But what happens when you want to expand outside of local markets? With Google now seeing more than 3.5 billion searches per day, there’s a massive opportunity for brands to capture new customers. The caveat is that existing SEO practices may not translate — and in some cases, may actually hurt your brand in other countries.
To avoid this potential pitfall, a robust international SEO strategy is critical. Here’s what you need to know about what it is, how it works, how it’ll benefit you, and what steps you can take to create an effective plan.
Ready? Shkojme! Idemo! Vámonos! Let’s go!
International SEO Strategy
An international SEO strategy is a combination of the policies, processes, and practices that your brand uses to optimize search content for other countries. The goal of international SEO is to make it easy for search engines to identify where your business operations are located and what languages you support.
Effective strategies leverage a combination of geographic and language data to develop SEO plans that drive reliable ROI. A strong international SEO strategy will help your company reach new markets and multiply revenue.
What does international SEO do for company websites?
An international SEO strategy for websites focuses on creating content that’s applicable to local markets, as well as developing a website structure that makes it easy for search engines to find and serve the right webpages to the right users at the right time.
Consider a company that sells window shades in the United States and is making a move into Canada. First, you’ll want to ensure Canadian customers are sent to the right pages on your website — pages that contain information about Canadian locations, Canadian shipping times, and fees and costs in CAD.
You’ll need a website structure that includes both U.S. and Canadian pages and leverages enough metadata that search requests from users will direct them to the right page for their current location.
Does my business need an international SEO strategy?
If you have no plans to expand beyond local markets — such as your current city or state — international SEO probably isn’t worth the time and resources required. In fact, international SEO can backfire if your business is entirely local. Customers who land on international pages won’t be happy when they discover you serve a very small geographic area.
On the other hand, if you’re looking to expand beyond country borders, it’s worth spending on international SEO. Given the sheer number of companies competing on the global stage and the increased challenge in ranking highly for relevant keywords, a comprehensive strategy is critical.
Still not sure whether you should go for a local SEO strategy or international SEO strategy?
International SEO vs Local SEO
The biggest difference between local and international SEO is scale. While local SEO is focused on keywords and target audiences within a narrow geographic area, international SEO targets audiences across diverse geographic regions.
There are four primary differentiators between local SEO and international SEO:
- Cost: Owing to their scale and scope, international SEO efforts come with significant costs.
- Content: To ensure international reach, you’ll need to create significantly more content than you would for a local SEO strategy.
- Capture: International SEO expands the target market you’re trying to capture, which necessitates in-depth research to ensure your brand aligns with customer expectations.
- Competition: Competition for keywords and customers is much greater for international SEO efforts. Instead of simply competing with other businesses in the same local sphere of influence, you could be up against multinational corporations.
Questions to Ask About International SEO
Not sure how to get your international SEO efforts off the ground? Start with these questions.
- Where are you headed?
- Should you target language or country?
- What localization factors matter most?
- How can you build local links?
- Does social media matter?
- Are current keywords good enough?
- Do you have the right tools and talent?
1. Where are you headed?
Depending on the part of the world you’re targeting, your international SEO approach will change. For example, if you’re headed to China, the most popular search engine is Baidu, while Yandex is the preferred choice in Russia. Each of these engines have their own approach to SEO, meaning it’s worth doing your research to find out what matters most for rankings.
2. Should you target language or country?
This is a common international SEO question: Are you better-served targeting a specific language or a country? The answer depends on your goals. If you’re looking to appeal to a broad audience regardless of where they live, language optimization may be the answer. If you’re looking to grow brand awareness in a specific part of the world, opt for country-based SEO.
3. What localization factors matter most?
Localization is the process of optimizing your website and content to reflect the local language and culture. Two of the most important factors here are accuracy and common use: First, it’s critical to make sure that translations of any keywords or slogans are accurate — direct translations can open your brand and services to misinterpretations, such as the always-classic “Come alive with Pepsi” slogan translated as “Pepsi brings your ancestors back from the dead” in Chinese markets.
Common use is the other concern. The words and phrases used to describe your business and what it does may not be the same in other languages, even if the literal translation of words gives that impression. Find out what words locals use to describe your products and services and use those instead.
4. How can you build local links?
Building local links back to your site also helps with international SEO. Here, it’s a good idea to write articles for local blogs, get a sponsored mention on websites that offer advice or useful information, connect with local social media influencers, and sponsor local events.
5. Does social media matter?
While Google has expressly stated that social media doesn’t factor into international SEO rankings, you can increase brand awareness and local influencer connections with a strong social media presence.
6. Are current keywords good enough?
While your current keywords may help you rank in the top 5 locally, the sheer number of companies competing for these keywords in global markets means you need to take a look at who’s using these keywords, where they rank, and whether other similar keywords might drive better results.
7. Do you have the right tools and talent?
Finally, consider if this is something you can take on yourself or if you’re better off hiring an experienced international SEO company.
Factors That Affect International SEO
Multiple factors affect international SEO, including:
Customer reviews on your website or on local review sites can positively or negatively impact your SEO efforts. Better reviews mean better connection with your primary keyword, in turn boosting your visibility.
The responsiveness of your website on mobile also matters to overall search rankings. As a result, it’s worth finding a content delivery network (CDN) capable of providing a top-tier website experience no matter where users are in the world.
Google My Business Account
Your Google My Business Account can help boost your SEO efforts — so long as you ensure to update where your company is operating. This acts as a starting point for Google to seek out geographic and language metadata on your site.
The more links heading back to your site from international sources, the better. As mentioned above, it’s a good idea to write for local blogs or connect with influencers to point links back to your website.
How to Develop an International SEO Strategy
Ready to develop your international SEO strategy? Start here.
1. Decide where and who you’ll target.
First, pick your target market and target audience. For example, you might decide to target the larger market of Brazil, then hone in on a subset of that market that has the means and motive to buy your product. The more focused your decisions around “where” and “who,” the better your results.
2. Determine whether you’ll hire an international SEO agency.
Do you want to do the heavy lifting of international SEO yourself or outsource this effort? There are advantages to both — you know your brand better than anyone else, but SEO experts are skilled at understanding local customs and preferences and creating a strategy to match.
3. Conduct international keyword research.
Keywords that work for you at home may not work abroad. This may simply be down to keyword volume, or it may be linked to how customers in your target market refer to your business. For example, trial lawyers in the United States are known as barristers in the United Kingdom — if you’re a legal firm looking to expand operations, this is a critical keyword difference.
4. Choose the right international domain structure.
The domain structure of your website makes it easier (or harder) for visitors and search engines to find your content. Different options include:
Country code Top Level Domains (ccTLDs) are two-letter domains assigned to specific countries. For example, .us is for the United States, .ca is for Canada, and .uk is for the United Kingdom. To improve international SEO, you may choose to create a unique ccTLD site for each country where your products or services are available.
Example: mybusiness.ca, mybusiness.uk
A generic Top-Level Domain (gTLD), meanwhile, refers to domain extensions with three or more characters; these TLDs are maintained by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA). Common examples include .com, .gov and .org.
Using a gTLD means that search engines won’t restrict results based on region, but it may reduce total traffic since many users prefer sites that include their country code TLD.
ccTLD or gTLD with subdomains
You can also choose to create subdomains for your site which combine aspects of both ccTLDs and gTLDs.
This offers the benefit of a country code and the advantages of a gTLD.
ccTLD or gTLD with subdirectories
Subdirectories, meanwhile, change the location of the country code:
5. Optimize content for the region and language
Finally, make sure all your content is optimized for both your target region and its local language. This includes double-checking all TLDs, translations, and content assets to ensure they’re aligned with local expectations.
Oh, and don’t forget the hreflang tag. This HTML attribute specifies the geographic area and language of a webpage. It’s used to differentiate similar webpages aimed at different audiences so that search engines don’t count them as duplicate content, and it looks like this:
Tools for International SEO
The right tools can also help you maximize the impact of international SEO by providing actionable data around traffic, click-throughs, and time spent on your site. Some of the most popular tools include:
HubSpot’s SEO software allows you to create an international content strategy, gives you live tips to improve your on-page SEO, and lets you organize your website in a way that’s easy for both search engines and users to understand.
Google Search Console lets you see what queries are driving traffic to your site, determine your position on Google Search, and analyze global site impressions.
Ahrefs is an all-in-one SEO toolset that lets you optimize your site, analyze your competitors’ rankings, and find the best keywords for your brand.
Moz offers site audits to determine potential issues, tracks keyword rankings across more than 170 search engines, analyzes backlink profiles to evaluate performance, and offers keyword research tools to find out how you stack up against the competition.
Semrush lets you identify high-value local and national keywords, analyze the backlink profile of any domain, and track your site’s SERP positions daily.
Google Analytics is an interconnected suite of tools that helps you analyze the impact of your website content worldwide.
International SEO Best Practices
No matter what approach you take to international SEO — language-focused or country-based, outsourced or in-house — the same best practices apply. Let’s take a look at them below.
1. Answer questions in the region’s native language and in the right context.
If there’s one thing to get right for international SEO, it’s making sure you’re speaking the same language as your customers. This means doing your research to ensure you’re always answering questions in their native language and in the appropriate context.
2. Translate existing content carefully.
While translation tools provide a literal conversion of words and phrases, they’re often not used this way by locals, meaning customers will quickly recognize that something isn’t quite right. Instead of translation, what you’re really looking for is “transcreation” — you want to recreate the same content but using the culture and language of your target market as a guide.
3. Consider the entire user experience in your strategy.
International SEO isn’t just about keywords and content. It’s also about making sure the entire user experience — from filling out forms to viewing prices in local currency or accessing multimedia assets that include native speakers — is seamlessly aligned across your site.
4. Avoid automatically redirecting users based on their IP address.
While it’s critical to serve content that matches local user expectations, don’t make the decision for them. Instead of automatically redirecting where they land based on their IP address, give them the option to choose their preferred region.
SEO: Improving Your International Impact
The right SEO strategy sets your brand apart from the crowd. And while this is important in home markets, it’s even more critical if you decide to go international, because it will ensure your website is optimized to support high-value content and keywords across regions and countries. By considering local customs, language, and context, you can boost consumer engagement, improve search engine results, and maximize your international impact.
Editor’s note: This post was originally published in March 2018 and has been updated for comprehensiveness.
Originally published Dec 24, 2021 7:00:00 AM, updated December 24 2021
Source: Eli Schwartz
Are Contextual Links A Google Ranking Factor?
Inbound links are a ranking signal that can vary greatly in terms of how they’re weighted by Google.
One of the key attributes that experts say can separate a high value link from a low value link is the context in which it appears.
When a link is placed within relevant content, it’s thought to have a greater impact on rankings than a link randomly inserted within unrelated text.
Is there any bearing to that claim?
Let’s dive deeper into what has been said about contextual links as a ranking factor to see whether there’s any evidence to support those claims.
The Claim: Contextual Links Are A Ranking Factor
A “contextual link” refers to an inbound link pointing to a URL that’s relevant to the content in which the link appears.
When an article links to a source to provide additional context for the reader, for example, that’s a contextual link.
Contextual links add value rather than being a distraction.
They should flow naturally with the content, giving the reader some clues about the page they’re being directed to.
Not to be confused with anchor text, which refers to the clickable part of a link, a contextual link is defined by the surrounding text.
A link’s anchor text could be related to the webpage it’s pointing to, but if it’s surrounded by content that’s otherwise irrelevant then it doesn’t qualify as a contextual link.
Contextual links are said to be a Google ranking factor, with claims that they’re weighted higher by the search engine than other types of links.
One of the reasons why Google might care about context when it comes to links is because of the experience it creates for users.
When a user clicks a link and lands on a page related to what they were previously looking at, it’s a better experience than getting directed to a webpage they aren’t interested in.
Modern guides to link building all recommend getting links from relevant URLs, as opposed to going out and placing links anywhere that will take them.
There’s now a greater emphasis on quality over quantity when it comes to link building, and a link is considered higher quality when its placement makes sense in context.
One high quality contextual link can, in theory, be worth more than multiple lower quality links.
That’s why experts advise site owners to gain at least a few contextual links, as that will get them further than building dozens of random links.
If Google weights the quality of links higher or lower based on context, it would mean Google’s crawlers can understand webpages and assess how closely they relate to other URLs on the web.
Is there any evidence to support this?
The Evidence For Contextual Links As A Ranking Factor
Evidence in support of contextual links as a ranking factor can be traced back to 2012 with the launch of the Penguin algorithm update.
Google’s original algorithm, PageRank, was built entirely on links. The more links pointing to a website, the more authority it was considered to have.
Websites could catapult their site up to the top of Google’s search results by building as many links as possible. It didn’t matter if the links were contextual or arbitrary.
Google’s PageRank algorithm wasn’t as selective about which links it valued (or devalued) over others until it was augmented with the Penguin update.
Penguin brought a number of changes to Google’s algorithm that made it more difficult to manipulate search rankings through spammy link building practices.
In Google’s announcement of the launch of Penguin, former search engineer Matt Cutts highlighted a specific example of the link spam it’s designed to target.
This example depicts the exact opposite of a contextual link, with Cutts saying:
“Here’s an example of a site with unusual linking patterns that is also affected by this change. Notice that if you try to read the text aloud you’ll discover that the outgoing links are completely unrelated to the actual content, and in fact, the page text has been “spun” beyond recognition.”
A contextual link, on the other hand, looks like the one a few paragraphs above linking to Google’s blog post.
Links with context share the following characteristics:
- Placement fits in naturally with the content.
- Linked URL is relevant to the article.
- Reader knows where they’re going when they click on it.
All of the documentation Google has published about Penguin over the years is the strongest evidence available in support of contextual links as a ranking factor.
Google will never outright say “contextual link building is a ranking factor,” however, because the company discourages any deliberate link building at all.
As Cutts adds at the end of his Penguin announcement, Google would prefer to see webpages acquire links organically:
“We want people doing white hat search engine optimization (or even no search engine optimization at all) to be free to focus on creating amazing, compelling web sites.”
Contextual Links Are A Ranking Factor: Our Verdict
Contextual links are probably a Google ranking factor.
A link is weighted higher when it’s used in context than if it’s randomly placed within unrelated content.
But that doesn’t necessarily mean links without context will negatively impact a site’s rankings.
External links are largely outside a site owner’s control.
If a website links to you out of context it’s not a cause for concern, because Google is capable of ignoring low value links.
On the other hand, if Google detects a pattern of unnatural links, then that could count against a site’s rankings.
If you have actively engaged in non-contextual link building in the past, it may be wise to consider using the disavow tool.
Featured Image: Paulo Bobita/Search Engine Journal
Is It A Google Ranking Factor?
Latent semantic indexing (LSI) is an indexing and information retrieval method used to identify patterns in the relationships between terms and concepts.
With LSI, a mathematical technique is used to find semantically related terms within a collection of text (an index) where those relationships might otherwise be hidden (or latent).
And in that context, this sounds like it could be super important for SEO.
If you’ve heard rumblings about latent semantic indexing in SEO or been advised to use LSI keywords, you aren’t alone.
But will LSI actually help improve your search rankings? Let’s take a look.
The Claim: Latent Semantic Indexing As A Ranking Factor
The claim is simple: Optimizing web content using LSI keywords helps Google better understand it and you’ll be rewarded with higher rankings.
Backlinko defines LSI keywords in this way:
“LSI (Latent Semantic Indexing) Keywords are conceptually related terms that search engines use to deeply understand content on a webpage.”
By using contextually related terms, you can deepen Google’s understanding of your content. Or so the story goes.
That resource goes on to make some pretty compelling arguments for LSI keywords:
- “Google relies on LSI keywords to understand content at such a deep level.”
- “LSI Keywords are NOT synonyms. Instead, they’re terms that are closely tied to your target keyword.”
- “Google doesn’t ONLY bold terms that exactly match what you just searched for (in search results). They also bold words and phrases that are similar. Needless to say, these are LSI keywords that you want to sprinkle into your content.”
Does this practice of “sprinkling” terms closely related to your target keyword help improve your rankings via LSI?
The Evidence For LSI As A Ranking Factor
Relevance is identified as one of five key factors that help Google determine which result is the best answer for any given query.
As Google explains is its How Search Works resource:
“To return relevant results for your query, we first need to establish what information you’re looking forーthe intent behind your query.”
Once intent has been established:
“…algorithms analyze the content of webpages to assess whether the page contains information that might be relevant to what you are looking for.”
Google goes on to explain that the “most basic signal” of relevance is that the keywords used in the search query appear on the page. That makes sense – if you aren’t using the keywords the searcher is looking for, how could Google tell you’re the best answer?
Now, this is where some believe LSI comes into play.
If using keywords is a signal of relevance, using just the right keywords must be a stronger signal.
There are purpose-build tools dedicated to helping you find these LSI keywords, and believers in this tactic recommend using all kinds of other keyword research tactics to identify them, as well.
The Evidence Against LSI As A Ranking Factor
“…we have no concept of LSI keywords. So that’s something you can completely ignore.”
There’s a healthy skepticism in SEO that Google may say things to lead us astray in order to protect the integrity of the algorithm. So let’s dig in here.
First, it’s important to understand what LSI is and where it came from.
Latent semantic structure emerged as a methodology for retrieving textual objects from files stored in a computer system in the late 1980s. As such, it’s an example of one of the earlier information retrieval (IR) concepts available to programmers.
As computer storage capacity improved and electronically available sets of data grew in size, it became more difficult to locate exactly what one was looking for in that collection.
Researchers described the problem they were trying to solve in a patent application filed September 15, 1988:
“Most systems still require a user or provider of information to specify explicit relationships and links between data objects or text objects, thereby making the systems tedious to use or to apply to large, heterogeneous computer information files whose content may be unfamiliar to the user.”
Keyword matching was being used in IR at the time, but its limitations were evident long before Google came along.
Too often, the words a person used to search for the information they sought were not exact matches for the words used in the indexed information.
There are two reasons for this:
- Synonymy: the diverse range of words used to describe a single object or idea results in relevant results being missed.
- Polysemy: the different meanings of a single word results in irrelevant results being retrieved.
These are still issues today, and you can imagine what a massive headache it is for Google.
However, the methodologies and technology Google uses to solve for relevance long ago moved on from LSI.
What LSI did was automatically create a “semantic space” for information retrieval.
As the patent explains, LSI treated this unreliability of association data as a statistical problem.
Without getting too into the weeds, these researchers essentially believed that there was a hidden underlying latent semantic structure they could tease out of word usage data.
Doing so would reveal the latent meaning and enable the system to bring back more relevant results – and only the most relevant results – even if there’s no exact keyword match.
Here’s what that LSI process actually looks like:
And here’s the most important thing you should note about the above illustration of this methodology from the patent application: there are two separate processes happening.
First, the collection or index undergoes Latent Semantic Analysis.
Second, the query is analyzed and the already-processed index is then searched for similarities.
And that’s where the fundamental problem with LSI as a Google search ranking signal lies.
Google’s index is massive at hundreds of billions of pages, and it’s growing constantly.
Each time a user inputs a query, Google is sorting through its index in a fraction of a second to find the best answer.
Using the above methodology in the algorithm would require that Google:
- Recreate that semantic space using LSA across its entire index.
- Analyze the semantic meaning of the query.
- Find all similarities between the semantic meaning of the query and documents in the semantic space created from analyzing the entire index.
- Sort and rank those results.
That’s a gross oversimplification, but the point is that this isn’t a scalable process.
This would be super useful for small collections of information. It was helpful for surfacing relevant reports inside a company’s computerized archive of technical documentation, for example.
The patent application illustrates how LSI works using a collection of nine documents. That’s what it was designed to do. LSI is primitive in terms of computerized information retrieval.
Latent Semantic Indexing As A Ranking Factor: Our Verdict
While the underlying principles of eliminating noise by determining semantic relevance have surely informed developments in search ranking since LSA/LSI was patented, LSI itself has no useful application in SEO today.
It hasn’t been ruled out completely, but there is no evidence that Google has ever used LSI to rank results. And Google definitely isn’t using LSI or LSI keywords today to rank search results.
Those who recommend using LSI keywords are latching on to a concept they don’t quite understand in an effort to explain why the ways in which words are related (or not) is important in SEO.
Relevance and intent are foundational considerations in Google’s search ranking algorithm.
Those are two of the big questions they’re trying to solve for in surfacing the best answer for any query.
Synonymy and polysemy are still major challenges.
Semantics – that is, our understanding of the various meanings of words and how they’re related – is essential in producing more relevant search results.
But LSI has nothing to do with that.
Featured Image: Paulo Bobita/Search Engine Journal
What Is a Google Broad Core Algorithm Update?
Google’s acknowledgment of core updates is always vague and doesn’t provide much detail other than to say the update occurred.
The SEO community is typically notified about core updates via the same standard tweets from Google’s Search Liaison.
There’s one announcement from Google when the update begins rolling out, and one on its conclusion, with few additional details in between (if any).
This invariably leaves SEO professionals and site owners asking many questions with respect to how their rankings were impacted by the core update.
To gain insight into what may have caused a site’s rankings to go up, down, or stay the same, it helps to understand what a broad core update is and how it differs from other types of algorithm updates.
After reading this article you’ll have a better idea of what a core update is designed to do, and how to recover from one if your rankings were impacted.
So, What Exactly Is A Core Update?
First, let me get the obligatory “Google makes hundreds of algorithm changes per year, often more than one per day” boilerplate out of the way.
In the case of Penguin, it was link spam; in the case of Pigeon, it was local SEO spam.
They all had a specific purpose.
In these cases, Google (sometimes reluctantly) informed us what they were trying to accomplish or prevent with the algorithm update, and we were able to go back and remedy our sites.
A core update is different.
The way I understand it, a core update is a tweak or change to the main search algorithm itself.
You know, the one that has between 200 and 500 ranking factors and signals (depending on which SEO blog you’re reading today).
What a core update means to me is that Google slightly tweaked the importance, order, weights, or values of these signals.
Because of that, they can’t come right out and tell us what changed without revealing the secret sauce.
The simplest way to visualize this would be to imagine 200 factors listed in order of importance.
Now imagine Google changing the order of 42 of those 200 factors.
Rankings would change, but it would be a combination of many things, not due to one specific factor or cause.
Obviously, it isn’t that simple, but that’s a good way to think about a core update.
Here’s a purely made up, slightly more complicated example of what Google wouldn’t tell us:
“In this core update, we increased the value of keywords in H1 tags by 2%, increased the value of HTTPS by 18%, decreased the value of keyword in title tag by 9%, changed the D value in our PageRank calculation from .85 to .70, and started using a TF-iDUF retrieval method for logged in users instead of the traditional TF-PDF method.”
(I swear these are real things. I just have no idea if they’re real things used by Google.)
For starters, many SEO pros wouldn’t understand it.
Basically, it means Google may have changed the way they calculate term importance on a page, or the weighing of links in PageRank, or both, or a whole bunch of other factors that they can’t talk about (without giving away the algorithm).
Put simply: Google changed the weight and importance of many ranking factors.
That’s the simple explanation.
At its most complex form, Google ran a new training set through their machine learning ranking model and quality raters picked this new set of results as more relevant than the previous set, and the engineers have no idea what weights changed or how they changed because that’s just how machine learning works.
(We all know Google uses quality raters to rate search results. These ratings are how they choose one algorithm change over another – not how they rate your site. Whether they feed this into machine learning is anybody’s guess. But it’s one possibility.)
It’s likely some random combination of weighting delivered more relevant results for the quality raters, so they tested it more, the test results confirmed it, and they pushed it live.
How Can You Recover From A Core Update?
Unlike a major named update that targeted specific things, a core update may tweak the values of everything.
Because websites are weighted against other websites relevant to your query (engineers call this a corpus) the reason your site dropped could be entirely different than the reason somebody else’s increased or decreased in rankings.
To put it simply, Google isn’t telling you how to “recover” because it’s likely a different answer for every website and query.
It all depends on what everybody else trying to rank for your query is doing.
Does every one of them but you have their keyword in the H1 tag? If so then that could be a contributing factor.
Do you all do that already? Then that probably carries less weight for that corpus of results.
It’s very likely that this algorithm update didn’t “penalize” you for something at all. It most likely just rewarded another site more for something else.
Maybe you were killing it with internal anchor text and they were doing a great job of formatting content to match user intent – and Google shifted the weights so that content formatting was slightly higher and internal anchor text was slightly lower.
(Again, hypothetical examples here.)
In reality, it was probably several minor tweaks that, when combined, tipped the scales slightly in favor of one site or another (think of our reordered list here).
Finding that “something else” that is helping your competitors isn’t easy – but it’s what keeps SEO professionals in the business.
Next Steps And Action Items
Rankings are down after a core update – now what?
Your next step is to gather intel on the pages that are ranking where your site used to be.
Conduct a SERP analysis to find positive correlations between pages that are ranking higher for queries where your site is now lower.
Try not to overanalyze the technical details, such as how fast each page loads or what their core web vitals scores are.
Pay attention to the content itself. As you go through it, ask yourself questions like:
- Does it provide a better answer to the query than your article?
- Does the content contain more recent data and current stats than yours?
- Are there pictures and videos that help bring the content to life for the reader?
Google aims to serve content that provides the best and most complete answers to searchers’ queries. Relevance is the one ranking factor that will always win out over all others.
Take an honest look at your content to see if it’s as relevant today as it was prior to the core algorithm update.
From there you’ll have an idea of what needs improvement.
The best advice for conquering core updates?
Keep focusing on:
- User intent.
- Quality content.
- Clean architecture.
- Google’s guidelines.
Finally, don’t stop improving your site once you reach Position 1, because the site in Position 2 isn’t going to stop.
Yeah, I know, it’s not the answer anybody wants and it sounds like Google propaganda. I swear it’s not.
It’s just the reality of what a core update is.
Nobody said SEO was easy.
Featured Image: Ulvur/Shutterstock
What is marketing automation?
TikTok’s Working on a New, Opt-In Function to Show You Who Viewed Your Profile
‘Flurona’ is a great example of how misinformation can circulate
Are Contextual Links A Google Ranking Factor?
Is It A Google Ranking Factor?
January 22nd Another Unconfirmed Google Search Ranking Update
What Is a Google Broad Core Algorithm Update?
Google Says It’s Not Possible To Prevent Outages
12 Helpful SEO Tools for Your Brand in 2022 [Infographic]
New Survey Shows that Social Media Users are Increasingly Concerned About Data Privacy [Infographic]
WordPress 5.9 to Introduce Language Switcher on Login Screen
Here’s How Meta Is Changing Facebook Ads Targeting For 2022
14 Top Reasons Why Google Isn’t Indexing Your Site
20 Tips and Best Practices
Pages That Look Like Error Pages Can Be Considered Soft 404s By Google
Are Nofollow Links a Google Ranking Factor?
17 Actionable Content Marketing Tips for 2022
Picking SEO Keywords: An Expert’s Guide
10 Things You Need To Know To Be Successful
How To Help Google Rank Products With Duplicate Descriptions
SEARCHENGINES3 days ago
Google Search Ranking Update On January 19th & 20th
MARKETING4 days ago
Which Social Networks Should You Advertise on in 2022?
SEARCHENGINES4 days ago
Some Sites Seeing Massive Crawl Spikes From Google
SEARCHENGINES2 days ago
Bug With Google Ads Discovery & Performance Max Campaigns & New Placement Reports
SEARCHENGINES2 days ago
Google Looking To Make Crawling More Efficient & Environmental Friendly
SEO18 hours ago
What Is a Google Broad Core Algorithm Update?
MARKETING2 days ago
How to Create Functional SOPs (That Your Employees Actually Use)
SEARCHENGINES1 day ago
Google New York City Conference Room View