Connect with us


Facebook Shares New Research into the Comparative Performance of Brand vs Direct Response Campaigns



Should you invest more of your marketing budget into brand-building or direct response, in order to drive sales results?

Both elements are important, but due to immediate pressures, it’s often direct response that gets more focus. Because we need to sell now, right? We need conversions in order to meet our KPIs and demonstrate ROI to decision-makers.

Yet, at the same time, the benefits of building brand can be equally, if not more significant, over time. It just depends on how long a time scale you’re able to measure.

To provide some more insight on this, Facebook recently partnered with Analytic Partners and GroupM to analyze more than 500 Facebook brand and DR campaigns run by 21 businesses over a three-year period. The research took into account the varying approaches, with a view to determining which actually drives more value for a business.

As explained by Facebook:

“What is the proper balance of lower funnel and upper-funnel marketing activities on Facebook? Is it possible for brands to maximize the ‘easy wins’ now (through lower funnel messaging) while simultaneously setting themselves up for further growth tomorrow (through upper funnel messaging)? These are questions that all marketers face, and they become even complex when facing real-world challenges such as pressing growth and limited budgets.”

So which is the better approach, according to the research? Well, really, it depends.

Facebook’s report essentially breaks down the comparison into three charts.


In this first graph, we can see that direct response campaigns generated more conversions, which makes sense given the focus on such. 

Facebook sales research

But Facebook notes that this isn’t the only metric to consider – you also need to factor in the cost per impression, with DR approaches generally being more expensive due to more specific audience targeting, which tends to have higher CPM.

Facebook sales research

As you can see here, the cost per impression for brand-building (upper funnel) campaigns is far lower, because your targeting will be much more broad as you look to connect with a wider audience.

See also  3 Ways to Use Instagram's New Keyword Search Option to Grow Your Business

Correcting for this, once you factor in the cost per conversion, brand-building actually ended up being a more effective approach in some verticals.

Facebook sales research

“On a per-spend basis, the ROI performance of upper-funnel marketing is more comparable because of the less expensive cost structure. In fact, upper-funnel marketing is a consistently better performing strategy for driving short-term sales in specific industries like ecommerce and Retail.”

That’s an interesting consideration, especially given the rise of eCommerce over the past year. Brand-building, and establishing connection with a wider audience, can actually drive similar, if not better, sales results – but you need to go the extra mile of comparing your costs and conversions over time to see that reflected in your data.

The research really highlights the need for taking a tiered approach to your advertising, and investing accordingly.

As a basic outline, the structure of each of your ad campaigns should be split into three elements:

  • Highlighting product utility and brand to generate initial interest (broad audience targeting)
  • Highlighting more specific product benefits in targeting people who’ve expressed initial interest (those who’ve responded to ads or posts, or have visited your website)
  • Retargeting those who’ve expressed interest in specific products by underlining specific benefits (those who’ve visited product pages or gone through to the check-out but haven’t converted)

Segmentation is key, and Facebook’s research here underlines the need for investment in each element in order to maximize results. 

But there’s no definitive answer – Facebook’s study doesn’t specifically say that investing in brand-building will generate better results for all businesses over DR campaigns. It does show, however, that there are clear benefits to each, and by experimenting and tracking your results, you’ll be able to demonstrate relevant value for your efforts over time.

See also  Are we heading for a social media exodus?

You can read Facebook’s full “The Effectiveness of Brand Messaging in Driving Sales Incrementality” report here.



Twitter adds warning labels to false Ukraine war posts



Twitter adds warning labels to false Ukraine war posts

Misleading tweets about Russia’s war on Ukraine will be hidden behind messages warning they could cause real world harm under a new Twitter policy. – Copyright AFP Asif HASSAN

Twitter on Thursday said it will put warning labels on demonstrably false posts about Russia’s war in Ukraine under a new “crisis misinformation policy.”

Tweets violating the new rule will be hidden behind messages saying that misleading information in the posts could cause real-world harm, said Twitter head of safety and integrity Yoel Roth.

Twitter users will then have to click on a link to see an offending post.

“While this first iteration is focused on international armed conflict, starting with the war in Ukraine, we plan to update and expand the policy to include additional forms of crisis,” Roth said in a blog post.

Examples of the kinds of posts that would merit warning labels included false reports about what is happening on the ground and how the international community is responding.

Twitter said it will make a priority of adding warning labels to tweets from high-profile accounts such as state-affiliated media outlets, governments, and users whose identities have been verified.


“Conversation moves quickly during periods of crisis, and content from accounts with wide reach are most likely to rack up views and engagement,” Roth said.

He added that the new policy will guide Twitter’s efforts “to elevate credible, authoritative information, and will help to ensure viral misinformation isn’t amplified or recommended by us during crises.”

The content moderation move comes as Twitter faces the prospect of being bought by billionaire Elon Musk.

See also  Facebook Adds New Metrics to its Ad Library Listings to Improve Transparency

The controversial Tesla chief openly advocates for anyone to be able to say whatever they want on Twitter, no matter how untrue, as long as it doesn’t break the law.

Source link

Continue Reading

Subscribe To our Newsletter
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address