Connect with us

SEO

High-Quality Links vs. Low-Quality Links: What’s the Difference?

Published

on

High-Quality Links vs. Low-Quality Links: What’s the Difference
We spend a lot of time as SEO professionals going after links.

They are often seen as the most powerful way to rank a site.

But not every link is created equal.

Over time, the search engines have adapted their algorithms to account for links in different ways, narrowing their use for determining the suitability of a webpage as an answer to a search query.

In this post, you will learn what makes a high-quality link, where to find opportunities to build them, and how to evaluate whether a link is worth the budget and effort to get it.

How Do Search Engines Use Links?

Search engines use links pointing to a webpage to both discover its existence and also determine information about it.

Google mentions in its help documentation,

Advertisement

“Google interprets a link from page A to page B as a vote by page A for page B. Votes cast by pages that are themselves “important” weigh more heavily and help to make other pages “important.”

Bing states in its Webmaster Help and How-To guide,

“Bing prefers to see links built organically. This essentially means the links are built by people linking to your content because they find value in your content. This is an important signal to a search engine because it is seen as a vote of confidence in the content.”

What Is Valuable About a Link?

We know that Google uses links like votes.

A link from a well-regarded website will have more clout than a lesser-regarded website.

Authority

This is often discussed as “authority.”

Many SEO tools will try to assign an authority metric to a website or webpage in an attempt to quantify the value of a link from them.

An authoritative webpage linking to your webpage can be a strong signal that it is itself an authoritative source.

Advertisement

In essence, an authoritative website is one that is considered by the search engines to be a reputable source of information about a subject – an authority in it.

Google will, in part, look at that site’s backlinks to determine its expertise and trustworthiness in a subject.

For instance, a website is considered an expert in interior design. It links to a lesser-known website about interior design.

The website by an expert in interior design is confident enough in the content of the lesser-known site that it’s willing to send its visitors there.

That’s a good, impartial way for the search engines to determine the reputation of a site and its authority on a subject.

Relevance

Authority isn’t everything, however.

Advertisement

Think of it like this… you’re going on holiday to a city you’ve never visited.

Who would you rather ask for restaurant recommendations: your friend who lives in the city, or a tour guide for a city 5 hours away from it?

Your friend who lives in the city is likely more of a relevant source of information on the restaurants in the area than the tour guide who doesn’t serve that area.

You might perceive a tour guide to be more knowledgeable about good restaurants, but not if it’s not their area of expertise.

In a similar way, the search engines will understand the value of a website in your industry linking to your webpage.

A website that reviews restaurants will be considered a more relevant source of information about restaurants than a local community group who had an outing to a restaurant.

Advertisement

Both sites may have a page talking about the “best sushi restaurant in New York,” but the restaurant review website will be more relevant in helping the search engines determine what to serve as an answer for “sushi restaurant in New York.”

Authority & Relevance

The best source of a link is a website that is both considered authoritative and relevant to your website.

What Makes a Link Low-Quality?

If we think of a quality link as one that is both relevant and authoritative, then it makes sense that the lowest quality link is one that is both irrelevant and not authoritative.

These sorts of links are usually easy to come by and can be self-created or requested.

For instance, a website that allows anyone to submit a link is unlikely to have highly curated content that would lend it to being authoritative.

The fact that anyone can add a link to the site means it isn’t likely to be particularly relevant to one industry or niche.

Advertisement

Links to your site from a website like this will be low-quality and generally useless.

At best, these links might have a little positive impact on your search rankings but at worst they could be perceived as part of a manipulative linking scheme.

Google has strict guidelines on what is considered a manipulative link.

You might want to familiarize yourself with Bing and Yandex’s definitions, too.

A Word About Paid Links

We all know by now that paying for links to aid rankings is against the guidelines of most big search engines.

In a best-case scenario, the link won’t be identified as having been paid for and you won’t see a penalty from it.

Advertisement

However, if Google detects that you’ve acquired links from websites that sell links, you may find the webpage it links to penalized.

There are legitimate reasons why links might be placed on websites for a fee.

It’s common practice to utilize banner advertising and affiliate marketing on the internet, for example.

In these instances, Google recommends that webmasters declare the links to be sponsored using the rel=”sponsored” attribute.

This indicates to Googlebots that the link is one that has been paid for and is not to be used for calculating PageRank.

These sorts of links have their own value for marketing and should not be discounted simply because they will not necessarily aid in search rankings.

Advertisement

A Word About NoFollow Links

Before Google introduced the use of the rel=”sponsored” attribute, it and other search engines were using the rel=”nofollow” attribute.

Putting a rel=”nofollow” attribute into the HTML for a link shows the search bots that they shouldn’t go to the destination of that link.

This is used by publishers to stop the search engines from visiting the page and ascribing any benefit of the link.

So, if a high-quality page links to your webpage with a link contain a rel=”nofollow” attribute, you won’t see any ranking benefit of that link.

Google announced recently that this attribute is a hint and therefore it might ignore it.

On the whole, this essentially makes a “nofollow” link useless for SEO link-building purposes as link equity will not pass through the link.

Advertisement

However, if people are following the link and discovering your webpage, I would argue it’s not useless at all!

What Do High-Quality Links Looks Like?

Low-quality links are usually those that are either:

  • Irrelevant in helping the search engines determine your site’s authority on a subject.
  • Or actually harmful.

I’m not addressing link penalties here, or even the sorts of link-building practices that will land you in hot water. For more information on that, see Chuck Price’s article on manual actions.

The low-quality links we’re talking about here are ones that you may well be going after but aren’t benefiting your site.

High-quality links are the Holy Grail of link-building.

They’re the links you show off in your “Team Wins” Slack channel and on Twitter.

They are hard to earn.

Advertisement

I also want to show you some “medium-quality” links.

These are the types of links that are good to get but perhaps won’t move the needle as much as you would like.

They form a part of a healthy backlink profile but aren’t worth your whole content marketing budget to land.

Low Quality: Low Authority/Low Relevance

The sorts of links you are likely to gain that are low-quality and low-relevance are ones that require no real effort to get.

For example, simply sourcing the links and asking for them or, in some cases, adding the link yourself.

Open Directories

Advertisement

These directory sites are very obviously low quality when you visit them. Typically they only offer one service – advertise your website here!

You do not need to pay for a link and everyone and their dog has taken advantage of this.

There will be links from websites in all sorts of industries with very little rhyme or reason as to why this directory exists.

Do note, however, that there are reputable local business directories that can help with verifying your business’s physical address and contact details—Yelp, for instance.

These listings are useful for local citations but are unlikely to really aid in boosting your site’s rankings.

The difference between reputable local directories and generic open directories is quite obvious when you visit them.

Advertisement

Comment Links

Forums ad blogs can be very relevant to a particular industry.

However, due to the ease with which anyone can add content to a forum page or blog comments, any links in that user-generated content are usually discounted by the search engines.

In recent SEO history, blog and forum comments were easy targets for squeezing in a link to a site.

The search engines became wise to this and started devaluing those links.

Alongside the rel=”sponsored” attribute, Google released rel=”ugc”.

Advertisement

This is a way for webmasters to indicate that the links within their forums are user-generated.

Low Quality: Low Effort & No Follow

Social Media Posts

Most large social media sites will use “no follow” tags on them.

However, Google did recently say that “nofollow” tags would be taken as hints rather than concretely respected.

Despite this, social media sites are not the place to go looking for backlinks to help your rankings.

Although social media sites themselves are often authoritative, they are full of uncurated content.

Advertisement

Businesses can set up their own social media pages with links back to their websites. They can talk about their sites in their posts.

These links are not unbiased. Due to this, they are largely ignored by search engines.

Medium Quality: Low Authority but High Relevancy

Small Industry Blogs

Most industries have a proliferation of blogs. Sites run by companies or individuals who want to share their knowledge and build their profile.

There are some highly relevant, niche blogs that might not be well-known enough to be getting their own authority-metric boosting backlinks.

They are, however, full of decent content and very relevant to the website you are trying to grow.

Advertisement

Small industry blog writers are often less over-run with requests to share content and add links than the well-known ones.

They are, however, keen to write and build community.

A smaller blog featuring your site is still a good reinforcement of your relevance to your industry.

This can help enormously with showing your relevance to search topics associated with that industry.

Small Industry Brands

There will be some staple brands in your industry that aren’t necessarily competitors but are tangentially related.

Advertisement

Think of paper manufacturers to your office supply store, for example.

A link from the paper manufacturer showing your store as their distributor can help show your authority in the industry.

Medium Quality: Medium Authority & Medium Low Relevancy

Local News Sites

Your local news site may report on anything to do with your community, or they might be more discerning.

Regardless, doing something considered locally newsworthy can get you featured a lot easier than in a national news website.

These are especially good links to get if you are trying to boost your local SEO efforts.

Advertisement

A link from a website known as a source of reliable local information could help the search engines to see your relevance to that physical area.

High Quality: High Authority but Medium/Low Relevancy

Some sites are extremely authoritative and hard to get a link from. These tend to be beneficial to your SEO efforts.

These sorts of links might not be highly relevant, however.

Although you will see a benefit to your search visibility, it may not help solidify your relevance for particular topics.

National News Sites

There are some national and international newspapers with extremely high authority websites. A link from these sites is worth the effort.

Advertisement

However, journalists are inundated with hundreds of press releases and article ideas every day.

It can be incredibly difficult to get featured, especially with a link.

The best way to get coverage in a national newspaper is to do something newsworthy.

Bringing it to the attention of the site’s journalists might help you get it covered, hopefully with a link back to your site.

High Quality: Medium Authority but High Relevancy

Big Industry Blogs

That website that everyone in the industry goes to for their news; your friends and family may not have heard of it, but your colleagues definitely have.

Advertisement

It’s likely to be a medium authority site according to authority metrics but it’s a leader in your industry.

It’s also very relevant to the website you’re promoting.

A link from a site like this will go a long way in showing your site’s expertise.

High Quality: High Authority & High Relevancy

Big Industry Brands

These are household names; the companies everyone in your industry (and possibly their families) know of.

These links are likely to be medium to high authority according to the tools but definitely leaders in your industry.

If you are linked to as a supplier or distributor, or even just mentioned in a favorable review, you are likely to see the ranking benefit.

Advertisement

Conclusion

A wide and varied link profile is good for SEO.

If you are actively looking to increase links to your site in an organic manner, it’s imperative you know how to generate high-quality links.

Don’t waste your time going for easy links on unrelated and low-quality sites.

Instead, focus your energy and budget on creating truly newsworthy content and bringing it to the attention of authoritative and relevant publishers.

More Resources:

Search Engine Journal

Advertisement
Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address

SEO

Big Update To Google’s Ranking Drop Documentation

Published

on

By

Google updates documentation for diagnosing ranking drops

Google updated their guidance with five changes on how to debug ranking drops. The new version contains over 400 more words that address small and large ranking drops. There’s room to quibble about some of the changes but overall the revised version is a step up from what it replaced.

Change# 1: Downplays Fixing Traffic Drops

The opening sentence was changed so that it offers less hope for bouncing back from an algorithmic traffic drop. Google also joined two sentences into one sentence in the revised version of the documentation.

The documentation previously said that most traffic drops can be reversed and that identifying the reasons for a drop aren’t straightforward. The part about most of them can be reversed was completely removed.

Here is the original two sentences:

“A drop in organic Search traffic can happen for several reasons, and most of them can be reversed. It may not be straightforward to understand what exactly happened to your site”

Now there’s no hope offered for “most of them can be reversed” and more emphasis on understanding what happened is not straightforward.

Advertisement

This is the new guidance

“A drop in organic Search traffic can happen for several reasons, and it may not be straightforward to understand what exactly happened to your site.”

Change #2 Security Or Spam Issues

Google updated the traffic graph illustrations so that they precisely align with the causes for each kind of traffic decline.

The previous version of the graph was labeled:

“Site-level technical issue (Manual Action, strong algorithmic changes)”

The problem with the previous label is that manual actions and strong algorithmic changes are not technical issues and the new version fixes that issue.

The updated version now reads:

“Large drop from an algorithmic update, site-wide security or spam issue”

Change #3 Technical Issues

There’s one more change to a graph label, also to make it more accurate.

Advertisement

This is how the previous graph was labeled:

“Page-level technical issue (algorithmic changes, market disruption)”

The updated graph is now labeled:

“Technical issue across your site, changing interests”

Now the graph and label are more specific as a sitewide change and “changing interests” is more general and covers a wider range of changes than market disruption. Changing interests includes market disruption (where a new product makes a previous one obsolete or less desirable) but it also includes products that go out of style or loses their trendiness.

Graph titled

Change #4 Google Adds New Guidance For Algorithmic Changes

The biggest change by far is their brand new section for algorithmic changes which replaces two smaller sections, one about policy violations and manual actions and a second one about algorithm changes.

The old version of this one section had 108 words. The updated version contains 443 words.

A section that’s particularly helpful is where the guidance splits algorithmic update damage into two categories.

Advertisement

Two New Categories:

  • Small drop in position? For example, dropping from position 2 to 4.
  • Large drop in position? For example, dropping from position 4 to 29.

The two new categories are perfect and align with what I’ve seen in the search results for sites that have lost rankings. The reasons for dropping up and down within the top ten are different from the reasons why a site drops completely out of the top ten.

I don’t agree with the guidance for large drops. They recommend reviewing your site for large drops, which is good advice for some sites that have lost rankings. But in other cases there’s nothing wrong with the site and this is where less experienced SEOs tend to be unable to fix the problems because there’s nothing wrong with the site. Recommendations for improving EEAT, adding author bios or filing link disavows do not solve what’s going on because there’s nothing wrong with the site. The problem is something else in some of the cases.

Here is the new guidance for debugging search position drops:

Algorithmic update
Google is always improving how it assesses content and updating its search ranking and serving algorithms accordingly; core updates and other smaller updates may change how some pages perform in Google Search results. We post about notable improvements to our systems on our list of ranking updates page; check it to see if there’s anything that’s applicable to your site.

If you suspect a drop in traffic is due to an algorithmic update, it’s important to understand that there might not be anything fundamentally wrong with your content. To determine whether you need to make a change, review your top pages in Search Console and assess how they were ranking:

Small drop in position? For example, dropping from position 2 to 4.
Large drop in position? For example, dropping from position 4 to 29.

Keep in mind that positions aren’t static or fixed in place. Google’s search results are dynamic in nature because the open web itself is constantly changing with new and updated content. This constant change can cause both gains and drops in organic Search traffic.

Small drop in position
A small drop in position is when there’s a small shift in position in the top results (for example, dropping from position 2 to 4 for a search query). In Search Console, you might see a noticeable drop in traffic without a big change in impressions.

Advertisement

Small fluctuations in position can happen at any time (including moving back up in position, without you needing to do anything). In fact, we recommend avoiding making radical changes if your page is already performing well.

Large drop in position
A large drop in position is when you see a notable drop out of the top results for a wide range of terms (for example, dropping from the top 10 results to position 29).

In cases like this, self-assess your whole website overall (not just individual pages) to make sure it’s helpful, reliable and people-first. If you’ve made changes to your site, it may take time to see an effect: some changes can take effect in a few days, while others could take several months. For example, it may take months before our systems determine that a site is now producing helpful content in the long term. In general, you’ll likely want to wait a few weeks to analyze your site in Search Console again to see if your efforts had a beneficial effect on ranking position.

Keep in mind that there’s no guarantee that changes you make to your website will result in noticeable impact in search results. If there’s more deserving content, it will continue to rank well with our systems.”

Change #5 Trivial Changes

The rest of the changes are relatively trivial but nonetheless makes the documentation more precise.

For example, one of the headings was changed from this:

Advertisement

You recently moved your site

To this new heading:

Site moves and migrations

Google’s Updated Ranking Drops Documentation

Google’s updated documentation is a well thought out but I think that the recommendations for large algorithmic drops are helpful for some cases and not helpful for other cases. I have 25 years of SEO experience and have experienced every single Google algorithm update. There are certain updates where the problem is not solved by trying to fix things and Google’s guidance used to be that sometimes there’s nothing to fix. The documentation is better but in my opinion it can be improved even further.

Read the new documentation here:

Debugging drops in Google Search traffic

Review the previous documentation:

Internet Archive Wayback Machine: Debugging drops in Google Search traffic

Advertisement

Featured Image by Shutterstock/Tomacco

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

SEO

Google March 2024 Core Update Officially Completed A Week Ago

Published

on

By

Graphic depicting the Google logo with colorful segments on a blue circuit board background, accompanied by the text "Google March 2024 Core Update.

Google has officially completed its March 2024 Core Update, ending over a month of ranking volatility across the web.

However, Google didn’t confirm the rollout’s conclusion on its data anomaly page until April 26—a whole week after the update was completed on April 19.

Many in the SEO community had been speculating for days about whether the turbulent update had wrapped up.

The delayed transparency exemplifies Google’s communication issues with publishers and the need for clarity during core updates

Google March 2024 Core Update Timeline & Status

First announced on March 5, the core algorithm update is complete as of April 19. It took 45 days to complete.

Advertisement

Unlike more routine core refreshes, Google warned this one was more complex.

Google’s documentation reads:

“As this is a complex update, the rollout may take up to a month. It’s likely there will be more fluctuations in rankings than with a regular core update, as different systems get fully updated and reinforce each other.”

The aftershocks were tangible, with some websites reporting losses of over 60% of their organic search traffic, according to data from industry observers.

The ripple effects also led to the deindexing of hundreds of sites that were allegedly violating Google’s guidelines.

Addressing Manipulation Attempts

In its official guidance, Google highlighted the criteria it looks for when targeting link spam and manipulation attempts:

  • Creating “low-value content” purely to garner manipulative links and inflate rankings.
  • Links intended to boost sites’ rankings artificially, including manipulative outgoing links.
  • The “repurposing” of expired domains with radically different content to game search visibility.

The updated guidelines warn:

“Any links that are intended to manipulate rankings in Google Search results may be considered link spam. This includes any behavior that manipulates links to your site or outgoing links from your site.”

John Mueller, a Search Advocate at Google, responded to the turbulence by advising publishers not to make rash changes while the core update was ongoing.

Advertisement

However, he suggested sites could proactively fix issues like unnatural paid links.

Mueller stated on Reddit:

“If you have noticed things that are worth improving on your site, I’d go ahead and get things done. The idea is not to make changes just for search engines, right? Your users will be happy if you can make things better even if search engines haven’t updated their view of your site yet.”

Emphasizing Quality Over Links

The core update made notable changes to how Google ranks websites.

Most significantly, Google reduced the importance of links in determining a website’s ranking.

In contrast to the description of links as “an important factor in determining relevancy,” Google’s updated spam policies stripped away the “important” designation, simply calling links “a factor.”

This change aligns with Google’s Gary Illyes’ statements that links aren’t among the top three most influential ranking signals.

Advertisement

Instead, Google is giving more weight to quality, credibility, and substantive content.

Consequently, long-running campaigns favoring low-quality link acquisition and keyword optimizations have been demoted.

With the update complete, SEOs and publishers are left to audit their strategies and websites to ensure alignment with Google’s new perspective on ranking.

Core Update Feedback

Google has opened a ranking feedback form related to this core update.

You can use this form until May 31 to provide feedback to Google’s Search team about any issues noticed after the core update.

While the feedback provided won’t be used to make changes for specific queries or websites, Google says it may help inform general improvements to its search ranking systems for future updates.

Advertisement

Google also updated its help documentation on “Debugging drops in Google Search traffic” to help people understand ranking changes after a core update.


Featured Image: Rohit-Tripathi/Shutterstock

FAQ

After the update, what steps should websites take to align with Google’s new ranking criteria?

After Google’s March 2024 Core Update, websites should:

  • Improve the quality, trustworthiness, and depth of their website content.
  • Stop heavily focusing on getting as many links as possible and prioritize relevant, high-quality links instead.
  • Fix any shady or spam-like SEO tactics on their sites.
  • Carefully review their SEO strategies to ensure they follow Google’s new guidelines.

Source link

Advertisement
Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

SEO

Google Declares It The “Gemini Era” As Revenue Grows 15%

Published

on

By

A person holding a smartphone displaying the Google Gemini Era logo, with a blurred background of stock market charts.

Alphabet Inc., Google’s parent company, announced its first quarter 2024 financial results today.

While Google reported double-digit growth in key revenue areas, the focus was on its AI developments, dubbed the “Gemini era” by CEO Sundar Pichai.

The Numbers: 15% Revenue Growth, Operating Margins Expand

Alphabet reported Q1 revenues of $80.5 billion, a 15% increase year-over-year, exceeding Wall Street’s projections.

Net income was $23.7 billion, with diluted earnings per share of $1.89. Operating margins expanded to 32%, up from 25% in the prior year.

Ruth Porat, Alphabet’s President and CFO, stated:

Advertisement

“Our strong financial results reflect revenue strength across the company and ongoing efforts to durably reengineer our cost base.”

Google’s core advertising units, such as Search and YouTube, drove growth. Google advertising revenues hit $61.7 billion for the quarter.

The Cloud division also maintained momentum, with revenues of $9.6 billion, up 28% year-over-year.

Pichai highlighted that YouTube and Cloud are expected to exit 2024 at a combined $100 billion annual revenue run rate.

Generative AI Integration in Search

Google experimented with AI-powered features in Search Labs before recently introducing AI overviews into the main search results page.

Regarding the gradual rollout, Pichai states:

“We are being measured in how we do this, focusing on areas where gen AI can improve the Search experience, while also prioritizing traffic to websites and merchants.”

Pichai reports that Google’s generative AI features have answered over a billion queries already:

Advertisement

“We’ve already served billions of queries with our generative AI features. It’s enabling people to access new information, to ask questions in new ways, and to ask more complex questions.”

Google reports increased Search usage and user satisfaction among those interacting with the new AI overview results.

The company also highlighted its “Circle to Search” feature on Android, which allows users to circle objects on their screen or in videos to get instant AI-powered answers via Google Lens.

Reorganizing For The “Gemini Era”

As part of the AI roadmap, Alphabet is consolidating all teams building AI models under the Google DeepMind umbrella.

Pichai revealed that, through hardware and software improvements, the company has reduced machine costs associated with its generative AI search results by 80% over the past year.

He states:

“Our data centers are some of the most high-performing, secure, reliable and efficient in the world. We’ve developed new AI models and algorithms that are more than one hundred times more efficient than they were 18 months ago.

How Will Google Make Money With AI?

Alphabet sees opportunities to monetize AI through its advertising products, Cloud offerings, and subscription services.

Advertisement

Google is integrating Gemini into ad products like Performance Max. The company’s Cloud division is bringing “the best of Google AI” to enterprise customers worldwide.

Google One, the company’s subscription service, surpassed 100 million paid subscribers in Q1 and introduced a new premium plan featuring advanced generative AI capabilities powered by Gemini models.

Future Outlook

Pichai outlined six key advantages positioning Alphabet to lead the “next wave of AI innovation”:

  1. Research leadership in AI breakthroughs like the multimodal Gemini model
  2. Robust AI infrastructure and custom TPU chips
  3. Integrating generative AI into Search to enhance the user experience
  4. A global product footprint reaching billions
  5. Streamlined teams and improved execution velocity
  6. Multiple revenue streams to monetize AI through advertising and cloud

With upcoming events like Google I/O and Google Marketing Live, the company is expected to share further updates on its AI initiatives and product roadmap.


Featured Image: Sergei Elagin/Shutterstock

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

Trending

Follow by Email
RSS