Connect with us
Cloak And Track Your Affiliate Links With Our User-Friendly Link Cloaking Tool, Try It Free

FACEBOOK

Opinion: Google and Facebook act tough in Bill C-18 standoff because they are desperate

Published

on

Opinion: Google and Facebook act tough in Bill C-18 standoff because they are desperate

Open this photo in gallery:

Minister of Canadian Heritage Pablo Rodriguez participates in a news conference on Bill C-18, the Online News Act, in Ottawa, on July 5.Justin Tang/The Canadian Press

Dylan Freeman-Grist is a freelance writer based in Toronto covering art, design and technology.

Justin Trudeau’s Liberals – particularly in recent times – have gained a reputation for bending over backward whenever foreign corporations have a temper tantrum in our backyard. One only needs to look to the pearl-clutching of Dutch automaker Stellantis and the subsequent billion-dollar subsidy forked over by Canadians for a recent example.

However, in the case of Google’s and Facebook’s standoff over Bill C-18, the federal government should recognize that it holds all the leverage, and act accordingly.

That is because both companies’ plans to block news in Canada, in response to legislation that forces them to pay media organizations, would be nothing short of self-sabotage and, as a result, are not to be taken seriously. Posturing from Meta and Google parent Alphabet shows desperation, not strength.

The companies’ valuations are up, yes, but they are bloated by the artificial-intelligence mania. Frothy share prices – current price-to-earnings ratios of 26 and 36 for Alphabet and Meta, respectively – simply show there is value in an emerging technology saturating the market.

The recent share performance of these two companies is best read as a fleeting veil for their own mounting troubles, all while other governments are planning legislation akin to Bill C-18. Both companies know that buckling to Canada’s demands risks setting off a flood.

Not all bloated valuations are the same. Microsoft’s Bing, fresh off its partnership with OpenAI, is looking less these days like the butt of a joke and more like the cutting-edge option when compared with the slow and sluggish advertising brochure that Google’s main product offering has become in the past few years.

As far as Meta goes, it should surprise no one with a teenager that most of them will tell you Facebook is dead and Instagram is dying. Instead, they are using rivals like TikTok as their primary social network and search engine – preferring their favorite influencers’ opinions to suffocating flashing ads. Google’s own data confirms that 40 per cent of Gen Z opt for TikTok and Instagram as their only search engine. We can expect that proportion to increase substantially if Instagram opts to follow Google off the diving board.

Both companies are very aware of all this, which is why if we take the tack of our Australian counterparts, who refused to budge on their own version of C-18 in 2021 under similar duress from the tech giants, the result would be the same – an agreement to pay a small fee for the content that has been a key reason they became multibillion-dollar companies.

It would also encourage democracies all over the world to pursue a similar, common-sense solution and give their vital news industries a boost amid a sea of media consolidations and closings. Which, of course, is the real reason Google and Meta are rolling out the publicity stunts and melodrama.

To demonstrate their level of seriousness, both companies have begun to roll out comically Orwellian censorship beta tests to segments of Canada’s news-reading public. One such recipient was the CBC’s editor-in-chief, Brodie Fenlon, who was blocked from viewing the broadcaster’s own Instagram account. Mr. Fenlon was met with a statement from Meta announcing that owing to unforeseen laws passed in Canada, it simply could not let him view the network’s newsfeed.

The actual context of why they are blocking content – that they are unwilling to share relative pennies with the organizations that give the platform any value at all – was left out of the statement.

For its part, Ottawa has responded with its own symbolic gestures, pulling all federal advertising from Google and Meta. What’s worrisome is that the move seems more like a strategy to avoid an awkward soundbite in Question Period as opposed to an attempt to put real pressure on the tech giants to back down. (Sympathy for the Poilievre staffer who had to toss out that draft.)

Canadian Heritage’s “Next Steps” for the bill, put out last week, is more troublesome, suggesting that the government is feeling the heat and is open to watering down the law to appease our Silicon Valley benefactors.

As we are a small market, Big Tech is gambling that Canadians will be apathetic to their antics, with our relative size giving the companies the runway to continue their tantrum for some time before they start paying any real price for it.

But a good poker player knows how to read a bluff, particularly when the tell is so glaring. This is why, with Canadians and the world watching on, Ottawa would be wise to double down, not fold.

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address

FACEBOOK

Facebook Faces Yet Another Outage: Platform Encounters Technical Issues Again

Published

on

By

Facebook Problem Again

Uppdated: It seems that today’s issues with Facebook haven’t affected as many users as the last time. A smaller group of people appears to be impacted this time around, which is a relief compared to the larger incident before. Nevertheless, it’s still frustrating for those affected, and hopefully, the issues will be resolved soon by the Facebook team.

Facebook had another problem today (March 20, 2024). According to Downdetector, a website that shows when other websites are not working, many people had trouble using Facebook.

This isn’t the first time Facebook has had issues. Just a little while ago, there was another problem that stopped people from using the site. Today, when people tried to use Facebook, it didn’t work like it should. People couldn’t see their friends’ posts, and sometimes the website wouldn’t even load.

Downdetector, which watches out for problems on websites, showed that lots of people were having trouble with Facebook. People from all over the world said they couldn’t use the site, and they were not happy about it.

When websites like Facebook have problems, it affects a lot of people. It’s not just about not being able to see posts or chat with friends. It can also impact businesses that use Facebook to reach customers.

Since Facebook owns Messenger and Instagram, the problems with Facebook also meant that people had trouble using these apps. It made the situation even more frustrating for many users, who rely on these apps to stay connected with others.

During this recent problem, one thing is obvious: the internet is always changing, and even big websites like Facebook can have problems. While people wait for Facebook to fix the issue, it shows us how easily things online can go wrong. It’s a good reminder that we should have backup plans for staying connected online, just in case something like this happens again.

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

FACEBOOK

Christian family goes in hiding after being cleared of blasphemy

Published

on

Christian family goes in hiding after being cleared of blasphemy

LAHORE, Pakistan — A court in Pakistan granted bail to a Christian falsely charged with blasphemy, but he and his family have separated and gone into hiding amid threats to their lives, sources said.

Haroon Shahzad (right) with attorney Aneeqa Maria. | The Voice Society/Morning Star News

Haroon Shahzad, 45, was released from Sargodha District Jail on Nov. 15, said his attorney, Aneeqa Maria. Shahzad was charged with blasphemy on June 30 after posting Bible verses on Facebook that infuriated Muslims, causing dozens of Christian families in Chak 49 Shumaali, near Sargodha in Punjab Province, to flee their homes.

Lahore High Court Judge Ali Baqir Najfi granted bail on Nov. 6, but the decision and his release on Nov. 15 were not made public until now due to security fears for his life, Maria said.

Shahzad told Morning Star News by telephone from an undisclosed location that the false accusation has changed his family’s lives forever.

“My family has been on the run from the time I was implicated in this false charge and arrested by the police under mob pressure,” Shahzad told Morning Star News. “My eldest daughter had just started her second year in college, but it’s been more than four months now that she hasn’t been able to return to her institution. My other children are also unable to resume their education as my family is compelled to change their location after 15-20 days as a security precaution.”

Though he was not tortured during incarceration, he said, the pain of being away from his family and thinking about their well-being and safety gave him countless sleepless nights.

“All of this is due to the fact that the complainant, Imran Ladhar, has widely shared my photo on social media and declared me liable for death for alleged blasphemy,” he said in a choked voice. “As soon as Ladhar heard about my bail, he and his accomplices started gathering people in the village and incited them against me and my family. He’s trying his best to ensure that we are never able to go back to the village.”

Shahzad has met with his family only once since his release on bail, and they are unable to return to their village in the foreseeable future, he said.

“We are not together,” he told Morning Star News. “They are living at a relative’s house while I’m taking refuge elsewhere. I don’t know when this agonizing situation will come to an end.”

The Christian said the complainant, said to be a member of Islamist extremist party Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan and also allegedly connected with banned terrorist group Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, filed the charge because of a grudge. Shahzad said he and his family had obtained valuable government land and allotted it for construction of a church building, and Ladhar and others had filed multiple cases against the allotment and lost all of them after a four-year legal battle.

“Another probable reason for Ladhar’s jealousy could be that we were financially better off than most Christian families of the village,” he said. “I was running a successful paint business in Sargodha city, but that too has shut down due to this case.”

Regarding the social media post, Shahzad said he had no intention of hurting Muslim sentiments by sharing the biblical verse on his Facebook page.

“I posted the verse a week before Eid Al Adha [Feast of the Sacrifice] but I had no idea that it would be used to target me and my family,” he said. “In fact, when I came to know that Ladhar was provoking the villagers against me, I deleted the post and decided to meet the village elders to explain my position.”

The village elders were already influenced by Ladhar and refused to listen to him, Shahzad said.

“I was left with no option but to flee the village when I heard that Ladhar was amassing a mob to attack me,” he said.

Shahzad pleaded with government authorities for justice, saying he should not be punished for sharing a verse from the Bible that in no way constituted blasphemy.

Similar to other cases

Shahzad’s attorney, Maria, told Morning Star News that events in Shahzad’s case were similar to other blasphemy cases filed against Christians.

“Defective investigation, mala fide on the part of the police and complainant, violent protests against the accused persons and threats to them and their families, forcing their displacement from their ancestral areas, have become hallmarks of all blasphemy allegations in Pakistan,” said Maria, head of The Voice Society, a Christian paralegal organization.

She said that the case filed against Shahzad was gross violation of Section 196 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), which states that police cannot register a case under the Section 295-A blasphemy statute against a private citizen without the approval of the provincial government or federal agencies.

Maria added that Shahzad and his family have continued to suffer even though there was no evidence of blasphemy.

“The social stigma attached with a blasphemy accusation will likely have a long-lasting impact on their lives, whereas his accuser, Imran Ladhar, would not have to face any consequence of his false accusation,” she said.

The judge who granted bail noted that Shahzad was charged with blasphemy under Section 295-A, which is a non-cognizable offense, and Section 298, which is bailable. The judge also noted that police had not submitted the forensic report of Shahzad’s cell phone and said evidence was required to prove that the social media was blasphemous, according to Maria.

Bail was set at 100,000 Pakistani rupees (US $350) and two personal sureties, and the judge ordered police to further investigate, she said.

Shahzad, a paint contractor, on June 29 posted on his Facebook page 1 Cor. 10:18-21 regarding food sacrificed to idols, as Muslims were beginning the four-day festival of Eid al-Adha, which involves slaughtering an animal and sharing the meat.

A Muslim villager took a screenshot of the post, sent it to local social media groups and accused Shahzad of likening Muslims to pagans and disrespecting the Abrahamic tradition of animal sacrifice.

Though Shahzad made no comment in the post, inflammatory or otherwise, the situation became tense after Friday prayers when announcements were made from mosque loudspeakers telling people to gather for a protest, family sources previously told Morning Star News.

Fearing violence as mobs grew in the village, most Christian families fled their homes, leaving everything behind.

In a bid to restore order, the police registered a case against Shahzad under Sections 295-A and 298. Section 295-A relates to “deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs” and is punishable with imprisonment of up to 10 years and fine, or both. Section 298 prescribes up to one year in prison and a fine, or both, for hurting religious sentiments.

Pakistan ranked seventh on Open Doors’ 2023 World Watch List of the most difficult places to be a Christian, up from eighth the previous year.

Morning Star News is the only independent news service focusing exclusively on the persecution of Christians. The nonprofit’s mission is to provide complete, reliable, even-handed news in order to empower those in the free world to help persecuted Christians, and to encourage persecuted Christians by informing them that they are not alone in their suffering.

Free Religious Freedom Updates

Join thousands of others to get the FREEDOM POST newsletter for free, sent twice a week from The Christian Post.

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

FACEBOOK

Individual + Team Stats: Hornets vs. Timberwolves

Published

on

CHARLOTTE HORNETS MINNESOTA TIMBERWOLVES You can follow us for future coverage by liking us on Facebook & following us on X: Facebook – All Hornets X – …

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

Trending