Facebook ‘glitch’ sent unintended friend requests to profiles visited by users: ‘Spooky’ and ‘uncool’
Meta said it’s now fixed a Facebook bug that was sending automatic friend requests when users visited profiles through the app — which was bad news for anyone covertly visiting others’ profiles on the popular social media site.
“We’re notifying people about a recent update to the Facebook app that briefly caused Facebook friend requests to be sent mistakenly,” Meta policy communications manager Emil Vasquez told Fox News Digital via email after a request for comment.
“We’ve stopped this from happening and have canceled any requests that were sent because of this error. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.”
The glitch caused both amusement and consternation on social media, with some people noting that this made “Facebook stalking” impossible.
“FYI: there’s a glitch on Facebook where if you click on a profile under the ‘people you may know’ tab, it auto-sends a friend request to that person. Just a warning. Now if you’ll excuse me I have a bridge to do a swan dive off of,” wrote one person on Twitter.
Yet another person tweeted, “As someone with a severe nosiness problem this Facebook friend request glitch is very spooky and very uncool with me.”
Under a May 14 Facebook post by The Business Standard announcing the repair of the glitch, one Facebook user wrote, “It’s safe to snoop a [little] again, lol.”
Another commented, “This is why … I got a friend request from ex.”
Additionally, “some found that Facebook sent friend requests to people they were trying to block,” noted website Endgaget.com.
One Boston-based 24-year-old said that this is “exactly why” he doesn’t use Facebook.
BALANCING THE PROS AND CONS OF SOCIAL MEDIA SCREEN TIME
“Forty-somethings and older have taken over Facebook anyway,” he told Fox News Digital, “and this is why my generation likes apps like Snapchat — everything disappears.”
For accounts that might have sent out erroneous friend requests, there is reportedly a fix/
“If you’re concerned you may still have lingering sent friend requests, you can check your pending requests by heading to www.facebook.com/friends,” according to website PCWorld.com.
Then, click “Friend Requests” in the left navigation bar, and next, “click on ‘view sent friend requests’ to see your unanswered friend requests,” the site continues.
It adds, “You can delete any that you didn’t mean to (or don’t recall) sending by clicking on the ‘cancel request’ button next to the person’s name.”
The glitch may cause some people to pause and consider whether visiting someone’s Facebook profile repeatedly can be defined as true “stalking.”
“If you were to ask 10 different people, you’d likely get 10 different answers,” Illinois private investigator Seth Ryan writes on his website, LawrenceryanInvestigations.com.
“For some,” he continued, “simply checking someone’s profile repeatedly is enough to qualify as cyberstalking. For others, it requires more heinous intentions.”
He adds, “Browsing an ex’s Facebook page is a bit different than messaging your ex over and over, for instance, so how do you know what crosses the line?”
Ryan said that two key factors are pertinent: intent and frequency.
“The intention of the communication matters a great deal,” Ryan wrote.
“Just looking at someone’s page isn’t enough to warrant a criminal charge. But threatening someone or sending them dozens of emails will.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Glitch aside, Facebook added 37 million users during the first quarter of the year, reported Endgaget, bringing total daily users up to 2.037 billion.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR LIFESTYLE NEWSLETTER
The number of daily users across Meta’s “family of apps” rose to over 3 billion users for the first time in company history, that outlet also said.
Facebook Faces Yet Another Outage: Platform Encounters Technical Issues Again
Uppdated: It seems that today’s issues with Facebook haven’t affected as many users as the last time. A smaller group of people appears to be impacted this time around, which is a relief compared to the larger incident before. Nevertheless, it’s still frustrating for those affected, and hopefully, the issues will be resolved soon by the Facebook team.
Facebook had another problem today (March 20, 2024). According to Downdetector, a website that shows when other websites are not working, many people had trouble using Facebook.
This isn’t the first time Facebook has had issues. Just a little while ago, there was another problem that stopped people from using the site. Today, when people tried to use Facebook, it didn’t work like it should. People couldn’t see their friends’ posts, and sometimes the website wouldn’t even load.
Downdetector, which watches out for problems on websites, showed that lots of people were having trouble with Facebook. People from all over the world said they couldn’t use the site, and they were not happy about it.
When websites like Facebook have problems, it affects a lot of people. It’s not just about not being able to see posts or chat with friends. It can also impact businesses that use Facebook to reach customers.
Since Facebook owns Messenger and Instagram, the problems with Facebook also meant that people had trouble using these apps. It made the situation even more frustrating for many users, who rely on these apps to stay connected with others.
During this recent problem, one thing is obvious: the internet is always changing, and even big websites like Facebook can have problems. While people wait for Facebook to fix the issue, it shows us how easily things online can go wrong. It’s a good reminder that we should have backup plans for staying connected online, just in case something like this happens again.
Christian family goes in hiding after being cleared of blasphemy
LAHORE, Pakistan — A court in Pakistan granted bail to a Christian falsely charged with blasphemy, but he and his family have separated and gone into hiding amid threats to their lives, sources said.
Haroon Shahzad, 45, was released from Sargodha District Jail on Nov. 15, said his attorney, Aneeqa Maria. Shahzad was charged with blasphemy on June 30 after posting Bible verses on Facebook that infuriated Muslims, causing dozens of Christian families in Chak 49 Shumaali, near Sargodha in Punjab Province, to flee their homes.
Lahore High Court Judge Ali Baqir Najfi granted bail on Nov. 6, but the decision and his release on Nov. 15 were not made public until now due to security fears for his life, Maria said.
Shahzad told Morning Star News by telephone from an undisclosed location that the false accusation has changed his family’s lives forever.
“My family has been on the run from the time I was implicated in this false charge and arrested by the police under mob pressure,” Shahzad told Morning Star News. “My eldest daughter had just started her second year in college, but it’s been more than four months now that she hasn’t been able to return to her institution. My other children are also unable to resume their education as my family is compelled to change their location after 15-20 days as a security precaution.”
Though he was not tortured during incarceration, he said, the pain of being away from his family and thinking about their well-being and safety gave him countless sleepless nights.
“All of this is due to the fact that the complainant, Imran Ladhar, has widely shared my photo on social media and declared me liable for death for alleged blasphemy,” he said in a choked voice. “As soon as Ladhar heard about my bail, he and his accomplices started gathering people in the village and incited them against me and my family. He’s trying his best to ensure that we are never able to go back to the village.”
Shahzad has met with his family only once since his release on bail, and they are unable to return to their village in the foreseeable future, he said.
“We are not together,” he told Morning Star News. “They are living at a relative’s house while I’m taking refuge elsewhere. I don’t know when this agonizing situation will come to an end.”
The Christian said the complainant, said to be a member of Islamist extremist party Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan and also allegedly connected with banned terrorist group Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, filed the charge because of a grudge. Shahzad said he and his family had obtained valuable government land and allotted it for construction of a church building, and Ladhar and others had filed multiple cases against the allotment and lost all of them after a four-year legal battle.
“Another probable reason for Ladhar’s jealousy could be that we were financially better off than most Christian families of the village,” he said. “I was running a successful paint business in Sargodha city, but that too has shut down due to this case.”
Regarding the social media post, Shahzad said he had no intention of hurting Muslim sentiments by sharing the biblical verse on his Facebook page.
“I posted the verse a week before Eid Al Adha [Feast of the Sacrifice] but I had no idea that it would be used to target me and my family,” he said. “In fact, when I came to know that Ladhar was provoking the villagers against me, I deleted the post and decided to meet the village elders to explain my position.”
The village elders were already influenced by Ladhar and refused to listen to him, Shahzad said.
“I was left with no option but to flee the village when I heard that Ladhar was amassing a mob to attack me,” he said.
Shahzad pleaded with government authorities for justice, saying he should not be punished for sharing a verse from the Bible that in no way constituted blasphemy.
Similar to other cases
Shahzad’s attorney, Maria, told Morning Star News that events in Shahzad’s case were similar to other blasphemy cases filed against Christians.
“Defective investigation, mala fide on the part of the police and complainant, violent protests against the accused persons and threats to them and their families, forcing their displacement from their ancestral areas, have become hallmarks of all blasphemy allegations in Pakistan,” said Maria, head of The Voice Society, a Christian paralegal organization.
She said that the case filed against Shahzad was gross violation of Section 196 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), which states that police cannot register a case under the Section 295-A blasphemy statute against a private citizen without the approval of the provincial government or federal agencies.
Maria added that Shahzad and his family have continued to suffer even though there was no evidence of blasphemy.
“The social stigma attached with a blasphemy accusation will likely have a long-lasting impact on their lives, whereas his accuser, Imran Ladhar, would not have to face any consequence of his false accusation,” she said.
The judge who granted bail noted that Shahzad was charged with blasphemy under Section 295-A, which is a non-cognizable offense, and Section 298, which is bailable. The judge also noted that police had not submitted the forensic report of Shahzad’s cell phone and said evidence was required to prove that the social media was blasphemous, according to Maria.
Bail was set at 100,000 Pakistani rupees (US $350) and two personal sureties, and the judge ordered police to further investigate, she said.
Shahzad, a paint contractor, on June 29 posted on his Facebook page 1 Cor. 10:18-21 regarding food sacrificed to idols, as Muslims were beginning the four-day festival of Eid al-Adha, which involves slaughtering an animal and sharing the meat.
A Muslim villager took a screenshot of the post, sent it to local social media groups and accused Shahzad of likening Muslims to pagans and disrespecting the Abrahamic tradition of animal sacrifice.
Though Shahzad made no comment in the post, inflammatory or otherwise, the situation became tense after Friday prayers when announcements were made from mosque loudspeakers telling people to gather for a protest, family sources previously told Morning Star News.
Fearing violence as mobs grew in the village, most Christian families fled their homes, leaving everything behind.
In a bid to restore order, the police registered a case against Shahzad under Sections 295-A and 298. Section 295-A relates to “deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs” and is punishable with imprisonment of up to 10 years and fine, or both. Section 298 prescribes up to one year in prison and a fine, or both, for hurting religious sentiments.
Pakistan ranked seventh on Open Doors’ 2023 World Watch List of the most difficult places to be a Christian, up from eighth the previous year.
Morning Star News is the only independent news service focusing exclusively on the persecution of Christians. The nonprofit’s mission is to provide complete, reliable, even-handed news in order to empower those in the free world to help persecuted Christians, and to encourage persecuted Christians by informing them that they are not alone in their suffering.
Free Religious Freedom Updates
Join thousands of others to get the FREEDOM POST newsletter for free, sent twice a week from The Christian Post.
Individual + Team Stats: Hornets vs. Timberwolves
CHARLOTTE HORNETS MINNESOTA TIMBERWOLVES You can follow us for future coverage by liking us on Facebook & following us on X: Facebook – All Hornets X – …
Source link
-
WORDPRESS5 days ago
WordPress biz Automattic details WP Engine deal demands • The Register
-
SEARCHENGINES7 days ago
Daily Search Forum Recap: September 30, 2024
-
SEARCHENGINES6 days ago
Daily Search Forum Recap: October 1, 2024
-
SEARCHENGINES5 days ago
Programming Note: Rosh Hashanah 5785
-
SEO6 days ago
Bing Expands Generative Search Capabilities For Complex Queries
-
WORDPRESS6 days ago
How to Easily Add Snapchat Pixel for WooCommerce in WordPress
-
SEARCHENGINES4 days ago
Daily Search Forum Recap: October 3, 2024
-
WORDPRESS5 days ago
How to Create A Website to Sell Products In 8 Steps [+6 Expert Tips]