Connect with us


Twitter Says that its Prompts on Potentially Offensive Tweet Replies Reduced Negative Interactions by 30%



Twitter Says that its Prompts on Potentially Offensive Tweet Replies Reduced Negative Interactions by 30%

It’s interesting to see what effect even the slightest level of friction can have on negative behaviors online, and how it can reduce unnecessary angst or disagreement, just through a basic heads-up.

Last February, Twitter re-launched its test of warning prompts on tweet replies which Twitter’s automated systems had determined could contain potentially offensive remarks.

Twitter launched a first iteration of the test back in May 2020, before it decided to shelve it during the US election period.

The new test, with an updated format for the alert, was released to selected users on iOS, and in a new report on the experiment, released this week, Twitter says that in 30% of cases where users were shown these prompts, they did in fact change or delete their replies, in order to avoid possible misinterpretation or offense.

Which is a significant amount – imagine if Twitter was able to remove 30% of the negativity and abuse on its platform through a simple nudge to each user.

That number’s also not fully reflective of the potential impact, as this means that, in 30% of cases when it was shown, the tweet author looked at the recommendation, then re-assessed their reply. But in many of the other 70% of examples, Twitter’s algorithms would have got it wrong, and it may not have been offensive at all. That means that the benefit here, in terms of reducing angst, could be huge – and again, it’s amazing to consider how such a simple prompt can have such a big impact.

Though it shouldn’t be overly surprising. Back in 2020, Twitter also added another pop-up alert which appears when users attempt to re-share articles in their tweets without actually opening the article link and reading it themselves first.

Twitter article share prompt

After three months of that implementation, Twitter reported that people who saw these alerts were opening articles 40% more often, while people opening articles before retweeting, specifically, increased by 33%.

Again, it’s just a small push, a tiny element of friction in the process. But it can have big results, with the immediacy of social media interaction often leading to less than thoughtful replies, and by simply asking people to re-assess, that, evidently, is often enough to change user behaviors.

The extension of that could also be that more users consider their overall tweet responses more deeply, and what they’re actually sharing online. Which, on a large scale, could have a big impact, and it’ll be interesting to see if Twitter does eventually roll out the alerts to all users.

Right now, Twitter’s extending the initial test, with users in Brazil now also set to get these prompts.

But it could go even further, and it could end up being another significant step in improving the in-app experience.

Source link


Snapchat Shares New Data on the Importance of Brands Supporting Inclusion and Social Causes



Snapchat Shares New Data on the Importance of Brands Supporting Inclusion and Social Causes

Snapchat has published some new insights into how its users view inclusion and diversity, as well as how brands support social movements, in various ways.

To glean insight into this, Snapchat conducted a survey of over 5,000 users from the US, Canada, the UK, Germany, France, Norway, Netherlands, Sweden and Australia, providing a wide breadth of perspectives on how its audience is looking to interact around social issues and movements.

And the results are likely as you would expect, given the young skew of the app – Snapchat users are increasingly inclusive, and are more open to brands that align with their worldview on key issues.

According to Snap’s data, some 75% of Snapchatters would use the word ‘inclusive’ to describe themselves and their friends, while 90% would use the word ‘kind’.

I mean, self-attribution could be different to actual reality, as I assume most people would consider themselves to be relatively kind and inclusive. But even so, Snap’s further insights reinforce this ethos, and the importance of inclusion in their approach.

As per Snap:

“Snapchatters embrace all aspects of who they are, like the causes they care about, the music they love, and the content they create and share online. 8 in 10 say ‘It’s important for me to be true to myself,’ and Pride Month is a time to celebrate their freedom to do so.”


Now, I had to double-check this a couple of times to ensure I wasn’t experiencing a glitch in the Matrix, but Pride Month was in June, and the new survey data was released today. I’m not sure why there’s such a focus on Pride Month given the timing, but the findings are relevant regardless, and could assist in your Snap planning.

Which may well be important, because the data also shows that nearly half of Snapchatters agree that all brands should reflect representation and inclusion.

“Over half of Snapchatters do research to tell if a brand cares about inclusion. In addition to checking to see if a brand has diverse and inclusive content, nearly 1 in 3 Snapchatters will read a brand’s mission statement and values. Likewise, many Snapchatters will look at the brand’s leadership to ensure the brand’s values are represented at an organizational level.

Snapchat inclusion survey

As has been highlighted in various Gen Z surveys and studies, the younger generation takes a much more socially conscious approach to the brands that they deal with, and it’s important for marketers to recognize this within their Snap marketing approach.

The data also shows that 64% of Snapchatters are interested in supporting brands that celebrate inclusion and diversity, while 35% said that they’re more likely to purchase products and services from brands they consider inclusive.

There’s also this:

“More than a quarter of Snapchatters said they would take action on a social issue, including doing further research, making a donation, or participating in an event if prompted by a brand.

So it’s not just the branding benefit of connecting with relevant social causes, and aligning with the perspective of your target market, but it can also help to encourage more activity and adoption of the same causes as a result of your promotions.

These are some interesting notes, which once again underline the brand value of being more upfront in regards to the causes and movements you align with, and promoting that up front, as opposed to keeping it to yourself in fear of turning some people away.


Younger consumers want to know that they’re supporting businesses that support the same things they do, which can also help to broaden awareness, maximize inclusion and evolve perspectives.

Some important notes – you can read Snap’s full study here.

Source link

Continue Reading

Subscribe To our Newsletter
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address