Connect with us


Meta Publishes New Videos Which Highlight the Possibilities of its Metaverse Vision



Meta Publishes New Videos Which Highlight the Possibilities of its Metaverse Vision

Does anyone else feel like Meta may have gone a little early with its whole ‘metaverse’ push?

I mean, it is investing billions of dollars into its next level projects, and it would have had to explain that expenditure to the market at some stage. But with everything that we’re seeing, and hearing in the space, it seems like Meta may have jumped the gun, with the actual metaverse, as envisioned, still a long way off being a reality, in any functional sense.

Which now puts Meta in a difficult spot – do you release half-formed metaverse concepts, with a proviso attached to each explaining that there’s more to come, or do you keep as much as you can in-house, till it’s really ready to blow people away?

Ideally, you would go with the latter – but again, when you tell investors that you’re pumping $10 billion into any project, they’re gonna’ want to see results, and sooner, rather than later.

Which is why Meta is now publishing new explainers and overviews, which aim to put more focus on where we’re headed, and the opportunities of advanced digital connection – as opposed to the current, legless genie engagement of its VR space.

As you can see in this new promo campaign, Meta’s looking to highlight the expanded potential of the metaverse, beyond its current developmental phase.


As per Meta:

“We want people to envision that, in addition to areas like gaming and entertainment, the metaverse has tangible potential on healthcare, education and skills training.”

Which, again, is a long way off, but Meta’s trying to re-focus people onto the bigger picture of its strategy, as opposed to the somewhat underwhelming, cartoonish landscapes that will form the basis for the next stage of development.

Meta’s also shared another new video clip, which shows how the metaverse will facilitate entirely new types of digital experiences.

Meta says that it’s ‘unlocking’ new possibilities, which is where the true, eventual
value of the metaverse lies.

“Meta is building technology that brings people closer – breaking down the barriers that limit what we can do together by letting people feel like they’re right there with another person or in another place.”

Which is all well and good, but if you’re going to present these as concepts, you need to also provide a timeline, or concrete examples of exactly how this type of interaction will actually work (note: you can go fishing with friends in VR right now, but it doesn’t look quite this realistic).


Which brings me back to the original question – is Meta pushing too hard, too soon on a concept that’s so far from actual reality that it will only really serve profiteers, while continually frustrating users and investors alike?

Definitely, the profiteers are happy. I’ve seen a heap of promotions looking to scare businesses into making big tech investments, in order to ‘prepare for the metaverse’ right now, while a number of metaverse explainer books are already on shelves – despite the actual metaverse being only a concept at this stage.

‘Yeah, but Meta’s isn’t the only metaverse.’

Yes it is – in any functional, scalable, valuable sense, the only metaverse that will actually matter is the one that Meta is developing, whether it ends up being the owner of the space, or it partners with others on its creation. The metaverse is a singular noun in this respect, it’s ‘the’ metaverse, not ‘a’ metaverse among many others.

We can understand the principles and key concepts based on existing examples, for sure, but no one is a metaverse expert at this stage.

Because it doesn’t exist, and while Meta has made it a thing, by changing its corporate name to ‘Meta’, it’s still such a long way from fruition that it’s going to continue confounding most for some time, which probably isn’t good for Meta overall.

Which is why it’s now working to shift our focus onto the horizon, onto that far off destination way out yonder, where the metaverse and full VR realization is a working, functional thing.

It looks good, right? Sure does, and hopefully, Meta’s shareholders will keep that in mind as it continues to shovel money into its various related projects.


Source link


TikTok Scales Back Live-Stream Commerce Ambitions, Which Could Be a Big Blow for the App



TikTok Expands Test of Downvotes for Video Replies, Adds New Prompts to Highlight its Safety Tools

TikTok’s facing a significant reassessment in its business expansion plans, with the company forced to scale back its live eCommerce initiative in Europe and the US due to operational challenges and lack of consumer interest.

TikTok has been working to integrate live-stream shopping after seeing major success with the option in the Chinese version of the app. But its initial efforts in the UK have been hampered by various problems.

As reported by The Financial Times:

“TikTok had planned to launch the feature in Germany, France, Italy and Spain in the first half of this year, before expanding into the US later in 2022, according to several people briefed on the matter. But the expansion plans have been dropped after the UK project failed to meet targets and influencers dropped out of the scheme, three people said.”

TikTok has since refuted some of FT’s claims, saying that the reported timeline for its commerce push is incorrect, and that it’s focused on fixing problems with its UK operation before expanding, which is still in its roadmap. But the basis – that its program is not going as smoothly as planned – is correct. 

TikTok’s UK shopping push has also faced internal problems due to conflicts over working culture and management.

Last month, reports surfaced that TikTok’s parent company ByteDance had been imposing tough conditions on its UK commerce staff, including regular 12-hour days, improbable sales targets, and questions over entitlements.


Now, it seems like the combination of challenges has led to a new growth dilemma for the app – which once again underlines the variance between Asian and western app usage trends.

Social media and messaging apps have become a central element of day-to-day life in several Asian countries, with apps like China’s WeChat and QQ now used for everything from purchasing train tickets to paying bills, to buying groceries, banking, and everything in between.

That spells opportunity for western social media providers, with Meta, in particular, looking to use the Chinese model as a template to help it translate the popularity of WhatsApp and Messenger into even more ubiquitous, more valuable functionality, which could then make them critical connective tools in various markets, solidifying Meta’s market presence.

But for various reasons, Chinese messaging trends have never translated to other markets.

Meta’s Messenger Bots push in 2016 failed to gain traction, and after its Messenger app became ‘too cluttered’ with an ever-expanding range of functionalities, including games, shopping, Stories, and more, Meta eventually scaled back its messaging expansion plans, in favor of keeping the app aligned with its core use case.

Meta then turned to WhatsApp, and making messaging a more critical process in developing markets like India and Indonesia. That expansion is still ongoing, but the signs, at present, don’t suggest that WhatsApp will ever reach the same level of ubiquity that Chinese messaging apps have.

Which then leads to TikTok, the world-beating short-form video app, which has seen massive growth in China, leading to whole new business opportunities, and even market sectors, based on how Chinese users have adapted to in-app commerce.

The Chinese version of TikTok, called ‘Douyin’, generated $119 billion worth of product sales via live broadcasts in 2021, an 7x increase year-over-year, while the number of users engaging with eCommerce live-streams exceeded 384 million, close to half of the platform’s user base.


Overall, the Chinese live-stream commerce sector brought in over $300 billion in 2021. For comparison, the entire US retail eCommerce market reached $767 billion last year.

Given this, you can see why TikTok would view this as a key opportunity in other markets as well – but as noted, Chinese market trends are not always a great proxy for other regions.

The decision to scale back its eCommerce ambitions is a significant blow to TikTok’s expansion plans, not only from a broader revenue perspective (and worth noting, TikTok’s parent company ByteDance recently cut staff due to ongoing revenue pressures), but also in regards to revenue share, and providing a pathway for creators to make money from their efforts in the app.

Unlike YouTube, TikTok clips are too short to add mid and pre-roll ads, which means that creators can’t simply switch on ads to make money from their content. That means that they need to organize brand partnerships to generate income, and on Douyin, in-stream commerce has become the key pathway to exactly that.

Without in-stream product integrations as an option, that will significantly limit creator earnings capacity in the app, which could eventually see them switch focus to other platforms, where they can more effectively monetize their output.

Which may not seem like a major risk, but that’s exact what killed Vine, when Vine creators called for a bigger share of the app’s revenue, then switched to Instagram and YouTube instead when Vine’s parent company Twitter refused to provide such.

Could TikTok eventually face a similar fate?

TikTok, of course, is much bigger than Vine ever was, and is still growing. But limited monetization opportunities could end up being a big challenge for the app – while it also continues to face scrutiny over its impact on youngsters, and the potential for it to be used as a surveillance tool by the Chinese Government.


In isolation, it may not seem like a major move, scaling back its eCommerce ambitions just slightly as it reassesses the best approach. But it’s a significant shift, which will slow down TikTok’s broader expansion. And it could end up hurting the app more than you, initially, would think.

Source link

Continue Reading

Subscribe To our Newsletter
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address