Connect with us


Facebook’s Running Another Webinar on the Coming Impacts of iOS 14 for Advertisers



After running a series of info sessions on the potential impacts of Apple’s IDFA update on its ad products back in January, Facebook is now holding another information session as it looks to ensure its ad partners are aware of the various ways that Apple’s changes to user data tracking could impact campaign performance.

The new session, being run on April 7th, will see Facebook product experts explaining how the IDFA update will impact ad targeting, optimization and performance reporting, by reducing the amount of information that Facebook will be able to track.

As explained by Facebook:

“Like the rest of the industry, we are waiting for Apple to confirm the date it will begin enforcing its App Tracking Transparency prompt, having previously announced it would be “early spring.” In the meantime, we want to emphasize the importance of implementing our guidance and taking our recommended actions prior to Apple’s prompt enforcement.”

Among the various expected impacts of the IDFA update for Facebook ads will be:

  • Reduced capacity to track user actions, including conversions, which will subsequently impact targeting and retargeting campaigns
  • Reduced data reporting, particularly related to attribution and measuring the effectiveness of ad campaigns. Facebook has already flagged the removal of its 28-day attribution data, which will result in fewer reported conversions for your campaigns. 
  • Reduced effectiveness for Audience Network campaigns, which rely on in-app tracking to present relevant ads to users

Essentially, with more people expected to opt-out of Facebook’s data tracking, you’ll have fewer tools to understand campaign performance, and to target people at the right stage. You’ll still have access to the information people post to Facebook, so region targeting, demographics, etc. But the more advanced elements will likely be lessened – depending on how many users do choose to opt-out when served with Apple’s new data-tracking prompts.

Apple IDFA prompt

As Facebook notes, Apple hasn’t yet provided an official launch date for its IDFA update, but based on previous guidance, it should be coming in the next couple of months. 

See also  Facebook’s new branding distinguishes app from acquisitions

There have been some issues that could be holding up the change, however. Aside from Facebook’s very public opposition to the updated data tracking process, Apple’s also facing a more significant challenge in China, where China’s tech giants have vowed to implement a new mobile identifier, dubbed CAID, which they claim replaces IDFA tracking without breaching Apple’s rules. But, it likely does. According to The Financial Times, CAID enables Chinese apps to continue tracking most of the same data that Apple’s update would restrict, which likely violates Apple’s rules.

That could put Apple in a tough situation, where it may need to confront China’s big tech players, and even remove their apps from the App Store in response. That could then lead to further complications with the Chinese Government, and may lead to other problems for the company. For example, the majority of Apple’s device components are manufactured in China.

If Apple chooses to ignore CAID, however, that could put China in a unique position, while it would also incentivize other regions to create their own workaround processes along similar lines.

There’s a lot at stake, and it could potentially force Apple to re-think the change entirely. Either way, we still don’t have any definitive date for the IDFA roll-out as yet.

As noted, Facebook’s been working to keep advertisers informed about the potential changes to their campaigns via webinars, a dedicated IDFA mini-site, help prompts and more.

This new webinar is another element, and it could be worth tuning in for those advertisers who are still trying to get their heads around the various potential impacts.

See also  4 Ways to Get Started with WhatsApp for Business [Infographic]

Again, we won’t know the full extent of these changes till it’s actually rolled out, but it’s worth preparing yourself for what’s coming, in anticipation of a pending announcement.

You can register for Facebook’s info session here.

Continue Reading


Meta’s Developing and ‘Ethical Framework’ for the Use of Virtual Influencers



Meta's Developing and 'Ethical Framework' for the Use of Virtual Influencers

With the rise of digital avatars, and indeed, fully digital characters that have evolved into genuine social media influencers in their own right, online platforms now have an obligation to establish clear markers as to what’s real and what’s not, and how such creations can be used in their apps.

The coming metaverse shift will further complicate this, with the rise of virtual depictions blurring the lines of what will be allowed, in terms of representation. But with many virtual influencers already operating, Meta is now working to establish ethical boundaries on their application.

As explained by Meta:

From synthesized versions of real people to wholly invented “virtual influencers” (VIs), synthetic media is a rising phenomenon. Meta platforms are home to more than 200 VIs, with 30 verified VI accounts hosted on Instagram. These VIs boast huge follower counts, collaborate with some of the world’s biggest brands, fundraise for organizations like the WHO, and champion social causes like Black Lives Matter.”

Some of the more well-known examples on this front are Shudu, who has more than 200k followers on Instagram, and Lil’ Miquela, who has an audience of over 3 million in the app.

At first glance, you wouldn’t necessarily realize that this is not an actual person, which makes such characters a great vehicle for brand and product promotions, as they can be utilized 24/7, and can be placed into any environment. But that also leads to concerns about body image perception, deepfakes, and other forms of misuse through false or unclear representation.

See also  Instagram Plans to Launch Multi-Participant Live-Streams Later This Month

Deepfakes, in particular, may be problematic, with Meta citing this campaign, with English football star David Beckham, as an example of how new technologies are evolving to expand the use of language, as one element, for varying purpose.

The well-known ‘DeepTomCruise’ account on TikTok is another example of just how far these technologies have come, and it’s not hard to imagine a scenario where they could be used to, say, show a politician saying or doing something that he or she actually didn’t, which could have significant real world impacts.

Which is why Meta is working with developers and experts to establish clearer boundaries on such use – because while there is potential for harm, there are also beneficial uses for such depictions.

Imagine personalized video messages that address individual followers by name. Or celebrity brand ambassadors appearing as salespeople at local car dealerships. A famous athlete would make a great tutor for a kid who loves sports but hates algebra.

Such use cases will increasingly become the norm as VR and AR technologies are developed, with these platforms placing digital characters front and center, and establishing new norms for digital connection.

It would be better to know what’s real and what’s not, and as such, Meta needs clear regulations to remove dishonest depictions, and enforce transparency over VI use.

But then again, much of what you see on Instagram these days is not real, with filters and editing tools altering people’s appearance well beyond what’s normal, or realistic. That can also have damaging consequences, and while Meta’s looking to implement rules on VI use, there’s arguably a case for similar transparency in editing tools applied to posted videos and images as well.

See also  New Report Looks at Creator Loyalty on YouTube, and What It Means for Marketers

That’s a more complex element, particularly as such tools also enable people to feel more comfortable in posting, which no doubt increases their in-app activity. Would Meta be willing to put more focus on this element if it could risk impacting user engagement? The data on the impact of Instagram on people’s mental health are pretty clear, with comparison being a key concern.

Should that also come under the same umbrella of increased digital transparency?

It’s seemingly not included in the initial framework as yet, but at some stage, this is another element that should be examined, especially given the harmful effects that social media usage can have on young women.

But however you look at it, this is no doubt a rising element of concern, and it’s important for Meta to build guardrails and rules around the use of virtual influencers in their apps.

You can read more about Meta’s approach to virtual influencers here.

Source link

Continue Reading


Meta Publishes New Guide to the Various Security and Control Options in its Apps



Meta Publishes New Guide to the Various Security and Control Options in its Apps

Meta has published a new set of safety tips for journalists to help them protect themselves in the evolving online connection space, which, for the most part, also apply to all users more broadly, providing a comprehensive overview of the various tools and processes that it has in place to help people avoid unwanted attention online.

The 32-page guide is available in 21 different languages, and provides detailed overviews of Meta’s systems and profile options for protection and security, with specific sections covering Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp.

The guide begins with the basics, including password protections and enabling two-factor authentication.

It also outlines tips for Page managers in securing their business profiles, while there are also notes on what to do if you’ve been hacked, advice for protection on Messenger and guidance on bullying and harassment.

Meta security guide

For Instagram, there are also general security tips, along with notes on its comment moderation tools.

Meta security guide

While for WhatsApp, there are explainers on how to delete messages, how to remove messages from group chats, and details on platform-specific data options.

Meta security guide

There are also links to various additional resource guides and tools for more context, providing in-depth breakdowns of when and how to action the various options.

It’s a handy guide, and while there are some journalist-specific elements included, most of the tips do apply to any user, so it could well be a valuable resource for anyone looking to get a better handle on your various privacy tools and options.

Definitely worth knowing either way – you can download the full guide here.

See also  Mr. Beast Takes the Top Spot in Forbes' 2021 YouTube Earners List

Source link

Continue Reading


Twitter bans account linked to Iran leader over video threatening Trump



Twitter bans account linked to Iran leader over video threatening Trump

Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei meets with relatives of slain commander Qasem Soleimani ahead of the second anniverary of his death in a US drone strike in Iraq – Copyright POOL/AFP/File Tom Brenner

Twitter said Saturday it had permanently suspended an account linked to Iran’s supreme leader that posted a video calling for revenge for a top general’s assassination against former US president Donald Trump.

“The account referenced has been permanently suspended for violating our ban evasion policy,” a Twitter spokesperson told AFP.

The account, @KhameneiSite, this week posted an animated video showing an unmanned aircraft targeting Trump, who ordered a drone strike in Baghdad two years ago that killed top Iranian commander General Qassem Soleimani.

Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s main accounts in various languages remain active. Last year, another similar account was suspended by Twitter over a post also appearing to reference revenge against Trump.

The recent video, titled “Revenge is Definite”, was also posted on Khamenei’s official website.

According to Twitter, the company’s top priority is keeping people safe and protecting the health of the conversation on the platform.

The social media giant says it has clear policies around abusive behavior and will take action when violations are identified.

As head of the Quds Force, the foreign operations arm of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, Soleimani was the architect of its strategy in the Middle East.

He and his Iraqi lieutenant were killed by a US drone strike outside Baghdad airport on January 3, 2020.

Khamenei has repeatedly promised to avenge his death.

On January 3, the second anniversary of the strike, the supreme leader and ultraconservative President Ebrahim Raisi once again threatened the US with revenge.

See also  New Report Looks at Creator Loyalty on YouTube, and What It Means for Marketers

Trump’s supporters regularly denounce the banning of the Republican billionaire from Twitter, underscoring that accounts of several leaders considered authoritarian by the United States are allowed to post on the platform.

Source link

Continue Reading

Subscribe To our Newsletter
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address