Connect with us

SOCIAL

Twitter Plans to Re-Launch its Controversial $8 Verification Program as Early as This Week

Published

on

Elon Says Revised $8 Twitter Blue ‘Verification’ Program Will Resume on November 29th

All’s been quiet on the Twitter verification front for the last two weeks, but that looks like it’s about to change, with the company reportedly preparing to re-launch Elon’s $8 verification plan as early as tomorrow, including new price points, alternative color checkmarks for business and government accounts, and more.

First off, on the launch date – after Elon Musk initially flagged that Twitter’s $8 verification plan would be re-launched two weeks back, then delayed it, reportedly in order to work out how it might be able to wriggle out of paying Apple’s 30% in-app purchase tax, the company is now targeting this Friday, i.e. tomorrow, for the re-launch of the program.

And Twitter apparently hasn’t worked out how to avoid the Apple tax.

As per The Information:

Twitter has informed some employees that it plans to change the pricing of its Twitter Blue subscription product to $7 if users pay for it through the web and $11 if they do so through its app for iPhones, according to a person briefed on the plans. Twitter had previously said it plans to charge $7.99 for Twitter Blue, which was then only available for purchase through Apple’s App Store.

So instead of avoiding the Apple tax, Twitter’s just going to build it into the price for iOS users, with no word on a launch of the program on Android just yet (note: Google also charges a 30% in-app purchase tax for those generating over $1 million per year).

If that’s the option Twitter does eventually go with, you can imagine that it will also make a big push on web-based sign-ups. Meta tried similar last year, by launching a Stars store, where users can purchase packages of its creator donation Stars, and avoid Apple’s in-app fees.

The question, then, is whether people will be as keen to sign up in a separate app/website, and what impact that could have on take-up. It seems like a relatively simple way to get more money direct to Twitter, but it does add another level of friction, which could slow take-up.

On another front, Twitter’s also developing variable color shades for its new, alternative color verification badges, in order to cater to color-blind users.

As we reported recently,  as part of the updated Twitter Blue rollout, business and government accounts will be given gold and gray ticks respectively, in order to avoid the issues with impersonation that were rife after the initial launch of the program.

That’ll essentially mean that people can’t just buy a verification tick, change their name and profile image to match a brand handle, then dupe users with false tweets, because people will now know that the actual official accounts will have a gold marker.

Which makes sense in theory, but it will require users to learn about what these new, alternative color badges mean.

It still feels like there’s a potential vulnerability there, but with the new checkmarks already in the process of being rolled out, it does seem like this is the solution Twitter’s going with, and that the new program is close to being re-opened to the public – maybe this week.

As reported by The Information, Musk has been very hands-on with the project, his first major initiative at the app. Elon’s view is that by enabling people to buy the much coveted blue checkmark for their account, that will attract big interest, and drive millions of sign-ups for the program, which will then enable Twitter to both reduce its reliance on ad revenue – and thus, its need to police speech in line with advertiser concerns – while also helping to tackle bots, because once everyone is signed up for a verified account, the only non-verified accounts left will be bot/spam peddlers.

Except, it’s unlikely to work how he expects.

As we’ve noted previously, social platform subscription offerings have never been popular, with fewer than 1% of users ever signing up for the previous version of Twitter Blue or Snapchat’s Snapchat+ package. Now, those are a lot different to Elon’s far more publicized blue checkmark program, and there’ll likely be a lot more people willing to pay to put a checkmark next to their name (reports suggest that more people signed up for Musk’s $8 checkmark plan in a few days than ever signed up for the previous iteration of Twitter Blue).

But even so, the likelihood of Elon getting enough users to sign-up to meet his goals for the program is seemingly not high.

Some basic estimates:

  • If Elon wants to get subscriptions to contribute 50% of Twitter’s revenue, as he’s previously stated, he’ll need around 30 million users to sign on to pay $8 per month for a blue tick, depending on where they do so (given the above-noted change in pricing on iOS)
  • If Elon wants to use this as a means to ‘verify all the humans’, you’d think he’d have to get upwards of 75% of Twitter’s user base signed on to make this even viable – which would currently equate to around 178 million users paying each month

Given the performance of previous social media subscription offerings, if Elon were to get a million paying subscribers for his $8 verification program, that would be a huge win, and if he gets five or ten million, that would be massive, a crazy level of success for the initiative.

But as you can see, that still wouldn’t even come close to shifting the needle on these key aims. And when you also consider that the majority of Twitter users are outside the US, and that it’s seeing most of its growth in developing markets, where paying $96 per year for a blue tick simply won’t be viable, it’s not gonna work. It’s just not.

In saying that, I’m also aware that the Elon stans will read that as criticism, as an attack on Elon’s grand plan, which I can’t possibly fathom, and on free speech itself – because for Elon’s supporters, unless you’re effusive in your praise of his every move, you’re somehow the enemy, and a negative force pushing back against his drive for ‘freedom’ – whatever they decide that means.

So to be clear, I do think that Elon will eventually get Twitter on the right track – and clearly, despite his Icarian approach to management, Twitter is still running, with half the staff, so he is succeeding in his plan thus far to reduce costs, and reform the app in his image.

I do expect that this will all eventually come around. But the confused verification plan, which has taken up far too much time and energy in the early days of Musk’s tenure at the app, is not the way forward.

I expect that Elon will realize this once it’s fully live, and that’ll eventually see him head back to the drawing board to devise a new money-making scheme at the app. And as I’ve detailed elsewhere, there are opportunities available that can generate more income for the app.

But paying $8 for a blue tick is hugely flawed, riddled with failure points, and unlikely, even at optimal levels, to generate enough revenue or interest to reach its intended aims.

Seems like we’ll find out soon, either way.

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address

SOCIAL

Musk regrets controversial post but won’t bow to advertiser ‘blackmail’

Published

on

Elon Musk's comments at the New York Times' Dealbook conference drew a shocked silence

Elon Musk’s comments at the New York Times’ Dealbook conference drew a shocked silence – Copyright GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP Slaven Vlasic

Elon Musk apologized Wednesday for endorsing a social media post widely seen as anti-Semitic, but accused advertisers who are turning away from his social media platform X of “blackmail” and said anyone who does so can “go fuck yourself.”

The remark before corporate executives at the New York Times’ Dealbook conference drew a shocked silence.

Earlier, Musk had apologized for what he called “literally the worst and dumbest post that I’ve ever done.”

In a comment on X, formerly Twitter, Musk on November 15 called a post “the actual truth” that said Jewish communities advocated a “dialectical hatred against whites,” which was criticized as echoing longtime conspiracy theory among White supremacists.

The statement prompted a flood of departures from X of major advertisers, including Apple, Disney, Comcast and IBM who criticized Musk for anti-semitism.

“I’m sorry for that tweet or post,” Musk said Wednesday. “It was foolish of me.”

He told interviewer Andrew Ross Sorkin that his post had been misinterpreted and that he had sought to clarify the remark in subsequent posts to the thread.

But Musk also said he wouldn’t be beholden to pressure from advertisers.

“If somebody’s gonna try to blackmail me with advertising, blackmail me with money?” Musk said. “Go fuck yourself.”

But the billionaire acknowledged that there were business implications to the advertiser actions.

“If the company fails… it will fail because of an advertiser boycott” Musk said. “And that will be what will bankrupt the company.”

Musk, who met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a visit to Israel earlier this week, insisted in the interview that he holds no discrimination against Jews, calling himself “philo-Semitic,” or an admirer of Judaism.

During the interview, Musk wore a necklace given to him by a parent of an Israeli hostage taken in the Hamas attack on October 7. The necklace reads, “Bring Them Home.”

Musk told Sorkin that the Israel trip had been planned earlier and was not an “apology tour” related to the controversial tweet.

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

SOCIAL

TikTok Encourages Creators To Make Longer Videos, With Focus On Ad Revenue 11/30/2023

Published

on

TikTok Encourages Creators To Make Longer Videos, With Focus On Ad Revenue 11/30/2023

With a need to expand its advertising business, TikTok is now fully focused on the output of long-form videos.

A new report by The Information shows the company’s recent efforts to convince
creators to put out longer videos in order to provide more room for ad placements.

According to the …



Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

SOCIAL

X Adds Option To Embed Videos in Isolation From Posts

Published

on

X Adds Option To Embed Videos in Isolation From Posts

Next time you go to embed an X post, you may notice a new step:

Now, X will enable you to choose whether you want to embed the video element in isolation, or the whole post, as normal.

And if you do choose to embed just the video (or GIF), it’ll look like this:

Which could be a helpful way to present X-originated video on third-party websites, and add context to, say, your blog post, without the clutter of the full X framing.

But it could also reduce brand exposure for X, which is likely why Twitter didn’t enable this before, though it did once provide an “embedded video widget” which essentially served the same purpose.

X embeds

Twitter gradually seemed to phase that out as the platform evolved, and there’s no specific reason that I can find as to why it removed it as an option. But either way, now, it’s back, so you have more options for using X-originated content, and putting more focus on video elements specifically.

Though I don’t know why they didn’t also take the opportunity to remove the ‘Tweet’ reference. Since the re-brand to X, the platform seems to have gone to little effort to weed out all the tweet and bird terminology, but then again, with 80% fewer staff, that’s probably understandable as well.



Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

Trending