Connect with us

SOCIAL

YouTube Tests New Emoji Reactions for Moments in Video Clips, Updates Community Polls

Published

on

YouTube Tests New Emoji Reactions for Moments in Video Clips, Updates Community Polls


YouTube’s testing a new way to react to certain elements of video clips with ‘Timed Reactions’, which are essentially emoji reactions that you can add to a specific frame in the playback.

As you can see in this example, similar to YouTube’s Timed Comments, Timed Reactions will enable users to attach an emoji character that captures their response to certain elements of a clip.   

As explained by YouTube:

“For viewers in the experiment you’ll tap comments, and you’ll see a popup tab in the bottom right hand corner of a video on mobile. Tap it, to see a set of reactions that you can then use to react to specific moments of the video you’re watching.”

So rather than posting a comment, you would select a reaction, which would then be viewable to anyone else watching the playback.

That could help guide users to the most engaging parts of each clip, while YouTube’s also working on adding new analytics to capture these responses, which could provide more insight into what exactly your viewers want to see more of from your uploads.

YouTube’s also working on a range of Reaction sets to measure response, with three different variants currently in play,

Advertisement
YouTube Reactions

It’s a simple, and likely effective experiment, especially given the broad availability of Reactions tools in other apps, which has established emoji response as a more habitual engagement behavior.

It could also prompt more users to share their thoughts, eliciting even more insight into what people want to see, which could further assist in your planning and strategy.

YouTube says that the test is in very early beta at the moment, with a small number of channels, so you might not even see these reactions in the app. But some channels will have Reactions active, so keep an eye out for them.

In addition to this, YouTube has also launched a new test of images in poll posts in the Community Tab.

“We are experimenting with functionality that allows for up to 4 images to be added to poll posts on the Community Tab. We’ve heard from creators and viewers alike that polls are fun to engage with, which is why we are continuing to invest in this feature. Creators on Android devices who have Community Tab access (500+ subscribers) are eligible to create image polls during this experiment, and viewers across Android, iOS and desktop devices are eligible to see and interact with them.”

YouTube’s Community Tab is a lesser utilized function, enabling creators to connect with their audience outside of their video uploads – essentially a regular social media, text-based interaction panel within your YouTube channel page.

Over time, some creators are coming to rely on that engagement even more, and with YouTube offering greater monetization potential than other apps (for most creators), it does make sense to utilize its community-building features with a view to maximizing your earnings potential through enhanced engagement.

Given this, the updated polls could be worth exploring. All creators with access to the Community Tab (which requires 500 subscribers, not 1,000 as noted in the above video clip) can now test out the new polls format.

Advertisement



Source link

SOCIAL

Meta Shares Insights into How Consumers View the Next Big Tech Shifts, Including the Metaverse

Published

on

Meta Shares Insights into How Consumers View the Next Big Tech Shifts, Including the Metaverse

The metaverse has become such a vague term, incorporating so many different tech elements, that it’s hard to say what people really understand about the next stage of digital connection – which, it’s important to note, does not actually exist as yet.

With that in mind, it’s not entirely clear what this new survey data from Meta actually means, in a broader marketing context.

In order to gauge consumer sentiment about the metaverse, and the opportunities that it will provide for brand connection, Meta conducted a survey of 30,000 shoppers from around the world, to see how they feel about different aspects of advancing technology, which Meta has then attributed back to the broader metaverse concept.

As per Meta:

“[We] found that today’s shoppers are interested in next-level experiences with brands. Whether it’s exploring a product through immersive technology, or making sure their avatars are every bit as stylish as they are in the physical world, shoppers want a greater sense of connection and inspiration with the brands they engage with.”

Which could point to some significant brand considerations – with some provisos on specific data points.

For example, among their key findings, Meta says that 28% of people are using, or have used AR while shopping, while 42% imagine that AR can improve the shopping experience ‘by bridging the gap between online and the physical store’.

Advertisement

Which is no doubt true – advancing AR try-on tools, in particular, can provide a great complement to the online shopping experience. But that’s not the ‘metaverse’ as such – AR is not the same as the VR worlds that Meta’s building to support its metaverse vision.

It’s this kind of extrapolation of related tech that Meta’s using to promote its metaverse vision, though it’s not actually the same thing. AR, VR, Web3 – these are all elements of tech development that are separate, and while it is likely that you’ll eventually be able to combine aspects of each, it doesn’t all come under the umbrella of ‘the metaverse’ necessarily.

But Meta, which has gone all-in on the metaverse concept, wants to make you think that it does, because it can then lead the way in the broader ‘metaverse’ space, and beat out the competition that may be working on individual elements. Really, ‘metaverse’ in this context is synonymous with ‘technology’, with each of these being elements of technological advancement, not metaverse-related entities within themselves.

Which, again, is important to note does not exist. A fully immersive, fully interoperable digital world, where people can interact in all new ways is not a reality at this stage, and may take years to even get close to being a thing. Not only will it require big take-up of VR, but there’s also work to be done on establishing universal agreements to facilitate cross-platform integration, partnerships that need to be established between tech platforms which likely have little interest in signing any such agreement, along with advancements in body scanning, interaction (i.e. giving VR avatars legs), control tools, etc.

Meta may be keen to place itself at the forefront of the next digital evolution, but we’re not there yet.

But still, Meta’s keen to convince brands that they need to invest now, or risk missing the metaverse boat.

Among other key findings from its survey:

  • 42% of shoppers believe that the metaverse will positively transform their shopping experience.
  • 51% say that virtual stores will offer a more convenient way to shop
  • 50% of respondents indicated that they believe that brands will need to have a presence on gaming platforms and other virtual worlds to be successful in future

Again, this is based on concept – if somebody showed you one of Meta’s polished, edited, animated depictions of its metaverse vision, you’d no doubt also agree that this could be amazing for how we connect.

Advertisement

But that’s not real. Meta’s selling people on a concept that it cannot deliver just yet.

Will it be able to deliver on such in future? Maybe, but there’s a lot that needs to happen before brands need to truly consider how they appear in a metaverse space, be it the one created by Meta, or any other.

The only real, valuable insight in this new survey comes in the latter elements, and how people view their digital selves:

“Shoppers are ready to start purchasing digital twins – a virtual, identical good that comes with a physical item. In our survey, 46% say it’s important that new real-world products become available as virtual products as well. We found that 46% of shoppers surveyed say virtual products provide a feeling of association with a brand by offering something rare and unique, and 48% say it makes them more loyal if a brand offers a virtual good as a reward for their loyalty.”

This is an aspect that seems will definitely become more valuable, with avatar depictions, already available via Snapchat’s Bitmoji characters, or even Facebook’s own avatars, increasingly being used within online communications and activities.

This stems from gaming worlds like Roblox and Fortnite, where youngsters have spent years interacting with each other in avatar form. That behavior is likely to translate as they move into older brackets, and as such, the depiction of self via digital avatars will become a bigger consideration.

And brands can tap into this to help expand their promotions.

“Avatar personalization is a key driver of the interest in digital goods, and according to our survey, 49% of shoppers want their avatar to look the same as their physical self. Meanwhile, 28% want to appear different, but still like a person, and 23% want to present a more surreal identity.”

Advertisement

This is another important note – part of the emphasis within the recent NFT fad was that users will be able to use their NFT characters as their digital identity, which would theoretically include using depictions of, say, a Bored Ape character as a 3D avatar in these virtual worlds.

But history, and data insights like this, show that this likely won’t be the case. If people can, they’ll choose avatars that look similar to themselves, which potentially lessens the projected value of NFT characters moving forward.

In summary, yes, there are opportunities in future-facing tech, but they likely don’t go as deep, at least at this stage, as Meta wants to make businesses believe.

Meta says that brands looking to ‘fully lean into the metaverse’ can start experimenting with AR try-on effects or build experiences in Meta Horizon Worlds. But the former is not necessarily associated with the metaverse concept, and the latter is not fully functional, or relevant as yet.

But this is what you can expect – many consultants, advisors and entrepreneurs looking to cash in on the early knowledge gap will indeed be keen to tell you that you need to invest in these concepts right now, or you’ll risk losing out, and many businesses, a lot of which dismissed social media in its early stages, will offer up handfuls of cash to ensure that they reserve a seat at the virtual table, and can hook into these new trends.

Do you actually need to be investing in these technologies at this early stage?

Staying in touch with AR developments is likely valuable, and there are various ways to experiment with AR tools that can keep you up to date in this respect, while understanding VR developments is also important.

But what if a new, universal agreement is formed on what the requirements of metaverse avatars are, and that renders your avatar characters obsolete? What if some of these early metaverse projects are not able to meet the eventual requirements of the broader, interconnected metaverse, and are forced to shut down as a result?

Advertisement

There’s a lot that has to happen before the metaverse concept becomes a thing, and it’s important to view each of these elements in isolation, not as a singular, broad-reaching concept.

You can check out Meta’s latest metaverse shopping study here.

Source link

Continue Reading

DON'T MISS ANY IMPORTANT NEWS!
Subscribe To our Newsletter
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address

Trending

en_USEnglish