution to the Twitter Files series, exposing how the White House under both President Biden and President Trump leaned on Twitter to moderate COVID-related content. 

From Facebook to family of five!

Mark Zuckerberg and Dr. Priscilla Chan announced on Friday that their third baby girl arrived.

“Welcome to the world, Aurelia Chan Zuckerberg!” the couple wrote via Instagram. “You’re such a little blessing.”

Zuckerberg and his former Harvard University classmate previously welcomed daughters Max, 7, and August, 5, in 2015 and 2017, respectively.

The entrepreneur, 38, mentioned the little ones in his September 2022 Instagram post announcing his 38-year-old wife’s pregnancy.

“Lots of love,” Zuckerberg captioned a smiling selfie with his hand on Chan’s budding belly.

“Happy to share that Max and August are getting a new baby sister next year!”

The couple met in 2003 at a frat party while in line for the bathroom.

“He was this nerdy guy who was just a little bit out there,” Chan told the New Yorker in 2010, joking that Zuckerberg had a “nerdy, computer-science appeal.”

On their first date, the Meta CEO told Chan that he would rather go out with her than “finish his take-home midterm.”

The sentiment “appalled” the “the type-A first child,” the pediatrician told “Today” show co-hosts in 2014.

The couple got married in 2012, and Zuckerberg called Chan the “most important” part of his life in a commencement speech at their alma mater five years later.

While trying to start a family, the doctor struggled to conceive and suffered three miscarriages.

Zuckerberg called the pregnancy losses “a lonely experience” in a 2015 Facebook post.

As the CZI co-founder and co-CEOs’ family began growing, Zuckerberg told North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University students that he had been changed in a “pretty dramatic way” by parenthood.

“The thing that I’m most proud of and the thing that brings me the most happiness is my family,” he gushed in 2017.