Ta kontakt med oss


Google introducerar Cloud Backup och Disaster Recovery


Google nyligen infört Cloud Backup och Disaster Recovery (DR), vilket gör att kunderna kan aktivera centraliserad backuphantering direkt från Google Molnkonsol. Den nya tjänsten för säkerhetskopiering och återställning är utformad för att fungera med molnlagringsförråd, databaser och applikationer.

Med Google Cloud Backup och DR kan administratörer effektivt hantera säkerhetskopior som spänner över flera arbetsbelastningar. Dessutom kan de generera program- och kraschkonsistenta säkerhetskopior för virtuella datorer på Compute Engine, VMware Engine eller VMware på plats, databaser (som SAP, MySQL och SQL Server) och filsystem. Och tjänsten på Google Cloud-plattformen ger en helhetsbild av säkerhetskopior över flera arbetsbelastningar.

Google Cloud Backup och DR lagrar säkerhetskopieringsdata i sitt ursprungliga, applikationsläsbara format, vilket gör att säkerhetskopieringsdata för många arbetsbelastningar är direkt tillgänglig från långtidslagring av säkerhetskopiering (med till exempel kostnadseffektiv molnlagring). Dessutom stöder den den så kallade utrymmeseffektiva "inkrementella forever"-lagringstekniken, vilket säkerställer att kunderna bara betalar för det de behöver. 

Jaswant Chajed och Jerome McFarland, båda produktchefer på Google Cloud, förklarar i blogginlägg på Google Cloud Backup och DR:

Med "inkrementell forever"-säkerhetskopiering, efter att Google Cloud Backup och DR tagit en första säkerhetskopia, lagrar efterföljande säkerhetskopieringar endast data som är associerade med ändringar i förhållande till den tidigare säkerhetskopieringen – vilket gör att säkerhetskopior kan tas snabbare och minskar nätverksbandbredden som krävs för att överföra tillhörande data . Det minimerar också mängden lagringsutrymme som förbrukas av säkerhetskopiorna, vilket gynnar dig genom minskade kostnader för lagringsförbrukning.

Användare av Google Backup och DR kan också välja var de vill lagra säkerhetskopiorna på Google Cloud Storage genom de olika Cloud Storage klasser

Andra offentliga molnleverantörer som Microsoft erbjuder tjänster för säkerhetskopiering och katastrofåterställning. Azure erbjuder en end-to-end lösning för säkerhetskopiering och katastrofåterställning liknande Googles Backup och DR, som är säkert, skalbart och kostnadseffektivt – och kan integreras med lokala dataskyddslösningar. Ändå är det inte en enda centraliserad tjänst.

Richard Seroter, chef för utgående produkthantering, twittrade på den nya tjänsten för säkerhetskopiering och återställning:

För övrigt, Antonio Gulli, en ingenjörschef på Google, twittrade:

Mer information om den nya tjänsten för säkerhetskopiering och återställning finns på dokumentationswebbplats, och prisinformation finns på prissida.


Google ska betala $391,5 miljoner för uppgörelse över platsspårning, säger statliga AG:er


Google to pay $391.5 million settlement over location tracking, state AGs say

Google has agreed to pay a $391.5 million settlement to 40 states to resolve accusations that it tracked people’s locations in violation of state laws, including snooping on consumers’ whereabouts even after they told the tech behemoth to bug off.

Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry said it is time for Big Tech to recognize state laws that limit data collection efforts.

“I have been ringing the alarm bell on big tech for years, and this is why,” Mr. Landry, a Republican, said in a statement Monday. “Citizens must be able to make informed decisions about what information they release to big tech.”

The attorneys general said the investigation resulted in the largest-ever multistate privacy settlement. Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, a Democrat, said Google’s penalty is a “historic win for consumers.”

“Location data is among the most sensitive and valuable personal information Google collects, and there are so many reasons why a consumer may opt out of tracking,” Mr. Tong said. “Our investigation found that Google continued to collect this personal information even after consumers told them not to. That is an unacceptable invasion of consumer privacy, and a violation of state law.”

Location tracking can help tech companies sell digital ads to marketers looking to connect with consumers within their vicinity. It’s another tool in a data-gathering toolkit that generates more than $200 billion in annual ad revenue for Google, accounting for most of the profits pouring into the coffers of its corporate parent, Alphabet, which has a market value of $1.2 trillion.

The settlement is part of a series of legal challenges to Big Tech in the U.S. and around the world, which include consumer protection and antitrust lawsuits.

Though Google, based in Mountain View, California, said it fixed the problems several years ago, the company’s critics remained skeptical. State attorneys general who also have tussled with Google have questioned whether the tech company will follow through on its commitments.

The states aren’t dialing back their scrutiny of Google’s empire.

Last month, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said he was filing a lawsuit over reports that Google unlawfully collected millions of Texans’ biometric data such as “voiceprints and records of face geometry.”

The states began investigating Google’s location tracking after The Associated Press reported in 2018 that Android devices and iPhones were storing location data despite the activation of privacy settings intended to prevent the company from following along.

Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich went after the company in May 2020. The state’s lawsuit charged that the company had defrauded its users by misleading them into believing they could keep their whereabouts private by turning off location tracking in the settings of their software.

Arizona settled its case with Google for $85 million last month. By then, attorneys general in several other states and the District of Columbia had pounced with their own lawsuits seeking to hold Google accountable.

Along with the hefty penalty, the state attorneys general said, Google must not hide key information about location tracking, must give users detailed information about the types of location tracking information Google collects, and must show additional information to people when users turn location-related account settings to “off.”

States will receive differing sums from the settlement. Mr. Landry’s office said Louisiana would receive more than $12.7 million, and Mr. Tong’s office said Connecticut would collect more than $6.5 million.

The financial penalty will not cripple Google’s business. The company raked in $69 billion in revenue for the third quarter of 2022, according to reports, yielding about $13.9 billion in profit.

Google downplayed its location-tracking tools Monday and said it changed the products at issue long ago.

“Consistent with improvements we’ve made in recent years, we have settled this investigation which was based on outdated product policies that we changed years ago,” Google spokesman Jose Castaneda said in a statement.

Google product managers Marlo McGriff and David Monsees defended their company’s Search and Maps products’ usage of location information.

“Location information lets us offer you a more helpful experience when you use our products,” the two men wrote on Google’s blog. “From Google Maps’ driving directions that show you how to avoid traffic to Google Search surfacing local restaurants and letting you know how busy they are, location information helps connect experiences across Google to what’s most relevant and useful.”

The blog post touted transparency tools and auto-delete controls that Google has developed in recent years and said the private browsing Incognito mode prevents Google Maps from saving an account’s search history.

Mr. McGriff and Mr. Monsees said Google would make changes to its products as part of the settlement. The changes include simplifying the process for deleting location data, updating the method to set up an account and revamping information hubs.

“We’ll provide a new control that allows users to easily turn off their Location History and Web & App Activity settings and delete their past data in one simple flow,” Mr. McGriff and Mr. Monsees wrote. “We’ll also continue deleting Location History data for users who have not recently contributed new Location History data to their account.”

• This article is based in part on wire service reports.


Fortsätt läsa

Prenumerera på vårt nyhetsbrev
Vi lovar att inte spamma dig. Avsluta prenumerationen när som helst.
Ogiltig e-postadress