Connect with us


Facebook Shares New Research into the Comparative Performance of Brand vs Direct Response Campaigns



Should you invest more of your marketing budget into brand-building or direct response, in order to drive sales results?

Both elements are important, but due to immediate pressures, it’s often direct response that gets more focus. Because we need to sell now, right? We need conversions in order to meet our KPIs and demonstrate ROI to decision-makers.

Yet, at the same time, the benefits of building brand can be equally, if not more significant, over time. It just depends on how long a time scale you’re able to measure.

To provide some more insight on this, Facebook recently partnered with Analytic Partners and GroupM to analyze more than 500 Facebook brand and DR campaigns run by 21 businesses over a three-year period. The research took into account the varying approaches, with a view to determining which actually drives more value for a business.

As explained by Facebook:

“What is the proper balance of lower funnel and upper-funnel marketing activities on Facebook? Is it possible for brands to maximize the ‘easy wins’ now (through lower funnel messaging) while simultaneously setting themselves up for further growth tomorrow (through upper funnel messaging)? These are questions that all marketers face, and they become even complex when facing real-world challenges such as pressing growth and limited budgets.”

So which is the better approach, according to the research? Well, really, it depends.

Facebook’s report essentially breaks down the comparison into three charts.


In this first graph, we can see that direct response campaigns generated more conversions, which makes sense given the focus on such. 

Facebook sales research

But Facebook notes that this isn’t the only metric to consider – you also need to factor in the cost per impression, with DR approaches generally being more expensive due to more specific audience targeting, which tends to have higher CPM.

Facebook sales research

As you can see here, the cost per impression for brand-building (upper funnel) campaigns is far lower, because your targeting will be much more broad as you look to connect with a wider audience.

Correcting for this, once you factor in the cost per conversion, brand-building actually ended up being a more effective approach in some verticals.

Facebook sales research

“On a per-spend basis, the ROI performance of upper-funnel marketing is more comparable because of the less expensive cost structure. In fact, upper-funnel marketing is a consistently better performing strategy for driving short-term sales in specific industries like ecommerce and Retail.”

That’s an interesting consideration, especially given the rise of eCommerce over the past year. Brand-building, and establishing connection with a wider audience, can actually drive similar, if not better, sales results – but you need to go the extra mile of comparing your costs and conversions over time to see that reflected in your data.

The research really highlights the need for taking a tiered approach to your advertising, and investing accordingly.

As a basic outline, the structure of each of your ad campaigns should be split into three elements:

  • Highlighting product utility and brand to generate initial interest (broad audience targeting)
  • Highlighting more specific product benefits in targeting people who’ve expressed initial interest (those who’ve responded to ads or posts, or have visited your website)
  • Retargeting those who’ve expressed interest in specific products by underlining specific benefits (those who’ve visited product pages or gone through to the check-out but haven’t converted)

Segmentation is key, and Facebook’s research here underlines the need for investment in each element in order to maximize results. 

But there’s no definitive answer – Facebook’s study doesn’t specifically say that investing in brand-building will generate better results for all businesses over DR campaigns. It does show, however, that there are clear benefits to each, and by experimenting and tracking your results, you’ll be able to demonstrate relevant value for your efforts over time.

You can read Facebook’s full “The Effectiveness of Brand Messaging in Driving Sales Incrementality” report here.



WhatsApp Launches ‘Call Links’ to Better Facilitate Group Audio and Video Chats



WhatsApp Launches ‘Call Links’ to Better Facilitate Group Audio and Video Chats

WhatsApp has announced the launch of a new Call Links feature, which, as it sounds, will enable you to share a link to invite others to join a group chat in the app.

As you can see in these examples, you’ll now be able to create dedicated URL links for WhatsApp group video and audio chats, which will make it easier for others to join the discussion in the app.

When available (the option is being rolled out this week), you’ll be able to see the Call Link option within your ‘Calls’ tab, enabling you to create a shareable link to get people into your chats.

It could be an easy way to help enhance community connection, and facilitate engagement, while brands could also use the option to better connect with influencers and advocates, in a more direct, intimate way.

For example, you could run an exclusive chat to discuss your upcoming product launch, or seek feedback on potential updates. Meta’s says that it’s also working on secure, encrypted video calling for up to 32 people as well, so there could soon be a range of ways to use the option as a means to spotlight specific audience segments and engage with them direct.

And with more engagement switching to messaging tools, that’s definitely worth considering.

Indeed, as part of a recent product announcement, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg noted that:


Most people use feeds to discover content and use messaging for deeper connections.”

As such, it may be time to start considering how you can lean into this shift, and better align with how users are now connecting, in order to maximize community and engagement.

Feeds are increasingly being overtaken by entertainment, so if you want to tap into the connective benefits of the medium, that may no longer be the place to be to reach your fans.

Messaging, and messaging groups, could be an important consideration going forward, and these new tools provide more options on this front.

Source link

Continue Reading

Subscribe To our Newsletter
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address