Connect with us


Bridging the Online-Offline Gap with Facebook Offline Events



We all know Facebook campaigns with Conversion objectives. The idea is to define a standard or custom event tracked by Pixel as a conversion action so Facebook Algorithm can optimize the ad delivery by showing ads to users who are more likely to complete that action. This can be visits to a “thank you” page, e-book download confirmation or in more complex cases we get to set a Custom Conversion for events such as button clicks, time spent on a page, scroll depth, etc. We have a blog post on that, in case you’re interested.

But, what if our desired conversion is something not online and therefore not trackable by Pixel? Here are a few examples:

  • A business that runs lead generation campaigns and follows up with leads over the phone to qualify them. They would like to optimize the delivery towards gettings SQLs (Sales Qualified Leads)
  • A chain business that runs store traffic or coupon download campaigns, but the final transaction (conversion) happens in the physical store and on a POS (Point of Sales) machine. They would like to optimize the delivery of their Facebook Ads for customers with the highest Lifetime Value.
  • A client who promotes events on Facebook but would like to measure and optimize for event attendance and not just online registrations.

This is where Facebook Offline Events feature shines. Let’s see what it is and how it works.

As you can see in all of the above examples the conversion is an offline event. Offline Conversion tracking allows us to close the tracking and optimization loop by feeding offline data back to the Facebook algorithm and tie our digital efforts to real-world outcomes. As a result, we will be able to answer questions like:

  • Which Campaign / Ad set / Creative generated the most successful phone calls?
  • What Age group / Geo / Gender / Placement performed the best in terms of generating SQLs (Sales Qualified Leads)?
  • What Campaign / Ad set / Creative has generated the highest amount of in-store sales?

A schematic of Facebook Offline Events attributed transactions.

Excited? Let’s see how we can activate and use this powerhouse!

The first thing we need is an Offline Event Set. Facebook creates one by default that you can use to associate your ads with. You also have the option to create one from scratch. To do so, go to Events Manager > Add New Data Source > Offline Event Set.

Facebook Ads Add a New Data Source dropdown menu

Offline Event Set can be associated to Ads under Tracking settings. If you have created new event set(s), make sure to pick the right one in the Ad level.

Facebook Ad level Tracking settings

There are two main ways to add transaction/conversion data to Offline Event Set:

  1. Syncing it with a CRM through Offline Event Set API: They have several integrations for popular CRM, Call Tracking, and Sales platforms. Check out here for a complete list of all available integrations.
  2. Uploading a spreadsheet: Sounds tedious but in many scenarios, this is the quickest way to get started with Offline Conversions and test its effectiveness. You can export transaction data out of a system that doesn’t support the API and manually upload it to your Offline Event Set. The process is very similar to uploading a customer list to Facebook. The best practice is to upload your data in the shortest intervals possible. Facebook recommends biweekly, but the shorter the merrier!

Facebook Ads interface for uploading Offline Events data.

There are 3 types of information that you can upload to an Offline Event Set:

  1. Customer Data: Information like First/Last Name, Gender, Age, Phone Number, E-mail address, Zip Code, City, State, Date of Birth, Year of Birth or Mobile Advertiser ID
  2. Event Time: The time that the offline transaction has occurred. You can upload events for the last 2 years if you have them available.
  3. Event Details: This includes information such as: Order Value, Currency, Item Number, Event Name

Once the data is uploaded, Facebook tries to match the column headers of the CSV file to a supported field. Always make sure to review the mapping and correct it if necessary.

Facebook Offline Event Set data fields

So now that we are familiar with creating an Offline Event Set and uploading data to it let’s take a look at a few interesting things that we can do with it.

Offline Attribution

As we said at the beginning of this post, the main purpose of creating an Offline Event Set is to get cross-channel insight into your Facebook campaigns and evaluate the performance based on the attribution for offline outcomes. There is even a column preset in Ad Manager for this. For example, you can tell what audience converted better offline.

Facebook Ads Reporting Column Presets

Offline Optimization

Another wonderful thing we get to do with Offline Conversions is to optimize ad delivery for an offline outcome. You can use the fields uploaded as parameters to define a Custom Conversion that makes the most sense for your campaigns. Examples:

  • Loyal Customers: Customers who visit and shop at your store frequently and their order values exceed a certain threshold.
  • Qualified Leads: Leads who answered the follow-up phone call from your sales team and accepted to attend a live demo meeting.

Offline Custom Audiences

Use your Offline Conversion information in your retargeting campaigns. Target customers who have shopped with you before but probably need to be reminded for a revisit. Or, leads who have been sent a quote but you never heard back from them.

Creating Lookalikes

 And my favorite usage of Offline Conversion is using them as lookalike seed to reach people who are similar to those who have already completed the offline transaction. Create lookalikes based on your most loyal customers, most engaged leads or highest value subscribers.

Offline Conversions is an underutilized feature or Facebook Ads platform. It can open up numerous opportunities for businesses that part of the customer journey happens in the offline world. It may sound complex to set up but it’s really easy to maintain after the initial setup and the value you can get totally justifies the time you invest in it.


Facebook, Twitter, and Other Social Platforms Go Offline



Facebook, Twitter, and Other Social Platforms Go Offline

Everything is down. Wednesday afternoon, widespread outages began to affect many of the internet’s most popular services, both social networks and otherwise. As of this writing, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Pokemon Go, and the McDonald’s mobile application a just a handful of the many services suffering from log-in difficulties. According to DownDetector, there’s no regional basis for the services going offline and reports are coming in from all corners of the country.

Meta—the parent company of Facebook—is only reporting “Major disruptions” with its ad service while Twitter says all of its systems are operational. Despite the difficulties, all other status pages for the aforementioned services suggest everything is operational. Keep scrolling to see what people are saying.

Silver Linings


Source link

Continue Reading


Wannabe Blackpool councillor suspended by Tories after civil service staff called 'pedos' in Facebook post



Wannabe Blackpool councillor suspended by Tories after civil service staff called 'pedos' in Facebook post

A prospective Blackpool councillor has been suspended from the Conservative Party following a series of offensive posts on social media that called …

Source link

Continue Reading


Republicans, aided by Musk, accuse Big Tech of colluding with Democrats



Republicans, aided by Musk, accuse Big Tech of colluding with Democrats


Soon after Elon Musk took over Twitter, he began promoting screenshots of internal company documents that he said exposed “free speech suppression” on the social media platform during the 2020 election. Republicans were thrilled.

“We knew Big Tech was censoring conservatives, but the #TwitterFiles keep showing us it was worse than we thought,” House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) tweeted recently.

On Wednesday, Musk’s “Twitter Files” will take center stage in a Capitol Hill hearing where GOP leaders will try to advance their campaign to turn Twitter’s decision to briefly block sharing a story about the president’s son into evidence of a broad conspiracy. Conservatives have long argued that Silicon Valley favors Democrats by systematically suppressing right-wing viewpoints on social media. These allegations have evolved in nearly a half-decade of warnings, as politicians in Washington and beyond fixate on the industry’s communications with Democratic leaders, seeking to cast the opposing party as against free speech.

The Twitter Files show no evidence of such a plot. Conservative influencers and stories from conservative platforms regularly draw a massive audience on social media. But Wednesday’s hearing, which will feature former Twitter executives as witnesses, is the latest effort to advance an increasingly popular Republican argument.

Elon Musk’s ‘Twitter files’ are an exercise in hypocrisy

As House Republicans throw their political weight behind the narrative that Democrats colluded with social media companies, they have formed a new House panel to probe perceived government abuses against conservatives, including allegations of social media bias. Meanwhile, two Republican attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri have filed a lawsuit alleging that the Biden administration is circumventing the First Amendment to censor social media.

Taken collectively, these actions represent the next phase of a GOP strategy, which contributed to the distrust among some conservatives that seeded “the “big lie,” the baseless claim that the 2020 election was stolen. The early warnings that liberal employees inside tech companies tilt the playing field in favor of Democrats have ballooned into accusations that government officials actively collude with the platforms to influence public discourse.

Paul M. Barrett, the deputy director of the New York University Stern Center for Business and Human Rights, said the increased pressure from Republicans have resulted in tech companies “bending over backward” to accommodate content from right-wing accounts for fear of political reprisal.

“The fact that … people are continuing to bang this drum that there’s anti-conservative bias is really unfortunate. It’s really confusing, and it’s just not true,” Barrett said in an interview.

What the Jan. 6 probe found out about social media, but didn’t report

Top Republican leaders have made alleged tech censorship one of their first priorities in the House, scheduling hearings and demanding reams of documents in a multipronged pressure campaign.

House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.), along with House Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.) and Jordan, in January introduced a bill called the Protecting Speech from Government Interference Act, which would penalize federal employees if they’re found to be asking social media companies to take down posts. The House Judiciary Committee has formed a special subcommittee focused on the “weaponization of the federal government,” designed in part to examine the interactions between the Biden administration and major tech companies.

Jordan sent letters in December to five large tech companies, demanding that they detail their “collusion with the Biden administration.”

“Big Tech is out to get conservatives, and is increasingly willing to undermine First Amendment values by complying with the Biden administration’s directives that suppress freedom of speech online,” Jordan wrote in the letters, which were sent to the executives of Facebook parent company Meta, Google, Apple, Microsoft and Amazon. (Amazon founder Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post). The accusations threaten to unravel nearly a decade of investment in people and policies intended to root out violence and falsehoods online — a powerful partisan attack on Silicon Valley, even as President Biden calls for unity to take on Big Tech.

An evolution of a years-long strategy

For more than half a decade, accusations of anti-conservative bias have plagued Silicon Valley, fueled by a high-profile mishap at Facebook in the run-up to the 2016 election. Anonymous former Facebook employees told the tech news website Gizmodo that the social media giant often passed over conservative media outlets when choosing stories to curate for its “trending” news feature.

Though stories with a conservative slant regularly outperform those from moderate or liberal-leaning outlets, tensions escalated under former president Donald Trump. As tech companies scrambled to shore up defenses against misinformation in the wake of Russian influence operations in the 2016 election, they created policy on the fly for Trump’s often false and racist tweets. Under political pressure, Facebook tilted to the right in policies, personnel and public gestures, according to a Post investigation.

How social media ‘censorship’ became a front line in the culture war

Top Republicans and right-wing influencers routinely accuse the companies of secretly tampering with their follower counts or “shadowbanning” their posts, even as their online audiences have grown. For many influencers, promoting how deeply they’ve been suppressed has become a marketing tool, especially after a number of them were invited by Trump to a White House “social media summit” on censorship in 2019. The president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., that year solicited preorders for his book on Twitter by calling it “the book the leftist elites don’t want you to read.”

Prodded by calls in Congress to overhaul social media laws, Trump signed an executive order that sought to change Section 230, a decades-old legal shield that prevents tech companies from being sued over the posts, photos and videos that people share on their platforms. In 2021, social media companies made the unprecedented decision to ban a sitting president from their services in the wake of the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Trump’s ban ignited a new legislative strategy in Republican-led statehouses. Florida and Texas forged ahead with new laws aimed at prohibiting the companies from banning politicians and censoring political views. States and the tech industry have called on the Supreme Court to weigh in on the constitutionality of the laws, after federal appeals courts issued conflicting rulings. The Supreme Court recently asked the Biden administration to weigh in on whether states can bar social media companies from removing political speech.

From the early days of his deal to buy Twitter, Musk has signaled that he shares Republican concerns that tech companies are suppressing their views. Before closing the deal, he boosted criticism of Twitter executive Vijaya Gadde, who was involved in politically controversial content moderation decisions, including the decision to ban Trump. Republicans have summoned Gadde to testify at Wednesday’s hearing.

Twitter lawyer long weighed safety, free speech. Then Musk called her out.

Since the deal closed, House Republicans have pressed Musk to hand over records related to Twitter’s handling of the New York Post article about Hunter Biden. In December, a group of handpicked journalists tweeted screenshots of internal company documents dubbed the Twitter Files, and GOP policymakers immediately teased congressional action.

“We’re very serious about this. We’re very concerned about this,” Comer said in a December interview on Fox News.

Back on Capitol Hill, Comer described the hearing as the beginning of a “narrow investigation” into “influence-peddling by the Biden administration.” House Republicans have mounted a sprawling effort across multiple congressional committees to scrutinize communications between tech companies and Democratic leaders, blanketing platforms and public officials with demands for documents and internal emails.

“I think Musk should be applauded because he’s been very transparent,” Comer said. “He’s putting stuff out there.”

Democrats on the House Oversight Committee say they plan to use the hearing to probe former Twitter leaders on concerns about violence and misinformation.

“Elon Musk has made it clear that he is going to be completely with the right-wing propaganda program,” Rep. Jamie B. Raskin (Md.), the committee’s top Democrat, said in an interview with The Post.

Raskin said that the controversy over whether the government alerted Twitter that the Hunter Biden story could be foreign propaganda was a nonissue, and that GOP bills seeking to ban such interactions would only serve to benefit foreign leaders like Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“I think it should be completely within the power of government to alert private media entities about the existence of foreign propaganda and disinformation campaigns,” he said. “So that legislation … looks like it’s going to be very good news for Vladimir Putin.”

Jan. 6 Twitter witness: Failure to curb Trump spurred ‘terrifying’ choice

Meanwhile, discovery continues in the Missouri and Louisiana case. Biden administration lawyers have attempted to dismiss the case, arguing that it contains no plausible evidence of coercion. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit has been skeptical of the states’ arguments, urging a lower court to consider the federal government’s argument that voluminous documents produced during discovery have so far shown no First Amendment violation.

State attorneys general leading the suit said in a recent statement that the litigation is part of a broader strategy to defend constitutional rights.

“This case is about the Biden administration’s blatant disregard for the First Amendment and its collusion with Big Tech social media companies to suppress speech it disagrees with,” Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey said.

Bailey’s office has promoted emails between the White House and Facebook, in which a White House official flags posts related to coronavirus vaccinations that he finds concerning. In one message, the official says that “the top post about vaccines today is tucker Carlson saying they don’t work.” Biden has previously called on social media companies to address coronavirus misinformation.

Barrett, the NYU professor, said political leaders and government officials have been communicating with companies for years, citing Trump’s dinner as president with Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg. Often, such communication is not nefarious, Barrett said, and has the routine intention of getting out information about how to vote or protect public health.

“We don’t want there to be some kind of impenetrable wall between these companies and the government,” Barrett said.

There is a need for Silicon Valley to be more transparent about its policies for interacting with governments and legal enforcers, he added, and congressional hearings could be a venue for politicians from both parties to ask “fair and substantive” questions about companies’ efforts to promote authoritative information.

But Barrett is not expecting that at Wednesday’s hearing, which he said has “all the earmarks of a purely partisan mudslinging exercise.”

Source link

Continue Reading