Connect with us

FACEBOOK

Water Park Changes Breastfeeding Policy After Woman’s Viral Facebook Post

Published

on

Water Park Changes Breastfeeding Policy After Woman's Viral Facebook Post

  • This month, a Georgia mother visited Rigby’s Water World in Warner Robins, Georgia. 
  • She said staff told her to stop breastfeeding her 11-month-old son in a now-viral Facebook post.
  • After online backlash, Rigby’s updated its policy to allow breastfeeding in the pools, a park rep told Insider.

A Georgia water park changed its breastfeeding policy after a mom said she was barred from nursing her son in a lazy pool earlier this month. 

Tiffany Francis shared the incident at Rigby’s Water World, in Warner Robins, in a now-viral Facebook post on July 14.

As of Wednesday, her post has garnered over 1,100 comments and reactions.

Advertisement

Francis said she thought staffers were joking when they told her to stop breastfeeding

Francis told Insider her family visited the water park on July 14, and at one point, she began to nurse her son to sleep in the lazy river because motion helps him sleep. However, she said she was approached by a lifeguard who told her she wasn’t allowed to nurse in the pool.

Francis added that she was shocked because she’s breastfed her son in the lazy river several times as a seasonal ticket holder.

“A lifeguard was sitting up in a little chair and said, “Ma’am, you can’t do that,’” Francis said. “I looked around and was like, ‘Is he joking?’”

After being confronted by two lifeguards, Francis told Insider she asked if there were specific rules stating she couldn’t breastfeed in the lazy river. 

“I knew they had a huge placard of rules at the front door, and so she [one of the lifeguards] said, “Yeah, the rules are up front.” I got out immediately and went up there to look, and there was nothing about that,” Francis said.

Francis told Insider she eventually spoke to the general manager, who reportedly said she was barred from breastfeeding “as a courtesy for others.” In her Facebook post, Francis wrote the general manager suggested it was because no food or drinks were allowed in the water. 

Advertisement

“I told him it was illegal, and I guess he didn’t realize or didn’t think about it at the time,” she said. 

According to the state’s law, breastfeeding “is an important and basic act of nurture which should be encouraged in the interests of maternal and child health. A mother may breastfeed her baby in any location where the mother and baby are otherwise authorized to be,” per Georgia’s Breastfeeding Coalition.

A woman and baby swimming

Tiffany Francis (not pictured) shared her experience on Facebook.

Orbon Alija/Getty Images



At that point, Francis said she asked for a refund on her season tickets, which, according to her, Rigby’s Water World denied. She told Insider she left the water park feeling “completely humiliated.” 

“I was literally shaking walking out of there, just trying to get out as fast as I could,” she added.

The same day, Francis said she wrote about her online experience as a cautionary tale for other mothers who plan to visit the water park. 

Advertisement

In her Facebook post, Francis wrote that most people wore “very little clothing” at the water park that day, “but my son and I were offensive.” 

A Rigby’s Water World representative told Insider they never intended to embarrass Francis

People’s Angela Andaloro reported Monday that after Francis’ Facebook went viral, a Rigby family member responded to Francis’ Facebook post and acknowledged that breastfeeding was important, but “an exposed breast in a water feature without a covering could be seen as indecent (we wouldn’t let another guest do the same).”

The family member added that family rooms, shaded seats, and an admin building at the water park could be used as alternatives, according to the outlet.

On Tuesday, a representative for Rigby’s Water World confirmed to Insider that its policy is now updated and allows mothers to breastfeed anywhere in the water park. They added they had no intention of embarrassing Francis, and the staff is now educated on the revised policy.

However, Francis told Insider the apology doesn’t move her. 

“I don’t feel a sincere apology at all, but they said, ‘Oh, well, we’ve said sorry,’” Francis said. “And they’ve changed their unwritten policy to say you can now do something that was already legal.”

Advertisement

Francis also acknowledged that she’d received an outpouring of support from people but also faced a stream of hate. 

“I told one person yesterday, I was like, ‘If you’re going to say something to a breastfeeding mom, make it positive, because that’s something it’s going to stick with them forever,’” she said. “It sticks with you because it’s a very sensitive topic.” 

Francis said more than anything; she’s shocked mothers were still navigating public breastfeeding in 2023. 

“It’s crazy that this is even still happening to people in this day and age,” she said. 

Source link

Advertisement
Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address

FACEBOOK

Facebook Faces Yet Another Outage: Platform Encounters Technical Issues Again

Published

on

By

Facebook Problem Again

Uppdated: It seems that today’s issues with Facebook haven’t affected as many users as the last time. A smaller group of people appears to be impacted this time around, which is a relief compared to the larger incident before. Nevertheless, it’s still frustrating for those affected, and hopefully, the issues will be resolved soon by the Facebook team.

Facebook had another problem today (March 20, 2024). According to Downdetector, a website that shows when other websites are not working, many people had trouble using Facebook.

This isn’t the first time Facebook has had issues. Just a little while ago, there was another problem that stopped people from using the site. Today, when people tried to use Facebook, it didn’t work like it should. People couldn’t see their friends’ posts, and sometimes the website wouldn’t even load.

Downdetector, which watches out for problems on websites, showed that lots of people were having trouble with Facebook. People from all over the world said they couldn’t use the site, and they were not happy about it.

When websites like Facebook have problems, it affects a lot of people. It’s not just about not being able to see posts or chat with friends. It can also impact businesses that use Facebook to reach customers.

Since Facebook owns Messenger and Instagram, the problems with Facebook also meant that people had trouble using these apps. It made the situation even more frustrating for many users, who rely on these apps to stay connected with others.

Advertisement

During this recent problem, one thing is obvious: the internet is always changing, and even big websites like Facebook can have problems. While people wait for Facebook to fix the issue, it shows us how easily things online can go wrong. It’s a good reminder that we should have backup plans for staying connected online, just in case something like this happens again.

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

FACEBOOK

Christian family goes in hiding after being cleared of blasphemy

Published

on

Christian family goes in hiding after being cleared of blasphemy

LAHORE, Pakistan — A court in Pakistan granted bail to a Christian falsely charged with blasphemy, but he and his family have separated and gone into hiding amid threats to their lives, sources said.

Haroon Shahzad (right) with attorney Aneeqa Maria. | The Voice Society/Morning Star News

Haroon Shahzad, 45, was released from Sargodha District Jail on Nov. 15, said his attorney, Aneeqa Maria. Shahzad was charged with blasphemy on June 30 after posting Bible verses on Facebook that infuriated Muslims, causing dozens of Christian families in Chak 49 Shumaali, near Sargodha in Punjab Province, to flee their homes.

Lahore High Court Judge Ali Baqir Najfi granted bail on Nov. 6, but the decision and his release on Nov. 15 were not made public until now due to security fears for his life, Maria said.

Shahzad told Morning Star News by telephone from an undisclosed location that the false accusation has changed his family’s lives forever.

“My family has been on the run from the time I was implicated in this false charge and arrested by the police under mob pressure,” Shahzad told Morning Star News. “My eldest daughter had just started her second year in college, but it’s been more than four months now that she hasn’t been able to return to her institution. My other children are also unable to resume their education as my family is compelled to change their location after 15-20 days as a security precaution.”

Though he was not tortured during incarceration, he said, the pain of being away from his family and thinking about their well-being and safety gave him countless sleepless nights.

Advertisement



“All of this is due to the fact that the complainant, Imran Ladhar, has widely shared my photo on social media and declared me liable for death for alleged blasphemy,” he said in a choked voice. “As soon as Ladhar heard about my bail, he and his accomplices started gathering people in the village and incited them against me and my family. He’s trying his best to ensure that we are never able to go back to the village.”

Shahzad has met with his family only once since his release on bail, and they are unable to return to their village in the foreseeable future, he said.

“We are not together,” he told Morning Star News. “They are living at a relative’s house while I’m taking refuge elsewhere. I don’t know when this agonizing situation will come to an end.”

The Christian said the complainant, said to be a member of Islamist extremist party Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan and also allegedly connected with banned terrorist group Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, filed the charge because of a grudge. Shahzad said he and his family had obtained valuable government land and allotted it for construction of a church building, and Ladhar and others had filed multiple cases against the allotment and lost all of them after a four-year legal battle.

“Another probable reason for Ladhar’s jealousy could be that we were financially better off than most Christian families of the village,” he said. “I was running a successful paint business in Sargodha city, but that too has shut down due to this case.”

Regarding the social media post, Shahzad said he had no intention of hurting Muslim sentiments by sharing the biblical verse on his Facebook page.

Advertisement



“I posted the verse a week before Eid Al Adha [Feast of the Sacrifice] but I had no idea that it would be used to target me and my family,” he said. “In fact, when I came to know that Ladhar was provoking the villagers against me, I deleted the post and decided to meet the village elders to explain my position.”

The village elders were already influenced by Ladhar and refused to listen to him, Shahzad said.

“I was left with no option but to flee the village when I heard that Ladhar was amassing a mob to attack me,” he said.

Shahzad pleaded with government authorities for justice, saying he should not be punished for sharing a verse from the Bible that in no way constituted blasphemy.

Similar to other cases

Shahzad’s attorney, Maria, told Morning Star News that events in Shahzad’s case were similar to other blasphemy cases filed against Christians.

Advertisement



“Defective investigation, mala fide on the part of the police and complainant, violent protests against the accused persons and threats to them and their families, forcing their displacement from their ancestral areas, have become hallmarks of all blasphemy allegations in Pakistan,” said Maria, head of The Voice Society, a Christian paralegal organization.

She said that the case filed against Shahzad was gross violation of Section 196 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), which states that police cannot register a case under the Section 295-A blasphemy statute against a private citizen without the approval of the provincial government or federal agencies.

Maria added that Shahzad and his family have continued to suffer even though there was no evidence of blasphemy.

“The social stigma attached with a blasphemy accusation will likely have a long-lasting impact on their lives, whereas his accuser, Imran Ladhar, would not have to face any consequence of his false accusation,” she said.

The judge who granted bail noted that Shahzad was charged with blasphemy under Section 295-A, which is a non-cognizable offense, and Section 298, which is bailable. The judge also noted that police had not submitted the forensic report of Shahzad’s cell phone and said evidence was required to prove that the social media was blasphemous, according to Maria.

Bail was set at 100,000 Pakistani rupees (US $350) and two personal sureties, and the judge ordered police to further investigate, she said.

Advertisement



Shahzad, a paint contractor, on June 29 posted on his Facebook page 1 Cor. 10:18-21 regarding food sacrificed to idols, as Muslims were beginning the four-day festival of Eid al-Adha, which involves slaughtering an animal and sharing the meat.

A Muslim villager took a screenshot of the post, sent it to local social media groups and accused Shahzad of likening Muslims to pagans and disrespecting the Abrahamic tradition of animal sacrifice.

Though Shahzad made no comment in the post, inflammatory or otherwise, the situation became tense after Friday prayers when announcements were made from mosque loudspeakers telling people to gather for a protest, family sources previously told Morning Star News.

Fearing violence as mobs grew in the village, most Christian families fled their homes, leaving everything behind.

In a bid to restore order, the police registered a case against Shahzad under Sections 295-A and 298. Section 295-A relates to “deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs” and is punishable with imprisonment of up to 10 years and fine, or both. Section 298 prescribes up to one year in prison and a fine, or both, for hurting religious sentiments.

Pakistan ranked seventh on Open Doors’ 2023 World Watch List of the most difficult places to be a Christian, up from eighth the previous year.

Advertisement



Morning Star News is the only independent news service focusing exclusively on the persecution of Christians. The nonprofit’s mission is to provide complete, reliable, even-handed news in order to empower those in the free world to help persecuted Christians, and to encourage persecuted Christians by informing them that they are not alone in their suffering.

Free Religious Freedom Updates

Join thousands of others to get the FREEDOM POST newsletter for free, sent twice a week from The Christian Post.

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

FACEBOOK

Individual + Team Stats: Hornets vs. Timberwolves

Published

on

CHARLOTTE HORNETS MINNESOTA TIMBERWOLVES You can follow us for future coverage by liking us on Facebook & following us on X: Facebook – All Hornets X – …

Source link

Keep an eye on what we are doing
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Continue Reading

Trending

Follow by Email
RSS