Connect with us


Difference Between Search Console CWV Report & PageSpeed Insights



Difference Between Search Console CWV Report & PageSpeed Insights

In an SEO office-hours video Google’s John Mueller answers why the PageSpeed Insights score and the Search Console Core Web Vitals scores are consistently different.

He explains why two measurements of page speed never match and why it makes sense that they don’t match.

PageSpeed Insights vs. Search Console CWV Report

It’s reasonable to ask why two things that purport to measure the same thing provide different results.

This is the question:

“When I check my PageSpeed Insight score on my website, I see a simple number. Why doesn’t this match what I see in Search Console in the Core Web Vitals report?

Which one of these numbers is correct?”

Different Page Speed Scores

John Mueller first mentions that the scores provided by PageSpeed Insights and Search Console are actually different sets of numbers.

He said:


“I think maybe first of all, to get the obvious answer out the door, where is no correct number when it comes to speed, when it comes to understanding how your website is performing for your users.

In PageSpeed Insights, by default, I believe we show a single number that kind of is a score from 0 to 100, something like that, which is based on a number of assumptions, where we assume that different things are a little bit faster or slower for users.

And based on that we calculate a score.

In Search Console we have the Core Web Vitals information which is based on three numbers for speed, responsiveness and interactivity.

And these numbers are slightly different, of course, because it’s three numbers not just one number.”

The Method for Calculations is Different

Mueller next explains how the scores for the two measurements (PageSpeed Insights and Search Console CWV report) are derived and why that results in different scores.

Mueller continued:

“But also there’s a big difference in the way that these numbers are determined.

Namely there’s a difference between so-called field data and the lab data.

Field data is what users have actually seen when they go to your website. And this is what we use in Search Console.


That’s what we use for search as well.

Whereas lab data is kind of a theoretical view of your website, like where our systems have certain assumptions where they think, well the average user is probably like this, using this kind of device and with this kind of a connection perhaps.

And based on those assumptions, we will estimate what those numbers might be for an average user.

And obviously you can imagine those estimations will never be a hundred percent correct.”

So what Mueller is saying then is that Search Console scores reflect what actual site visitors saw.

The way Google measures those actual numbers is through visitors who have opted in to allowing Chrome to provide anonymized core web vitals data.

Google doesn’t measure every site visitor, only those who have opted in to sending that data to Google.

Contrasting with Search Console’s field data, PageSpeed Insights is creating a simulation of what a user might experience.


The purpose of Search Console data is to show what real site visitors are experiencing.

The purpose of PageSpeed Insights data is to provide an estimate of what’s going on in order to provide diagnostic feedback on what may be causing poor webpage speed performance.

Mueller next comments on how even though Search Console is based on real site visitors that the data is going to vary and not be consistent.

He explained:

“And similarly, the data that users have seen, that will change over time as well, where some users might have a really fast connection or a fast device and everything goes really fast on their website, or when they visit your website.

And others might not have that.

And because of that, this variation can always result in different numbers.

Our recommendation is generally to use the field data, the data you would see in Search Console, as a way of understanding what is kind of the current situation for a website.

And then to use the lab data, namely the individual tests that you can run directly yourself, to optimize your website and try to improve things.


And when you are pretty happy with the lab data that you’re getting with your new version of your website, then over time you can collect the field data, which happens automatically and double-check that users actually see it as being faster or more responsive as well.

So in short, again, there is no absolutely correct number when it comes to any of these metrics.

There is no kind of like absolutely correct answer where you’d say, this is what it should actually be.

But rather, there’s different assumptions and different ways of collecting data and each of these are subtly different.”

Two Metrics for Two Purposes

Perhaps a helpful way to think about the two metrics is that they both are useful for two different purposes.

Search Console Core Web Vitals data is derived from actual visitors and provides a sampling of what the user experience of real-world site visitors is (field data0. Actual site visitor data might highlight issues that may not show up in a simulated sampling.

PageSpeed Insights scores are simulated scores whose purpose is for analysis and debugging page speed issues. This tool identifies problems that interfere with fast page downloads and offers suggestions on how to fix them.

The data sources are different so they will never match exactly. But that doesn’t matter because the intention for each tool is different.


Google’s official documentation for the Search Console CWV report states:

“The Core Web Vitals report shows URL performance grouped by status, metric type, and URL group (groups of similar web pages).”

The purpose of PageSpeed Insights tool is stated on the webpage of the tool:

“Make your web pages fast on all devices”

In short, this is what each tool is for:

  • The purpose of the Search Console tool is to provide granular snapshots of real-world site performance.
  • The purpose of PageSpeed Insights is diagnostic, to identify problems and offer suggestions for improvement.


Watch John Mueller answer the question at the 31 second mark.

fbq('init', '1321385257908563');

fbq('track', 'PageView');

fbq('trackSingle', '1321385257908563', 'ViewContent', { content_name: 'search-console-cwv-report-and-pagespeed-insights-scores', content_category: 'news seo' }); }

Source link


Meta Brings Automation To Small Business Advertising



Meta Brings Automation To Small Business Advertising

Meta is rolling out new tools to help small business advertisers take advantage of advances in AI and automation.

When creating an ad through a Facebook page, small businesses can now utilize Meta’s Advantage+ advertising technologies.

Advantage+, Meta’s most advanced AI and automation offering for advertisers, was exclusive to full-fledged campaigns. Now, it will be used when running single ads.

In addition, Meta is upgrading Advantage+ with new capabilities for shopping campaigns, app campaigns, and more.

Here’s an overview of all updates for Meta advertisers.

Meta Advantage+ For Small Business Ads

Small businesses can now use Advantage+ creative and Advantage audience to create ads through their Facebook page.

When using Advantage+ creative, ads will automatically adjust for each person who views them. Meta will show individual users the version of the ad they’re most likely to respond to.


Advantage audience allows businesses to target ads to relevant people more effectively. Meta will create personalized audiences for serving ads using details on the business’s Facebook page.

These tools are available starting today.

Advantage+ Shopping Campaigns

Meta Advantage+ can now help advertisers running shopping campaigns learn what’s working faster.

Using AI and automation technologies, Meta Advantage+ can generate up to 150 creative combinations at once.

Running multiple versions of ads at once is intended to help advertisers quickly identify what’s converting. With this data, advertisers can make more efficient use of their budgets.

Meta states in a blog post:

“In a study of 15 A/B tests2 , we discovered that Advantage+ shopping campaigns drove 12% lower cost per purchase conversion compared to advertisers’ Business as Usual (BAU) ads. With these savings, businesses can reinvest in their marketing strategies and drive customer acquisition and sales more efficiently.”

Advantage+ shopping campaigns are rolling out to ecommerce and retail advertisers on August 15.

Later this year, U.S. businesses with a checkout-enabled Shop will have the option to add their Shop as a destination for Advantage+ shopping campaigns.


Updates To Meta Advantage+ App Campaigns

Meta is releasing a series of updates to an existing Advantage+ solution.

Advantage+ app campaigns are getting the following updates:

  • More creative flexibility with asset pairing and improved stability
  • 7-day click attribution
  • Split testing capabilities
  • More granular reporting insights with the region and ad-level data

Better Results For Advertisers?

It’s no secret Facebook’s ad targeting capabilities took a significant hit when Apple let users block trackers on iOS. As a result, Meta’s ad revenue growth began to slow down.

Meta’s last quarterly report revealed the company experienced its first-ever decline in ad revenue. There’s pressure on Meta to deliver better results next quarter.

Bringing advanced targeting capabilities to small business advertisers may give Meta the boost it needs in the short term. The question is whether this solution will generate long-term results for advertisers.

Meta’s next quarterly report will be interesting, as it will show us if advertisers are sold on Advantage+.

Source: Meta
Featured Image: Wirestock Creators/Shutterstock

window.addEventListener( 'load2', function() {

if( sopp != 'yes' && addtl_consent != '1~' ){

!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s) {if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)}; if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0'; n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,document,'script', '');

if( typeof sopp !== "undefined" && sopp === 'yes' ){ fbq('dataProcessingOptions', ['LDU'], 1, 1000); }else{ fbq('dataProcessingOptions', []); }

fbq('init', '1321385257908563');

fbq('track', 'PageView');

fbq('trackSingle', '1321385257908563', 'ViewContent', { content_name: 'meta-brings-automation-to-small-business-advertising', content_category: 'facebook news' }); } });

Source link

Continue Reading

Subscribe To our Newsletter
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address