SEO
25 Best Examples Of Effective FAQ Pages
Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) pages (or informational hubs) enable your business to respond, react, and anticipate the needs of your audience more quickly and appropriately than other types of destination page experiences.
An effective FAQ resource can educate, inform, and naturally guide the user through your website’s content and toward the goals and results you have set.
Over the years, the role of the FAQ page has changed substantially, and now an FAQ page is an essential webpage to have on your site.
Why An FAQ Resource?
Firstly, FAQ pages can bring new visitors to your website via organic search and drive them quickly to related pages – most typically deeper blog pages and service pages closely related to the questions being resolved.
Next, one of the most significant opportunities for impactful brand visibility within the search engine result pages (in-SERP) is targeting audience questions, wants, needs, and pain points.
The FAQ page is one of the best ways to help people visit your site and get snippets of answers in front of users before they click any results within the search pages.
A helpful FAQ page (more likely an FAQ hub of core pages and topical intent) shortens the time it takes for people to solve their search requirements.
The experience from the first visit to conversion is also faster because you remove any possible barriers to knowledge (informational and often trust).
As a company, you are showcasing expertise through FAQs, plus introducing your key staff, knowledge, and unique insights into the industry sooner.
You add credibility and value through meaningful content in the many forms your audience requires. This will typically include audio, visual/video, and layering of content types now, compared to traditional text-only content provision.
You are also servicing the need for offline conversation and experience through faster and always available online mechanisms.
People will always seek help and advice. They are unwilling to pick up the phone, walk into a store, or wait hours (even minutes) for that information or insight to become accessible.
It needs to be available now and in the format they enjoy the most.
Why FAQ Pages Are A Priority
FAQ pages continue to be a priority area for SEO and digital marketing professionals.
An FAQ page is one of the simplest ways to improve your site and help site visitors and users.
Your FAQ section should be seen as a constantly expanding source of value provided to your audience. It is a place where their ever-changing and growing requirements are not only met but anticipated and exceeded frequently.
In no small part, the importance of FAQ pages has been driven in recent years by the growth in voice search, mobile search, and personal/home assistants and speakers.
These predominantly rely on the pre-results (Google Answers and Featured Snippets) and can be explicitly targeted with FAQ pages.
People need conversation, comparison, and support for most of their decision-making online and offline; FAQs can cater to them all.
An effective FAQ page seeks to:
- Reflect and respond to your audience’s needs wholly and thoroughly.
- Cover a broad range of intent (transactional, informational, locational, etc.).
- Stay updated based on new insights from your data, the industry, and broader best practices.
- Land new users to the website by solving problems and supporting return visits with regular additions and valuable expertise sharing.
- Drive internal pageviews to other important pages and support key conversion paths.
- Fuel blog (and deeper content) creation logically and intuitively ties together semantically relevant content.
- Shine a light on expertise, trust, and authority within your niche, giving your brand and key staff a platform to educate, inform, and support your community.
25 Of The Best Examples Of FAQ Pages
Now let’s look at 25 great examples of FAQ pages/resources and why they’re so effective.
1. Twitter
Twitter’s FAQ help center made a list as it factored in some fascinating personalization, easy-to-use search functionality, and has a positive user experience (something few FAQ pages ever achieve).
2. YouTube
YouTube’s FAQ page is clean, fresh, simple to use, and provides access to the most commonly asked “help” topics.
As you might expect, content delivery combines video/visual content with standard textual content. The role of mixed content types in FAQ pages is something often overlooked.
3. McDonald’s
The McDonald’s FAQ page feels informal and sociable, encouraging people to share their FAQ experiences (a rarity).
4. WhatsApp
The FAQ resource for Whatsapp is bright, easy to use, and categorized effectively for quick desktop or mobile use.
When considering the functional role and practical requirements of an FAQ resource, it can be easy to forget the importance of loading time and speed of access to information.
5. Wikipedia
Wikipedia’s help center is an excellent example of an “old-school” FAQ page.
It is text-heavy, blocked into key topic areas, and has extensive access to all the critical support areas you could ever need.
There is something necessary, meaningful and nostalgic about FAQ-orientated websites like this, plus they are hugely helpful and remain more than fit for purpose.
6. The University of East Anglia (UEA)
The University of East Anglia FAQ resource is more of an inbuilt problem-solving informational architecture than a separate FAQ resource.
This type of audience understanding throughout every critical section and site navigation reflects the potential to continuously service and support your audience as a core part of the business positioning.
7. UCAS
The FAQs section of UCAS is simple, scaled back, and concise.
It includes a prompt to ask if the information was helpful and to gather user feedback to improve the resource.
This type of first-party/direct user feedback loop is excellent as it demonstrates a willingness to refine and improve the FAQ section iteratively.
8. Foresters Friendly Society
The Foresters Friendly Society FAQ page example showcases topic-specific FAQ content clusters or hubs in action.
This facilitates a quick and effective experience for people to explore topics in detail that matter to them the most, without the added clicks or distractions of single-stop (all-topic) FAQ destinations.
9. Ontrack
The standout features of the Ontrack FAQ section include the simplified user experience and bold, functional (dialed back) access to crucial information.
The content isn’t cluttered, it’s easy to skim read, plus you can switch between FAQ-related resources within a single click to service various layers of user intent.
10. DaysOutGuide
DaysOutGuide’s frequently asked questions resource incorporates tags to make the most out of single-click functionality for all device access to information.
The balance between text, images, and interactive features works well.
Content segments are demarked and intuitive.
11. SendInBlue
SendInBlue’s FAQs are by far the most basic by design (single grid defined by thin square design categories) included in this list of my best and most effective FAQs, but they work.
It’s a simple solution but almost always overlooked.
This offers a helpful reminder that it is the content value and ease of access to information instead of over-design when it comes to effective FAQ pages.
12. FreeSpirit
The FreeSpirit FAQ page combines useful information navigational features with interactive content to empower users to progress through the site and make buying decisions faster.
13. Amazon Web Services
Amazon Web Services’ FAQs are functional, easy to skim through, and categorized for use.
There are no frills here.
But, in some cases, it’s better to get straight to the point.
14. Silicone Engineering
Silicone Engineering’s FAQs help demystify a traditionally complex industry.
The combination of quick links, ask the expert, and more profound content answers work well for the user regardless of time availability or device used.
Engineering and related industries can seem daunting to many, so this content distillation is always a welcome experience for the user.
15. Dropbox
Dropbox Help brings fun to the FAQ area with the choice of images and encourages the user to experience the site through self-discovery.
It’s a helpful reminder that FAQs can be a fun and engaging way to bring your brand in front of new and existing audiences in various ways.
16. TUI
TUI FAQs are in a grid format, include depth of topical coverage, and reflect the volumes of information available on the site.
The resource is not overly pretty by design, but it works and almost has a retro feel.
17. UPS
The UPS Help and Support Centre includes a virtual chat assistant which leverages the FAQs above the static functionality of most.
Chatbots are ideal FAQ considerations mainly based on their ability to expedite and drive the user journey (a key effectiveness area for any help and FAQ resource).
18. Trent Furniture
In this example, the Trent Furniture FAQ and guides section acts as both an FAQ resource and a guide roll-up resource.
This means that users can access top-level information, deeper, more comprehensive buying guides, measurement information, and a whole host of other insights normally only accessible through blogs.
For ecommerce sites, it’s positive to access layers of content depth relevant to your buying decisions – whether you intend to purchase in the same session or are working your way through the buying and information-seeking journey.
19. FatFace
The FatFace help center and FAQs resource is a practical example of a bigger brand getting it right.
The help center places the users first with the topics covered and still manages to feel personable and helpful.
20. Stewarts Law
This Stewarts Law FAQs example demonstrates the multipurpose nature of informational content.
This case merges traditional news and article content provision alongside FAQs, insights, and broader expert opinions.
21. Pinterest
Pinterest’s Help Center takes simplicity to the next level.
The design and information provided are prioritized for the mobile user by combining visual and textual triggers.
FAQ resources should place function first, and that’s clear in this example.
22. Elite Island Holidays UK
The audience’s needs drive Elite Island Holidays’ FAQs and set out to answer people’s holiday dilemmas, from preparation to last-minute help and support.
The blog nature of the answers means that the site visitor doesn’t need to travel beyond the FAQs page for help.
FAQ answers’ completeness can vary by industry and on a site-by-site basis.
In this example, the more profound content provision is good to see and helps prevent multiple clicks or return to search engine query refinement to find a complete answer.
23. Airtable
Airtable’s Help Center is fun, visually driven, and even provides helpful information on how to use the FAQ section.
Making a help resource fun isn’t easy. However, Airtable has achieved this.
I like to be objective (as much as possible with opinion-based topics like this) and consider FAQ pages that stand out with clear purpose and thought.
24. Pretty Little Thing
The FAQs on Pretty Little Thing immediately tell their audience and position the design and content accordingly.
The FAQs also appear well thought out and enticing to interact with.
The clickable visual elements reflect mobile and all device interaction, which is essential for online mobile-first and all device expectations.
25. First Direct
First Direct’s FAQs, Help Center, and Tools/Guide Resource brings many information-rich segmented guides and financial tools into one place.
Making often complex and dry financial topics straightforward and accessible is not easy, but this section does it well.
Creating An Effective FAQ page
Whether you have an FAQ page in place, believe it can contribute more, or are looking to create a new FAQ resource for your website, it’s essential to consider the next steps.
Remember not to overlook the necessity to gather data in your FAQ section. Use this to continue adding to it, refine, and expand the ongoing value provision to your audience.
Your FAQ resource needs to be proactively updated to cater to all the new and ever-changing data sets reflecting your existing and new community requirements, offline and online.
1. Decide On The Purpose Of The FAQ Page
Suppose you wish to bring your experts to the foreground and provide ongoing audience support. In that case, your FAQ hub will function very differently than it would if you intend to increase the ease of access to know cornerstone content on your website.
You need to have a clearly defined FAQ section purpose and ensure you support this with business objectives and KPIs.
This helps maintain prioritization and justification to keep investing resources and focus on FAQ development alongside more traditional commercial website pages.
2. Plan In Advance To Maintain And Grow Your FAQ Hub
Your audience questions will change frequently, and you must ensure that your FAQ content reflects this.
Data within Google Search Console (GSC), on-site search behavior, plus broader industry trends will help inform this.
Don’t limit your data gathering to a single source, however.
Look at the competition, consider Google Rich Results (using tools such as Semrush), and look at the completeness of your expertise provision through your FAQ content.
3. Look Outside Of Your Company Data Environment
While your data is fantastic for servicing your existing customer base, there are often multiple layers of FAQs to fulfill.
You can use free tools such as Answer the Public for more general questions, Google Trends, and competitor sites.
The opportunity to answer In-SERP questions grows all the time. You want to be present in these conversations by showcasing your FAQ content and creating compelling content types to target these items correctly.
4. Structuring FAQs
Both your page and individual FAQs (whether a single FAQ page or entire sections of your site specific to FAQ content) need some consideration on how you structure them and make a lot of varied content accessible for the user and search engines alike.
Consider the expandable on-click text at the individual FAQ level to keep answers clean and easy to use.
At the page structure level, take time to prioritize content based on value and demand, plus technical optimization areas such as the use of schema, page speed, and mobile-friendliness.
Remember that people look to digest content in many ways.
FAQ content does not have to be text only. It’s far broader reaching and valuable to people and for search if it’s multi-tiered and varied in content types.
5. Use Data To Refine & Improve: Part Of ‘Always On’ Focus
FAQ pages quickly become outdated, and their value declines over time.
Make sure you are testing page changes and iteratively improving everything from headings and clickable page elements to new data-led content additions and calls to action.
Every month there will be evidence-led chances to improve, and this mentality is key to maximizing business and user impact.
6. Don’t Forget The People Element
The most successful FAQ pages and help center hubs often stem from a deeper understanding of the people they are intended to help.
Data and evidence are always important, but you must balance this with real-world insights and offline experiences.
The best people to help with this are the front-line staff, who actively engage with your audience daily and truly understand how online and offline FAQs can support and enrich your problem-solving offering.
Your FAQ section supports your staff as much as it’s present to help educate and inform your community.
Think about your recurring conversations and how they can be served equally well online.
Don’t forget mixed content types to replicate the offline experience online, plus the need to gather feedback from your users directly.
As a final quick tip: Every FAQ resource, however complete it may appear, will have new ways to leverage the value received from it and areas to grow.
You can often reposition existing content for new search opportunities, bolster and expand its depth and value, plus create unique visual content from a text-only provision for many short-term and ongoing gains.
More Resources:
Featured Image: Kavaleuskaya Aksana/Shutterstock
SEO
How Compression Can Be Used To Detect Low Quality Pages
The concept of Compressibility as a quality signal is not widely known, but SEOs should be aware of it. Search engines can use web page compressibility to identify duplicate pages, doorway pages with similar content, and pages with repetitive keywords, making it useful knowledge for SEO.
Although the following research paper demonstrates a successful use of on-page features for detecting spam, the deliberate lack of transparency by search engines makes it difficult to say with certainty if search engines are applying this or similar techniques.
What Is Compressibility?
In computing, compressibility refers to how much a file (data) can be reduced in size while retaining essential information, typically to maximize storage space or to allow more data to be transmitted over the Internet.
TL/DR Of Compression
Compression replaces repeated words and phrases with shorter references, reducing the file size by significant margins. Search engines typically compress indexed web pages to maximize storage space, reduce bandwidth, and improve retrieval speed, among other reasons.
This is a simplified explanation of how compression works:
- Identify Patterns:
A compression algorithm scans the text to find repeated words, patterns and phrases - Shorter Codes Take Up Less Space:
The codes and symbols use less storage space then the original words and phrases, which results in a smaller file size. - Shorter References Use Less Bits:
The “code” that essentially symbolizes the replaced words and phrases uses less data than the originals.
A bonus effect of using compression is that it can also be used to identify duplicate pages, doorway pages with similar content, and pages with repetitive keywords.
Research Paper About Detecting Spam
This research paper is significant because it was authored by distinguished computer scientists known for breakthroughs in AI, distributed computing, information retrieval, and other fields.
Marc Najork
One of the co-authors of the research paper is Marc Najork, a prominent research scientist who currently holds the title of Distinguished Research Scientist at Google DeepMind. He’s a co-author of the papers for TW-BERT, has contributed research for increasing the accuracy of using implicit user feedback like clicks, and worked on creating improved AI-based information retrieval (DSI++: Updating Transformer Memory with New Documents), among many other major breakthroughs in information retrieval.
Dennis Fetterly
Another of the co-authors is Dennis Fetterly, currently a software engineer at Google. He is listed as a co-inventor in a patent for a ranking algorithm that uses links, and is known for his research in distributed computing and information retrieval.
Those are just two of the distinguished researchers listed as co-authors of the 2006 Microsoft research paper about identifying spam through on-page content features. Among the several on-page content features the research paper analyzes is compressibility, which they discovered can be used as a classifier for indicating that a web page is spammy.
Detecting Spam Web Pages Through Content Analysis
Although the research paper was authored in 2006, its findings remain relevant to today.
Then, as now, people attempted to rank hundreds or thousands of location-based web pages that were essentially duplicate content aside from city, region, or state names. Then, as now, SEOs often created web pages for search engines by excessively repeating keywords within titles, meta descriptions, headings, internal anchor text, and within the content to improve rankings.
Section 4.6 of the research paper explains:
“Some search engines give higher weight to pages containing the query keywords several times. For example, for a given query term, a page that contains it ten times may be higher ranked than a page that contains it only once. To take advantage of such engines, some spam pages replicate their content several times in an attempt to rank higher.”
The research paper explains that search engines compress web pages and use the compressed version to reference the original web page. They note that excessive amounts of redundant words results in a higher level of compressibility. So they set about testing if there’s a correlation between a high level of compressibility and spam.
They write:
“Our approach in this section to locating redundant content within a page is to compress the page; to save space and disk time, search engines often compress web pages after indexing them, but before adding them to a page cache.
…We measure the redundancy of web pages by the compression ratio, the size of the uncompressed page divided by the size of the compressed page. We used GZIP …to compress pages, a fast and effective compression algorithm.”
High Compressibility Correlates To Spam
The results of the research showed that web pages with at least a compression ratio of 4.0 tended to be low quality web pages, spam. However, the highest rates of compressibility became less consistent because there were fewer data points, making it harder to interpret.
Figure 9: Prevalence of spam relative to compressibility of page.
The researchers concluded:
“70% of all sampled pages with a compression ratio of at least 4.0 were judged to be spam.”
But they also discovered that using the compression ratio by itself still resulted in false positives, where non-spam pages were incorrectly identified as spam:
“The compression ratio heuristic described in Section 4.6 fared best, correctly identifying 660 (27.9%) of the spam pages in our collection, while misidentifying 2, 068 (12.0%) of all judged pages.
Using all of the aforementioned features, the classification accuracy after the ten-fold cross validation process is encouraging:
95.4% of our judged pages were classified correctly, while 4.6% were classified incorrectly.
More specifically, for the spam class 1, 940 out of the 2, 364 pages, were classified correctly. For the non-spam class, 14, 440 out of the 14,804 pages were classified correctly. Consequently, 788 pages were classified incorrectly.”
The next section describes an interesting discovery about how to increase the accuracy of using on-page signals for identifying spam.
Insight Into Quality Rankings
The research paper examined multiple on-page signals, including compressibility. They discovered that each individual signal (classifier) was able to find some spam but that relying on any one signal on its own resulted in flagging non-spam pages for spam, which are commonly referred to as false positive.
The researchers made an important discovery that everyone interested in SEO should know, which is that using multiple classifiers increased the accuracy of detecting spam and decreased the likelihood of false positives. Just as important, the compressibility signal only identifies one kind of spam but not the full range of spam.
The takeaway is that compressibility is a good way to identify one kind of spam but there are other kinds of spam that aren’t caught with this one signal. Other kinds of spam were not caught with the compressibility signal.
This is the part that every SEO and publisher should be aware of:
“In the previous section, we presented a number of heuristics for assaying spam web pages. That is, we measured several characteristics of web pages, and found ranges of those characteristics which correlated with a page being spam. Nevertheless, when used individually, no technique uncovers most of the spam in our data set without flagging many non-spam pages as spam.
For example, considering the compression ratio heuristic described in Section 4.6, one of our most promising methods, the average probability of spam for ratios of 4.2 and higher is 72%. But only about 1.5% of all pages fall in this range. This number is far below the 13.8% of spam pages that we identified in our data set.”
So, even though compressibility was one of the better signals for identifying spam, it still was unable to uncover the full range of spam within the dataset the researchers used to test the signals.
Combining Multiple Signals
The above results indicated that individual signals of low quality are less accurate. So they tested using multiple signals. What they discovered was that combining multiple on-page signals for detecting spam resulted in a better accuracy rate with less pages misclassified as spam.
The researchers explained that they tested the use of multiple signals:
“One way of combining our heuristic methods is to view the spam detection problem as a classification problem. In this case, we want to create a classification model (or classifier) which, given a web page, will use the page’s features jointly in order to (correctly, we hope) classify it in one of two classes: spam and non-spam.”
These are their conclusions about using multiple signals:
“We have studied various aspects of content-based spam on the web using a real-world data set from the MSNSearch crawler. We have presented a number of heuristic methods for detecting content based spam. Some of our spam detection methods are more effective than others, however when used in isolation our methods may not identify all of the spam pages. For this reason, we combined our spam-detection methods to create a highly accurate C4.5 classifier. Our classifier can correctly identify 86.2% of all spam pages, while flagging very few legitimate pages as spam.”
Key Insight:
Misidentifying “very few legitimate pages as spam” was a significant breakthrough. The important insight that everyone involved with SEO should take away from this is that one signal by itself can result in false positives. Using multiple signals increases the accuracy.
What this means is that SEO tests of isolated ranking or quality signals will not yield reliable results that can be trusted for making strategy or business decisions.
Takeaways
We don’t know for certain if compressibility is used at the search engines but it’s an easy to use signal that combined with others could be used to catch simple kinds of spam like thousands of city name doorway pages with similar content. Yet even if the search engines don’t use this signal, it does show how easy it is to catch that kind of search engine manipulation and that it’s something search engines are well able to handle today.
Here are the key points of this article to keep in mind:
- Doorway pages with duplicate content is easy to catch because they compress at a higher ratio than normal web pages.
- Groups of web pages with a compression ratio above 4.0 were predominantly spam.
- Negative quality signals used by themselves to catch spam can lead to false positives.
- In this particular test, they discovered that on-page negative quality signals only catch specific types of spam.
- When used alone, the compressibility signal only catches redundancy-type spam, fails to detect other forms of spam, and leads to false positives.
- Combing quality signals improves spam detection accuracy and reduces false positives.
- Search engines today have a higher accuracy of spam detection with the use of AI like Spam Brain.
Read the research paper, which is linked from the Google Scholar page of Marc Najork:
Detecting spam web pages through content analysis
Featured Image by Shutterstock/pathdoc
SEO
New Google Trends SEO Documentation
Google Search Central published new documentation on Google Trends, explaining how to use it for search marketing. This guide serves as an easy to understand introduction for newcomers and a helpful refresher for experienced search marketers and publishers.
The new guide has six sections:
- About Google Trends
- Tutorial on monitoring trends
- How to do keyword research with the tool
- How to prioritize content with Trends data
- How to use Google Trends for competitor research
- How to use Google Trends for analyzing brand awareness and sentiment
The section about monitoring trends advises there are two kinds of rising trends, general and specific trends, which can be useful for developing content to publish on a site.
Using the Explore tool, you can leave the search box empty and view the current rising trends worldwide or use a drop down menu to focus on trends in a specific country. Users can further filter rising trends by time periods, categories and the type of search. The results show rising trends by topic and by keywords.
To search for specific trends users just need to enter the specific queries and then filter them by country, time, categories and type of search.
The section called Content Calendar describes how to use Google Trends to understand which content topics to prioritize.
Google explains:
“Google Trends can be helpful not only to get ideas on what to write, but also to prioritize when to publish it. To help you better prioritize which topics to focus on, try to find seasonal trends in the data. With that information, you can plan ahead to have high quality content available on your site a little before people are searching for it, so that when they do, your content is ready for them.”
Read the new Google Trends documentation:
Get started with Google Trends
Featured Image by Shutterstock/Luis Molinero
SEO
All the best things about Ahrefs Evolve 2024
Hey all, I’m Rebekah and I am your Chosen One to “do a blog post for Ahrefs Evolve 2024”.
What does that entail exactly? I don’t know. In fact, Sam Oh asked me yesterday what the title of this post would be. “Is it like…Ahrefs Evolve 2024: Recap of day 1 and day 2…?”
Even as I nodded, I couldn’t get over how absolutely boring that sounded. So I’m going to do THIS instead: a curation of all the best things YOU loved about Ahrefs’ first conference, lifted directly from X.
Let’s go!
OUR HUGE SCREEN
The largest presentation screen I’ve ever seen! #ahrefsevolve pic.twitter.com/oboiMFW1TN
— Patrick Stox (@patrickstox) October 24, 2024
This is the biggest presentation screen I ever seen in my life. It’s like iMax for SEO presentations. #ahrefsevolve pic.twitter.com/sAfZ1rtePx
— Suganthan Mohanadasan (@Suganthanmn) October 24, 2024
CONFERENCE VENUE ITSELF
It was recently named the best new skyscraper in the world, by the way.
The Ahrefs conference venue feels like being in inception. #AhrefsEvolve pic.twitter.com/18Yjai1Cej
— Suganthan Mohanadasan (@Suganthanmn) October 24, 2024
I’m in Singapore for @ahrefs Evolve this week. Keen to connect with people doing interesting work on the future of search / AI #ahrefsevolve pic.twitter.com/s00UkIbxpf
— Alex Denning (@AlexDenning) October 23, 2024
OUR AMAZING SPEAKER LINEUP – SUPER INFORMATIVE, USEFUL TALKS!
A super insightful explanation of how Google Search Ranking works #ahrefsevolve pic.twitter.com/Cd1VSET2Aj
— Amanda Walls (@amandajwalls) October 24, 2024
“would I even do this if Google didn’t exist?” – what a great question to assess if you actually have the right focus when creating content amazing presentation from @amandaecking at #AhrefsEvolve pic.twitter.com/a6OKbKxwiS
— Aleyda Solis ️ (@aleyda) October 24, 2024
Attending @CyrusShepard ‘s talk on WTF is Helpful Content in Google’s algorithm at #AhrefsEvolve
“Focus on people first content”
Super relevant for content creators who want to stay ahead of the ever evolving Google search curve! #SEOTalk #SEO pic.twitter.com/KRTL13SB0g
This is the first time I am listening to @aleyda and it is really amazing. Lot of insights and actionable information.
Thank you #aleyda for power packed presentation.#AhrefsEvolve @ahrefs #seo pic.twitter.com/Xe3A9MGfrr
— Jignesh Gohel (@jigneshgohel) October 25, 2024
— Parth Suba (@parthsuba77) October 24, 2024
@thinking_slows thoughts on AI content – “it’s very good if you want to be average”.
We can do a lot better and Ryan explains how. Love it @ahrefs #AhrefsEvolve pic.twitter.com/qFqWs6QBH5
— Andy Chadwick (@digitalquokka) October 24, 2024
A super insightful explanation of how Google Search Ranking works #ahrefsevolve pic.twitter.com/Cd1VSET2Aj
— Amanda Walls (@amandajwalls) October 24, 2024
This is the first time I am listening to @aleyda and it is really amazing. Lot of insights and actionable information.
Thank you #aleyda for power packed presentation.#AhrefsEvolve @ahrefs #seo pic.twitter.com/Xe3A9MGfrr
— Jignesh Gohel (@jigneshgohel) October 25, 2024
GREAT MUSIC
First time I’ve ever Shazam’d a track during SEO conference ambience…. and the track wasn’t even Shazamable! #AhrefsEvolve @ahrefs pic.twitter.com/ZDzJOZMILt
— Lily Ray (@lilyraynyc) October 24, 2024
AMAZING GOODIES
Ahrefs Evolveきました!@ahrefs @AhrefsJP #AhrefsEvolve pic.twitter.com/33EiejQPdX
— さくらぎ (@sakuragi_ksy) October 24, 2024
Aside from the very interesting topics, what makes this conference even cooler are the ton of awesome freebies
Kudos for making all of these happen for #AhrefsEvolve @ahrefs team pic.twitter.com/DGzk5FSTN8
— Krista Melgarejo (@kimelgarejo) October 24, 2024
Content Goblin and SEO alligator party stickers are definitely going on my laptop. @ahrefs #ahrefsevolve pic.twitter.com/QBsBuY5Yix
— Patrick Stox (@patrickstox) October 24, 2024
This is one of the best swag bags I’ve received at any conference!
Either @ahrefs actually cares or the other conference swag bags aren’t up to par w Ahrefs!#AhrefsEvolve pic.twitter.com/Yc9e6wZPHn— Moses Sanchez (@SanchezMoses) October 25, 2024
SELFIE BATTLE
Some background: Tim and Sam have a challenge going on to see who can take the most number of selfies with all of you. Last I heard, Sam was winning – but there is room for a comeback yet!
Got the rare selfie with both @timsoulo and @samsgoh #AhrefsEvolve
— Bernard Huang (@bernardjhuang) October 24, 2024
THAT BELL
Everybody’s just waiting for this one.
@timsoulo @ahrefs #AhrefsEvolve pic.twitter.com/6ypWaTGDDP
— Jinbo Liang (@JinboLiang) October 24, 2024
STICKER WALL
Viva la vida, viva Seo!
Awante Argentina loco!#AhrefsEvolve pic.twitter.com/sfhbI2kWSH
— Gaston Riera. (@GastonRiera) October 24, 2024
AND, OF COURSE…ALL OF YOU!
#AhrefsEvolve let’s goooooooooooo!!! pic.twitter.com/THtdvdtUyB
— Tim Soulo (@timsoulo) October 24, 2024
–
There’s a TON more content on LinkedIn – click here – but I have limited time to get this post up and can’t quite figure out how to embed LinkedIn posts so…let’s stop here for now. I’ll keep updating as we go along!
-
AI3 days ago
How AI is Transforming SEO and What Website Owners Need to Know
-
SEARCHENGINES7 days ago
Google Ranking Movement, Sitelinks Search Box Going Away, Gen-AI In Bing & Google, Ad News & More
-
WORDPRESS7 days ago
5 Most Profitable Online Businesses You Can Start Today for Free!
-
WORDPRESS6 days ago
Automattic demanded web host pay $32M annually for using WordPress trademark
-
SEARCHENGINES6 days ago
Google Search Ranking Volatility October 26th & 27th & 23rd & 24th
-
SEO7 days ago
New Google Trends SEO Documentation
-
AFFILIATE MARKETING6 days ago
Cut Costs, Not Features with This Microsoft Bundle Deal
-
WORDPRESS5 days ago
WP Engine sues WordPress co-creator Mullenweg and Automattic, alleging abuse of power
You must be logged in to post a comment Login