Connect with us

SEO

Yes, This Is Still A Thing

Published

on

Yes, This Is Still A Thing

It wasn’t long from the time when search engine optimizers first realized the important role backlinks played in search rankings until some enterprising soul came up with the idea of selling links.

Of course, it wasn’t long before bad actors started abusing it, just like nearly every other ranking hack in SEO. And Google, doing what Google does, began cracking down on the process.

There’s not much in the way of a gray area regarding Google’s position on the issue.

The first bullet point in Google’s Webmaster Guide about link schemes states that buying or selling links that pass PageRank will negatively impact your site’s ranking. This includes “…exchanging money for links, or posts that contain links, exchanging goods or services for links, or sending someone a ‘free’ product in exchange for them writing about it and including a link.”

And as good, white hat SEOs, of course, none of us would ever dream of doing such a thing. Except a lot of sites still do. It’s not openly discussed in our field, but the practice is still alive.

Advertisement

This, of course, raises some questions. Namely, what’s the benefit of paying for links? And is it worth the risk?

In this piece, we’ll answer these questions and take a closer look at the buying and selling of links.

Disclaimer: The author and Search Engine Journal in no way promote, condone, and/or endorse link buying. This post is for informational purposes only, and if you choose to do so, you do so at your own risk.

What Is & Isn’t A Paid Link?

Before we begin, let’s address the elephant in the room: What exactly is a paid link?

When I start talking about paid link building, this is the most common question I get asked.

Google’s definition is clear. Any exchange of money, goods, and/or services for a link is verboten.

Advertisement

In other words, sponsored guest posts and paid reviews are paid links. These are standard practices, but Google is cracking down on them daily.

As you read this article, you should be aware that even “safer” paid link-building strategies risk being considered part of a link scheme and violate Google’s terms and conditions.

Why Do Some Professionals Still Buy Links?

Right now, you may be asking, why are websites still doing it if paying for links is so frowned upon? For the same reason people speed in their cars – it’s faster, and some view it as worth the risk.

It reduces the workload building links requires (e.g., creating quality content, prospecting for link opportunities, and building relationships) and significantly cuts down the time it takes to start seeing results.

With this in mind, many SEO professionals don’t mind taking a chance. And believe it or not, paying for links has not always been frowned upon.

In the early 2000s, buying and selling links wasn’t just in vogue – it was considered good business. Directories that let you pay for reviews and service companies that allowed you to buy or “rent” links sprung up like dandelions on a lawn.

Advertisement

Then Google brought out the weed whacker – enabling users to report paid links – which forced link buyers and sellers to get sneakier or change tactics.

Over the past two decades, buying links has become increasingly risky because Google’s ability to seek and destroy the SEO value of paid links has become uncannily accurate. That’s the critical risk.

If you pay for a link, there’s a good chance the algorithms will quietly ignore it. You’ll have no idea whether you just threw money into a pit.

That said, Google isn’t foolproof. Some companies still resort to paid link building because it’s easier, it’s all they know, or it’s standard practice in their industry.

Today, the rise of organic link building and content marketing has more or less nullified the need for buying links in the SEO industry at large. But that doesn’t mean the practice has disappeared.

The Reality Of Buying Links

So, here’s the rub: You most definitely 100% should not be giving a website owner $500 to link to your site. This is a shady practice and is likely to get you burned. But there is a correct way to buy links.

Advertisement

One way is outsourcing linking to a reputable agency that can earn you links (keyword: EARN). When done correctly, this isn’t paying for links as defined by Google.

Paying for the work of creating resources, performing outreach, and building relationships aren’t against Google’s guidelines.

There’s a big difference between paying someone to build links for you and participating in a link scheme. If you choose to do the latter, beware. There are a lot of low-quality link sellers out there. And Google usually knows about them.

That said, there are links worth buying outright. For example, if you’re looking to boost awareness (independent from your SEO efforts), you should pay to be featured on reputable websites with properly attributed and nofollow links. These can be a great addition to your public relations strategy – don’t expect them to help you climb search engine rankings.

Bad link buying practices include anything Google’s been working diligently to stamp out over the past few decades.

These include link farms and PBNs (private blog networks). If your paid links yield a large volume of low-quality links, watch out, you’re at serious risk of receiving a penalty.

Advertisement

A few recommendations:

  • Never buy sitewide links. Sitewide links (e.g., links in the sidebar, footer, navigation, etc.) scream “spam” to Google.
  • Avoid link-selling services and anyone selling “backlink packages.” Paying someone on Fiverr for a backlink package and contracting a link selling service (e.g., Sape) are quick ways to waste money. And if a site openly advertises that they sell links? Run!
  • Avoid “red flag” websites. Websites that have been previously penalized, repurposed into link/article farms, and generally rely on ad-heavy, content-thin pages should all set off your internal alarm.
  • Always disclose paid links and ensure they are correctly tagged with rel=nofollow or rel=sponsored. Don’t buy links for SEO. Buy sponsored packages with properly attributed links if they make sense for your brand.
  • Did I already mention that you should not buy links for SEO?

Just like organic link building, it’s always essential that you monitor the health of your backlink profile. Use link tracking software to measure your links’ impact and prune low-quality links that might have a negative effect on your site.

You should be incredibly diligent if you’ve purchased links in the past – double-check your link profile and consider disavowing any risky links. Yes, even if you paid for them. It’s not likely that you’ll get a manual action for a few paid links, but if you’ve used these tactics en masse, it’s a real risk.

Do Paid Links Work?

The fact is, yes, paying for backlinks can increase your search engine ranking – provided you don’t get caught. If it weren’t worth the risk, no one would do it.

But it’s getting harder and harder to hide paid links.

Backlinks are valuable in helping establish a site’s reputation and relevance in Google’s eyes.

But it’s not strictly a numbers game. Earning a few links from relevant websites where the links provide a good user experience will outperform dozens of incoming links from low-quality sites.

Advertisement

It’s most accurate to say that paid links work until they don’t. Some people are okay with business models that rely on temporary tactics with high churn.

Should You Buy Links?

Now that you understand buying and selling backlinks better, it’s time for the $10,000 question: Should you do it?

If you ask me or anyone at SEJ, we will tell you firmly: No. At least, not for SEO.

But you’re an adult and make your own decisions. It’s entirely up to you to determine whether you think the potential benefits outweigh the risk.

Are you willing to accept the risks? Are you okay with being a “churn and burn” website and losing a significant amount of your traffic overnight? If so, you may determine it’s worth taking a chance.

Just be aware that paying for links in the long term is a waste of money.

Advertisement

The time and resources you dedicate to purchasing links would be much better served to perform above-board SEO work.

Bought links can give you a quick boost, but at some point, probably much sooner than you would hope, Google will start ignoring those links you paid for.

But maybe that’s your business model.

If you’re fine with being an SEO comet that blazes brightly for a short time and then burns out spectacularly, don’t say we didn’t warn you. Just be prepared to lose your investment when Google catches on to what you’re doing.

You’re much better off paying for an SEO agency to legitimately boost your rankings than you are buying links. In other words, pay for work, not links. Just make sure to do your research and hire a reputable agency or professional who isn’t just buying links on your behalf.

More Resources:

Advertisement

Featured Image: Photoroyalty/Shutterstock



Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address

SEO

Google Declares It The “Gemini Era” As Revenue Grows 15%

Published

on

By

A person holding a smartphone displaying the Google Gemini Era logo, with a blurred background of stock market charts.

Alphabet Inc., Google’s parent company, announced its first quarter 2024 financial results today.

While Google reported double-digit growth in key revenue areas, the focus was on its AI developments, dubbed the “Gemini era” by CEO Sundar Pichai.

The Numbers: 15% Revenue Growth, Operating Margins Expand

Alphabet reported Q1 revenues of $80.5 billion, a 15% increase year-over-year, exceeding Wall Street’s projections.

Net income was $23.7 billion, with diluted earnings per share of $1.89. Operating margins expanded to 32%, up from 25% in the prior year.

Ruth Porat, Alphabet’s President and CFO, stated:

Advertisement

“Our strong financial results reflect revenue strength across the company and ongoing efforts to durably reengineer our cost base.”

Google’s core advertising units, such as Search and YouTube, drove growth. Google advertising revenues hit $61.7 billion for the quarter.

The Cloud division also maintained momentum, with revenues of $9.6 billion, up 28% year-over-year.

Pichai highlighted that YouTube and Cloud are expected to exit 2024 at a combined $100 billion annual revenue run rate.

Generative AI Integration in Search

Google experimented with AI-powered features in Search Labs before recently introducing AI overviews into the main search results page.

Regarding the gradual rollout, Pichai states:

“We are being measured in how we do this, focusing on areas where gen AI can improve the Search experience, while also prioritizing traffic to websites and merchants.”

Pichai reports that Google’s generative AI features have answered over a billion queries already:

Advertisement

“We’ve already served billions of queries with our generative AI features. It’s enabling people to access new information, to ask questions in new ways, and to ask more complex questions.”

Google reports increased Search usage and user satisfaction among those interacting with the new AI overview results.

The company also highlighted its “Circle to Search” feature on Android, which allows users to circle objects on their screen or in videos to get instant AI-powered answers via Google Lens.

Reorganizing For The “Gemini Era”

As part of the AI roadmap, Alphabet is consolidating all teams building AI models under the Google DeepMind umbrella.

Pichai revealed that, through hardware and software improvements, the company has reduced machine costs associated with its generative AI search results by 80% over the past year.

He states:

“Our data centers are some of the most high-performing, secure, reliable and efficient in the world. We’ve developed new AI models and algorithms that are more than one hundred times more efficient than they were 18 months ago.

How Will Google Make Money With AI?

Alphabet sees opportunities to monetize AI through its advertising products, Cloud offerings, and subscription services.

Advertisement

Google is integrating Gemini into ad products like Performance Max. The company’s Cloud division is bringing “the best of Google AI” to enterprise customers worldwide.

Google One, the company’s subscription service, surpassed 100 million paid subscribers in Q1 and introduced a new premium plan featuring advanced generative AI capabilities powered by Gemini models.

Future Outlook

Pichai outlined six key advantages positioning Alphabet to lead the “next wave of AI innovation”:

  1. Research leadership in AI breakthroughs like the multimodal Gemini model
  2. Robust AI infrastructure and custom TPU chips
  3. Integrating generative AI into Search to enhance the user experience
  4. A global product footprint reaching billions
  5. Streamlined teams and improved execution velocity
  6. Multiple revenue streams to monetize AI through advertising and cloud

With upcoming events like Google I/O and Google Marketing Live, the company is expected to share further updates on its AI initiatives and product roadmap.


Featured Image: Sergei Elagin/Shutterstock

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

SEO

brightonSEO Live Blog

Published

on

brightonSEO Live Blog

Hello everyone. It’s April again, so I’m back in Brighton for another two days of sun, sea, and SEO!

Being the introvert I am, my idea of fun isn’t hanging around our booth all day explaining we’ve run out of t-shirts (seriously, you need to be fast if you want swag!). So I decided to do something useful and live-blog the event instead.

Follow below for talk takeaways and (very) mildly humorous commentary. 

Advertisement

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

SEO

Google Further Postpones Third-Party Cookie Deprecation In Chrome

Published

on

By

Close-up of a document with a grid and a red stamp that reads "delayed" over the word "status" due to Chrome's deprecation of third-party cookies.

Google has again delayed its plan to phase out third-party cookies in the Chrome web browser. The latest postponement comes after ongoing challenges in reconciling feedback from industry stakeholders and regulators.

The announcement was made in Google and the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) joint quarterly report on the Privacy Sandbox initiative, scheduled for release on April 26.

Chrome’s Third-Party Cookie Phaseout Pushed To 2025

Google states it “will not complete third-party cookie deprecation during the second half of Q4” this year as planned.

Instead, the tech giant aims to begin deprecating third-party cookies in Chrome “starting early next year,” assuming an agreement can be reached with the CMA and the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).

The statement reads:

Advertisement

“We recognize that there are ongoing challenges related to reconciling divergent feedback from the industry, regulators and developers, and will continue to engage closely with the entire ecosystem. It’s also critical that the CMA has sufficient time to review all evidence, including results from industry tests, which the CMA has asked market participants to provide by the end of June.”

Continued Engagement With Regulators

Google reiterated its commitment to “engaging closely with the CMA and ICO” throughout the process and hopes to conclude discussions this year.

This marks the third delay to Google’s plan to deprecate third-party cookies, initially aiming for a Q3 2023 phaseout before pushing it back to late 2024.

The postponements reflect the challenges in transitioning away from cross-site user tracking while balancing privacy and advertiser interests.

Transition Period & Impact

In January, Chrome began restricting third-party cookie access for 1% of users globally. This percentage was expected to gradually increase until 100% of users were covered by Q3 2024.

However, the latest delay gives websites and services more time to migrate away from third-party cookie dependencies through Google’s limited “deprecation trials” program.

The trials offer temporary cookie access extensions until December 27, 2024, for non-advertising use cases that can demonstrate direct user impact and functional breakage.

Advertisement

While easing the transition, the trials have strict eligibility rules. Advertising-related services are ineligible, and origins matching known ad-related domains are rejected.

Google states the program aims to address functional issues rather than relieve general data collection inconveniences.

Publisher & Advertiser Implications

The repeated delays highlight the potential disruption for digital publishers and advertisers relying on third-party cookie tracking.

Industry groups have raised concerns that restricting cross-site tracking could push websites toward more opaque privacy-invasive practices.

However, privacy advocates view the phaseout as crucial in preventing covert user profiling across the web.

With the latest postponement, all parties have more time to prepare for the eventual loss of third-party cookies and adopt Google’s proposed Privacy Sandbox APIs as replacements.

Advertisement

Featured Image: Novikov Aleksey/Shutterstock

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

Trending

Follow by Email
RSS