Connect with us


How to Do a Content Audit in 2022



How to Do a Content Audit in 2022


Most of us are so focused on publishing new content that we neglect the content we already have.

This is a mistake because not everything you publish will be a home run out of the park. Sometimes, it’ll fail to rank on Google, or convert, or contribute to your business goals in any meaningful way.

When this happens, you shouldn’t just leave the page to die a slow, painful death. You should revisit it, figure out what went wrong, and take action to improve its performance.

However, before you can do that, you need to find your underperforming pages—which is where a content audit comes in.

In this guide, you’ll learn the following:

A content audit is where you analyze the performance of your content to find opportunities for improvement. Many content audits focus on SEO performance, but a full audit also takes into account the content’s business performance and utility.


Why is a content audit important?

A content audit is important for understanding what you need to do to improve your site’s performance. It helps you to identify pages that aren’t performing well, why they aren’t, and how to fix that.

How to do an SEO content audit

If you’re purely looking to improve your site’s organic search performance, follow this simple SEO content audit process:

Flowchart of how to do an SEO content audit


Here are two things to keep in mind when following this process:

  1. You should only use it for pages intended to rank in organic search – In other words, don’t use this for “About” pages and the like. It doesn’t matter whether those pages rank on Google because that’s not their purpose.
  2. You should take the recommendations with a pinch of salt – Don’t blindly follow the recommendations without manually double-checking that they make sense. Things aren’t always so black and white, and you may need to check a couple of other things manually before confidently executing the action. I’ll discuss a few common “it depends” scenarios below.

This process is based closely on the way our free SEO WordPress plugin works, which pretty much automates the entire content audit process and kicks back recommendations.

List of post-audit recommendations

Example of post-audit recommendations in our free SEO WordPress plugin.

For that reason, if your site runs on WordPress and you don’t want to know every last detail of how the process works, it’s probably quicker to use the plugin. (We have resources to help you learn how to install and use it.) 


But if you’re doing this manually, keep reading as we go through how to answer the questions in the content audit process and what actions to take in each scenario.

Let’s start at the top.

1. Is the page more than 6 months old?

If the answer to this question is no, then the page shouldn’t be audited. This is because it takes time to rank on Google, so it’s not a great idea to make changes to recently published content until it has had time to rank.

For example, we won’t bother auditing this blog post today. This is because it was only published in January:

Excerpt of title and date of our blog post on HTTP status codes

That said, the six-month period isn’t set in stone. If you think three months is enough time for a page to rank or simply prefer to leave pages for 12 months before auditing them, feel free to adjust this number.

2. Does it rank in the top three?

If the page is more than 6 months old, the next question is whether it currently ranks in the top three for its primary target keyword. You can find this information in Ahrefs’ Site Explorer (get access for free with an Ahrefs Webmaster Tools account).

Here’s how:

  1. Paste your webpage URL into Site Explorer
  2. Go to the Organic keywords report
  3. Check your primary target’s ranking position

For example, if we do this for our SEO checklist, you can see that it ranks in position #3:

Excerpt of Organic keywords report results

If your page ranks in the top three and you’re happy with that position, there’s no need to take any action. However, if you want to pursue the top spot, you’ll want to investigate the SERP further to see whether that’s even likely to be possible. And if so, what you’ll need to do to get there.

Learn how to do that in our guide to ranking higher on Google.

3. Does it rank in the top 20?

If your page doesn’t currently rank in the top three, use the Organic keywords report to see if it’s at least in the top 20.


If it is, check to see whether the page is targeting a unique keyword.

The easiest way is to run a site: search for your website and target keyword, then eyeball the results for other pages seemingly targeting the same keyword.

For example, if we run a site: search for + keyword cannibalization, Moz appears to have multiple pages targeting this keyword:

Google SERP for + keyword cannibalization

In this case, it probably makes the most sense to merge these posts into one—then use 301 redirects to consolidate the link equity.

However, if the page is targeting a unique keyword, the best course of action is probably to update it. After all, the page is ranking in the top 20, so it’s showing some signs of life. You may be able to crack the top 10 by adding updates to ensure that:

  1. It’s a good match for search intent.
  2. Its basic on-page SEO is on point (title tag, H1, etc.).
  3. It covers the topic fully.


Low rankings aren’t always a content problem. You may simply not have enough backlinks to compete in the SERP. You can get a rough sense of how your link profile stacks up against the competition by plugging your keyword into Ahrefs’ Keywords Explorer and checking the Domains column for the competition.

SERP overview for "content audit"

You can then see how those numbers compare to your page by plugging it into Ahrefs’ Site Explorer.

Site Explorer overview for blog post on content audit

In our case, it doesn’t look like we’re lacking backlinks, as the number of referring domains pointing to our page is roughly on par with our competitors’.

If you’re an Ahrefs user, you can use Site Explorer to find important subtopics you may have missed. Just plug your page in it, go to the Content Gap report, paste in the URLs of a few top-ranking posts for your keyword, then hit “Show keywords.” You’ll see all the keywords these pages rank for that your page doesn’t.

For example, if we do this for our guest blogging guide, you’ll see that some of the top-ranking pages are ranking for “what is guest blogging”:

Content gap report results

We don’t rank for this keyword because we didn’t include a definition on our page, so we’ll probably want to add this during the update to make our page more comprehensive.

4. Is ranking for this keyword important to you?

If your page isn’t ranking in the top 20 for its target keyword, it’s probably going to take a lot of time and effort to crack the first page. After all, it’s usually harder to boost a page by 20+ positions than it is by just one or two.


For that reason, you need to decide whether the effort is really worth the reward—and that means asking yourself how important ranking for this keyword is for your business.

If the keyword is not particularly important…

Plug the page into Google Search Console to see if it’s attracting any organic traffic.

Excerpt of Top pages report results

If it is attracting organic traffic and you want to keep it, leave the page as is and exclude it from future content audits.

If it isn’t attracting organic traffic, follow this process:

Flowchart showing process for pages not attracting organic traffic

Note that if you’re redirecting the page, you should redirect it to a similar page (e.g., /link-building-tactics/ → /link-building/).


It’s also best practice to update internal links after you delete a page. Here’s how to find these links using Ahrefs’ Site Audit (you can use this for free with an Ahrefs Webmaster Tools account):

  1. Crawl your site
  2. Go to the Link Explorer tool
  3. Enter the URL of the page you just deleted in the search box
  4. Set the dropdown to “Target URL”

You’ll then see the locations of all internal links to that page:

Link explorer report results

If the keyword is important…

You need to figure out why the page is not ranking and take action. Often, this will come down to grossly mismatched search intent—at least in part. If that’s the case, you’ll probably have to go back to the drawing board and rewrite the content from scratch.

However, there could be other reasons the page isn’t ranking, such as a lack of backlinks, a SERP dominated by well-known competitors, or something else entirely. For that reason, if you’re not sure why it isn’t ranking, check out our step-by-step guide to ranking higher on Google.

How to do a full content audit


If you’re looking for a more robust, SEO-first content audit that also takes things like conversions into account, Patrick Stox has you covered:

Flowchart showing process for doing a full content audit

You can see this is a more intensive process that’s pretty much impossible to fully automate, so it’s certainly more of a workflow for hardcore marketers.

Here are a few tools and resources to help with answering the questions:

Final thoughts

Content audits should be done regularly. They reveal how to improve your website’s performance (SEO and otherwise) and help you achieve your business objectives.

Just remember that although automation can help with the content audit process, common sense and manual checks are still important. Never delete or redirect content unless you’re confident that it’s the best course of action. And if you’re unsure, hire an SEO or marketing professional to do the content audit for you.

Got questions? Ping me on Twitter.


Source link



B2B PPC Experts Give Their Take On Google Search On Announcements



B2B PPC Experts Give Their Take On Google Search On Announcements

Google hosted its 3rd annual Search On event on September 28th.

The event announced numerous Search updates revolving around these key areas:

  • Visualization
  • Personalization
  • Sustainability

After the event, Google’s Ad Liason, Ginny Marvin, hosted a roundtable of PPC experts specifically in the B2B industry to give their thoughts on the announcements, as well as how they may affect B2B. I was able to participate in the roundtable and gained valuable feedback from the industry.

The roundtable of experts comprised of Brad Geddes, Melissa Mackey, Michelle Morgan, Greg Finn, Steph Bin, Michael Henderson, Andrea Cruz Lopez, and myself (Brooke Osmundson).

The Struggle With Images

Some of the updates in Search include browsable search results, larger image assets, and business messages for conversational search.

Brad Geddes, Co-Founder of Adalysis, mentioned “Desktop was never mentioned once.” Others echoed the same sentiment, that many of their B2B clients rely on desktop searches and traffic. With images showing mainly on mobile devices, their B2B clients won’t benefit as much.

Another great point came up about the context of images. While images are great for a user experience, the question reiterated by multiple roundtable members:

  • How is a B2B product or B2B service supposed to portray what they do in an image?

Images in search are certainly valuable for verticals such as apparel, automotive, and general eCommerce businesses. But for B2B, they may be left at a disadvantage.

More Uses Cases, Please

Ginny asked the group what they’d like to change or add to an event like Search On.


The overall consensus: both Search On and Google Marketing Live (GML) have become more consumer-focused.

Greg Finn said that the Search On event was about what he expected, but Google Marketing Live feels too broad now and that Google isn’t speaking to advertisers anymore.

Marvin acknowledged and then revealed that Google received feedback that after this year’s GML, the vision felt like it was geared towards a high-level investor.

The group gave a few potential solutions to help fill the current gap of what was announced, and then later how advertisers can take action.

  • 30-minute follow-up session on how these relate to advertisers
  • Focus less on verticals
  • Provide more use cases

Michelle Morgan and Melissa Mackey said that “even just screenshots of a B2B SaaS example” would help them immensely. Providing tangible action items on how to bring this information to clients is key.

Google Product Managers Weigh In

The second half of the roundtable included input from multiple Google Search Product Managers. I started off with a more broad question to Google:

  • It seems that Google is becoming a one-stop shop for a user to gather information and make purchases. How should advertisers prepare for this? Will we expect to see lower traffic, higher CPCs to compete for that coveted space?

Cecilia Wong, Global Product Lead of Search Formats, Google, mentioned that while they can’t comment directly on the overall direction, they do focus on Search. Their recommendation:

  • Manage assets and images and optimize for best user experience
  • For B2B, align your images as a sneak peek of what users can expect on the landing page

However, image assets have tight restrictions on what’s allowed. I followed up by asking if they would be loosening asset restrictions for B2B to use creativity in its image assets.

Google could not comment directly but acknowledged that looser restrictions on image content is a need for B2B advertisers.

Is Value-Based Bidding Worth The Hassle?

The topic of value-based bidding came up after Carlo Buchmann, Product Manager of Smart Bidding, said that they want advertisers to embrace and move towards value-based bidding. While the feedback seemed grim, it opened up for candid conversation.

Melissa Mackey said that while she’s talked to her clients about values-based bidding, none of her clients want to pull the trigger. For B2B, it’s difficult to assess the value on different conversion points.


Further, she stated that clients become fixated on their pipeline information and can end up making it too complicated. To sum up, they’re struggling to translate the value number input to what a sale is actually worth.

Geddes mentioned that some of his more sophisticated clients have moved back to manual bidding because Google doesn’t take all the values and signals to pass back and forth.

Finn closed the conversation with his experience. He emphasized that Google has not brought forth anything about best practices for value-based bidding. By having only one value, it seems like CPA bidding. And when a client has multiple value inputs, Google tends to optimize towards the lower-value conversions – ultimately affecting lead quality.

The Google Search Product Managers closed by providing additional resources to dig into overall best practices to leverage search in the world of automation.

Closing Thoughts

Google made it clear that the future of search is visual. For B2B companies, it may require extra creativity to succeed and compete with the visualization updates.

However, the PPC roundtable experts weighed in that if Google wants advertisers to adopt these features, they need to support advertisers more – especially B2B marketers. With limited time and resources, advertisers big and small are trying to do more with less.

Marketers are relying on Google to make these Search updates relevant to not only the user but the advertisers. Having clearer guides, use cases, and conversations is a great step to bringing back the Google and advertiser collaboration.

A special thank you to Ginny Marvin of Google for making space to hear B2B advertiser feedback, as well as all the PPC experts for weighing in.


Featured image: Shutterstock/T-K-M

fbq('track', 'PageView');

fbq('trackSingle', '1321385257908563', 'ViewContent', { content_name: 'b2b-ppc-experts-give-their-take-on-google-search-on-announcements', content_category: 'news pay-per-click seo' }); } });

Source link

Continue Reading

Subscribe To our Newsletter
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address