Google Modifies Logo Requirements for AMP Structured Data
Google updated the requirements for the logo structured data for AMP articles. The update is a clarification of how publishers can display the structured data for their logos so that they remain eligible for rich results.
Logo Structured Data
The logo structured data is used by Google to show the correct logo in their rich results of the search results and in the Knowledge Panel.
Correctly specifying the logo through structured data without making a mistake is important. Incorrectly coding the logo structured data could result in Google being unable to correctly display the logo in the rich results or knowledge panel
Logo is a structured data property. A property can be thought of as a thing and the structured data types can be thought of as attributes of that property.
The logo has two expected types (attributes of the logo property).
The two types that are expected are:
- ImageObject
- URL
The logo is used in the structured data for the following types:
- Brand
- Organization
- Place
- Product
- Service
This change however only affects structured data for the Article structured data type and will likely be most often be used with the Organization structured data type.
What Was Updated to the Logo Structured Data?
The update to the developer pages is actually a clarification. The update makes it clearer what Google’s logo requirements are for the AMP structured data.
There are two ways to code the structured data for a logo.
A publisher can use an ImageObject type to describe the logo. A publisher can also use the Logo property to communicate what the logo is.
The Difference Between a Structured Data Property and a Type
A type is an attribute of a property. A property can be thought of as a thing. The type can be thought of as an attribute of that thing.
For example, a car can be an example of a property and the color of that automobile can be the attribute.
Examples of How to Show a Logo in AMP Structured Data
Google published this example of the ImageObject type for the logo structured data:
{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "NewsArticle", "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Google", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://google.com/logo.jpg" } } }
The key part of the above structured data is this part:
"logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://google.com/logo.jpg"
It features the logo property with the ImageObject type, followed by the URL of the actual logo. That takes three lines to describe what the logo is.
This is the other way to display the logo property by using just a URL:
{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "NewsArticle", "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Google", "logo": "https://google.com/logo.jpg" } }
In the above example it takes just a single line to describe what the logo is:
"logo": "https://google.com/logo.jpg"
The update to Google’s developer pages was to make this clear that either way can be used.
Google’s changelog for this update announced:
“Modified the publisher logo requirements of AMP Article structured data to more accurately reflect that we understand both raw URLs as well as ImageObject markup.”
Citation
Read the updated developer page here:
https://developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/article#article-types
Google Warns About Misuse of Its Indexing API
Google has updated its Indexing API documentation with a clear warning about spam detection and the possible consequences of misuse.
Warning Against API Misuse The new message in the guide says:
“All submissions through the Indexing API are checked for spam. Any misuse, like using multiple accounts or going over the usage limits, could lead to access being taken away.”
This warning is aimed at people trying to abuse the system by exceeding the API’s limits or breaking Google’s rules.
What Is the Indexing API? The Indexing API allows websites to tell Google when job posting or livestream video pages are added or removed. It helps websites with fast-changing content get their pages crawled and indexed quickly.
But it seems some users have been trying to abuse this by using multiple accounts to get more access.
Impact of the Update Google is now closely watching how people use the Indexing API. If someone breaks the rules, they might lose access to the tool, which could make it harder for them to keep their search results updated for time-sensitive content.
How To Stay Compliant To use the Indexing API properly, follow these rules:
- Don’t go over the usage limits, and if you need more, ask Google instead of using multiple accounts.
- Use the API only for job postings or livestream videos, and make sure your data is correct.
- Follow all of Google’s API guidelines and spam policies.
- Use sitemaps along with the API, not as a replacement.
Remember, the Indexing API isn’t a shortcut to faster indexing. Follow the rules to keep your access.
This Week in Search News: Simple and Easy-to-Read Update
Here’s what happened in the world of Google and search engines this week:
1. Google’s June 2024 Spam Update
Google finished rolling out its June 2024 spam update over a period of seven days. This update aims to reduce spammy content in search results.
2. Changes to Google Search Interface
Google has removed the continuous scroll feature for search results. Instead, it’s back to the old system of pages.
3. New Features and Tests
- Link Cards: Google is testing link cards at the top of AI-generated overviews.
- Health Overviews: There are more AI-generated health overviews showing up in search results.
- Local Panels: Google is testing AI overviews in local information panels.
4. Search Rankings and Quality
- Improving Rankings: Google said it can improve its search ranking system but will only do so on a large scale.
- Measuring Quality: Google’s Elizabeth Tucker shared how they measure search quality.
5. Advice for Content Creators
- Brand Names in Reviews: Google advises not to avoid mentioning brand names in review content.
- Fixing 404 Pages: Google explained when it’s important to fix 404 error pages.
6. New Search Features in Google Chrome
Google Chrome for mobile devices has added several new search features to enhance user experience.
7. New Tests and Features in Google Search
- Credit Card Widget: Google is testing a new widget for credit card information in search results.
- Sliding Search Results: When making a new search query, the results might slide to the right.
8. Bing’s New Feature
Bing is now using AI to write “People Also Ask” questions in search results.
9. Local Search Ranking Factors
Menu items and popular times might be factors that influence local search rankings on Google.
10. Google Ads Updates
- Query Matching and Brand Controls: Google Ads updated its query matching and brand controls, and advertisers are happy with these changes.
- Lead Credits: Google will automate lead credits for Local Service Ads. Google says this is a good change, but some advertisers are worried.
- tROAS Insights Box: Google Ads is testing a new insights box for tROAS (Target Return on Ad Spend) in Performance Max and Standard Shopping campaigns.
- WordPress Tag Code: There is a new conversion code for Google Ads on WordPress sites.
These updates highlight how Google and other search engines are continuously evolving to improve user experience and provide better advertising tools.
AI
Exploring the Evolution of Language Translation: A Comparative Analysis of AI Chatbots and Google Translate
According to an article on PCMag, while Google Translate makes translating sentences into over 100 languages easy, regular users acknowledge that there’s still room for improvement.
In theory, large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT are expected to bring about a new era in language translation. These models consume vast amounts of text-based training data and real-time feedback from users worldwide, enabling them to quickly learn to generate coherent, human-like sentences in a wide range of languages.
However, despite the anticipation that ChatGPT would revolutionize translation, previous experiences have shown that such expectations are often inaccurate, posing challenges for translation accuracy. To put these claims to the test, PCMag conducted a blind test, asking fluent speakers of eight non-English languages to evaluate the translation results from various AI services.
The test compared ChatGPT (both the free and paid versions) to Google Translate, as well as to other competing chatbots such as Microsoft Copilot and Google Gemini. The evaluation involved comparing the translation quality for two test paragraphs across different languages, including Polish, French, Korean, Spanish, Arabic, Tagalog, and Amharic.
In the first test conducted in June 2023, participants consistently favored AI chatbots over Google Translate. ChatGPT, Google Bard (now Gemini), and Microsoft Bing outperformed Google Translate, with ChatGPT receiving the highest praise. ChatGPT demonstrated superior performance in converting colloquialisms, while Google Translate often provided literal translations that lacked cultural nuance.
For instance, ChatGPT accurately translated colloquial expressions like “blow off steam,” whereas Google Translate produced more literal translations that failed to resonate across cultures. Participants appreciated ChatGPT’s ability to maintain consistent levels of formality and its consideration of gender options in translations.
The success of AI chatbots like ChatGPT can be attributed to reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF), which allows these models to learn from human preferences and produce culturally appropriate translations, particularly for non-native speakers. However, it’s essential to note that while AI chatbots outperformed Google Translate, they still had limitations and occasional inaccuracies.
In a subsequent test, PCMag evaluated different versions of ChatGPT, including the free and paid versions, as well as language-specific AI agents from OpenAI’s GPTStore. The paid version of ChatGPT, known as ChatGPT Plus, consistently delivered the best translations across various languages. However, Google Translate also showed improvement, performing surprisingly well compared to previous tests.
Overall, while ChatGPT Plus emerged as the preferred choice for translation, Google Translate demonstrated notable improvement, challenging the notion that AI chatbots are always superior to traditional translation tools.
Source: https://www.pcmag.com/articles/google-translate-vs-chatgpt-which-is-the-best-language-translator
-
SEARCHENGINES7 days ago
Daily Search Forum Recap: September 9, 2024
-
SEARCHENGINES6 days ago
Daily Search Forum Recap: September 10, 2024
-
WORDPRESS7 days ago
The Ultimate eCommerce Launch Checklist for WordPress
-
SEO6 days ago
Expert Embedding Techniques for SEO Success
-
SEARCHENGINES5 days ago
Daily Search Forum Recap: September 11, 2024
-
WORDPRESS6 days ago
Roadmap Update – WordPress.com News
-
WORDPRESS5 days ago
14 Tools for Creating and Selling Digital Products (Expert Pick)
-
SEARCHENGINES4 days ago
Daily Search Forum Recap: September 12, 2024