SOCIAL
LinkedIn Shares Latest Update on Fake Account Detection, Scams, Government Requests and More

LinkedIn has published its latest Transparency Report, covering the period between January and June 2021, which outlines all of the content and account violations it detected and actioned in the period, along with government requests for information and more.
LinkedIn’s transparency reports highlight key usage trends, particularly in relation to topics being discussed in the app, as well as changes in the way that scammers and spammers are seeking to target users over time. And with LinkedIn usage rising, it’s worth noting these shifts.
First off, in terms of fake accounts, LinkedIn says that there’s been no increase in fake account prevalence, as detected by its systems.
LinkedIn reported 11.6 million detections at the registration stage in the preceding period as well, though it has seen a slight rise in the amount of fake profiles restricted proactively over time.
It’s difficult to say, definitively, how well LinkedIn is doing on this front, as it can only report on the accounts that it detects, so there’s no true percentage of fake profiles in the app. If LinkedIn doesn’t know about them, it can’t report on such, so it’s not entirely clear what impact its efforts are having on this element, overall, but the numbers have remained steady, which shows that LinkedIn’s detection systems are catching out many attempts to scam users with fake profiles.
In terms of spam and scam activity, LinkedIn saw a decline in the period, dropping from 91.9 million removals in the preceding quarter to 66.1 million. LinkedIn has actually seen this number declining over the last two years – though interesting to note that LinkedIn has also included an update which explains that:
"An earlier version of this report reflected that LinkedIn proactively removed 22.4 million spam and scams during the reporting period of July through December 2020. We have edited the report to accurately reflect that LinkedIn proactively removed 91.9 million spam and scams during such reporting period.”
Not sure what the error was there, but seems like a fairly significant discrepancy.
Also notable: Misinformation removals are on the rise.

Over the past three reporting periods, LinkedIn removed 23k posts for misinformation (Jan-Jun 2020), then 111k in the last report, up to 147k now. Violent/graphic content removals have also increased over time, and in both cases, that could simply reflect increasing usage of the app, and more people posting more often, while approaches to misinformation, particularly around COVID-19, have also shifted a lot in that time.
But it is interesting to note the trends, and consider their implications in the broader scope of what people are sharing to LinkedIn, and how LinkedIn is enforcing such.
Harassment and abusive content removals declined slightly in the period.
In terms of Government requests, LinkedIn also saw a rise in the period.

Though I suspect that’s supposed to be Jan-Jun 2021, in line with previous reporting periods.
The US submitted the most Government removal requests, which mostly relates to search warrants and subpoenas, followed by Germany, France and India.
Interestingly, China only submitted five requests in the period. Back in October, LinkedIn shut down its main platform in China due to ongoing challenges in dealing with local compliance requirements in the region.
There are some interesting trend insights here, relating to the ever-shifting regulatory changes and approaches that influence the broader social media landscape. For LinkedIn, which is steadily rising in usage as various regions look to get back on track, it’s interesting to note the broadening scope of user reports and issues, and how that reflects the expanded usage of the platform for a wider range of purposes.
Maintaining user safety is a challenge for all platforms, and going on this report, it does seem that LinkedIn’s systems are keeping pace with usage trends, for the most part. But fake accounts and violations remain a problem, and an ongoing challenge for the platform to contend with.
You can read LinkedIn’s full Transparency Report for January to June 2021 här.
Källlänk
SOCIAL
Snapchat når 15 miljoner aktiva användare varje månad i Tyskland

Snapchat has reported another growth milestone, with the app now reaching 15 million monthly active users in Germany.
The ephemeral messaging app, which reached 750 million total monthly actives in February, continues to steadily expand its global footprint, with EU users now making up around 25% of its total audience. The majority of Snapchatters now actually come from India, which reached 200 million monthly actives last month, while North America makes up around 190 million of its global audience.
Snapchat has been working to build its European audience, with the company also reporting 21 million monthly active users in the UK two weeks back. It’s not expanding in the region as fast as it is in India, which is rapidly rising with the rate of mobile adoption, but Snapchat is still growing, despite being a relatively smaller player in the global social media market.
At one stage, it seemed that Snap would be killed off entirely, after Instagram stole its mojo by copying Stories back in 2016. That led to a significant drop-off in Snap usage, but since then, the app has continued to double-down on its niche of being a more private connective app for friends, which has helped it maintain and maximize its growth momentum.
And now it’s firming its footing in Europe, while Snap has also shared some trend notes on German app usage.
- Although we are loved by Generation Z, almost 40% of Snapchatters in Germany are 25 years or older
- In Germany, Snapchatters open the app an average of 30 times per day – to chat with friends and family, watch highlights of their favorite shows, or share moments from their lives
- 75% use our augmented reality lenses daily to express themselves creatively, have fun, and even try on and buy clothes.
Most of these are fairly universal Snap trend notes, though it is interesting to note the aging user group, as Snap continues to investigate more ways to maintain relevance as its audience ages up.
That’s a key challenge, because while Snap is a valuable connector for teens, it hasn’t, historically, held the same appeal for older users, who end up focusing more of their time in other apps instead.
If Snap can capitalize on this element, that could be a valuable growth path, as it continues to expand its global network.
SOCIAL
Kaliforniens lag skulle få teknikjättar att betala för nyheter

A bill making its way through the California state legislature would mandate that internet giants pay news agencies monthly ‘journalism usage fees’ based on viewing of stories via their platforms – Copyright AFP SEBASTIEN BOZON
Glenn CHAPMAN
A proposed law requiring internet giants to pay for news stories moved forward in California on Friday, despite Facebook owner Meta threatening to pull news from its platform if it passes.
The California Journalism Preservation Act (CJPA), which cleared the state assembly on Thursday and was in the hands of the state senate, would mandate that large online platforms pay a monthly “journalism usage fee” to news providers whose work appears on their services.
The bill is designed to support local news organizations, which have been decimated in recent years as ad revenue bled away to Google and Facebook, both advertising behemoths.
Meta spokesman Andy Stone on Friday told AFP that if the bill becomes law, Meta “will be forced to remove news from Facebook and Instagram rather than pay into a slush fund that primarily benefits big, out-of-state media companies.”
The bill has to make its way through the state senate and be signed by Governor Gavin Newsom to become law.
The CJPA is like other legislative texts pending across the globe.
In Australia, Facebook in 2021 briefly blocked news articles over a similar law and Google threatened to pull its search engine from the country before they made deals to pay several media groups.
In the European Union, tech giants can be asked to pay a copyright fee to publishers for links posted in search results or feeds.
“The CJPA is riddled with holes, the biggest of which is that the bill primarily funds national media outlets that spread misinformation,” said Chamber of Progress chief executive Adam Kovacevich.
“It’s sad the Assembly is passing the buck to the Senate rather than fixing the bill’s problems.”
The chamber is a trade group with a list of partners that includes Amazon, Apple, Google, and Meta.
A study posted by the chamber concluded that “disinformation outlets” including Fox News would benefit most from the California law.
The bill defines online platforms as those having at least 50 million monthly active users in the United States; a billion monthly users worldwide, or be valued at more than $550 billion based on its stock price.
– Money for reporters? –
Fees paid would be based on the number of views and news providers would be required to spend it on journalism and support staff, according to the text of the bill.
Stone noted that the wording of the bill means revenue from the law would not have to be spent on reporters covering news.
The California state assembly website indicated the bill was sent to a senate committee responsible for scheduling debates and votes on legislation, with no indication of when it would go to a vote.
“Meta’s threat to take down news is undemocratic and unbecoming,” trade group News Media Alliance said in a posted statement.
“We have seen this in their playbook before.”
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau last month slammed Meta after executives said it would block news for Canadian Facebook and Instagram users in response to the proposed law there.
The Canada law builds on Australia’s New Media Bargaining Code, which was a world first, aimed at making Google and Meta pay for news content on their platforms.
SOCIAL
Frankrike har godkänt en lag som riktar sig till influencers. Vad betyder det för stjärnor i sociala medier?

The wording of the new law was approved by French lawmakers across the political spectrum and could mean jail time or stiff fines.
The French Parliament adopted a bipartisan bill on Thursday to regulate social media influencers’ activities in a bid to curb the promotion of dangerous products and trends.
After lawmakers in the National Assembly voted in favour of it on Wednesday, 342 senators from across the political spectrum voted to pass the bill introduced by socialist MP Arthur Delaporte and Stéphane Vojetta, an MP from President Emmanuel Macron’s Renaissance.
“We can be proud of this unprecedented agreement,” said rapporteur Amel Gacquerre, the senator tasked with presenting the bill in the upper chamber.
Speaking after the vote, Olivia Grégoire, Junior Minister for Commerce, hailed the “commitment of the parliamentarians” and “the quality of this work”.
There are an estimated 150,000 influencers in France, but the actions of some of them have put influencer marketing in line with increasing criticism.
‘Influvoleurs’
Plaintiffs have launched collective actions and a scathing report has been published by the French Fraud Prevention Directorate (DGCCRF).
More surprisingly, the French rapper Booba has been on a digital crusade against those whom he nicknamed “influ-thieves” – “influvoleurs” in French – amplifying the issue through his campaigning on social media.
From the promotion of dangerous products to accusations of fraud, there have been growing calls for the market to be regulated.
Since Wednesday, influencers Illan Castronovo and Simon Castaldi have been ordered to display a message from the DGCCRF on social media warning against some of their content.
Many influencers have a modest audience, but some celebrities with millions of followers can influence consumption behaviors, especially among young people.
“Influencers will continue to operate. The ‘influ-thieves’ will always exist but will know that the law is there to punish them”, Delaporte said.
The text “will protect consumers, especially the younger ones,” added Vojetta.
What does the law change for influencers?
The text proposes to legally define influencers as “individuals or legal entities who, for a fee, mobilise their notoriety with their audience” to promote goods and services online.
It prohibits the promotion of certain practices – such as cosmetic surgery and therapeutic abstention – and prohibits or heavily regulates the promotion of several medical devices.
It also bans the promotion of products containing nicotine.
It tackles sports betting and gambling: influencers will no longer be able to promote subscriptions to sports forecasts, and the promotion of money games will be limited to platforms that technically restrict access to minors.
The penalties for non-compliance can go up to two years in prison and a fine of €300,000.
The law also bans staged scenes with animals whose ownership is prohibited.
Promotional images – of cosmetics, for example – must disclose whether they have been retouched or use a filter making them more attractive.
Several senators have emphasised the need to strengthen the resources of regulatory authorities in the future, including those of the DGCCRF and the Financial Markets Authority.
“There are many sheriffs and they must have the means to work properly,” Gacquerre said. This comes after the economy minister, Bruno Le Maire, warned last month that the sector “could not be the Wild West”.
Who else does it affect?
Influencers’ agents will also be regulated. A written contract will be mandatory when the amounts involved exceed a certain threshold. The text also includes measures to hold platforms accountable.
While many successful influencers operate from abroad, such as in Dubai, the text aims to require those operating from outside the European Union, Switzerland, or the European Economic Area to take out civil liability insurance within the EU.
The stated goal is to create a fund to compensate potential victims. They will also have to designate a legal representative in the EU.
In late March, the Union of Influence Professions and Content Creators (Umicc), which recently began representing agencies in the sector, praised “commendable and essential proposals”.
However, they warned lawmakers about the risk of “discriminating or over-regulating” certain actors.
-
SÖKMOTORER4 dagar sedan
Google uppdaterar policycenter för shoppingannonser och policycenter för gratisannonser
-
SEO4 dagar sedan
Hur man använder AI för att förbättra ditt SEO-innehållsskrivande [Webinar]
-
SÖKMOTORER4 dagar sedan
Google Local Service Ads skickar ut masspolicyöverträdelser
-
SÖKMOTORER4 dagar sedan
Google-sökning med mer detaljerade verktyg för biljämförelse
-
SEO4 dagar sedan
Googles sökrelationsteam undersöker Web3:s SEO-effekt
-
PPC4 dagar sedan
49 Fars dag Instagram bildtexter och färdiga bilder
-
WORDPRESS6 dagar sedan
Anpassade temadesigner blev precis enklare – WordPress.com Nyheter
-
AFFILIATE MARKNADSFÖRING7 dagar sedan
Vilket är det bästa WordPress-temat för dig 2023?