Connect with us

SOCIAL

Deconstructing A Crisis: After An Accident, 1 Tweet Could Ruin a Contractor’s Reputation

Published

on

Minutes after the partial collapse of the Hard Rock Hotel in New Orleans last month, videos of the devastating accident flooded the internet. Using just their smartphones, bystanders captured the destruction and chaos that left three workers dead and 30 people injured. Videos and images from the horrific accident spread quickly on social media, from Facebook and Twitter to Instagram and Snapchat.

Partly because of the shocking footage, the incident quickly became national news, where the videos were replayed on news programs repeatedly throughout the days and weeks afterward.

The fast pace of social media has changed how construction companies need to respond to a crisis, said Anthony Huey, president of Columbus, Ohio-based consulting firm Reputation Management. It makes quickly communicating with the news media more important than ever to make sure the correct information gets out.

In fast-changing situations, platforms like Twitter, Facebook and Instagram sometimes breed misleading and wrong information that often goes viral, said Huey, who has been helping U.S. contractors sharpen their crisis communications skills since 2004.

In fact, most problems Huey has seen in the dozens of crises he’s been involved with relate to misinformation that spread in the first minutes and hours after an accident. He tells clients to make an initial statement within the first 45 minutes to help “set the record straight.”

Here is one example of a video that was tweeted by a bystander that quickly was picked up by the local news station:

“If it takes several hours for you to get back to the media or update your employees, in that vacuum of silence people are speculating and misinformation is leaking out,” he said.

Perfect storm of events

An example of this, Huey said, ​is the day the newly opened Florida International University pedestrian bridge collapsed in 2018. Heavy equipment had to be moved out of the way to make room for emergency vehicles. As the operator of a construction crane moved the piece of equipment off-site, a bystander took a photo and posted it on social media.

The image was picked up by the Miami Herald with the headline “Crane operator flees scene.” Readers quickly jumped on social media to speculate that the driver might have had something to do with the accident, which was later proven to be false. The report also appeared in other local media outlets and as far away as the New York Post and the Daily Mail, a U.K.-based publication.

Huey said the case is an example of how incorrect information can quickly go viral and said the contractor and crane operator should have quashed the report when it first appeared. But no one from either company called the Miami Herald or took to social media to refute the story, he said. “To this day, it’s still out there for anyone to see.”


“Now [news] lives forever on Google.”

Anthony Huey

Ohio-based communications consultant


Via photos and videos, social media can also record small problems and amplify them into big ones, Huey said. “In the past, if someone made a blunder on a jobsite and the TV news didn’t pick it up, it would not make it into the public’s awareness, but now it lives forever on Google,” he said.

Advertisement

Patricia Kagerer, executive vice president of risk management at Jordan Foster Construction in Dallas, agrees, saying that construction firms of all sizes must have a process to monitor online comments.

“Old school thinking was to ignore it,” she said, “but today that is no longer the case.”

It ‘won’t happen to us’

The power of social media to amplify or distort bad news is just one reason why firms need to have a crisis communications plan in place, said Huey. However, a majority of construction companies don’t have one and prefer to think a major catastrophe “won’t happen to us.”

He looks at social media as a double-edged sword, one with the power to spread misinformation but also to create an opportunity for general contractors and subs to communicate to a large number of people very quickly.

Platforms like Facebook and Twitter offer potential benefits for promoting positive company news but they can also be drivers of bad news, making accidents seem worse than they are. Not having a plan for how to handle negative information on social media can impact future business, according to Kagerer, who helps to oversee the emergency response plan at Jordan Foster Construction. ​

“If you don’t have a plan as to how to handle the fact that somebody’s out there saying that your company kills people or if you’re not even aware of it, it could cost you a potential job in the future,” she said. “I can assure you that your owners are aware of it.”​

Communication best practices

Bethesda, Maryland-based Clark Construction has a comprehensive emergency action plan in place, according to Sara Guthrie, vice president of communications. She said while she hopes they never have to use it, the plan includes a communication protocol and process for responding to media inquiries. Spokespersons are determined on a case-by-case basis depending on the location and type of event, she said.

“When there is an unexpected event, it’s important to make sure that there is a clear plan for notifying and coordinating with everyone involved — company leadership, the client, local authorities and the media,” she said. “This includes clearly assigning responsibility for notifying and coordinating with each of those entities.”

Advertisement

The FIU bridge collapse in March 2018 spawned incorrect reports on social media.

Because Clark’s first priority is always the safety and security of employees, trade partners and the public, Guthrie said, company leaders want to make sure they are taking proper steps to communicate necessary information to those parties.

“When it comes to media relations, it’s important that everyone involved understands the process for fielding and coordinating approved responses to inquiries so that they can respond in a timely manner with accurate information,” she said.

The challenge for a large firm like Clark, which employs 4,200 people and has offices in eight states, is that employees are spread over many jobsites, which takes extra work to make sure everyone understands communication protocols.

“We reinforce the plan regularly with our senior leadership and ensure that our project management guidebook is updated with the latest approach,” she said.

The company also developed a short video that is posted on its intranet to explain the process for responding to the media and established a media hotline to ensure employees can quickly notify a member of the communication team regarding a media inquiry.​

Other ways that construction firms can be ready to respond to social media reports during a crisis include some of the following imperatives:

  • Prepare a website in advance that can go live when needed and keep news of the incident separate from the company’s main website.
  • Keep reporters in the loop, Huey said, even with just minimal news in the early hours of an incident. “If reporters can’t get information from you, they will look elsewhere,” he said. “They’re not going to stop reporting on something just because you have no information for them, so give them some facts to use in their reporting.”
  • Use “buy time” statements that contain basic information and that let the media know that company representatives are working on getting answers to their questions, said Carla Thompson, senior marketing consultant for Zweig Group, an AEC consulting group, during a recent webinar sponsored by Engineering News-Record.
  • Designate an employee to monitor the media for disinformation and quickly correct anything that’s false, whether in print, broadcast or social media. “The problem with social media is that what used to be just another channel for the dissemination of information like a TV station or newspaper or radio now has the potential to become a crisis in and of itself if it’s mismanaged,” Huey said. “Once it goes viral it’s almost impossible to manage.”
  • Provide media training for employees, who are often the first line of information in a crisis. “If they complain about taking time out for training, ask them how they will feel with 20 to 50 microphones in their face,” said Thompson.
  • Make sure subcontractors and other partners are on the same page. Guthrie said Clark requires subcontractors to obtain company approval before releasing any information, statements or images to the media or on social media.
  • ​Consider all the types of risks to a contractor’s reputation. In her 20 years in construction risk management, Kagerer told Construction Dive, she typically sees construction firms only planning for two types of incidents: weather events and employee accidents. She urges companies to undertake a hazard vulnerability assessment to look at all aspects of risk, including issues like cybersecurity, worker strikes and construction defects. “What are any of the things that could harm a company’s reputation?” she said.​
  • Realize that negative social media posts or comments don’t always warrant a response. Kagerer recalled a disgruntled former employee of a contractor she worked with who posted many negative comments about the company’s projects and leadership. The company was aware of the posts and its social media manager and legal and risk departments worked together to come up with a plan of action but decided not to respond because it would have resulted in a online battle with a potentially dangerous individual, she said. Instead they continued to monitor the remarks for a period of time until they stopped. “Instead of responding directly, the social media manager posted other stories on the company’s feed that showed the company’s positive culture, benefits, community outreach and happy employees,” she said.

Costs vs. rewards

While developing a crisis communications plan can be expensive and time consuming, the extra costs and time are well worth it, experts say.

​”Remember,” Thompson said. “When stuff starts hitting the fan, that advance planning will help you navigate and survive. Hopefully it will work out like you hope your home or car insurance does, where you’ll never need it.”

Another webinar participant, Magnusson Klemencic Associates Senior Principal Jon Magnusson, an engineer who worked on the World Trade Center during the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and helped to respond to media inquiries, said he’s even seen companies emerge stronger after a crisis.

Advertisement

“Many clients judge a company more keenly based on how they behave when things go wrong,” he said.

For those of you looking for more information on how to prepare for and manage a social media crisis, check out our article called, 5 Tips for Managing a Social Media Crisis”.

Socialmediatoday.com

See also  Facebook launches Facebook Business Suite, an app for managing business accounts across Facebook, Instagram and Messenger
Advertisement

SOCIAL

Elon Musk’s Team Asks for More Data to Complete Assessment of Twitter Bots

Published

on

Elon Musk's Team Asks for More Data to Complete Assessment of Twitter Bots

Okay, let’s just check in on the latest with the Twitter/Elon Musk takeover saga, and where things are placed to close out the week.

According to the latest reports, Musk’s team recently asked Twitter for more tweet info, in order to help it make an accurate assessment of bot activity in the app. This comes after Musk questioned Twitter’s claim that bots and fake accounts make up only 5% of its active user base, and said that his Twitter takeover deal could not go ahead unless Twitter could produce more evidence to support this figure.

Which Twitter did, by providing Musk with access to its ‘full firehose’ of tweets over a given period, which it shared with Musk’s team back on June 8th. Musk’s group has now had that data for a couple of weeks, but this week, it said that this info is not enough to go on, and that it needs even more insight from Twitter to make its judgment.

And after initially resisting calls for more data access, Twitter has now reportedly relented and handed over more tweet data access to Musk’s team.

Which may or may not be a concern, depending on how you see it.

In its initial data dump, Twitter reportedly gave Musk’s team info on:

  • Total user tweets (within a given time period)
  • Data on which devices were used

As noted, Musk’s team says that this has not provided it with the insight that it needs to conduct an accurate analysis of potential bot activity, so Twitter has now provided Musk with more ‘real-time API data’.

See also  WHO launches new social media campaign against coronavirus

It’s not clear whether that means that Twitter has provided everything that its API systems can provide, but that could mean that Musk’s team can now access:

Advertisement
  • Real-time info on tweet text and visual elements/attachments
  • Data on retweets, replies, and quote Tweets for each
  • Data on tweet author, mentioned users, tagged locations, hashtag and cashtag symbols, etc
  • Date, time, location, device info

That should satisfy any analytical needs to uncover potential bot trends, and get a better handle on Twitter’s bot problem, though it also means that Musk has all your tweet info – which, again, it’s worth noting, Twitter up till now had been hesitant to provide.

I’m sure it’s fine. Musk’s team is beholden to disclosure laws around such, so it’s not like they can do anything much with that info anyway, in a legal sense. But the idea that the sometimes erratic Elon Musk now has all the tweets could be a little concerning for some.

But Twitter likely had to provide what it can, and if Musk is going to become CEO of the app soon anyway, he’s going to have access to all of that data either way.

But still, given Musk and Co’s past history of undermining and attacking critics, sacking trouble maker employees and digging up potential dirt on rivals, it sits a little uneasy.

Should be fine. No problems – no need to go deleting all your DMs (which are likely not included in the data that Twitter has provided at this stage).

According to reports, Musk’s team says that it now has the info it needs to make its assessment of bot activity, which should see the deal move forward (or not) sometime soon.

See also  Social Media Content Calendar: 24 Types of Post to Share With Your Followers [Infographic]

Of course, no one knows what exactly is going to happen next, and whether Musk’s team will look to renegotiate, or even back out of the deal entirely as a result of its bot analysis. But it does seem like, one way or another, Musk will be forced to go ahead with the $44 billion transaction, with Twitter’s past bot reporting methodology already accepted by the SEC, giving it legal grounding to argue that it’s acted in good faith, regardless of what Musk’s team finds.

The next steps then, according to Musk, would be securing debt financing and gaining Twitter shareholder approval, clearing the last hurdles for Musk to change the app’s name to ‘Telsla Social’, and add a million references to ‘420’ into the platforms various terms and conditions.

Because of the memes, because weed jokes are still funny to the richest man in the world – because he vacillates between inspired genius and a massive nerd who now gets to play out some fantasy of being cool.

Advertisement

Or something. Who knows what goes on in Elon Musk’s head – which is also why most are hesitant to bet against him, as nobody knows if and how he might be able to fix Twitter, and whether this is a great investment or a massive disaster.

It seems like we may soon find out. Maybe. Who knows. Either way, the memes should be great.



Source link

Continue Reading

DON'T MISS ANY IMPORTANT NEWS!
Subscribe To our Newsletter
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address

Trending

en_USEnglish