Connect with us

SOCIAL

Twitter Pauses New $8 Checkmark Offering as Musk Warns of Possible Bankruptcy at the App

Published

on

Musk Looks to Reassure Advertisers Ahead of Twitter Takeover, Outlines Elements of His Plan

It’s Friday, so let’s keep the Elon Musk/Twitter updates to a minimum, shall we?

Okay. There’s, like, a lot.

Verification Chaos

As expected, Elon’s plan to sell blue checkmarks, which no longer signify verification (as there is no form of ID checking in the updated process), has led to a raft of people impersonating prominent identities and brands in the app.

Which is what everyone said would happen, yet Elon pushed ahead with it anyway, explaining that it would be ‘the great leveler’, in that it would enable everyone to get a blue checkmark, not just celebrities – even though selling the tiny profile graphic negates the whole purpose of Twitter’s verification system.

Advertisement

The impersonation issue has gotten so bad, so fast, that Twitter has now paused the new $8 Twitter Blue offering, in order to re-assess the process.

Twitter’s also now finally decided to go ahead with its new, extra gray tick for ‘official’ profiles that Twitter thinks need some sort of indicator that they are the actual, legit profile of this specific entity.

Twitter Official ticks

Twitter announced this on Tuesday, then Elon ‘killed it’ just hours after launch, then the gray markers started appearing again, then Twitter announced that they were not rolling them out, then, a day later, Twitter said that they actually would be rolling them out again.

And now, they’re apparently in production, and as you can see above, the gray tick not only appears on user profiles, but also on their tweets in-stream, giving you that cool, double tick credibility.   

In addition to this, Musk has also laid out new rules for parody accounts:

Yet, at the same time, Twitter has also stopped currently verified users from changing their username, which was implemented to stop people from making fun of Elon specifically earlier in the week – so some people who are running parody accounts now can’t list such as per Elon’s instructions, putting their profiles at risk.

Advertisement

Honestly, the vectors for deception and scams have increased drastically with this new ‘checkmark-for-sale’ process, and it’s evident from just the first few days that this is going to be a problem, which is going to lead to many people falling for scams.

But as we’ve previously noted, Musk is only worried about how much money Twitter will get, and with each account paying $8 to run each scam, he seems relatively happy with the process thus far.

To reiterate, the median cost of reported social media scams in the US last year was $468, so scammers are essentially risking an $8 fine for an opportunity to make 58x that, on average.

If you needed evidence that this is a cash grab for Elon, who’s desperately trying to claw back money, then this is it.

But, of course, Elon’s blaming issues with the process on the media – which he’ll keep doing when the number of paying subscribers fails to hit his goals.

Advertisement

Which is going to happen.

If Elon eventually gets a million people signed up for his $8 blue checkmark offering, that would be huge, and if he got two million, that would be amazing. Yet, that would still only equate to less than 1% of Twitter’s overall user base, and Musk needs to get all the real humans paying in order for his broader bot-battling, revenue-raising plan to work.

It won’t, but again, it certainly won’t be Elon’s fault.

Also worth noting here – Twitter originally added the blue checkmarks after being sued by a former MLB player over impersonation, with a scammer using his likeness to dupe people in the app. You’d have to imagine that similar lawsuits will definitely be on the cards after this latest chaos.

Cash Flow Challenges

Advertisement

So why is Elon so desperate to push ahead with half-baked plans so quickly?

Because he needs the money.

At an all-staff meeting this week, Musk told Twitter’s remaining employees that they can no longer work from home, which had been a long-standing policy at the company, while he also informed them that the business may well go bankrupt soon.

As per Musk:

“We just definitely need to bring in more cash than we spend. If we don’t do that and there’s a massive negative cash flow then bankruptcy is not out of the question.”

Twitter was reportedly losing $4 million per day when Musk took over, which is why he’s moved so quickly on staff cuts, and on pushing out something – anything – to make more money. But the suggestion that Twitter could actually collapse has spooked many banks and investment funds that have backed the Musk takeover deal, with some now looking to distance themselves from the business as fast as they can.

Advertisement

Some have also questioned whether Musk has an ulterior motive in tanking the business. Which seems unlikely, but that’s how bad the situation has become, and with all of Twitter’s former senior leadership team now exiting the company (Musk lost four more execs this week, though he did convince one to stay), there’s little faith that Musk will be able to get the platform back on track, and making real money any time soon.

But then again, a lot of people seem to be signing up for the new $8 checkmark option. Or they were, till Twitter cut it off.

There’s also a question on that front as to how sustainable any income will be from that process, as Musk needs people to keep paying, every month, to keep bringing in cash.

That seems unlikely – but then again, if scammers can keep making money…

The New YouTube?

In the aforementioned all-staff meeting this week, Musk also noted his plans to introduce a new revenue share program for video creators in the app, much like YouTube, but with a better revenue share percentage, in order to lure creators in.

Advertisement

The only hitch is that Musk also showed that he has no idea about the competitive landscape in this respect, nor how such a system might work.

As Musk told Twitter employees:

“Let’s just get a bunch of content creators that we think are cool on YouTube and say, “Hey, would you consider putting your content on Twitter, and we’ll pay you 10 percent more than YouTube and see how it goes?” Let’s do that. Okay, great. So you will do that? […] I’m a big believer in having just a maniacal sense of urgency. So if you can do it after this meeting, I would do it after this meeting. Just a maniacal sense of urgency. Like, if you want to get stuff done, maniacal sense of urgency. Just go “aah!” Hardcore!”

The problem is, hosting long-form video at scale is costly, and Musk has also tasked Twitter staff with reducing infrastructure costs by $1 billion.

As a reminder, Twitter cut its separate Periscope app last year, because it was too costly to run, and when you factor all of these elements together, it’s clearly not as simple as just going ‘hardcore’ and flipping a switch on a new video creator monetization program, especially one which, if they do offer a better revenue split, would likely become cash negative for the app.

Along a similar line:

Advertisement

Not sure how happy I’d feel, as an investment partner, to find out that my new CEO doesn’t know that much about the industry, or even the company itself.

For reference, Twitter acquired messaging app Quill last December.

Look, all of this seems chaotic and messy, and ridiculous for the most part. But then again, according to Elon:

Is there some way that he can bring everything back together?

I can’t see it, but I also accept that maybe Elon, who’s driven success at his other companies, has an entirely different perspective and vision here.

And as various Musk supporters have pointedly informed me in their comments on my posts, I’m not a billionaire.

Advertisement

Definitely seems like it’ll need some next-level, Mars colonization thinking to right the ship.



Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address

SOCIAL

Snapchat Explores New Messaging Retention Feature: A Game-Changer or Risky Move?

Published

on

By

Snapchat Explores New Messaging Retention Feature: A Game-Changer or Risky Move?

In a recent announcement, Snapchat revealed a groundbreaking update that challenges its traditional design ethos. The platform is experimenting with an option that allows users to defy the 24-hour auto-delete rule, a feature synonymous with Snapchat’s ephemeral messaging model.

The proposed change aims to introduce a “Never delete” option in messaging retention settings, aligning Snapchat more closely with conventional messaging apps. While this move may blur Snapchat’s distinctive selling point, Snap appears convinced of its necessity.

According to Snap, the decision stems from user feedback and a commitment to innovation based on user needs. The company aims to provide greater flexibility and control over conversations, catering to the preferences of its community.

Currently undergoing trials in select markets, the new feature empowers users to adjust retention settings on a conversation-by-conversation basis. Flexibility remains paramount, with participants able to modify settings within chats and receive in-chat notifications to ensure transparency.

Snapchat underscores that the default auto-delete feature will persist, reinforcing its design philosophy centered on ephemerality. However, with the app gaining traction as a primary messaging platform, the option offers users a means to preserve longer chat histories.

The update marks a pivotal moment for Snapchat, renowned for its disappearing message premise, especially popular among younger demographics. Retaining this focus has been pivotal to Snapchat’s identity, but the shift suggests a broader strategy aimed at diversifying its user base.

Advertisement

This strategy may appeal particularly to older demographics, potentially extending Snapchat’s relevance as users age. By emulating features of conventional messaging platforms, Snapchat seeks to enhance its appeal and broaden its reach.

Yet, the introduction of message retention poses questions about Snapchat’s uniqueness. While addressing user demands, the risk of diluting Snapchat’s distinctiveness looms large.

As Snapchat ventures into uncharted territory, the outcome of this experiment remains uncertain. Will message retention propel Snapchat to new heights, or will it compromise the platform’s uniqueness?

Only time will tell.

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

SOCIAL

Catering to specific audience boosts your business, says accountant turned coach

Published

on

Catering to specific audience boosts your business, says accountant turned coach

While it is tempting to try to appeal to a broad audience, the founder of alcohol-free coaching service Just the Tonic, Sandra Parker, believes the best thing you can do for your business is focus on your niche. Here’s how she did just that.

When running a business, reaching out to as many clients as possible can be tempting. But it also risks making your marketing “too generic,” warns Sandra Parker, the founder of Just The Tonic Coaching.

“From the very start of my business, I knew exactly who I could help and who I couldn’t,” Parker told My Biggest Lessons.

Parker struggled with alcohol dependence as a young professional. Today, her business targets high-achieving individuals who face challenges similar to those she had early in her career.

“I understand their frustrations, I understand their fears, and I understand their coping mechanisms and the stories they’re telling themselves,” Parker said. “Because of that, I’m able to market very effectively, to speak in a language that they understand, and am able to reach them.” 

“I believe that it’s really important that you know exactly who your customer or your client is, and you target them, and you resist the temptation to make your marketing too generic to try and reach everyone,” she explained.

Advertisement



“If you speak specifically to your target clients, you will reach them, and I believe that’s the way that you’re going to be more successful.

Watch the video for more of Sandra Parker’s biggest lessons.

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

SOCIAL

Instagram Tests Live-Stream Games to Enhance Engagement

Published

on

Instagram Tests Live-Stream Games to Enhance Engagement

Instagram’s testing out some new options to help spice up your live-streams in the app, with some live broadcasters now able to select a game that they can play with viewers in-stream.

As you can see in these example screens, posted by Ahmed Ghanem, some creators now have the option to play either “This or That”, a question and answer prompt that you can share with your viewers, or “Trivia”, to generate more engagement within your IG live-streams.

That could be a simple way to spark more conversation and interaction, which could then lead into further engagement opportunities from your live audience.

Meta’s been exploring more ways to make live-streaming a bigger consideration for IG creators, with a view to live-streams potentially catching on with more users.

That includes the gradual expansion of its “Stars” live-stream donation program, giving more creators in more regions a means to accept donations from live-stream viewers, while back in December, Instagram also added some new options to make it easier to go live using third-party tools via desktop PCs.

Live streaming has been a major shift in China, where shopping live-streams, in particular, have led to massive opportunities for streaming platforms. They haven’t caught on in the same way in Western regions, but as TikTok and YouTube look to push live-stream adoption, there is still a chance that they will become a much bigger element in future.

Advertisement



Which is why IG is also trying to stay in touch, and add more ways for its creators to engage via streams. Live-stream games is another element within this, which could make this a better community-building, and potentially sales-driving option.

We’ve asked Instagram for more information on this test, and we’ll update this post if/when we hear back.

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

Trending

Follow by Email
RSS