SOCIAL
The Latest Phase in the Elon Versus Zuck Fued Highlights the Flaws in Selling Verification Checkmarks

The latest episode of the Zuck versus Elon saga has taken a less savory turn, and interestingly, it seems like Elon’s own changes to Twitter’s verification system have caused at least part of the misunderstanding in this case.
Pre-warning: This post deals with some NSFW references made by Elon, so if you’re likely to be offended, best to click away now and avoid potentially harmful mental images. In fact, that warning applies to all readers – it’s not good areas to be venturing into.
So, following the launch of Threads, Meta’s new Twitter-esque social app, Elon’s been taking subtle jabs at Zuckerberg, continuing their ongoing public feud. Which still may or may not result in a UFC-style cage match between the two mega-billionaires – but in the latest development, Elon has actually challenged Zuck to another form of contest:
I propose a literal dick measuring contest ????
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 10, 2023
Yep, that’s a legitimate tweet, from somebody whom a lot of people consider to be one of the smartest people on the planet, and who’s without doubt one of the richest.
So where did Elon come up with this notion?
It actually seems to have stemmed from this tweet, which Elon responded to shortly before issuing his challenge to Zuckerberg, and includes a doctored screenshot from Threads referencing another, separate insult from Elon (that ‘Zuck is a cuck‘).
That’s not an actual comment from Zuck – and as you can see, the screenshot also includes an image of Elon Musk’s profile pic, suggesting that he also has a Threads account (or an imposter using his image). But for whatever reason, Elon seems to have taken this as somewhat legit, or it got his mind racing either way, which has then led to his mentally scarring appendage challenge.
And as noted, at least part of what’s at play here is confusion around blue tick accounts, which used to only be allocated to noteworthy users, and people who could generally be trusted to only share legitimate, researched comments, to a large degree. There were some flaws in this system, granted, but amid the ongoing back and forth, in this case, and in many other debates, it’s getting harder and harder to know who to trust in the app, because now, the blue checkmark is meaningless in this context. And for some, that’s proving to be a habitual marker that’s difficult to shake.
To be clear, I don’t think that Elon actually believes that Zuckerberg posted this comment. But then again, he’s taking this information from an account that he does trust, and engages with regularly, which also has a blue checkmark. It’s probably foolish to assume that we might have any understanding of what’s going on in Elon’s head – but he has repeatedly engaged with content from blue tick accounts that are actually fake or parody presences.
Indeed, as T(w)itter News Daily recently pointed out (note: non-Twitter accounts aren’t allowed to include ‘Twitter’ in their profile name, hence the odd moniker, but it’s actually a good source of Twitter 2.0 news), many parody accounts on Twitter are actually causing confusion, because the self-appended ‘parody’ tag is being cut off from the username in-stream.
for example, recently many Pakistani Twitter users believed that Elon had tuned in for this space with Imran Khan – it was actually the parody account, but the “(Parody)” in the username was cut off in the Spaces view. pic.twitter.com/K1TWmw8Xnk
— T(w)itter Daily News (@TitterDaily) July 8, 2023
Elon responded to this, noting that:
If the word “parody” is literally in the account name, then I think one cannot blame the account
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 8, 2023
But it’s a relevant point – Twitter’s decision to re-structure the verification program has caused a whole new vector for misunderstanding in the app, which is hurting its value as a news and information source.
Which, of course, is also now the same on Meta, where users can also buy a blue tick. The decision to sell verification markers makes no sense in this regard, and will continue to cause confusion – until users become so skeptical that they question everything that they see, in every social app.
Which, in the long run, may not necessarily be a bad thing – but till we get to that stage, there will continue to be misinterpretations and misunderstandings, leading to people sharing false reports, joke tweets, and everything in between, thinking that it’s actually legit info.
It just seems like a self-own, that could have been totally avoided – but then again, as noted, maybe Elon knew this was fake all along and just wanted an excuse to issue such a challenge.
I don’t know, but I do know that the tweet stream is becoming less trustworthy every day.
SOCIAL
Musk regrets controversial post but won’t bow to advertiser ‘blackmail’

Elon Musk’s comments at the New York Times’ Dealbook conference drew a shocked silence – Copyright GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP Slaven Vlasic
Elon Musk apologized Wednesday for endorsing a social media post widely seen as anti-Semitic, but accused advertisers who are turning away from his social media platform X of “blackmail” and said anyone who does so can “go fuck yourself.”
The remark before corporate executives at the New York Times’ Dealbook conference drew a shocked silence.
Earlier, Musk had apologized for what he called “literally the worst and dumbest post that I’ve ever done.”
In a comment on X, formerly Twitter, Musk on November 15 called a post “the actual truth” that said Jewish communities advocated a “dialectical hatred against whites,” which was criticized as echoing longtime conspiracy theory among White supremacists.
The statement prompted a flood of departures from X of major advertisers, including Apple, Disney, Comcast and IBM who criticized Musk for anti-semitism.
“I’m sorry for that tweet or post,” Musk said Wednesday. “It was foolish of me.”
He told interviewer Andrew Ross Sorkin that his post had been misinterpreted and that he had sought to clarify the remark in subsequent posts to the thread.
But Musk also said he wouldn’t be beholden to pressure from advertisers.
“If somebody’s gonna try to blackmail me with advertising, blackmail me with money?” Musk said. “Go fuck yourself.”
But the billionaire acknowledged that there were business implications to the advertiser actions.
“If the company fails… it will fail because of an advertiser boycott” Musk said. “And that will be what will bankrupt the company.”
Musk, who met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a visit to Israel earlier this week, insisted in the interview that he holds no discrimination against Jews, calling himself “philo-Semitic,” or an admirer of Judaism.
During the interview, Musk wore a necklace given to him by a parent of an Israeli hostage taken in the Hamas attack on October 7. The necklace reads, “Bring Them Home.”
Musk told Sorkin that the Israel trip had been planned earlier and was not an “apology tour” related to the controversial tweet.
SOCIAL
TikTok Encourages Creators To Make Longer Videos, With Focus On Ad Revenue 11/30/2023

A new report by The Information shows the company’s recent efforts to convince
creators to put out longer videos in order to provide more room for ad placements.
According to the …
SOCIAL
X Adds Option To Embed Videos in Isolation From Posts

Next time you go to embed an X post, you may notice a new step:
Now, X will enable you to choose whether you want to embed the video element in isolation, or the whole post, as normal.
And if you do choose to embed just the video (or GIF), it’ll look like this:
Which could be a helpful way to present X-originated video on third-party websites, and add context to, say, your blog post, without the clutter of the full X framing.
But it could also reduce brand exposure for X, which is likely why Twitter didn’t enable this before, though it did once provide an “embedded video widget” which essentially served the same purpose.

Twitter gradually seemed to phase that out as the platform evolved, and there’s no specific reason that I can find as to why it removed it as an option. But either way, now, it’s back, so you have more options for using X-originated content, and putting more focus on video elements specifically.
Though I don’t know why they didn’t also take the opportunity to remove the ‘Tweet’ reference. Since the re-brand to X, the platform seems to have gone to little effort to weed out all the tweet and bird terminology, but then again, with 80% fewer staff, that’s probably understandable as well.
-
FACEBOOK6 days ago
Indian Government Warns Facebook, YouTube About Deepfakes, Misinformation Violations
-
MARKETING5 days ago
Whiteboard Friday Recap 2023: AI Edition
-
SOCIAL7 days ago
Meta Stock: Still Room For Upside In A Maturing Market (NASDAQ:META)
-
SOCIAL6 days ago
Instagram Will Now Enable All Users to Download Publicly Posted Reels Clips
-
SOCIAL7 days ago
X is Bringing Post Headlines Back to Link Previews In-Stream
-
MARKETING7 days ago
OpenAI: The return of the king
-
MARKETING6 days ago
Making the Most of Electronic Resumes (Pro Tips and Tricks)
-
SEARCHENGINES4 days ago
Google Merchant Center Automatically Creating Promotions