John Mueller from Google shared something both funny and mostly true about SEO tasks. He basically said that it is often hard or even sometimes impossible to know which SEO tasks led to ranking success, even after it is all set and done. John said on Twitter “you can’t even tell afterwards” which SEO tasks worked or not.
I’ve been writing about the SEO space for over 18 years now, and watching it for maybe over 21 years now. There is a lot of truth to that statement. You can put 10 SEOS on a single project and each SEO can claim that their tactic was why the site had SEO success. One guy worked on schema, one gal worked on speed, another bot worked on alt tags, etc etc. Truth is, probably they all had some small effect to have some larger result.
The set of tweets is a good one, let me share it:
Partially it’s also just that prioritizing SEO efforts is super hard, takes a lot of experience, and requires that you take leaps of faith sometimes. It’s easy to find 100 things to do for SEO, but which one is the right one to focus on right now? You can’t even tell afterwards.
— 🧀 John 🧀 (@JohnMu) December 15, 2021
You can see the frustration one SEO has around some SEOs just throwing SEO at the wall and then waiting to see what sticks. John responded that for many, “prioritizing SEO efforts is super hard, takes a lot of experience, and requires that you take leaps of faith sometimes. It’s easy to find 100 things to do for SEO, but which one is the right one to focus on right now.” Very true – but often, you need to do the 100 things these days and doing the one thing is rarely going to give you a win – that is unless the site’s title tags all say homepage or the pages can’t be indexed – like big SEO mistakes.
Some things are easy: fixing a technically broken site & seeing it rank is an obvious win. But for the rest, is a 10% improvement a sign you did the right thing? or could the other have resulted in +50%?
— 🧀 John 🧀 (@JohnMu) December 15, 2021
In any event, I thought you’d all like these tweets.
Forum discussion at Twitter.
Well, not exactly. It was more about prioritization.
— 🧀 John 🧀 (@JohnMu) December 16, 2021
Google to pay $391.5 million settlement over location tracking, state AGs say
Google has agreed to pay a $391.5 million settlement to 40 states to resolve accusations that it tracked people’s locations in violation of state laws, including snooping on consumers’ whereabouts even after they told the tech behemoth to bug off.
Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry said it is time for Big Tech to recognize state laws that limit data collection efforts.
“I have been ringing the alarm bell on big tech for years, and this is why,” Mr. Landry, a Republican, said in a statement Monday. “Citizens must be able to make informed decisions about what information they release to big tech.”
The attorneys general said the investigation resulted in the largest-ever multistate privacy settlement. Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, a Democrat, said Google’s penalty is a “historic win for consumers.”
“Location data is among the most sensitive and valuable personal information Google collects, and there are so many reasons why a consumer may opt out of tracking,” Mr. Tong said. “Our investigation found that Google continued to collect this personal information even after consumers told them not to. That is an unacceptable invasion of consumer privacy, and a violation of state law.”
Location tracking can help tech companies sell digital ads to marketers looking to connect with consumers within their vicinity. It’s another tool in a data-gathering toolkit that generates more than $200 billion in annual ad revenue for Google, accounting for most of the profits pouring into the coffers of its corporate parent, Alphabet, which has a market value of $1.2 trillion.
The settlement is part of a series of legal challenges to Big Tech in the U.S. and around the world, which include consumer protection and antitrust lawsuits.
Though Google, based in Mountain View, California, said it fixed the problems several years ago, the company’s critics remained skeptical. State attorneys general who also have tussled with Google have questioned whether the tech company will follow through on its commitments.
The states aren’t dialing back their scrutiny of Google’s empire.
Last month, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said he was filing a lawsuit over reports that Google unlawfully collected millions of Texans’ biometric data such as “voiceprints and records of face geometry.”
The states began investigating Google’s location tracking after The Associated Press reported in 2018 that Android devices and iPhones were storing location data despite the activation of privacy settings intended to prevent the company from following along.
Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich went after the company in May 2020. The state’s lawsuit charged that the company had defrauded its users by misleading them into believing they could keep their whereabouts private by turning off location tracking in the settings of their software.
Arizona settled its case with Google for $85 million last month. By then, attorneys general in several other states and the District of Columbia had pounced with their own lawsuits seeking to hold Google accountable.
Along with the hefty penalty, the state attorneys general said, Google must not hide key information about location tracking, must give users detailed information about the types of location tracking information Google collects, and must show additional information to people when users turn location-related account settings to “off.”
States will receive differing sums from the settlement. Mr. Landry’s office said Louisiana would receive more than $12.7 million, and Mr. Tong’s office said Connecticut would collect more than $6.5 million.
The financial penalty will not cripple Google’s business. The company raked in $69 billion in revenue for the third quarter of 2022, according to reports, yielding about $13.9 billion in profit.
Google downplayed its location-tracking tools Monday and said it changed the products at issue long ago.
“Consistent with improvements we’ve made in recent years, we have settled this investigation which was based on outdated product policies that we changed years ago,” Google spokesman Jose Castaneda said in a statement.
Google product managers Marlo McGriff and David Monsees defended their company’s Search and Maps products’ usage of location information.
“Location information lets us offer you a more helpful experience when you use our products,” the two men wrote on Google’s blog. “From Google Maps’ driving directions that show you how to avoid traffic to Google Search surfacing local restaurants and letting you know how busy they are, location information helps connect experiences across Google to what’s most relevant and useful.”
The blog post touted transparency tools and auto-delete controls that Google has developed in recent years and said the private browsing Incognito mode prevents Google Maps from saving an account’s search history.
Mr. McGriff and Mr. Monsees said Google would make changes to its products as part of the settlement. The changes include simplifying the process for deleting location data, updating the method to set up an account and revamping information hubs.
“We’ll provide a new control that allows users to easily turn off their Location History and Web & App Activity settings and delete their past data in one simple flow,” Mr. McGriff and Mr. Monsees wrote. “We’ll also continue deleting Location History data for users who have not recently contributed new Location History data to their account.”
• This article is based in part on wire service reports.
17 Types Of Content Marketing You Can Use
Twitter Removes the Option to Create Moments, Effectively Shutting Down the Feature
Google Adds Disclaimer To Appointment Providers Links In Local Panel
Will Artificial Intelligence Take Over the Role of Visual Effects Artists?
5 Strategies for Growing Your Business Through Digital Marketing
LinkedIn Announces New Privacy-Friendly Ad Targeting Options for B2B Brands
Daily Search Forum Recap: December 7, 2022
LinkedIn Newsletters: What I’ve Learned (So Far)
Google Tag Manager: A GA4 Beginners Guide
FAQs: How blockchain and cloud compare
B2C marketing: A guide for marketers
This Week’s Deals with Gold and Spotlight Sale, Plus Xbox Black Friday Sale
Vampire Survivors Available Today with Xbox Game Pass for Xbox Series X|S and Xbox One
Xbox Shares Community Safety Approach in Transparency Report
Identifying an Effective B2B Target Market for Ads
8 eCommerce Marketing Strategies for 2022 and Beyond
How Metaverse is Reshaping the Tourism Industry
Deep Rock Galactic Season 03: Plaguefall Infects Xbox
Available Now: Get Frosty in Halo Infinite’s Winter Update
Is Reading Level A Google Ranking Factor?
SEARCHENGINES6 days ago
Google Testing Map Interface Within Search Result Snippets
SEARCHENGINES5 days ago
Google Says If Your Most Important Page Is Terrible, Then That Is A Big Deal For SEO
SEARCHENGINES7 days ago
Google Sues Company That Scams Small Businesses By Impersonating Google
SOCIAL6 days ago
Meta Launches Two New Art Projects to Highlight the Creative Opportunities of the Metaverse