SOCIAL
Influencer Kai Cenat Sparks Massive NYC Riot with PlayStation Giveaway

A giveaway by influencer Kai Cenat in New York City Friday turned violent as crowds surged and objects including construction materials were thrown around.
A Level 4 mobilization was called in response to the situation, meaning that all NYPD resources in the five boroughs were called to the area.
Cenat was later arrested along with others connected with the afternoon’s events.
Video shared online and broadcast from CBS News’ chopper showed a huge crowd in Manhattan’s Union Square Park mid-afternoon.
When a large crowd gathered, officials asked people to stay away from the area. The police department told The Messenger it was there for crowd control.
Fans of YouTubers Fanum and Kai were reportedly waiting for a PlayStation giveaway event when events took a turn for the worst.
In a broadcast on Twitch from inside a truck parked near the park on Friday afternoon, Cenat waved gift cards he’d announced for the giveaway, along with PS5s and gaming chairs.
“This **** looking like a movie,” he said. “They throwing tear gas out there.”
He told followers he would not be doing anything until it was safe to do so, before being seen heading out into the crowd with his team.
Fans could be seen running after him as he crossed from a side street into Union Square.
People could be seen running around, standing on vehicles and throwing objects including construction materials and hoardings.
There were unconfirmed reports of multiple injuries as fights broke out.
‘People were suffering out here’
Police reportedly used tear gas to try and disperse the crowd, while drivers were left trapped in their cars unable to leave the area.
At a press conference at 6pm, the NYPD said officers used drones to monitor the situation as it developed and to try and ensure further violence didn’t occur.
“After numerous warnings, and being hit with rocks, bottles and other debris, we started to make arrests to clear out the park,” NYPD Chief of Department Jeffrey B. Maddrey told reporters.
“Individuals were also lighting fireworks and throwing them toward police and each other”
The influencer was removed from the scene for his safety, the NYPD said, and they were in communication with him about the incident.
Discussions are ongoing about whether Cenat would be charged and the total number of arrests is being tallied.
“I personally observed young people bleeding from their heads and faces,” Maddrey added. “I observed young people having panic attacks, anxiety attacks, asthma attacks. People were suffering out here.”
He said the NYPD had experienced events like this before, but never on this scale, and that this showed the power of social media.
Shoppers and subway riders see disruption
Subway service at the nearby 14th St-Union Square station was suspended as events unfolded, but was later restored.
The Union Square Whole Foods supermarket on the south side of the park was being evacuated via the rear service entrance, while NYPD closed surrounding streets and tried to extract a bus stuck in the crowd.
SOCIAL
Walmart says it has stopped advertising on Elon Musk’s X platform

Walmart said Friday that it is scaling back its advertising on X, the social media company formerly known as Twitter, because “we’ve found some other platforms better for reaching our customers.”
Walmart’s decision has been in the works for a while, according to a person familiar with the move. Yet it comes as X faces an advertiser exodus following billionaire owner Elon Musk’s support for an antisemitic post on the platform.
The retailer spends about $2.7 billion on advertising each year, according to MarketingDive. In an email to CBS MoneyWatch, X’s head of operations, Joe Benarroch, said Walmart still has a large presence on X. He added that the company stopped advertising on X in October, “so this is not a recent pausing.”
“Walmart has a wonderful community of more than a million people on X, and with a half a billion people on X, every year the platform experiences 15 billion impressions about the holidays alone with more than 50% of X users doing most or all of their shopping online,” Benarroch said.
Musk struck a defiant pose earlier this week at the New York Times’ Dealbook Summit, where he cursed out advertisers that had distanced themselves from X, telling them to “go f— yourself.” He also complained that companies are trying to “blackmail me with advertising” by cutting off their spending with the platform, and cautioned that the loss of big advertisers could “kill” X.
“And the whole world will know that those advertisers killed the company,” Musk added.
Dozens of advertisers — including players such as Apple, Coca Cola and Disney — have bailed on X since Musk tweeted that a post on the platform that claimed Jews fomented hatred against White people, echoing antisemitic stereotypes, was “the actual truth.”
Advertisers generally shy away from placing their brands and marketing messages next to controversial material, for fear that their image with consumers could get tarnished by incendiary content.
The loss of major advertisers could deprive X of up to $75 million in revenue, according to a New York Times report.
Musk said Wednesday his support of the antisemitic post was “one of the most foolish” he’d ever posted on X.
“I am quite sorry,” he said, adding “I should in retrospect not have replied to that particular post.”
SOCIAL
US Judge Blocks Montana’s Effort to Ban TikTok

TikTok has won another reprieve in the U.S., with a district judge blocking Montana’s effort to ban the app for all users in the state.
Back in May, Montana Governor Greg Gianforte signed legislation to ban TikTok outright from operating in the state, in order to protect residents from alleged intelligence gathering by China. There’s no definitive evidence that TikTok is, or has participated in such, but Gianforte opted to move to a full ban, going further than the government device bans issued in other regions.
As explained by Gianforte at the time:
“The Chinese Communist Party using TikTok to spy on Americans, violate their privacy, and collect their personal, private, and sensitive information is well-documented. Today, Montana takes the most decisive action of any state to protect Montanans’ private data and sensitive personal information from being harvested by the Chinese Communist Party.”
In response, a collection of TikTok users challenged the proposed ban, arguing that it violated their first amendment rights, which led to this latest court challenge, and District Court Judge Donald Molloy’s decision to stop Montana’s ban effort.
Montana’s TikTok ban had been set to go into effect on Jan. 1, 2024.
In issuing a preliminary injunction to stop Montana from imposing a full ban on the app, Molloy said that Montana’s legislation does indeed violate the Constitution and “oversteps state power.”
Molloy’s judgment is primarily centered on the fact that Montana has essentially sought to exercise foreign policy authority in enacting a TikTok ban, which is only enforceable by federal authorities. Molloy also noted that there was a “pervasive undertone of anti-Chinese sentiment” within Montana’s proposed legislation.
TikTok has welcomed the ruling, issuing a brief statement in response:
We are pleased the judge rejected this unconstitutional law and hundreds of thousands of Montanans can continue to express themselves, earn a living, and find community on TikTok.
— TikTok Policy (@TikTokPolicy) December 1, 2023
Montana attorney general, meanwhile, has said that it’s considering next steps to advance its proposed TikTok ban.
The news is a win for TikTok, though the Biden Administration is still weighing a full TikTok ban in the U.S., which may still happen, even though the process has been delayed by legal and legislative challenges.
As I’ve noted previously, my sense here would be that TikTok won’t be banned in the U.S. unless there’s a significant shift in U.S.-China relations, and that relationship is always somewhat tense, and volatile to a degree.
If the U.S. government has new reason to be concerned, it may well move to ban the app. But doing so would be a significant step, and would prompt further response from the C.C.P.
Which is why I suspect that the U.S. government won’t act, unless it feels that it has to. And right now, there’s no clear impetus to implement a ban, and stop a Chinese-owned company from operating in the region, purely because of its origin.
Which is the real crux of the issue here. A TikTok ban is not just banning a social media company, it’s blocking cross-border commerce, because the company is owned by China, which will remain the logic unless clear evidence arises that TikTok has been used as a vector for gathering information on U.S. citizens.
Banning a Chinese-owned app because it is Chinese-owned is a statement, beyond concerns about a social app, and the U.S. is right to tread carefully in considering how such a move might impact other industries.
So right now, TikTok is not going to be banned, in Montana, or anywhere else in the U.S. But that could still change, very quickly.
SOCIAL
EU wants to know how Meta tackles child sex abuse

The investigation is the first step in procedures launched under the EU’s new online content law known as the Digital Services Act – Copyright AFP Kirill KUDRYAVTSEV
The EU on Friday demanded Instagram-owner Meta provide more information about measures taken by the company to address child sexual abuse online.
The request for information focuses on Meta’s risk assessment and mitigation measures “linked to the protection of minors, including regarding the circulation of self-generated child sexual abuse material (SG-CSAM) on Instagram”, the European Commission said.
Meta must also give information about “Instagram’s recommender system and amplification of potentially harmful content”, it added.
The investigation is the first step in procedures launched under the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA), but does not itself constitute an indication of legal violations or a move towards punishment.
Meta must respond by December 22.
A report by Stanford University and the Wall Street Journal in June this year said Instagram is the main platform used by paedophile networks to promote and sell content showing child sexual abuse.
Meta at the time said it worked “aggressively” to fight child exploitation.
The commission has already started a series of investigations against large digital platforms seeking information about how they are complying with the DSA.
It has sought more information from Meta in October about the spread of disinformation as well as a request for information last month about how the company protects children online.
The DSA is part of the European Union’s powerful regulatory armoury to bring big tech to heel, and requires digital giants take more aggressive action to counter the spread of illegal and harmful content as well as disinformation.
Platforms face fines that can go up to six percent of global turnover for violations.
-
SEARCHENGINES6 days ago
Google Merchant Center Automatically Creating Promotions
-
SEARCHENGINES6 days ago
Google Bug Sends Notice To Some Advertisers That Their Ad Accounts Were Suspended
-
SEO5 days ago
Google Discusses Fixing 404 Errors From Inbound Links
-
SEO6 days ago
Is Alt Text A Ranking Factor For Google Image Search?
-
MARKETING6 days ago
3 Questions About AI in Content: What? So What? Now What?
-
SOCIAL2 days ago
Musk regrets controversial post but won’t bow to advertiser ‘blackmail’
-
SEARCHENGINES5 days ago
Google Search Console Was Down Today
-
MARKETING5 days ago
10 Advanced Tips for Crafting Engaging Social Content Strategies