Connect with us

DUCKDUCKGO

The alternative browser challenges Big Tech. DuckDuckGo is committed to privacy and security

Published

on

the-alternative-browser-challenges-big-tech.-duckduckgo-is-committed-to-privacy-and-security
The creators of the alternative DuchDuckGo browser have just announced that it will soon be available not only for mobile devices, but also in the desktop version. The app is distinguished by the fact that, unlike Google and other Big Tech industry proposals, it not only blocks third-party tracking, but also informs users who is trying to track them at the moment. The developers of the application have made available a list of companies responsible for violating the privacy of internet users

By entering a website in the DuckDuckGO (DDG) browser, we receive a notification in the upper left corner, after clicking which we learn that at that moment Google, Facebook and, for example, three other pages that collect data about our activity, for example for marketing reasons, were trying to track us. .

“Browse as always, and we will do the rest” – is the slogan of the manufacturer, which declares that his browser is as functional as the solutions known to everyone, but with the difference that, as a rule, it blocks all cookies and tracking attempts, including location tracking.

An alternative browser is currently available on mobile devices, but a beta version for computers has already been launched and a fully functional version can be expected in some time. The popularity of the new browser is growing, and some time ago the creators of the new solution reported that they had achieved a result of 100 million searches per day.

DDG declares not only not selling data to the advertiser, but also a different principle of operation of algorithms that screen out the content called farm content, i.e. focused not on the subject matter, but only on achieving a high position in the browser.

For several years, the company ran a project called Tracker Radar, which collected data about user tracking applications. The results of this study were recently published, which managed to create a list of 1,727 companies responsible for violating user privacy. Whoever is the leader on this list is obviously no surprise, and the top eight players are as follows: Google, Facebook, Adobe, Amazon, Oracle, TowerData, AppNexus and Rubicon Project.

Source: antyweb.pl

Advertisement

DUCKDUCKGO

Why DuckDuckGo want Masses to Sap Chrome

Published

on

Why DuckDuckGo want Masses to Sap Chrome

The security of web surfers is a major issue, and it’s a legitimate one. Your personal information may be at risk because of a breach of privacy. As a result, it’s critical that large internet businesses like Google preserve your anonymity when you utilize their services. However, are the tech giant’s privacy pledges really real? DuckDuckGo, on the other hand, isn’t convinced. With its Threads and FLEDGE services, the private browser has accused the former of violating its customers’ privacy rights. DuckDuckGo is fighting Google over this, but why is that? Let see!

DuckDuckGo Has Accused Google of Reneging on Its Promise to Protect Users’ Privacy

The Search engine has accused Google of making false statements about the security of its Discussions as well as FLEDGE services. According to the post shared in the May of this year, the corporation slammed the latter for making false claims that its goods were more secure. In order to create a “more private web,” The Tech giant established its Security Sandbox in August of this year. Discussions and FLEDGE were introduced at the beginning of this year via the Sandbox once FLoC was discontinued due to considerable controversy.

The concept is that users have greater authority and visibility over their personal information since you may eliminate subjects you dislike or deactivate Topics altogether. When it comes to Google’s FLEDGE product, the company says it’s “built in a way that no other third-party application can leverage it to monitor user surfing activity between websites.” Google’s product promises are called out by DuckDuckGo, which suggests that their software is superior. However, there are a number of other methods available for ensuring your safety when surfing the web.

DuckDuckGo

Why This Fierce Rivalry?

Basically speaking, the former alleges that Google is misleading its consumers by claiming that Topics and FLEDGE are more secure than the latter’s Search because of this. For more information on these services, check out this blog post from the corporation: As a result, it claims that despite Google’s assurances of increased confidentiality, the company’s new services are really “creepy” and “privacy-invasive.”

Since these programs monitor your digital behavior and exchange your personal information with web pages and advertising without your permission, the firm considers this to be the case. – The overarching argument from the former is that your information isn’t secure until privacy is set as the preferred setting.

DuckDuckGo

To provide just one example, it claims Google’s justification that customers may eliminate Subjects they wouldn’t wish to be monitored for is codswallop since most users don’t alter their standard browsing options According to the report, Google’s “dark patterns” render it extremely tough for consumers to accomplish just that. DuckDuckGo claims that FLEDGE operates in the same way as third-party cookies. Ads may approach users on some other pages by requesting that Google classify and categorize them like a certain demographic.

Advertisement

The bottom line is that Google nonetheless sells your information to advertising and renders it difficult for users to modify the configuration to private. Ads may target and re-target your browsing history, which is one major and lingering concern.

Source link

Continue Reading

DON'T MISS ANY IMPORTANT NEWS!
Subscribe To our Newsletter
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address

Trending

en_USEnglish