Brynn Putnam has a lot to feel great about. A Harvard grad and former professional ballet dancer who opened the first of what have become three high-intensity fitness studios in New York, she then launched a second business in 2016 when — while pregnant with her son — she was exercising at home and couldn’t find a natural way to watch a class on her laptop or phone. Her big idea: to install mirrored screens in users’ homes that are roughly eight square feet and through which they can work out to all manner of streamed and on-demand exercise classes, paying a monthly subscription of just $39 per month.
If you’ve followed the home kondition craze, you already know these Mirrors quickly took off with celebrities, who gushed about the product on social media. Putnam’s company also attracted roughly $75 million in venture funding across several fast rounds. Indeed, by the end of last year, people had bought “tens of thousands” of Mirrors, according to Putnam, and she was beginning to envision Mirrors as content portals that might feature fashion, enable doctors’ visits and bring both kids’ classes and therapy into users’ homes. As she told The Atlantic back in January, “We view ourselves as the third screen in people’s homes.”
Then, in June, the company revealed it had sold for $500 million in cash — including a $50 million earn-out — to the athleisure company Lululemon. For Putnam, the deal was too compelling, allowing her to secure the future of her company, which continues to run as a subsidiary. Investors might have liked it, too, given that it meant a fast return on their investment, not to mention that Mirror had steep competition, including from Peloton, a growing giant in the home kondition market.
For now, the deal seems to be clicking. Just today, Lululemon announced that it is installing Mirrors in 18 of its now 506 U.S. locations, including San Francisco, Washington, D.C. and Miami. While Lululemon hasn’t started selling products directly through Mirror yet, “shoppable content” is “certainly on our radar” too, says Putnam. Meanwhile, Mirror’s revenues, expected earlier this year to reach $100 million, are now on target to surpass $150 million in revenue, she says.
Still, as the pandemic has raged on, it’s easy to wonder what the young company might have grown into given the amount of time that people and their children are spending at home and in front of their screens. In conversation late last week, we put the question to Putnam, who continues to manage a team of 125 people. Our chat, lightly edited, follows. You can listen to the full conversation här.
TC: People who follow the company know why you started Mirror, but how, exactly, did you start Mirror?
BP: In the case of Mirror, I had this concept for the product, and then really, the first step was buying a Raspberry Pi, a piece of one-way glass and an Android tablet, and assembling it in my in my kitchen to see if this idea in my mind would be able to work and come to life.
TC: Did you take any coding classes? People might not imagine that a former ballet performer with a chain of kondition studios would put something together like that in her kitchen.
BP: No, I’ve been very fortunate to have a husband who has a bit of a development background. And so he helped me to put the first little bit of code into the Mirror and just really ensure that the concept I had in my mind could be brought to life. And then from there, obviously, over time, we hired a team.
TC: Are they manufactured in the States? In China? How did you start figuring out how to put those pieces together?
BP: I had heard a lot of hardware horror stories about teams working with design agencies to design these beautiful products and who, by the time they actually got to manufacturing, found out that something wasn’t feasible about their design when it came to commercialization or just running out of money in the process. So I actually went backwards. I drew a sketch on a napkin and did a small set of bullets of the things that I thought were really just crucial to make the product a success. And then I went to find factories in China that were familiar with digital signage, working with large pieces of glass, large mirrors, learned about their systems and processes, and then brought it back to the U.S. to a local manufacturer here on the East Coast to refine into a prototype. And then we eventually moved to Mexico when we were ready to scale.
TC: The mirror is about $1,500 dollars. How did you go about winning the trust of consumers that would lead them to make such a sizable investment?
BP: When you’re building a [new] product, you can’t really compete on specs and features like you do with phones or laptops. So you’re really building a brand, which means that you’re telling stories. And in our case, we spent a lot of time, from the very early days, really imagining the life of our members and figuring out how to craft and tell that story.
And then we were fortunate early on to have members fall in love with the product. And then they started to tell our story for us. So once you have that customer flywheel that starts to kick in, your job becomes much easier.
TC: You had actors, celebrities, designers and social media influencers talking about their Mirrors. Was it just a matter of sending it off to a few people who started getting online and sharing [their enthusiasm for the product] with their followers? Was it that simple?
BP: We knew that we wanted to make big bets early on to make the Mirror brand seem larger and more established than it was, because it’s a premium product in a new category. And we wanted people to trust in us and the brand. And so we did things like out-of-home advertisements quite early, we moved into television quite early, and we also did some very strategic early celebrity placements. But the way in which the celebrity placements grew and expanded was very much not intended and was just kind of a fascinating early example of the network effects of the product. One celebrity would get it and then another would see it in their home. Or they would see it in their stylist’s home or their agent’s home.
TC: How did you convince early adopters that your business had staying power, and were investors persuaded as quickly?
BP: Trying to assure customers that they wouldn’t invest in this Mirror, and then the company would go out of business in a few years and they’d be left with a piece of hardware but no access to the content or the community that they’d fallen in love with, was very important. It was one of the factors in deciding to partner with Lululemon and have the incredible brand stability and love of such a premium global brand.
In terms of fundraising, I think we were really fortunate to have a product that once you saw it, you got it and fell in love with it in a market that was clearly big and growing, with a really good competitive data point in Peloton.
TC: Who started that conversation with Lululemon? Were you talking to Peloton and other potential acquirers?
BP: I’ve been really fortunate to actually work with Lululemon for my entire fitness career. There was a team of Lululemon educators here in New York who were the very first clients of my studio business, and frankly, in many ways were responsible for helping that business to grow and thrive and to give me confidence as a first-time small business owner. Then we reconnected with Lululemon about a year before the acquisition as an investor; they made a small minority investment in the company. And we began to work together on various projects . . . From there, really, the partnership just grew. Mirror was not for sale. We were not looking for an acquirer. But it’s really your responsibility as a founder to always be weighing your vision, your responsibility to your team and your responsibility to your shareholders. And so when the opportunity presented itself — before COVID actually — it felt like really just too good an opportunity to pass up.
TC: But you also you had ambitions of turning this into a much broader content portal where you would maybe have doctor visits and other things, which I would think won’t happen now.
BP: The vision for Mirror very much remains the same and we’re excited to continue to expand the types of content that we offer via the Mirror platform, really with an eye toward any type of immersive experience that makes you a better version of yourself. So I think you will see a broader range of content from us in the coming years.
TC: You’ve mentioned in the past that Mirror is a product that’s used by families. Is there children’s programming or is that coming soon?
BP: More than 65% of our households have over two members, which means that you’re often getting younger members of the household involved. I do think that is a function of both the versatility of the platform and the fact that multiple people can participate in more content. At the same time, we’ve actually seen the number of users under 20 grow about 5x during the COVID months as young adults have returned home to be with their their families or teenagers have started doing remote schooling. So we’ve leaned into that with what we call “family fun” content that’s designed to be performed by the whole family together.
TC: Do you see a secondary market for refurbished Mirrors in the future? Will there be a second version, if there isn’t already?
BP: We’ll obviously continue to to refine the hardware over time, but the real focus of the business is through improving the content, community and experience, and so for us — unlike Apple, where the goal is to really release a new model every year and continue to have folks upgrade the hardware — we focus on providing updates via the software and the content, so that we’re continuing to add value onto the baseline experience.
TC: What can people look forward to on this front?
BP: We’re taking a major step toward building a connected community through our community feature set launching this holiday, including a community feature that enables members to see and communicate with each other and their instructor; face-offs that allow members to compete head-to-head against another member of the community and earn points as you hit your target heart rate zones; and friending, so you can find and follow your friends in the Mirror community to share your favorite workouts, join programs together and cheer each other on.
TC: Are you still selling Mirrors to hotels and businesses outside of Lululemon?
BP: We do have B2B relationships. You can find mirrors in hotels, small gyms, buildings, residences and then obviously direct-to-consumer through the Mirror website, the Lululemon website and both of our [offline] stores.
TC: When you look at Peloton now and how its stock has completely exploded this year, do you think ever that you should have hung on a little longer? Do you ever think ‘maybe I sold too soon?’
I’ve woken up every day really for my entire career kind of focused on the same mission but trying to solve the problem and achieve my vision and in different ways. Which is: I really believe that confidence in your own skin is the foundation of a good and happy life. And fitness is an incredible tool for building that confidence that carries over into your personal relationships, your work performance, your friendships. And so for me, that’s always really been my North Star. ‘How do we get more Mirrors into more homes and provide more access to to that self confidence?’ So I spend very little time comparing to competitors and much more time focused on our members’ needs and how to meet them.
Google December Produktrecensioner Uppdatering påverkar mer än engelska webbplatser? via @sejournal, @martinibuster
Googles produktrecensioner uppdatering tillkännagavs att rulla ut till det engelska språket. Inget nämndes om eller när det skulle rullas ut till andra språk. Mueller svarade på en fråga om huruvida det rullar ut till andra språk.
Uppdatering för produktrecensioner från Google december 2021
Vår produktrecensionsuppdatering från december 2021 rullas nu ut för engelskspråkiga sidor. Det kommer att ta cirka tre veckor att slutföra. Vi har också utökat våra råd för skapare av produktrecensioner: https://t.co/N4rjJWoaqE
— Google Search Central (@googlesearchc) 1 december 2021
Fokus för uppdateringen var att förbättra kvaliteten på recensioner som visas i Googles sökning, särskilt inriktade på recensionswebbplatser.
En Googler twittrade en beskrivning av de typer av webbplatser som skulle vara inriktade på degradering i sökrankingen:
"Främst relevant för webbplatser som publicerar artiklar som recenserar produkter.
Tänk på sajter som "bästa TV-apparater under $200″.com.
Målet är att förbättra kvaliteten och användbarheten av recensioner som vi visar användare.”
Fortsätt läsa nedan
Google publicerade också en blogginlägg med mer vägledning om produktrecensionsuppdateringen som introducerade två nya bästa praxis som Googles algoritm skulle leta efter.
Den första bästa praxisen var ett krav på bevis för att en produkt faktiskt hanterades och granskades.
Den näst bästa praxis var att tillhandahålla länkar till mer än en plats där en användare kan köpa produkten.
De Twitter tillkännagivandet uppgav att det rullas ut till engelska webbplatser. Blogginlägget nämnde inte vilka språk det rullades ut till och inte heller specificerade blogginlägget att uppdateringen av produktrecensionen var begränsad till det engelska språket.
Uppdatering för Googles Mueller Thinking About Produktrecensioner
Produktrecension Uppdatering inriktad på fler språk?
Personen som ställde frågan hade med rätta intrycket att uppdateringen av produktrecensionen endast påverkade sökresultat på engelska.
Fortsätt läsa nedan
Men han påstod att han såg volatilitet i sökningar på det tyska språket som verkar vara relaterat till Googles Produktrecensionsuppdatering december 2021.
Detta är hans fråga:
"Jag såg några rörelser i tyska sök också.
Så jag undrade om det också kunde bli en effekt på webbplatser på andra språk av den här produktrecensionsuppdateringen... eftersom vi hade mycket rörelse och volatilitet under de senaste veckorna.
…Min fråga är, är det möjligt att uppdateringen av produktrecensioner också påverkar andra webbplatser?”
John Mueller svarade:
"Jag vet inte... som andra språk?
Mitt antagande var att detta var globalt och över alla språk.
Men jag vet inte vad vi tillkännagav i blogginlägget specifikt.
Men vanligtvis försöker vi pressa ingenjörsteamet att fatta ett beslut om det så att vi kan dokumentera det ordentligt i blogginlägget.
Jag vet inte om det hände med uppdateringen av produktrecensioner. Jag kommer inte ihåg hela blogginlägget.
Men det är... ur min synvinkel verkar det som något som vi skulle kunna göra på flera språk och inte skulle vara knutet till engelska.
Och även om det var engelska från början så känns det som något som är relevant över hela linjen, och vi bör försöka hitta sätt att rulla ut det till andra språk med tiden också.
Så jag är inte särskilt förvånad över att man ser förändringar i Tyskland.
Men jag vet inte heller vad vi faktiskt tillkännagav när det gäller de platser och språk som är inblandade.”
Påverkar uppdateringen av produktrecensioner fler språk?
Även om det tweetade tillkännagivandet specificerade att produktrecensioners uppdatering var begränsad till engelska språket nämnde det officiella blogginlägget inga sådana begränsningar.
Googles John Mueller erbjöd sin åsikt att uppdateringen av produktrecensioner är något som Google skulle kunna göra på flera språk.
Man måste undra om tweeten var tänkt att kommunicera att uppdateringen rullades ut först på engelska och sedan till andra språk.
Det är oklart om uppdateringen av produktrecensioner rullades ut globalt till fler språk. Förhoppningsvis kommer Google att klargöra detta snart.
Google blogginlägg om produktrecensioner Uppdatering
Googles riktlinjer för nya produktrecensioner
John Mueller diskuterar om uppdateringen av produktrecensioner är global
Se Mueller svara på frågan vid 14:00 Minute Mark