Connect with us

SEO

The 9 Most Important SEO KPIs You Should Be Tracking

Published

on

The 9 Most Important SEO KPIs You Should Be Tracking

If you ask 10 SEOs what their top SEO Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are, you’ll likely receive 10 different answers.

The reason is that KPIs are situational; they are specific to each type of business.

Accordingly, the following are nine KPIs that can be considered important for a wide variety of online monetization models.

An interesting thing about KPIs is that KPIs aren’t always metrics that show where you are winning. They can also be metrics that show where improvement is needed.

Many people rightly focus on metrics related to winning and focus on improving those in order to increase sales, conversions, and other metrics of winning. It’s a good approach.

But there are also KPIs related to failure, and those can be useful for identifying new areas to find success.

So, this survey reviews KPIs related to success and failure, investigates shortcomings in popular KPIs, and introduces additional KPIs that may not be widely known.

1. Customer Lifetime Value (CLV)

Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) is a metric that measures the earnings each customer brings.

In the context of SEO, CLV helps a business identify which SEO activities result in the greatest positive financial impact.

Jeff Coyle, co-founder of AI-based content strategy SaaS company MarketMuse, is passionate about CLV and feels it is an important KPI for many businesses to be aware of.

Jeff Coyle said this about the CLV KPI:

“My perspective on using CLV and why it connects to core KPI is because it’s a Unifying metric.

I love unifying metrics because all teams, all silos, have to support it.

It forces people who typically focus only on one stage of the funnel to think bigger, to think customer-centric.

So in terms of content, it typically means all teams have to think about the entire funnel, all personas, all levels of expertise of the future and present customers.

An SEO focused on a myopic one keyword to one webpage SEO hack or publishing low-quality content may be able to get lucky with a ranking every once in a while.

But that type of strategy isn’t going perform well with CLV growth.

Similarly, a PPC person or a demand generation marketer who isn’t willing to support full funnel content at awareness stage and all the way down but they should, especially for support and customer content.

They get paid on leads and conversions.

Customer Lifetime Value makes them have to care about all the content. It makes them care about customer success, renewals, support and exponential viral growth.”

According to Jeff, focusing on CLV forces all parts of the company to hone what they do toward keeping the company growing year over year.

2. Content Efficiency

Jeff had one more KPI he wanted to share, and this one is Content Efficiency.

Content Efficiency is a fascinating metric because it’s about optimizing content not just for search engines but for achieving company goals for that content.

Jeff explains it like this:

“My other favorite KPI is content efficiency. It’s about how many content items you publish, how many content items you update and/or optimize versus how often those pages meet their goals and predicted ROI.

Average content teams create content that reaches 10% of their goals, 10% of their content is successful.

I get teams operating 40% or more, where 40% or more of their content achieve their intended goals. That percentage defines good content teams.

Looked at another way, the company with the team performing at 10% Content Efficiency is a company that is spending 10 times what they think they are spending on content to achieve their goals.

How much does content cost? $400 to $500 a page? They only get meaningful results from 10% of that content.

So, their effective cost per successful content motion (publication and updating the content) is like $5,000 for the average team.

For a team operating at peak Content Efficiency, the cost is around $2,500 to $3,000 to achieve their goals.

Using Content Efficiency as a KPI, that’s when people really start wanting to improve their content strategy and transition to data-driven decision making for what to create and what to update.

Content Efficiency is one of the core MarketMuse value propositions. Personalized Difficulty metrics. You know what to build and how much you need to invest to make an impact.”

3. Average Engagement Time

I next asked someone who specializes in analytics, Kayle Larkin, about KPIs.

Kayle is an Analytics and SEM consultant for B2B and ecommerce sites in the U.S., Canada, Europe, and Asia, as well as a Content Writer here at Search Engine Journal.

She shared about a KPI available in Google Analytics 4 that tracks user engagement with a website, something that can be difficult to accurately measure.

Kayle shared:

“GA4 (Google Analytics 4) improved our ability to measure whether or not a user engaged with the website.

Average engagement time tells us the average length of time that the site had focus in the user’s browser. That means the user was most likely looking at it.”

4. Conversion Goals By Percent-Based Metrics

Kayle next advised reviewing KPIs as percent-based metrics:

“The most important KPI is conversions/goals. Which should only be that which makes your company money.

However… Don’t forget to look at goals by percent-based metrics, not solely raw event values.

Because if your traffic is increasing, the number of goals will naturally increase too.

But, if the goal conversion rate (expressed as a percentage) is dropping then maybe the organic campaign is not as efficient as it could be.

Or, on the flip side maybe traffic is decreasing but goal conversion rate is increasing because you’re better focused/speaking to your target audience.”

Those two are the main KPIs from an “Is this organic strategy performing well over time?” viewpoint.

5. Accurate Search Visibility KPIs

Next, I asked Cindy Krum, and she shared two KPIs that are proprietary to her company, MobileMoxie.

The KPIs she shared are improvements to accurately assessing search visibility.

Most search ranking reports operate on the old model of 10 blue links. But, the search results are not 10 blue links anymore, they’ve evolved.

Cindy shows how there are more accurate KPIs to track that will give a better idea of search visibility.

Cindy shared metrics that provide a more accurate view of the search engine results pages (SERPs):

“At MobileMoxie, we are looking more and more at metrics that tell the story of the SERP – especially on important head terms.

We know that ranking in ‘Position 1′ isn’t what it used to be, so in our toolset we also look at things that give us more information about the ranking, such as ‘Pixels from the Top.’

We also compare the ‘Traditional Rank’ with ‘Actual Rank’.

Traditional Rank is what SEO’s are used to using, which excludes things like PPC, Knowledge Graph, and other Google assets in the SERPs.

So, what we do is compare Traditional Rank with Actual Rank, which counts everything in the SERPs that can push an organic ranking down, including PPC, Knowledge Graph, Answers, and other Google elements in the search.

This comparison tells us more about the value of each ranking and how visible a search position really is to a searcher.”

6. Brand Visibility In Search KPIs

Cindy next shared another metric that tracks brand visibility in a way that includes all of a brand’s assets, particularly off-site brand assets.

“We have also started caring much more about a brand’s over-all representation in a search result.

That includes how much of the SERP is dominated by brand assets, including content on the main site, and also other content, such as social media profiles and posts, YouTube videos, images, Knowledge Graph results, and everything else that could be a good representation of the brand, and help drive sales and awareness.

For years, SEOs have been optimizing off-site content, and we want them to start getting credit for that work too.

Off-site optimized assets are useful because they crowd competitors out of the SERPs.

So, we developed a score that we call the MoxieScore, that represents how much of a SERP a brand owns.

These are all important KPIs that we care about more now than ever before.”

7. New And Returning Users As KPIs

Jim Hedger, one of the hosts of the popular Webcology podcast, had an interesting take on using new and returning users as a KPI for optimizing web pages for more conversions, particularly for B2B websites.

Many KPIs are situational and depend on the type of site and who the visitors are. This idea about new and returning users as a KPI is no different in that regard.

Jim explains it like this:

“Most of us have clients with varying success metrics but each of those metrics have one thing in common, the site visitor must take a specific action, a conversion event, generally via a click.

Understanding how users get to the conversion event is critical to moving more users towards conversions.

Google Analytics, Google Search Console, and Bing Webmaster Tools can give us relatively good event metrics representing page value in relation to those conversion points.

In Google Analytics, it’s easy to separate site users into new and returning segments.

This gives a wildly different view of which pages in a site are most valuable to which segment of visitors.

Returning users tend to convert at a far higher rate than new users, even though new users tend to heavily outweigh returning users.

New users and returning users tend to enter the website on different landing pages.

Knowing new users are more likely visiting the site for discovery and returning users are frequently visiting to convert, and learning which pages each segment tends to move through on their conversion journey helps SEOs craft content that better suits the site visitor’s intent.

You may be surprised by looking at any KPI while segmenting between new and returning visitors. Since I’ve been doing that, I’ve noticed how very different the actions of each segment are.”

According to Jim, looking at site visitors as a KPI and segmenting the traffic into New and Returning visitors, one will attain a better view of which users are most valuable, and why.

8. Average Time On Site – A Caveat

Average time on site seems like a no-brainer KPI to use for trying to measure the effectiveness of the content on different webpages.

But there are actually some limits to be aware of regarding this KPI that need to be considered before using this as a way to measure the engagement success or lack of success of website content.

Jeff Coyle shared this:

“The average time on site can be a little misleading because if they don’t exclude bounces the data is terrible.”

I asked analytics expert Kayle Larkin about it, and she cautioned that Average Time on Site needs to be justified with data before using it as a KPI.

Kayle said:

“I don’t use Average Time on Site as a KPI so I’d have to see how they’re excluding bounces.

I guess this is one of those where and why things because it’s so situational.

Maybe if it was an affiliate site? Where you want people spending time on your page.

Maybe if they’ve found that people who spend between X and Z time have an increased conversion rate?

Otherwise, I’d ask why is this a KPI? How does this achieve business objectives?”

9. Revenue Per Thousand (RPM) And Average Position

Revenue Per Thousand (RPM) is a way to calculate how valuable your traffic is, particularly for ad-supported websites.

And, Average Position is a keyword ranking metric provided by Google Search Console.

Both of these KPIs can work together for identifying keywords and webpages that need improvement. This is one of those cases where two metrics working together can yield better insights.

RPM KPI

I wouldn’t use this KPI in isolation to determine the effectiveness of a webpage. But, it’s a good way to measure changes over the course of time to evaluate how a change to a webpage affects earnings.

You can do things like make a webpage faster or swap in a different kind of ad unit and through the RPM KPI get an idea of how well or poorly the change affects earnings.

A Google AdSense help page describes it like this:

“Revenue per 1,000 impressions (RPM) represents the estimated earnings you’d accrue for every 1,000 impressions you receive.

RPM doesn’t represent how much you have actually earned; rather, it’s calculated by dividing your estimated earnings by the number of page views, impressions, or queries you received, then multiplying by 1,000.”

Revenue Per Thousand may not seem like an SEO KPI but ad-derived earnings can be tracked to SEO via the RPM metric.

The keyword and traffic choices made on the SEO side will determine the performance on the revenue side.

For example, a common SEO approach is to focus on high-traffic keywords.

But some high traffic keywords don’t have a sales-related intent and this can be reflected in a lower RPM metric.

The most valuable keywords to bid on, for advertising purposes, are the ones with a strong sales intent.

The RPM metric is a good starting point for evaluating which kinds of topics have a good blend of traffic and high earnings.

Average Position KPI

This is a Google Search Console metric that shows the average position of a keyword phrase in the search results.

Google defines this metric like this:

“Average position [Chart only]-

The average position of the topmost result from your site.

So, for example, if your site has three results at positions 2, 4, and 6, the position is reported as 2.

If a second query returned results at positions 3, 5, and 9, your average position would be (2 + 3)/2 = 2.5. If a row of data has no impressions, the position will be shown as a dash (-), because the position doesn’t exist.”

KPIs tend to focus on where a website is winning. And, if the KPI isn’t “winning enough” then the effort is made to improve the KPI scores.

But KPIs that show low performance can be helpful, too.

For the Google Search Console average position report, the keywords at the bottom provide goals for increasing traffic and expanding search visibility.

The first step is to match the low-performing keywords to webpages to see if maybe the page needs an additional paragraph to expand on a topic or maybe a new webpage is necessary.

If Google thinks your website is relevant for a certain keyword but not relevant enough to show it on page one of the search results, then that may be a sign that your website already has one toe on page one of the SERPs for that keyword.

Keywords listed at the bottom of the average position report can be an inspiration for new ideas for growing search visibility.

Top SEO KPIs

The concept of top SEO KPIs seems to me almost not possible to iterate because every business model has different goals. This is why I (and others) say that KPIs are situational.

Marketing Analytics Expert and Canadian Search Awards Judge Alan Knecht makes the observation that because every business is different, each business must begin formulating their KPIs based on their specific goals.

Alan shared:

“Know what you want from your site, then measure that success. See if these successes improve at the same rate or faster than your SEO success.”

These top nine KPIs are not meant to be the absolute top KPIs. They are top because they are worthy of consideration and inspirational for developing your own KPIs that are relevant for your business.

More Resources:


Featured Image: TommyStockProject/Shutterstock




Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address

SEO

Google Ads To Phase Out Enhanced CPC Bidding Strategy

Published

on

By

Google Ads To Phase Out Enhanced CPC Bidding Strategy

Google has announced plans to discontinue its Enhanced Cost-Per-Click (eCPC) bidding strategy for search and display ad campaigns.

This change, set to roll out in stages over the coming months, marks the end of an era for one of Google’s earliest smart bidding options.

Dates & Changes

Starting October 2024, new search and display ad campaigns will no longer be able to select Enhanced CPC as a bidding strategy.

However, existing eCPC campaigns will continue to function normally until March 2025.

From March 2025, all remaining search and display ad campaigns using Enhanced CPC will be automatically migrated to manual CPC bidding.

Advertisers who prefer not to change their campaigns before this date will see their bidding strategy default to manual CPC.

Impact On Display Campaigns

No immediate action is required for advertisers running display campaigns with the Maximize Clicks strategy and Enhanced CPC enabled.

These campaigns will automatically transition to the Maximize Clicks bidding strategy in March 2025.

Rationale Behind The Change

Google introduced Enhanced CPC over a decade ago as its first Smart Bidding strategy. The company has since developed more advanced machine learning-driven bidding options, such as Maximize Conversions with an optional target CPA and Maximize Conversion Value with an optional target ROAS.

In an email to affected advertisers, Google stated:

“These strategies have the potential to deliver comparable or superior outcomes. As we transition to these improved strategies, search and display ads campaigns will phase out Enhanced CPC.”

What This Means for Advertisers

This update signals Google’s continued push towards more sophisticated, AI-driven bidding strategies.

In the coming months, advertisers currently relying on Enhanced CPC will need to evaluate their options and potentially adapt their campaign management approaches.

While the change may require some initial adjustments, it also allows advertisers to explore and leverage Google’s more advanced bidding strategies, potentially improving campaign performance and efficiency.


FAQ

What change is Google implementing for Enhanced CPC bidding?

Google will discontinue the Enhanced Cost-Per-Click (eCPC) bidding strategy for search and display ad campaigns.

  • New search and display ad campaigns can’t select eCPC starting October 2024.
  • Existing campaigns will function with eCPC until March 2025.
  • From March 2025, remaining eCPC campaigns will switch to manual CPC bidding.

How will this update impact existing campaigns using Enhanced CPC?

Campaigns using Enhanced CPC will continue as usual until March 2025. After that:

  • Search and display ad campaigns employing eCPC will automatically migrate to manual CPC bidding.
  • Display campaigns with Maximize Clicks and eCPC enabled will transition to the Maximize Clicks strategy in March 2025.

What are the recommended alternatives to Enhanced CPC?

Google suggests using its more advanced, AI-driven bidding strategies:

  • Maximize Conversions – Can include an optional target CPA (Cost Per Acquisition).
  • Maximize Conversion Value – Can include an optional target ROAS (Return on Ad Spend).

These strategies are expected to deliver comparable or superior outcomes compared to Enhanced CPC.

What should advertisers do in preparation for this change?

Advertisers need to evaluate their current reliance on Enhanced CPC and explore alternatives:

  • Assess how newer AI-driven bidding strategies can be integrated into their campaigns.
  • Consider transitioning some campaigns earlier to adapt to the new strategies gradually.
  • Leverage tools and resources provided by Google to maximize performance and efficiency.

This proactive approach will help manage changes smoothly and explore potential performance improvements.


Featured Image: Vladimka production/Shutterstock

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

SEO

The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

Published

on

The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

We analyzed the organic traffic growth of 1,600 SaaS companies to discover the SEO strategies that work best in 2024…

…and those that work the worst.

In this article, we’re looking at the companies that lost the greatest amount of estimated organic traffic, year over year.

  • We analyzed 1,600 SaaS companies and used the Ahrefs API to pull estimated monthly organic traffic data for August 2023 and August 2024.
  • Companies were ranked by estimated monthly organic traffic loss as a percentage of their starting traffic.
  • We’ve filtered out traffic loss caused by website migrations and URL redirects and set a minimum starting traffic threshold of 10,000 monthly organic pageviews.

This is a list of the SaaS companies that had the greatest estimated monthly organic traffic loss from August 2023 to August 2024.

Sidenote.

Our organic traffic metrics are estimates, and not necessarily reflective of the company’s actual traffic (only they know that). Traffic loss is not always bad, and there are plenty of reasons why companies may choose to delete pages and sacrifice keyword rankings.

Rank Company Change Monthly Organic Traffic 2023 Monthly Organic Traffic 2024 Traffic Loss
1 Causal -99.52% 307,158 1,485 -305,673
2 Contently -97.16% 276,885 7,866 -269,019
3 Datanyze -95.46% 486,626 22,077 -464,549
4 BetterCloud -94.14% 42,468 2,489 -39,979
5 Ricotta Trivia -91.46% 193,713 16,551 -177,162
6 Colourbox -85.43% 67,883 9,888 -57,995
7 Tabnine -84.32% 160,328 25,142 -135,186
8 AppFollow -83.72% 35,329 5,753 -29,576
9 Serverless -80.61% 37,896 7,348 -30,548
10 UserGuiding -80.50% 115,067 22,435 -92,632
11 Hopin -79.25% 19,581 4,064 -15,517
12 Writer -78.32% 2,460,359 533,288 -1,927,071
13 NeverBounce by ZoomInfo -77.91% 552,780 122,082 -430,698
14 ZoomInfo -76.11% 5,192,624 1,240,481 -3,952,143
15 Sakari -73.76% 27,084 7,106 -19,978
16 Frase -71.39% 83,569 23,907 -59,662
17 LiveAgent -70.03% 322,613 96,700 -225,913
18 Scoro -70.01% 51,701 15,505 -36,196
19 accessiBe -69.45% 111,877 34,177 -77,700
20 Olist -67.51% 204,298 66,386 -137,912
21 Hevo Data -66.96% 235,427 77,781 -157,646
22 TextGears -66.68% 19,679 6,558 -13,121
23 Unbabel -66.40% 45,987 15,450 -30,537
24 Courier -66.03% 35,300 11,992 -23,308
25 G2 -65.74% 4,397,226 1,506,545 -2,890,681

For each of the top five companies, I ran a five-minute analysis using Ahrefs Site Explorer to understand what may have caused their traffic decline. 

Possible explanations include Google penalties, programmatic SEO, and AI content.

Causal 2023 2024 Absolute change Percent change
Organic traffic 307,158 1,485 -305,673 -99.52%
Organic pages 5,868 547 -5,321 -90.68%
Organic keywords 222,777 4,023 -218,754 -98.19%
Keywords in top 3 8,969 26 -8943 -99.71%

Causal is a finance platform for startups. They lost an estimated 99.52% of their organic traffic as a result of a Google manual penalty:

This story might sound familiar. Causal became internet-famous for an “SEO heist” that saw them clone a competitor’s sitemap and use generative AI to publish 1,800 low-quality articles like this:

1725893766 634 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS1725893766 634 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

Google caught wind and promptly issued a manual penalty. Causal lost hundreds of rankings and hundreds of thousands of pageviews, virtually overnight:

The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaSThe 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

As the Ahrefs SEO Toolbar shows, the offending blog posts are now 301 redirected to the company’s (now much better, much more human-looking) blog homepage:

1725893766 532 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS1725893766 532 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS
Contently 2023 2024 Absolute change Percent change
Organic traffic 276,885 7,866 -269,019 -97.16%
Organic pages 32,752 1,121 -31,631 -96.58%
Organic keywords 94,706 12,000 -82,706 -87.33%
Keywords in top 3 1,874 68 -1,806 -96.37%

Contently is a content marketing platform. They lost 97% of their estimated organic traffic by removing thousands of user-generated pages.

1725893766 662 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS1725893766 662 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

Almost all of the website’s traffic loss seems to stem from deindexing the subdomains used to host their members’ writing portfolios:

1725893767 584 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS1725893767 584 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

A quick Google search for “contently writer portfolios” suggests that the company made the deliberate decision to deindex all writer portfolios by default, and only relist them once they’ve been manually vetted and approved:

1725893767 266 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS1725893767 266 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

We can see that these portfolio subdomains are now 302 redirected back to Contently’s homepage:

1725893767 27 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS1725893767 27 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

And looking at the keyword rankings Contently lost in the process, it’s easy to guess why this change was necessary. It looks like the free portfolio subdomains were being abused to promote CBD gummies and pirated movies:

1725893767 370 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS1725893767 370 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS
Datanyze 2023 2024 Absolute change Percent change
Organic traffic 486,626 22,077 -464,549 -95.46%
Organic pages 1,168,889 377,142 -791,747 -67.74%
Organic keywords 2,565,527 712,270 -1,853,257 -72.24%
Keywords in top 3 7,475 177 -7,298 -97.63%

Datanyze provides contact data for sales prospecting. They lost 96% of their estimated organic traffic, possibly as a result of programmatic content that Google has since deemed too low quality to rank.

1725893767 1 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS1725893767 1 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

Looking at the Site Structure report in Ahrefs, we can see over 80% of the website’s organic traffic loss is isolated to the /companies and /people subfolders:

1725893767 855 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS1725893767 855 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

Looking at some of the pages in these subfolders, it looks like Datanyze built thousands of programmatic landing pages to help promote the people and companies the company offers data for:

1725893767 323 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS1725893767 323 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

As a result, the majority of Datanyze’s dropped keyword rankings are names of people and companies:

1725893767 895 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS1725893767 895 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

Many of these pages still return 200 HTTP status codes, and a Google site search still shows hundreds of indexed pages:

1725893767 251 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS1725893767 251 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

In this case, not all of the programmatic pages have been deleted—instead, it’s possible that Google has decided to rerank these pages into much lower positions and drop them from most SERPs.

BetterCloud 2023 2024 Absolute change Percent change
Organic traffic 42,468 2,489 -39,979 -94.14%
Organic pages 1,643 504 -1,139 -69.32%
Organic keywords 107,817 5,806 -102,011 -94.61%
Keywords in top 3 1,550 32 -1,518 -97.94%

Bettercloud is a SaaS spend management platform. They lost 94% of their estimated organic traffic around the time of Google’s November Core Update:

1725893767 743 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS1725893767 743 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

Looking at the Top Pages report for BetterCloud, most of the traffic loss can be traced back to a now-deleted /academy subfolder:

1725893767 488 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS1725893767 488 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

The pages in the subfolder are now deleted, but by using Ahrefs’ Page Inspect feature, it’s possible to look at a snapshot of some of the pages’ HTML content.

This short, extremely generic article on “How to Delete an Unwanted Page in Google Docs” looks a lot like basic AI-generated content:

1725893767 574 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS1725893767 574 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

This is the type of content that Google has been keen to demote from the SERPs.

Given the timing of the website’s traffic drop (a small decline after the October core update, and a precipitous decline after the November core update), it’s possible that Google demoted the site after an AI content generation experiment.

Ricotta Trivia 2023 2024 Absolute change Percent change
Organic traffic 193,713 16,551 -177,162 -91.46%
Organic pages 218 231 13 5.96%
Organic keywords 83,988 37,640 -46,348 -55.18%
Keywords in top 3 3,124 275 -2,849 -91.20%

Ricotta Trivia is a Slack add-on that offers icebreakers and team-building games. They lost an estimated 91% of their monthly organic traffic, possibly because of thin content and poor on-page experience on their blog.

1725893767 457 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS1725893767 457 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

Looking at the Site Structure report, 99.7% of the company’s traffic loss is isolated to the /blog subfolder:

1725893767 252 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS1725893767 252 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

Digging into the Organic keywords report, we can see that the website has lost hundreds of first-page rankings for high-volume keywords like get to know you questions, funny team names, and question of the day:

1725893767 323 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS1725893767 323 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

While these keywords seem strongly related to the company’s core business, the article content itself seems very thin—and the page is covered with intrusive advertising banners and pop-ups (a common hypothesis for why some sites were negatively impacted by recent Google updates):

1725893768 58 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS1725893768 58 The 25 Biggest Traffic Losers in SaaS

The site seems to show a small recovery on the back of the August 2024 core update—so there may be hope yet.

Final thoughts

All of the data for this article comes from Ahrefs. Want to research your competitors in the same way? Check out Site Explorer.

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

SEO

Mediavine Bans Publisher For Overuse Of AI-Generated Content

Published

on

By

Single continuous line drawing robot sitting near piles of work files.

According to details surfacing online, ad management firm Mediavine is terminating publishers’ accounts for overusing AI.

Mediavine is a leading ad management company providing products and services to help website publishers monetize their content.

The company holds elite status as a Google Certified Publishing Partner, which indicates that it meets Google’s highest standards and requirements for ad networks and exchanges.

AI Content Triggers Account Terminations

The terminations came to light in a post on the Reddit forum r/Blogging, where a user shared an email they received from Mediavine citing “overuse of artificially created content.”

Trista Jensen, Mediavine’s Director of Ad Operations & Market Quality, states in the email:

“Our third party content quality tools have flagged your sites for overuse of artificially created content. Further internal investigation has confirmed those findings.”

Jensen stated that due to the overuse of AI content, “our top partners will stop spending on your sites, which will negatively affect future monetization efforts.”

Consequently, Mediavine terminated the publisher’s account “effective immediately.”

The Risks Of Low-Quality AI Content

This strict enforcement aligns with Mediavine’s publicly stated policy prohibiting websites from using “low-quality, mass-produced, unedited or undisclosed AI content that is scraped from other websites.”

In a March 7 blog post titled “AI and Our Commitment to a Creator-First Future,” the company declared opposition to low-value AI content that could “devalue the contributions of legitimate content creators.”

Mediavine warned in the post:

“Without publishers, there is no open web. There is no content to train the models that power AI. There is no internet.”

The company says it’s using its platform to “advocate for publishers” and uphold quality standards in the face of AI’s disruptive potential.

Mediavine states:

“We’re also developing faster, automated tools to help us identify low-quality, mass-produced AI content across the web.”

Targeting ‘AI Clickbait Kingpin’ Tactics

While the Reddit user’s identity wasn’t disclosed, the incident has drawn connections to the tactics of Nebojša Vujinović Vujo, who was dubbed an “AI Clickbait Kingpin” in a recent Wired exposé.

According to Wired, Vujo acquired over 2,000 dormant domains and populated them with AI-generated, search-optimized content designed purely to capture ad revenue.

His strategies represent the low-quality, artificial content Mediavine has vowed to prohibit.

Potential Implications

Lost Revenue

Mediavine’s terminations highlight potential implications for publishers that rely on artificial intelligence to generate website content at scale.

Perhaps the most immediate and tangible implication is the risk of losing ad revenue.

For publishers that depend heavily on programmatic advertising or sponsored content deals as key revenue drivers, being blocked from major ad networks could devastate their business models.

Devalued Domains

Another potential impact is the devaluation of domains and websites built primarily on AI-generated content.

If this pattern of AI content overuse triggers account terminations from companies like Mediavine, it could drastically diminish the value proposition of scooping up these domains.

Damaged Reputations & Brands

Beyond the lost monetization opportunities, publishers leaning too heavily into automated AI content also risk permanent reputational damage to their brands.

Once a determining authority flags a website for AI overuse, it could impact how that site is perceived by readers, other industry partners, and search engines.

In Summary

AI has value as an assistive tool for publishers, but relying heavily on automated content creation poses significant risks.

These include monetization challenges, potential reputation damage, and increasing regulatory scrutiny. Mediavine’s strict policy illustrates the possible consequences for publishers.

It’s important to note that Mediavine’s move to terminate publisher accounts over AI content overuse represents an independent policy stance taken by the ad management firm itself.

The action doesn’t directly reflect the content policies or enforcement positions of Google, whose publishing partner program Mediavine is certified under.

We have reached out to Mediavine requesting a comment on this story. We’ll update this article with more information when it’s provided.


Featured Image: Simple Line/Shutterstock

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

Trending