Connect with us

MARKETING

8 Factors to Consider Before Buying or Building your AI Solution

Published

on

Artificial intelligence (AI) – it’s here, it’s there, it’s everywhere. Businesses in every vertical – retail, finance, healthcare, manufacturing, transport, supply chain, entertainment, and technology – use AI.

More than a quarter of companies using AI attribute at least 5% of their earnings before interest and taxes to AI. Almost two-thirds of early AI adopters note AI gives them a competitive advantage. Given the benefits, it’s hardly surprising that some businesses have FOMO on AI.

But when the company is ready to adopt AI, they face a dilemma – should they buy or build? Read on to learn about factors to consider when deciding on AI solutions for your business.

AI for business

Startups and big enterprises ready to adopt AI have two ways to go about it: Build their own AI model or buy commercially available AI software. Both options involve the use of open-source AI or off-the-shelf product such as free live chat apps

Before dissecting the build vs buy dilemma, it’s important to understand open-source and proprietary AI software.

Open-source AI

Open-source AI includes freely available AI tools. These could be algorithms, datasets, ready-to-use application programming interfaces (APIs), libraries of codes, or a combination of all. Some of the free AI and machine learning (ML) platforms are Tensorflow, Python, PyTorch, KNIME, Apache Spark, and H2O.ai.

Usually, each AI software has specific use cases like speech recognition, computer vision, ML, natural language processing (NLP), or big data analytics. For instance, TensorFlow and PyTorch are suited for building ML and deep learning models. Libraries like Keras and OpenNN, on the other hand, are artificial neural network (ANN) frameworks. Businesses leverage these libraries and platforms to build their own AI system based on their requirements.  

Commercial AI software

From chatbots and conversational AI to automation and advanced data science, there are many ready-to-use AI tools.  Though it’s costly, these tools can save a lot of resources and time for the company. The most common commercial model of AI software is the annual subscription model that includes necessary licenses, support, and service from vendors. Another type is “pay-as-you-go”  where one can access the AI software as an API.

Major tech companies like Google, Microsoft, Amazon, IBM, and Salesforce also offer AI and ML as a platform service. These AI services provide end-to-end cloud-hosted platforms for developing and deploying AI models.

Breaking down the build vs buy dilemma

Imagine you need a new house – would you buy or build one? Choosing between the two depends on a lot of factors. What kind of house do you want? What resources do you have on hand? How much time and money do you have? And how much of each are you willing to spend?

Deciding on whether you want to build or buy your AI for your business is similar. Let’s look at the factors you should consider before taking the plunge.

The need: Why do you need AI?

Diving into algorithms and neural networks before figuring out what you want from AI is a bit like diving into the ocean to find a lost treasure that might or might not exist. What is your business looking to achieve by using AI tools? Is AI a core component of future business growth? Or is it to automate a task or improve business processes?

If AI is the core of your business, build it. If you want to use AI for just specific business operations, then buy. A chatbot provider needs to build its own NLP model. But a small online startup doesn’t have to build a huge NLP model to have a chatbot on its website. It can simply buy the tool from conversational AI providers like Dialpad or Drift and improve customer experience.

The difficulty: How complex is the AI solution?

The complexity of the AI solution the business is looking to adopt is also an important element to think about. There are many tried and tested products in the market that you can buy for common AI applications, like sales and marketing automation processes, predictive forecasting, chatbots, speech-to-text, or machine translation.

But sometimes, the data involved is sensitive or the business is looking for a novel solution.  Commercial tools are simply not suitable or sufficient in these cases. Netflix, for instance, built its own proprietary AI model that offers personalized movies and shows recommendations based on user data. It was worth it to build because Netflix considers this feature critical to its business.

On the other hand, Woodside Energy, an oil and gas company, leveraged IBM Watson’s ML and NLP tech to make 30 years of data on oil platform operations accessible throughout the company.  Woodside owns the data, but shared it with IBM to tap their expertise instead of building it in-house.

The human effort: Do you have the right people?

Evaluate the AI capabilities of your in-house experts. Can your pool of technical experts develop AI frameworks?  Or does your firm have the resources to hire such experts? If yes, then the firm can think about building an AI model in-house.

Tech companies, AI vendors, and large enterprises in the banking, retail, and healthcare sectors have a huge pool of AI experts working exclusively on AI and have the resources to develop their solutions in-house.

Bank of America, for example, built its own virtual banking assistant, Erica. By the time the bank’s AI assistant was in the beta phase in 2017, the bank had a dedicated team of more than 100 people working on the project.

However, if the firm doesn’t have technical expertise or resources to hire, it’s best to purchase from a vendor. For example, a small marketing firm can buy an AI-powered content creation tool rather than investing millions to hire a team and develop it in-house.

The time: What’s the deadline?

Do you need the AI software immediately? Or can you wait to get a custom tool?

If your business needs the tool at once, and there are already multiple products available to purchase, then buying is the ideal solution. But, if the company needs a custom tool that needs time to build, the firm can develop on its own, given it has the resources to do it.

The cost: What’s the budget?

Many enterprises fail to understand the true cost of building or buying an AI model. Both options require heavy investment to get the right people, hardware, and software.

A company can cut some costs by building AI using free, open-source software. But there are other prices to pay. From getting training data to buying necessary software and hardware like cloud storage, expensive computing power, and AI operationalization software, there are significant hidden costs involved. Companies have to cough up more to hire (expensive and rare) AI experts. The average base pay for an AI job is easily above $100,000 in the USA.

Buying a third-party AI solution solves the problem of having to spend on hiring an AI team. But commercial tools can still be expensive.  A custom AI solution can cost from $6000 to over $300,000 per solution while a third-party software can cost up to $40,000 per year. Firms will have to weigh the costs of both options and decide.

The integration:  Can your current tech support AI?

It’s critical to gauge how well the existing IT infrastructure can integrate with AI, whether building or buying. The team should look at whether the AI platform can sync with their current tech stack. More often than not, open-source platforms have integration and scaling issues.

Commercial vendors take care of the dreaded task of AI integration, scaling, and compatibility issues. But it’s always better to check the compatibility of the vendor tool with the existing ecosystem. If you’re integrating an AI solution to optimize your lead generation process, it should seamlessly integrate with your existing CRM. Ignoring this can become costly to fix.

The service: What happens when something goes wrong??

With commercial products, there’s always vendor service and support. The AI vendor has responsibility and accountability for the smooth functioning of the tool. Your team can rely on them  to fix bugs and other issues that crop up in the AI model. While building AI, the company has to deal with any issues that crop up without much support.

The security: Is your AI safe?  

Both open-source and commercial AI platforms have potential security risks. Unlike popular opinion that open source has more vulnerabilities, nearly 90% of IT leaders think it’s as secure or more secure than proprietary software. So the question is not about which option is more secure but which needs more support. The answer is building with open source. AI vendors take care of security issues and fix bugs and patches themselves. But building AI in-house means having a team dedicated to looking at potential security issues. This adds significant costs to the budget.

Building vs buying AI: Weighing the pros and cons

Let‘s make your decision-making on AI solutions a little easier. Here are some common advantages and disadvantages of building vs buying AI.

Pros and cons of building AI

Building an in-house AI using open-source frameworks suits firms that have unique data and the capability to invest time and resources. Its advantages include:

  • no or low-cost investment in the tech
  • better customization based on needs
  • control over both data and the model
  • flexibility to change the model when required
  • community support

However, open-source AI platforms have several gaps like:

  • high turnaround time
  • difficulty in hiring AI experts and data scientists
  • lack of service and support to solve issues
  • added security cost  
  • compatibility issues with other software

Pros and cons of  buying proprietary AI

Buying an off-the-shelf commercial tool might be best for companies that don’t have the human resources to build their own solution or lack unique datasets. Its advantages include:

  • specialized knowledge for a particular AI use case
  • availability of large, well-organized training datasets
  • seamless integration of AI tools into existing infrastructure
  • ability to scale AI models
  • continuous vendor service and support to solve issues

But commercial products have their own drawbacks like:

  • high investment cost
  • fewer customization options
  • risk of losing access to critical data
  • vendor lock-in periods

Still confused? Go for the lean strategy

If you’re still confused after assessing all factors, think about the lean AI strategy. The strategy comes from the Japanese manufacturing industries’ philosophy called the lean manufacturing process. Adopted by carmakers like Toyota, the strategy aims to reduce production waste without sacrificing efficiency and quality.

The lean AI strategy also aims for the same: implement AI incrementally while reducing resource costs and risks. The business can start with a small AI project that delivers a minimum viable AI product (MVAP).

The build-vs-buy decision tree

With MVAP in mind, consider the following decision tree. Scout for an available solution. If there are multiple commercial products, buying would be the best solution. If there are not many vendors offering the required tool, look for a partner to develop a custom AI solution. This saves the company time, efforts, and resources of building from scratch.

However, if both buying and partnering don’t work, the company can build its MVAP. Aiming at MVAP helps the company kickstart the AI project sooner. With established deadlines and goals, companies can assess the performance and business impact of MVAP faster. As the project matures, the business gets more opportunities to evaluate and undertake more ambitious AI projects.

Winning with AI

Like all deliberations about implementing new technologies, it’s important to make an informed decision on AI in your company. Whether you choose to build or buy your AI, just keep in mind that AI is not going anywhere anytime soon – so start early to reap the rewards early.

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address

MARKETING

YouTube Ad Specs, Sizes, and Examples [2024 Update]

Published

on

YouTube Ad Specs, Sizes, and Examples

Introduction

With billions of users each month, YouTube is the world’s second largest search engine and top website for video content. This makes it a great place for advertising. To succeed, advertisers need to follow the correct YouTube ad specifications. These rules help your ad reach more viewers, increasing the chance of gaining new customers and boosting brand awareness.

Types of YouTube Ads

Video Ads

  • Description: These play before, during, or after a YouTube video on computers or mobile devices.
  • Types:
    • In-stream ads: Can be skippable or non-skippable.
    • Bumper ads: Non-skippable, short ads that play before, during, or after a video.

Display Ads

  • Description: These appear in different spots on YouTube and usually use text or static images.
  • Note: YouTube does not support display image ads directly on its app, but these can be targeted to YouTube.com through Google Display Network (GDN).

Companion Banners

  • Description: Appears to the right of the YouTube player on desktop.
  • Requirement: Must be purchased alongside In-stream ads, Bumper ads, or In-feed ads.

In-feed Ads

  • Description: Resemble videos with images, headlines, and text. They link to a public or unlisted YouTube video.

Outstream Ads

  • Description: Mobile-only video ads that play outside of YouTube, on websites and apps within the Google video partner network.

Masthead Ads

  • Description: Premium, high-visibility banner ads displayed at the top of the YouTube homepage for both desktop and mobile users.

YouTube Ad Specs by Type

Skippable In-stream Video Ads

  • Placement: Before, during, or after a YouTube video.
  • Resolution:
    • Horizontal: 1920 x 1080px
    • Vertical: 1080 x 1920px
    • Square: 1080 x 1080px
  • Aspect Ratio:
    • Horizontal: 16:9
    • Vertical: 9:16
    • Square: 1:1
  • Length:
    • Awareness: 15-20 seconds
    • Consideration: 2-3 minutes
    • Action: 15-20 seconds

Non-skippable In-stream Video Ads

  • Description: Must be watched completely before the main video.
  • Length: 15 seconds (or 20 seconds in certain markets).
  • Resolution:
    • Horizontal: 1920 x 1080px
    • Vertical: 1080 x 1920px
    • Square: 1080 x 1080px
  • Aspect Ratio:
    • Horizontal: 16:9
    • Vertical: 9:16
    • Square: 1:1

Bumper Ads

  • Length: Maximum 6 seconds.
  • File Format: MP4, Quicktime, AVI, ASF, Windows Media, or MPEG.
  • Resolution:
    • Horizontal: 640 x 360px
    • Vertical: 480 x 360px

In-feed Ads

  • Description: Show alongside YouTube content, like search results or the Home feed.
  • Resolution:
    • Horizontal: 1920 x 1080px
    • Vertical: 1080 x 1920px
    • Square: 1080 x 1080px
  • Aspect Ratio:
    • Horizontal: 16:9
    • Square: 1:1
  • Length:
    • Awareness: 15-20 seconds
    • Consideration: 2-3 minutes
  • Headline/Description:
    • Headline: Up to 2 lines, 40 characters per line
    • Description: Up to 2 lines, 35 characters per line

Display Ads

  • Description: Static images or animated media that appear on YouTube next to video suggestions, in search results, or on the homepage.
  • Image Size: 300×60 pixels.
  • File Type: GIF, JPG, PNG.
  • File Size: Max 150KB.
  • Max Animation Length: 30 seconds.

Outstream Ads

  • Description: Mobile-only video ads that appear on websites and apps within the Google video partner network, not on YouTube itself.
  • Logo Specs:
    • Square: 1:1 (200 x 200px).
    • File Type: JPG, GIF, PNG.
    • Max Size: 200KB.

Masthead Ads

  • Description: High-visibility ads at the top of the YouTube homepage.
  • Resolution: 1920 x 1080 or higher.
  • File Type: JPG or PNG (without transparency).

Conclusion

YouTube offers a variety of ad formats to reach audiences effectively in 2024. Whether you want to build brand awareness, drive conversions, or target specific demographics, YouTube provides a dynamic platform for your advertising needs. Always follow Google’s advertising policies and the technical ad specs to ensure your ads perform their best. Ready to start using YouTube ads? Contact us today to get started!

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

MARKETING

Why We Are Always ‘Clicking to Buy’, According to Psychologists

Published

on

Why We Are Always 'Clicking to Buy', According to Psychologists

Amazon pillows.

(more…)

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

MARKETING

A deeper dive into data, personalization and Copilots

Published

on

A deeper dive into data, personalization and Copilots

Salesforce launched a collection of new, generative AI-related products at Connections in Chicago this week. They included new Einstein Copilots for marketers and merchants and Einstein Personalization.

To better understand, not only the potential impact of the new products, but the evolving Salesforce architecture, we sat down with Bobby Jania, CMO, Marketing Cloud.

Dig deeper: Salesforce piles on the Einstein Copilots

Salesforce’s evolving architecture

It’s hard to deny that Salesforce likes coming up with new names for platforms and products (what happened to Customer 360?) and this can sometimes make the observer wonder if something is brand new, or old but with a brand new name. In particular, what exactly is Einstein 1 and how is it related to Salesforce Data Cloud?

“Data Cloud is built on the Einstein 1 platform,” Jania explained. “The Einstein 1 platform is our entire Salesforce platform and that includes products like Sales Cloud, Service Cloud — that it includes the original idea of Salesforce not just being in the cloud, but being multi-tenancy.”

Data Cloud — not an acquisition, of course — was built natively on that platform. It was the first product built on Hyperforce, Salesforce’s new cloud infrastructure architecture. “Since Data Cloud was on what we now call the Einstein 1 platform from Day One, it has always natively connected to, and been able to read anything in Sales Cloud, Service Cloud [and so on]. On top of that, we can now bring in, not only structured but unstructured data.”

That’s a significant progression from the position, several years ago, when Salesforce had stitched together a platform around various acquisitions (ExactTarget, for example) that didn’t necessarily talk to each other.

“At times, what we would do is have a kind of behind-the-scenes flow where data from one product could be moved into another product,” said Jania, “but in many of those cases the data would then be in both, whereas now the data is in Data Cloud. Tableau will run natively off Data Cloud; Commerce Cloud, Service Cloud, Marketing Cloud — they’re all going to the same operational customer profile.” They’re not copying the data from Data Cloud, Jania confirmed.

Another thing to know is tit’s possible for Salesforce customers to import their own datasets into Data Cloud. “We wanted to create a federated data model,” said Jania. “If you’re using Snowflake, for example, we more or less virtually sit on your data lake. The value we add is that we will look at all your data and help you form these operational customer profiles.”

Let’s learn more about Einstein Copilot

“Copilot means that I have an assistant with me in the tool where I need to be working that contextually knows what I am trying to do and helps me at every step of the process,” Jania said.

For marketers, this might begin with a campaign brief developed with Copilot’s assistance, the identification of an audience based on the brief, and then the development of email or other content. “What’s really cool is the idea of Einstein Studio where our customers will create actions [for Copilot] that we hadn’t even thought about.”

Here’s a key insight (back to nomenclature). We reported on Copilot for markets, Copilot for merchants, Copilot for shoppers. It turns out, however, that there is just one Copilot, Einstein Copilot, and these are use cases. “There’s just one Copilot, we just add these for a little clarity; we’re going to talk about marketing use cases, about shoppers’ use cases. These are actions for the marketing use cases we built out of the box; you can build your own.”

It’s surely going to take a little time for marketers to learn to work easily with Copilot. “There’s always time for adoption,” Jania agreed. “What is directly connected with this is, this is my ninth Connections and this one has the most hands-on training that I’ve seen since 2014 — and a lot of that is getting people using Data Cloud, using these tools rather than just being given a demo.”

What’s new about Einstein Personalization

Salesforce Einstein has been around since 2016 and many of the use cases seem to have involved personalization in various forms. What’s new?

“Einstein Personalization is a real-time decision engine and it’s going to choose next-best-action, next-best-offer. What is new is that it’s a service now that runs natively on top of Data Cloud.” A lot of real-time decision engines need their own set of data that might actually be a subset of data. “Einstein Personalization is going to look holistically at a customer and recommend a next-best-action that could be natively surfaced in Service Cloud, Sales Cloud or Marketing Cloud.”

Finally, trust

One feature of the presentations at Connections was the reassurance that, although public LLMs like ChatGPT could be selected for application to customer data, none of that data would be retained by the LLMs. Is this just a matter of written agreements? No, not just that, said Jania.

“In the Einstein Trust Layer, all of the data, when it connects to an LLM, runs through our gateway. If there was a prompt that had personally identifiable information — a credit card number, an email address — at a mimum, all that is stripped out. The LLMs do not store the output; we store the output for auditing back in Salesforce. Any output that comes back through our gateway is logged in our system; it runs through a toxicity model; and only at the end do we put PII data back into the answer. There are real pieces beyond a handshake that this data is safe.”

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

Trending