SEO
AI Content Is Short-Term Arbitrage, Not Long-Term Strategy
For a few hundred bucks, you can hit the big red “publish” button and use generative AI to write every article you’ve ever wanted to write. It’s sorely tempting.
But beyond the short-term dopamine hit of publishing a thousand articles at once, for most businesses, the negatives of AI content will very quickly outweigh the positives.
First up—there is precedent for getting a Google manual action for publishing AI content at scale.
Back in November, the founder of an AI content tool tweeted about their “SEO heist”. They exported a competitor’s sitemap, turned every URL into an article title, and used AI to publish 1,800 articles:
In some ways, this is part of the cat-and-mouse game of SEO. A website identifies a traffic opportunity, their competitors follow suit. But in the month following the tweet, the site’s traffic tanked to virtually zero:
Most of the site’s rankings plummeted into non-existence, courtesy of a manual action:
Crucially, I don’t think that publishing AI content means an automatic penalty. AI content detectors don’t work, and even if they did, Google is apparently agnostic to AI use—but it is not agnostic to bad content or bad actors.
And AI makes it very easy to make bad content:
I think the penalty happened because:
- They published 1,800 pages of low-quality content, with no images, virtually no formatting, and many errors, and
- They tweeted about it and caught Google’s attention.
Even if you don’t tweet about your AI content efforts, the precedent matters: publishing tons of AI content with no oversight is penalty-worthy. For any business building its traffic and audience for the long term, even a small risk of a catastrophic outcome (like a penalty) should give pause for thought.
AI content is, by its nature, mediocre. Mediocrity should not be the end goal of your content strategy.
LLMs, like ChatGPT, work through a kind of averaging. Words are chosen based on how often they appear in a similar context in the model’s dataset, generating “new” content based largely on what everyone else has already said. As Britney Muller explains in her guide to LLMs:
“Instead of randomly drawing a word out of a hat, an LLM will focus only on the most probable next words… It’s like a musician reading sheet music, moving through the notes one at a time. The goal is to figure out what the next word is likely to be as the model processes each word in the sentence.”
To borrow a phrase from Britney, AI-generated content represents the literal “average of everything online.” That’s useful for topics where there’s a single, objective answer (“when was Abraham Lincoln born?”), but less useful for any topic that benefits from nuance, or differing perspectives, or firsthand experience.
You can play with different prompting strategies to alter and shape the structure and style of AI content. But even assuming you go to that length (many AI content tools don’t offer that freedom), you can’t escape a few realities of AI content:
- It contains no information gain: it can’t conduct research, or share personal experience, or vocalize a defensible opinion.
- It gets things wrong: it suffers from hallucinations and regurgitates common mistakes and errors.
- It doesn’t understand you or your business: try getting AI content to tactfully showcase your product in your content (like we do at Ahrefs).
…and this is before we worry about leaking sensitive information, accidental copyright infringement, or the million ways in which unsupervised content could perpetuate bias and misinformation.
It’s easy to look at traffic graphs for AI content and think that “mediocre” content is good enough. But returning to the example of the “SEO heist”, most of their (now lost) rankings were limited to very low competition keywords (as measured by Keyword Difficulty in Ahrefs):
Mediocre content might perform well in uncontested SERPs, but it isn’t enough to compete in SERPs where companies have invested actual effort and resources into their content.
And crucially, it leaves a bad impression on the living, breathing people who read it:
Let’s assume your AI content works. You publish hundreds of articles and generate thousands and thousands of visits. Is that really the boon it sounds like?
For most companies that pursue SEO, blog posts quickly become the primary source of website visitors. For an extreme example, look at the pages that generate the most organic traffic for Zapier—they are almost entirely blog posts:
This is estimated organic traffic (and doesn’t include traffic from other sources), but the point is clear: most of the interactions people have with your company are mediated by content.
Many visitors won’t ever see your carefully crafted homepage or product landing pages. Their entire perception of your company—its ethos, beliefs, quality standards, helpfulness—will be shaped by the blog posts they read.
Are you happy with AI content making that first impression?
Think of the time and effort that went into your core website pages: endless variations of copy and messaging, illustrations and visual design, tone of voice, rounds of review and finessing… and compare it to the effort that goes into AI content, published en masse, unread, unedited.
It’s easy to think of content as “just an acquisition channel,” but in reality, your 800 AI-generated SEO posts will have a bigger impact on the public perception of your brand than your latest product landing page.
The point of content marketing is to help sales. Everything you create should, in some way, help people to buy your product or service.
The types of keywords AI content is good at ranking for are typically low commercial value and unlikely to lead to a sale. By way of example, here’s the estimated traffic value for the “SEO heist” site’s organic traffic, at its peak:
Sidenote.
Traffic value measures the equivalent monthly cost if a site’s traffic from all keyword rankings was paid for through PPC advertising—so it acts as a good proxy for the commercial value of a keyword (a high traffic value means companies think the keyword is lucrative enough to bid on).
And here’s the Ahrefs blog, with a similar amount of estimated organic traffic… and a traffic value six times higher:
Most of the benefit of AI content boils down to lots of traffic, fast—the quality and purchase intent of that traffic is a distant second.
Great, if your entire business model is monetizing mountains of traffic through affiliate links or ad networks. But for every other type of business, traffic is only half the battle. In order to help sales and grow the business, content also needs to:
- Leave a lasting impression and help readers remember your company.
- Encourage people to visit again and again (and not bounce forever on the first post).
- Build trust in and affinity for the real people behind the brand.
Here’s another AI content example. How well does this guide to “Removing Dashes from ISBN Numbers in Excel” tick those boxes?
AI content is good for generating traffic but bad at building trust. There’s no recognisable voice, no firsthand experience or narrative, and no real person behind the writing (unless you take the Sports Illustrated route and also create AI-generated authors for your content).
At best, it’s like reading a Wikipedia page: even if you help the reader solve a problem, they won’t remember you for it. While traffic is great (and more traffic is usually better than less), it can’t come at the expense of trust.
Here’s the most important problem with AI content: there is no barrier to entry. Anyone can do it, virtually for free. If it’s easy for you to publish 1,000 articles, it’s easy for your competitors to do the same, and their competitors, and their competitors…
So even assuming you get good results from AI content—how long will those results last?
At best, AI content is a form of short-term arbitrage, a small window of opportunity to build tons of traffic before a competitor, or a dozen competitors, decide to do the same. With most AI-generated content being pretty similar, there will be no “loyalty” from readers—they will read whatever ranks highest, and it will only be a matter of time before your content is challenged by a bigger fish, a company with a bigger budget and better SEO team.
Over time, you will be outcompeted by companies able to put more effort into their articles. So just skip right to the end of the cycle and create content that has a defensible moat:
- Interview real people and share new information that other publications haven’t covered,
- Collect original data in the form of industry surveys, polls, and data analysis,
- Tell personal stories and share the unique, firsthand experiences of the topic that nobody else can.
Or put another way:
Final thoughts
There are plenty of good use cases for LLMs in SEO and content marketing. You can brainstorm keywords and titles, generate metadata and alt text at scale, write regex queries and code snippets, and generally use LLMs as useful inputs into your creative process.
But for most businesses, hitting the big red “publish” button and publishing thousands of AI-generated articles is a pretty bad use of LLMs, and a pretty bad idea overall. And even if AI content gets good enough to render most of these objections irrelevant, we will still have the problem of zero barrier to entry; if it’s easy for you to do, it’s easy for your competitors.
AI content is short-term arbitrage, not a long-term strategy.
SEO
The 100 Most Searched People on Google in 2024
These are the 100 most searched people, along with their monthly search volumes.
# | Keyword | Search volume |
---|---|---|
1 | donald trump | 7450000 |
2 | taylor swift | 7300000 |
3 | travis kelce | 4970000 |
4 | matthew perry | 3790000 |
5 | kamala harris | 2730000 |
6 | joe biden | 2480000 |
7 | caitlin clark | 2400000 |
8 | olivia rodrigo | 2100000 |
9 | jd vance | 2060000 |
10 | billie eilish | 1720000 |
11 | sabrina carpenter | 1680000 |
12 | kate middleton | 1660000 |
13 | patrick mahomes | 1570000 |
14 | gypsy rose | 1520000 |
15 | jason kelce | 1490000 |
16 | mihály csíkszentmihályi | 1460000 |
17 | timothee chalamet | 1450000 |
18 | tyreek hill | 1380000 |
19 | lola beltrán | 1350000 |
20 | lebron james | 1330000 |
21 | lauren boebert | 1310000 |
22 | barry keoghan | 1300000 |
23 | brock purdy | 1280000 |
24 | drake | 1250000 |
25 | griselda blanco | 1210000 |
26 | ryan reynolds | 1200000 |
27 | zendaya | 1180000 |
28 | scottie scheffler | 1170000 |
29 | aaron rodgers | 1170000 |
30 | casimir funk | 1170000 |
31 | zach bryan | 1150000 |
32 | tom brady | 1150000 |
33 | jacob elordi | 1140000 |
34 | blake lively | 1130000 |
35 | millie bobby brown | 1120000 |
36 | margot robbie | 1110000 |
37 | luisa moreno | 1110000 |
38 | bruce willis | 1090000 |
39 | v | 1090000 |
40 | eminem | 1050000 |
41 | cillian murphy | 1040000 |
42 | anthony edwards | 1020000 |
43 | peso pluma | 1000000 |
44 | fani willis | 1000000 |
45 | etel adnan | 1000000 |
46 | dua lipa | 991000 |
47 | jennifer aniston | 986000 |
48 | bianca censori | 983000 |
49 | megan fox | 982000 |
50 | shannen doherty | 977000 |
51 | mike tyson | 973000 |
52 | megan thee stallion | 971000 |
53 | ariana grande | 960000 |
54 | james baldwin | 958000 |
55 | britney spears | 954000 |
56 | oj simpson | 941000 |
57 | lainey wilson | 937000 |
58 | dan schneider | 933000 |
59 | emma stone | 932000 |
60 | raoul a. cortez | 930000 |
61 | dolly parton | 926000 |
62 | joe burrow | 925000 |
63 | anya taylor-joy | 925000 |
64 | amanda bynes | 924000 |
65 | danny masterson | 920000 |
66 | matt rife | 918000 |
67 | kendrick lamar | 912000 |
68 | messi | 901000 |
69 | bronny james | 901000 |
70 | adam sandler | 898000 |
71 | james earl jones | 897000 |
72 | coco gauff | 892000 |
73 | michael jackson | 884000 |
74 | victor wembanyama | 870000 |
75 | pink | 865000 |
76 | luka doncic | 861000 |
77 | selena gomez | 861000 |
78 | jelly roll | 861000 |
79 | jonathan majors | 840000 |
80 | justin fields | 824000 |
81 | meghan markle | 821000 |
82 | florence pugh | 819000 |
83 | post malone | 813000 |
84 | jayson tatum | 808000 |
85 | diddy | 804000 |
86 | justin jefferson | 799000 |
87 | sza | 794000 |
88 | ana de armas | 793000 |
89 | cj stroud | 790000 |
90 | ben affleck | 788000 |
91 | jake paul | 786000 |
92 | zac efron | 783000 |
93 | scarlett johansson | 779000 |
94 | deion sanders | 771000 |
95 | dr. victor chang | 760000 |
96 | andrew tate | 759000 |
97 | jason momoa | 756000 |
98 | pedro pascal | 755000 |
99 | bad bunny | 744000 |
100 | christian mccaffrey | 735000 |
# | Keyword | Search volume |
---|---|---|
1 | taylor swift | 17000000 |
2 | trump | 12400000 |
3 | matthew perry | 9100000 |
4 | sydney sweeney | 8500000 |
5 | travis kelce | 7500000 |
6 | oppenheimer | 7300000 |
7 | messi | 7000000 |
8 | elon musk | 6500000 |
9 | sinner | 6300000 |
10 | cristiano ronaldo | 6100000 |
11 | kate middleton | 5900000 |
12 | billie eilish | 5200000 |
13 | joe biden | 5000000 |
14 | xxxtentacion | 5000000 |
15 | 大谷翔平 | 4900000 |
16 | virat kohli | 4800000 |
17 | jenna ortega | 4700000 |
18 | v | 4600000 |
19 | ronaldo | 4600000 |
20 | kamala harris | 4300000 |
21 | olivia rodrigo | 4200000 |
22 | griselda blanco | 4000000 |
23 | margot robbie | 4000000 |
24 | cillian murphy | 3800000 |
25 | carlos alcaraz | 3600000 |
26 | dua lipa | 3600000 |
27 | zendaya | 3600000 |
28 | djokovic | 3500000 |
29 | bianca censori | 3500000 |
30 | jude bellingham | 3400000 |
31 | alcaraz | 3400000 |
32 | millie bobby brown | 3400000 |
33 | ana de armas | 3300000 |
34 | sabrina carpenter | 3300000 |
35 | henry cavill | 3300000 |
36 | ryan reynolds | 3200000 |
37 | ice spice | 3200000 |
38 | anne hathaway | 3100000 |
39 | timothée chalamet | 3100000 |
40 | putin | 3100000 |
41 | barry keoghan | 3000000 |
42 | lana rhoades | 3000000 |
43 | michael jackson | 3000000 |
44 | peso pluma | 3000000 |
45 | ariana grande | 3000000 |
46 | jacob elordi | 3000000 |
47 | lebron james | 3000000 |
48 | blake lively | 2900000 |
49 | bruce willis | 2900000 |
50 | lamine yamal | 2900000 |
51 | emma stone | 2900000 |
52 | shubman gill | 2900000 |
53 | simone biles | 2900000 |
54 | rohit sharma | 2900000 |
55 | brad pitt | 2900000 |
56 | eminem | 2900000 |
57 | jennifer aniston | 2800000 |
58 | timothee chalamet | 2800000 |
59 | mike tyson | 2700000 |
60 | megan fox | 2700000 |
61 | lola beltrán | 2700000 |
62 | caitlin clark | 2700000 |
63 | leonardo dicaprio | 2700000 |
64 | johnny depp | 2600000 |
65 | scarlett johansson | 2600000 |
66 | selena gomez | 2600000 |
67 | drake | 2600000 |
68 | mihály csíkszentmihályi | 2600000 |
69 | anya taylor-joy | 2500000 |
70 | madonna | 2500000 |
71 | britney spears | 2500000 |
72 | max verstappen | 2500000 |
73 | jeremy allen white | 2500000 |
74 | gypsy rose | 2500000 |
75 | andrew tate | 2500000 |
76 | kylie jenner | 2500000 |
77 | travis scott | 2400000 |
78 | fabrizio romano | 2400000 |
79 | jennifer lawrence | 2400000 |
80 | meghan markle | 2400000 |
81 | hardik pandya | 2400000 |
82 | keanu reeves | 2400000 |
83 | angelina jolie | 2400000 |
84 | glen powell | 2400000 |
85 | jd vance | 2400000 |
86 | shannen doherty | 2300000 |
87 | jungkook | 2300000 |
88 | jason momoa | 2300000 |
89 | jennifer lopez | 2300000 |
90 | bellingham | 2200000 |
91 | jeffrey epstein | 2200000 |
92 | justin bieber | 2200000 |
93 | florence pugh | 2200000 |
94 | kim kardashian | 2200000 |
95 | ben affleck | 2200000 |
96 | haaland | 2200000 |
97 | zac efron | 2200000 |
98 | tyson fury | 2200000 |
99 | imane khelif | 2100000 |
100 | adam sandler | 2100000 |
In almost every industry, there are celebrities, professionals, or influencers that other people want to emulate. For example, an amateur tennis player might want to know which tennis racket Novak Djokovic uses. Or a football player might want to know the shoes Trent Alexander-Arnold wears.
In fact, Equipboard has taken this idea seriously and created a site around the gear used by professional musicians.
You can do the same for your industry too.
Here’s how:
- Go to Keywords Explorer
- Enter the names of famous people in your niche
- Go to the Matching terms report
- Filter for keywords related to gears using the Include filter
For example, if I entered the names of professional tennis players (Roger Federer, Emma Radacanu, Rafael Nadal) and filtered for tennis gear keywords (e.g., shoes, racket, wristband, shorts), I see 960 potential keywords I could target. If I were a tennis site, I could create a category page for each celebrity and list out all their preferred equipment.
Another way is to enter a relevant keyword into Keywords Explorer, go to the Matching terms report, and observe keyword patterns. For example, if I were a fitness site, I could enter “weight loss” into Keywords Explorer.
The first thing I’ll notice is that many people are actually interested in how certain celebrities lost their weight. The second thing I notice is that the keywords all form a pattern: [first name][last name] weight loss.
As such, I can use the Word count filter to look for keywords that have 4 words, which gives me a list of celebrity-related weight loss keywords:
Want to do keyword research for your site? Sign up for Keywords Explorer.
SEO
WordPress Announces New Executive Director
Automattic CEO and WordPress co-creator Matt Mullenweg announced a new Executive Director for WordPress.org after the previous director’s resignation. Social media reactions, while generally positive, were notably subdued, with many comments focused on the recent WordPress controversy.
New Executive Director
Mullenweg announced that Mary Hubbard, was hired as the new Executive Director. Hubbard was formerly the Chief Product Officer for WordPress.com from 2020 and will begin her new position on October 21st. She recently resigned as the Head of TikTok Americas, Governance and Experience.
The Executive Director position at WordPress.org opened up after the resignation of 8.4% of Automattic employees, including the previous Executive Director Josepha Haden Chomphosy. Mullenweg offered employees who wished to leave $30,000 or the equivalent of six months pay, whichever was higher. The severance package was offered after the recent issues between Automattic, Mullenweg and WP Engine (WPE) which resulted in WPE filing a federal lawsuit against Mullenweg and Automattic, alleging attempted extortion.
Muted Response To Announcement
A post in the popular Dynamic WordPress Facebook Group generated 21 responses within seven hours, with most of the comments a discussion about the recent drama and the Mullenweg’s ownership of WordPress.org and other similar topics (view the discussion here, must join the private group to view).
The response to the official WordPress.org announcement on X was muted, with about equal amounts of people posting welcomes as those who were taking the opportunity to post their displeasure and opinions about recent events.
Seven hours after posting the announcement there were only 15 responses, 21 retweets, and 117 likes.
Screenshot Of Tweet
Typical Expressions Of Welcome
Welcome!
— Robert Jacobi (@RobertJacobi) October 8, 2024
Welcome Mary!
— Michael Potter (@Michael_6of7) October 8, 2024
Typical Other Responses
What does the E.D. do for https://t.co/sbi8NmJkOL? Is https://t.co/sbi8NmJkOL part of the Foundation? Part of Automattic? Something else? Unlike WPEngine, the differences between these organizations, their ownership, and governance are incredibly confusing.
— Jeff Severson (@jeffseverson) October 8, 2024
“Our”? I thought Matt owns this establishment, with foundation having nothing to do with https://t.co/Duw3H6Qbg3. 🤨🤷
— Viktor Nagornyy (@V1ktor) October 8, 2024
Fire @photomatt
— Shay Grafdelver (@shaygrafdelver) October 8, 2024
Read the official announcement on WordPress.org
Featured Image by Shutterstock/michaelheim
SEO
Pro-Tech SEO Checklist For Agencies
This post was sponsored by JetOctopus. The opinions expressed in this article are the sponsor’s own.
When you’re taking on large-scale projects or working with extensive websites with hundreds to thousands of pages, you must leverage advanced technical SEO techniques.
Large websites come with challenges such as vast site architectures, dynamic content, and the higher-stakes competition in maintaining rankings.F
Leveling up your team’s technical SEO chops can help you establish a stronger value proposition, ensuring your clients gain that extra initial edge and choose to continue growing with your agency.
With this in mind, here’s a concise checklist covering the most important nuances of advanced technical SEO that can lead your clients to breakthrough performance in the SERPs.
1. Advanced Indexing And Crawl Control
Optimizing search engine crawl and indexation is foundational for effective technical SEO. Managing your crawl budget effectively begins with log file analysis—a technique that offers direct insights into how search engines interact with your clients’ websites.
A log file analysis helps:
- Crawl Budget Management: Essential for ensuring Googlebot crawls and indexes your most valuable pages. Log file analysis indicates how many pages are crawled daily and whether important sections are missed.
- Identifying Non-Crawled Pages: Identifies pages Googlebot misses due to issues like slow loading times, poor internal linking, or unappealing content, giving you clear insights into necessary improvements.
- Understand Googlebot Behavior: Know what Googlebot actually crawls on a daily basis. Spikes in the crawl budget may signal technical issues on your website, like auto-generated thin, trashy pages, etc.
For this, integrating your SEO log analyzer data with GSC crawl data provides a complete view of site functionality and search engine interactions, enhancing your ability to guide crawler behavior.
Next, structure robots.txt to exclude search engines from admin areas or low-value add-ons while ensuring they can access and index primary content. Or, use the x-robots-tag—an HTTP header—to control indexing at a more granular level than robots.txt. It is particularly useful for non-HTML files like images or PDFs, where robot meta tags can’t be used.
For large websites, the approach with sitemaps is different from what you may have experienced. It almost doesn’t make sense to put millions of URLs in the sitemaps and want Googlebot to crawl them. Instead, do this: generate sitemaps with new products, categories, and pages on a daily basis. It will help Googlebot to find new content and make your sitemaps more efficient. For instance, DOM.RIA, a Ukrainian real estate marketplace, implemented a strategy that included creating mini-sitemaps for each city directory to improve indexing. This approach significantly increased Googlebot visits (by over 200% for key pages), leading to enhanced content visibility and click-through rates from the SERPs.
2. Site Architecture And Navigation
An intuitive site structure aids both users and search engine crawlers in navigating the site efficiently, enhancing overall SEO performance.
Specifically, a flat site architecture minimizes the number of clicks required to reach any page on your site, making it easier for search engines to crawl and index your content. It enhances site crawling efficiency by reducing the depth of important content. This improves the visibility of more pages in search engine indexes.
So, organize (or restructure) content with a shallow hierarchy, as this facilitates quicker access and better link equity distribution across your site.
For enterprise eCommerce clients, in particular, ensure proper handling of dynamic parameters in URLs. Use the rel=”canonical” link element to direct search engines to the original page, avoiding parameters that can result in duplicates.
Similarly, product variations (such as color and size) can create multiple URLs with similar content. It depends on the particular case, but the general rule is to apply the canonical tag to the preferred URL version of a product page to ensure all variations point back to the primary URL for indexing. If there is a significant number of such pages where Google ignores non-canonical content and puts them in the index, consider reviewing the canonicalization approach on the website.
3. JavaScript SEO
As you know, JavaScript (JS) is crucial in modern web development, enhancing site interactivity and functionality but introducing unique SEO challenges. Even if you’re not directly involved in development, ensuring effective JavaScript SEO is important.
The foremost consideration in this regard is critical rendering path optimization — wait, what’s that?
The critical rendering path refers to the sequence of steps the browser must take to convert HTML, CSS, and JavaScript into a rendered web page. Optimizing this path is crucial for improving the speed at which a page becomes visible to users.
Here’s how to do it:
- Reduce the number and size of the resources required to display initial content.
- Minify JavaScript files to reduce their load time.
- Prioritize loading of above-the-fold content to speed up page render times.
If you’re dealing with Single Page Applications (SPAs), which rely on JavaScript for dynamic content loading, then you might need to fix:
- Indexing Issues: Since content is loaded dynamically, search engines might see a blank page. Implement Server-Side Rendering (SSR) to ensure content is visible to search engines upon page load.
- Navigation Problems: Traditional link-based navigation is often absent in SPAs, affecting how search engines understand site structure. Use the HTML5 History API to maintain traditional navigation functionality and improve crawlability.
Dynamic rendering is another technique useful for JavaScript-heavy sites, serving static HTML versions to search engines while presenting interactive versions to users.
However, ensure the browser console shows no errors, confirming the page is fully rendered with all necessary content. Also, verify that pages load quickly, ideally under a couple of seconds or so, to prevent user frustration (nobody likes a prolonged loading spinner) and reduce bounce rates.
Employ tools like GSC and Lighthouse to test and monitor your site’s rendering and web vitals performance. Regularly check that the rendered content matches what users see to ensure consistency in what search engines index.
4. Optimizing For Seasonal Trends
In the retail eCommerce space, seasonal trends influence consumer behavior and, consequently, search queries.
So, for these projects, you must routinely adapt your SEO strategies to stay on par with any product line updates.
Seasonal product variations—such as holiday-specific items or summer/winter editions—require special attention to ensure they are visible at the right times:
- Timely Content Updates: Update product descriptions, meta tags, and content with seasonal keywords well before the season begins.
- Seasonal Landing Pages: Create and optimize dedicated landing pages for seasonal products, ensuring they link appropriately to main product categories.
- Ongoing Keyword Research: Continually perform keyword research to capture evolving consumer interests and optimize new product categories accordingly.
- Technical SEO: Regularly check for crawl errors, ensure fast load times, and confirm that new pages are mobile-friendly and accessible.
On the flip side, managing discontinued products or outdated pages is just as crucial in maintaining site quality and retaining SEO value:
- Evaluate Page Value: Conduct regular content audits to assess whether a page still holds value. If a page hasn’t received any traffic or a bot hit in the last half-year, it might not be worth keeping.
- 301 Redirects: Use 301 redirects to transfer SEO value from outdated pages to relevant existing content.
- Prune Content: Remove or consolidate underperforming content to focus authority on more impactful pages, enhancing site structure and UX.
- Informative Out-of-Stock Pages: Keep pages for seasonally unavailable products informative, providing availability dates or links to related products.
Put simply, optimizing for seasonal trends means preparing for high-traffic periods and effectively managing the transition periods. This supports sustained SEO performance and a streamlined site experience for your clients.
5. Structured Data And Schema Implementation
Structured data via schema.org markup is a powerful tool to enhance a site’s SERP visibility and boost CTR through rich snippets.
Advanced schema markup goes beyond basic implementation, allowing you to present more detailed and specific information in SERPs. Consider these schema markups in your next client campaign:
- Nested Schema: Utilize nested schema objects to provide more detailed information. For example, a Product schema can include nested Offer and Review schemas to display prices and reviews in search results.
- Event Schema: For clients promoting events, implementing an Event schema with nested attributes like startDate, endDate, location, and offers can help in displaying rich snippets that show event details directly in SERPs.
- FAQ and How-To Pages: Implement FAQPage and HowTo schemas on relevant pages to provide direct answers in search results.
- Ratings, Reviews, and Prices: Implement the AggregateRating and Review schema on product pages to display star ratings and reviews. Use the Offer schema to specify pricing information, making the listings more attractive to potential buyers.
- Availability Status: Use the ItemAvailability schema to display stock status, which can increase the urgency and likelihood of a purchase from SERPs.
- Blog Enhancements: For content-heavy sites, use Article schema with properties like headline, author, and datePublished to enhance the display of blog articles.
Use Google’s Structured Data Testing Tool tool to test your pages’ structured data and identify any errors/warnings in your schema implementation. Also, use Google’s Rich Results Test to get feedback on how your page may appear in SERPs with the implemented structured data.
Conclusion
Considering their long SEO history and legacy, enterprise-level websites require more profound analysis from different perspectives.
We hope this mini checklist serves as a starting point for your team to take a fresh look into your new and existing customers and help deliver great SEO results.
Image Credits
Featured Image: Image by JetOctopus. Used with permission.
In-Post Images: Image by JetOctopus. Used with permission.
-
WORDPRESS7 days ago
WordPress biz Automattic details WP Engine deal demands • The Register
-
SEARCHENGINES7 days ago
Programming Note: Rosh Hashanah 5785
-
SEARCHENGINES6 days ago
Daily Search Forum Recap: October 3, 2024
-
SEO7 days ago
How To Stop Filter Results From Eating Crawl Budget
-
WORDPRESS6 days ago
How Open Source Collaboration Enhances Studio – WordPress.com News
-
SEO6 days ago
YouTube Extends Shorts To 3 Minutes, Adds New Features
-
WORDPRESS5 days ago
Automattic demanded web host pay $32M annually for using WordPress trademark
-
WORDPRESS6 days ago
WP Engine sues WordPress co-creator Mullenweg and Automattic, alleging abuse of power