Connect with us


LinkedIn Launches New Group to Provide Insights and Tips for LinkedIn Marketers



LinkedIn Launches New Group to Provide Insights and Tips for LinkedIn Marketers

LinkedIn groups can be hit or miss, with many of them over-run by spam, and most approving a little more content than most members would like, which can then flood your notifications and/or home feed.

But LinkedIn may be about to demonstrate how, exactly, LinkedIn groups should be run, with the launch of a new group through which the platform will look to provide community support and guidance for digital marketers.

LinkedIn’s refreshed Marketing Partner Community Group will focus on sharing industry knowledge and relevant conversations, while also hosting discussion around new and coming updates, and insights from the platform itself, to help improve approaches to LinkedIn marketing.

As explained by LinkedIn:

The group is designed specifically for marketers who want to take their efforts to the next level. We want to increase the synergy and collaboration between our marketing partners, customers, and internal experts to help everyone involved reach new heights. If you’re interested in getting the most out of LinkedIn for your marketing, and learning how various third-party connections and enhancements can improve your results across a variety of focuses — from content and creative to targeting to lead generation and beyond — this group is for you.”

That could be great for those looking to take their LinkedIn marketing to the next level, and stay in touch on the latest updates. And while I hate the term ‘synergy’ in almost any context, the description does sound promising in terms of highlighting new tools and options that you can potentially build into your LinkedIn marketing approach.

See also  8 Virtual Interview Tips to Help You Get The Job

In the new group rules, LinkedIn has also sought to establish clear parameters around what will and won’t be accepted.


No network marketing or MLM (Multi-level Marketing) of any kind is allowed to be promoted in this forum. This is not the forum for that type of business. NO SPAM or DIRECT SALES PITCHES ARE ALLOWED.

Which should probably be basic parameters of every functional group, but it’ll be interesting to see how LinkedIn looks to action this, and ensure that its own group doesn’t end up getting shredded by self-promotional posts and other rubbish, which can prompt users to switch off their notifications entirely.

LinkedIn has had an up and down relationship with groups over the years. Once considered a key connective tool for many professionals, the influx of spam ended up turning most people away, and rather than address the rising problems with its groups product, LinkedIn sought to de-emphasize them by reducing reach and notification capacity, essentially putting them out of sight and out of mind for many.

But there is a lot of potential in LinkedIn groups, and LinkedIn has, at times, seemed intent on refreshing them, with presentation updates and management tools to help cull the spam, and re-engage users.

Thus far, those updates haven’t really been able to get LinkedIn group engagement back on track, but maybe, there could still be potential there, and maybe, through this group, LinkedIn will show how group management is done, and will generate more engagement benefits as a result.

See also  On Facebook, Trump’s next false voting claim will come with an info label

Though the key, inevitably, is manual intervention. If you want to ensure that your LinkedIn group is valuable, you need to moderate it, and reject off-topic posts, in order to maintain focus. That takes more and more of your time the more members you have join up, and the question then comes down to how much value you’re gleaning from the effort that it takes to manage such.

Still, LinkedIn’s new group could provide some valuable insights into key platform approaches, and it could be worth joining up to see what kinds of internal discussion it shares, along with case studies, interviews, etc.

It might be nothing, but it might also be the start of a new beginning for LinkedIn groups. Because one way or another, LinkedIn, through re-focusing on its own group, is about to learn the challenges of maintaining and maximizing group engagement in its app.


Source link


New Legal Challenges Could Further Impact Elon Musk’s Twitter Takeover Push



Elon Musk Mulls Tender Offer for Twitter as an Alternative Path to Take Over the App

So as the fifth week of the Elon Musk Twitter takeover drama comes to a close, let’s just check in on how things are progressing.

Oh, it’s bad. Nothing good to see here.

This week, as Musk maintains that his $44 billion takeover offer remains ‘on hold’ due to questions over the accuracy of Twitter’s claim that 5% of its active users are fake, Twitter itself has faced its own drama, connected to the takeover push.

Having already lost several top executives, either directly or indirectly stemming from the pending change in ownership (as well as former CEO Jack Dorsey exiting the company entirely), Twitter is now facing a battle over its board members, with Silver Lake Partners’ Egon Durban resigning from the board after Twitter shareholders blocked his re-election.

Durban was given a Twitter board seat in 2020, following a push by Elliott Management Group to buy up Twitter shares, and force Jack Dorsey out of his position as CEO. Elliott’s view was that Dorsey was underperforming, and it partnered with Silver Lake to put pressure on the company to either improve its bottom line, or accept a change in management.

That lead to Twitter implementing tough new revenue and growth targets, which it recently admitted that it’s not on track to meet.  

In addition to his work with Twitter and various other public companies, Durban has also been a longtime ally of Elon Musk, and earlier this week, Twitter shareholders voted to stop Durban from being re-appointed, in a move that many viewed as a statement of protest, of sorts, from Twitter investors.


But as with all things Elon and Twitter, it’s not that simple – today Twitter itself has refused to accept Durban’s resignation.

See also  Twitter Tests New Layout for Images, Considers Adding Limited Time Tweet Editing

In a statement to the SEC, Twitter explained that Durban’s board re-election was likely rejected by shareholders due to him also serving on the board of six other publicly traded companies. Durban has vowed to take a step back from these other commitments, which Twitter says is enough to keep him on its team.

As per Twitter:

“While the Board does not believe that Mr. Durban’s other public company directorships will become an impediment if such engagements were to continue, Mr. Durban’s commitment to reduce his board service commitment to five public company boards by the Remediation Date appropriately addresses the concerns raised by stockholders with regard to such engagements. Accordingly, the Board has reached the determination that accepting Mr. Durban’s Tendered Resignation at this time is not in the best interests of the Company.”

Why does Twitter want to keep Durban on? It’s hard to say – especially given that Musk has noted that he’ll be looking to eliminate Twitter’s board if/when he becomes the platform’s owner.

The inclusion of representatives from key investors, however, may ensure Twitter maintains a level of stability, in case the deal goes south.

And there could be another key reason to maintain the link between Twitter’s board and Musk.

On another front, Twitter shareholders are also mulling a class-action lawsuit against Elon Musk over his Twitter takeover push, based on the allegation that Musk has ‘violated California corporate laws on several fronts’ with his Twitter acquisition commentary, effectively engaging in market manipulation.


As reported by CNBC:

In one potential violation, they claim that Musk financially benefited by delaying required disclosures about his stake in Twitter and by temporarily concealing his plan in early April to become a board member at the social network. Musk also snapped up shares in Twitter, the complaint says, while he knew insider information about the company based on private conversations with board members and executives, including former CEO Jack Dorsey, a longtime friend of Musk’s, and Silver Lake co-CEO Egon Durban, a Twitter board member whose firm had previously invested in SolarCity before Tesla acquired it.”

Maybe that’s why Twitter wants to keep Durban in-house, due to both his past dealings with Musk, which may help ease the deal through, or to assist shareholders in their class action.

See also  How to Start an Ecommerce Business in 2022 [Steps + Must-Follow Tips]

Durban’s current participation likely doesn’t hold any additional legal clout in this respect, but there may be some linkage between these two aspects of the increasingly messy Twitter deal.

And yes, there is still a possibility that the Musk takeover may not happen.

Musk himself has repeatedly and publicly vowed that he will not pay for the company unless it can convince him that its data on fake profiles is accurate – though Twitter maintains that there’s no such thing as the deal being ‘on hold’ and it’s continuing to prepare for the final transaction to be approved.

But there may also be other complications, with the SEC now investigating Musk’s conduct in the lead-up to his Twitter takeover push. Add to that his many public criticisms and disclosures, which border on market manipulation (as per the proposed shareholder action) and there could well be a breakpoint for Musk’s Twitter deal, where authorities simply veto the process entirely due to his conduct.

Could that be Musk’s plan? Various analysts have suggested that Musk is looking for a way out of the acquisition, and while the overall sentiment is that Musk will, eventually, be forced to pay-up, and take ownership of the app, there are still some legal cracks that he could explore that could end the transaction.


Which would be a disaster for Twitter.

While investors are unhappy with Musk right now, especially since his various comments and critiques have tanked the stock, Musk walking away would leave Twitter in a much lesser state, with many product leaders gone, and a declining share price that would be difficult to correct, given the various questions raised by Musk about its processes.

See also  LinkedIn Virtual Event Attendance Up 231%

Could Twitter get itself back on track, and back to growth, if Musk were to abandon his takeover push?

In essence, Musk walking away would be a big, public statement that Twitter is not a good investment, and as the media hype dies down, that could see interest in the app decline even further, harming growth for, potentially, years to come.

Maybe that, then, is Musk’s real intent here – to harm the company so much that it has no choice but to accept a lower offer price, which could save Elon himself millions in his takeover bid.

Either way, right now, it’s not looking good, and there are many moving parts that must be keeping current Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal up at night.

It still seems like the Elon era is coming, but when, exactly, is a whole other question.

Source link

Continue Reading

Subscribe To our Newsletter
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address