Connect with us

FACEBOOK

The first social media babies have grown up – and they’re angry

Published

on

The first social media babies have grown up - and they’re angry

The idea of a child giving consent for images of themselves to be posted is tricky. Photo / Getty Images

By RNZ

Parents and children performing for social media clicks and views is “murky ground” says American journalist Kate Lindsay.

“Social media likes and engagement can motivate us to post certain things or behave in certain ways. When you bring a child into that, a child can very easily become a prop … and that creates a troubling dynamic,” she tells Kim Hill.

Currently, children of parents who were or are “oversharers” on social media have few legal options, she says.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

One such child of an oversharer, 24-year-old Caymi Barrett, has become a vocal advocate for the protection of children on social media, even though her mother was not an influencer or content creator.

“[Caymi’s] mother was a regular kind of parent, just like any other, but who was new to Facebook. And perhaps, as a lot of people weren’t at the time, she wasn’t quite aware of just how public social media could be. So she would accept every friend request and had a large audience of strangers and also at the same time really use Facebook as a scrapbook for [photos of] Caymi.”

Posting family-related content can also be a 'super lucrative' business. Photo / Getty Images
Posting family-related content can also be a ‘super lucrative’ business. Photo / Getty Images

The Facebook page wasn’t a highlights reel, though, as Caymi’s mother included details of her medical issues, a car crash and “unflattering” personal information.

One summer, she posted about a skin condition Caymi had. Although the condition had healed when Caymi returned to school, her classmates refused to sit near her and the teacher even made her sit at an isolated desk.

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

Parents like Caymi’s mother are not “cartoon villains”, Lindsay says. In years past, there wasn’t an awareness that social media would still be around and become even more prevalent.

Unfortunately, this problem is only getting worse. Yet in the United States, lawmakers who are not social media savvy don’t understand why this is a serious issue, she says.

While legislation is one part of improving the situation, we also need to figure out how to socially enforce what is and isn’t acceptable when it comes to the “slippery slope” of social media.

Advertisement

“Social media can kind of trick you and then get you to post more … That’s a feeling that so many people feel. And parents, I imagine, benefit from that social media validation even more.

“Social media likes and engagement can motivate us to post certain things or behave in certain ways. When you bring a child into that, a child can very easily become a prop … and that creates a troubling dynamic.

“Also, I think it’s worth considering the dynamic that that child is then going to have with their own social media because they’re going to mimic what they were raised on. If it’s a relationship that’s very performative or very oversharing or just toxic in any way, that groundwork is being laid by how their parents are treating social media with them.”

If every parent on social media becomes a little bit more thoughtful and aware of how their posts may impact their children, this would do wonders, Lindsay says – “just exercising judgment in terms of what it is you’re sharing – is this for you or for them?

“Now that we know every person grows up and assumes a social media identity of their own, is that an identity they would want to inherit?”

Depending on the platform, parents are usually able to take down any content they’ve posted of their children, Lindsay says. Private accounts, limited accounts, face covering and Instagram stories that disappear can also help keep images and videos of children in “a nice closed loop”.

Advertisement

She also recommends parents keep an eye out for their children always “performing.

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

“When you see the little ways that the child growing up can feel like they need to perform, you see how a parent’s relationship with social media is going to inform a child’s relationship with social media.”

The idea of a child giving consent for images of themselves to be posted is tricky because it requires saying no to your parents, she says.

Parents are usually able to take down any content they've posted of their children. Photo / Getty Images
Parents are usually able to take down any content they’ve posted of their children. Photo / Getty Images

“I think it’s really hard for any child [to say no to content being posted], especially when they see what they’re doing makes their parents happy. That’s what they want, they want their parents to be happy. So really consent from a child in this scenario can only mean so much. It really is up to the parents to create an environment where a child can feel comfortable really sharing how they feel about this and the parent makes sure that they’re not accidentally encouraging this kind of relationship.

“It’s incumbent upon the parent to make sure they’ve created a really open environment where the child can feel comfortable expressing those thoughts and keep it being an open conversation that can change day to day.”

Lindsay recommends parents keep up an open conversation flowing with their children about social media content, delete anything that makes anyone in the family feel uncomfortable and be mindful of the potential audience, i.e. a child’s future employer.

– RNZ

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address