We need to talk about Twitter Communities.
Or more specifically, it’s worth discussing the ways in which Twitter’s going about enhancing user engagement through Communities for more enclosed tweet discussions, and other experiments that could eventually change the way that you tweet.
Communities is the most obvious element on this front, because it’s already live, and is already developing as an option to improve tweet engagement.
Indeed, while Twitter hasn’t shared any official stats on Communities usage as yet, it has said that its biggest communities (in terms of sheer member numbers) have all been created in recent weeks. So while it may not seem like a major element in the Twittersphere as yet, it is growing – whether you realize it or not.
And Twitter is addressing key problems with the option. At launch, one of the flaws that I identified was in limiting the capacity for people to join Communities, with only those invited by current members able to join a group. Twitter’s fixed this with a new option to request to join, while it’s also improved its controls over open and invite-only groups.
There are still some problems with this (the capacity for members to invite five people will likely dilute group quality), but the system is improving, which will facilitate more control over membership.
Twitter’s also added a new member search option to help admins locate mods primarily, while also facilitating other use cases, while it’s also now testing Communities search on the web to make it easier for users to find groups to join.
Improving discoverability is a key focus, and while I’m not entirely confident that Twitter’s algorithms will be able to highlight the most relevant communities to each user, being able to search for yourself, across all apps, will help.
But there are still some bigger questions around engagement, and whether Twitter users will actually care enough about sharing in more enclosed, topic-focused groups, as opposed to posting to their own followers.
A problem in this respect is that most Twitter users have already curated their audience over time, by choosing who they follow, and tweeting about certain subjects to build an audience. Given that they’ve already cultivated a group of people that are interested in the same things, do we really need Communities? Is it really worth tweeting into these smaller groups?
The main use-case for Communities is to give users more options to share on different subjects, as opposed to feeling confined to certain topics to appease their one audience.
As explained by Jay Sullivan, Twitter’s VP of consumer product (to The Verge):
“One of the things I hear from people is, ‘Hey, I read a lot of stuff. I’m not necessarily comfortable tweeting or don’t know when or why I should tweet. I would feel better if I was tweeting to a smaller community of people.”
That makes sense – for example, I really like NBA basketball, and follow all the latest news and conversations, yet I don’t feel overly comfortable tweeting about the NBA on my main account, because the majority of my followers won’t be interested, as they follow me due to my work on Social Media Today.
Communities offers some level of solution on this front, though there is another Twitter project, which has seemingly gone quiet of late, which could offer more potential in this respect.
This project, initially called ‘Twitter Facets’, would enable users to tweet under different personas, while also letting followers choose which persona/s they want to follow, so that they don’t have to see every tweet from each user. The complication is that it requires some additional manual effort from creators, as you would need to select which ‘Facet’ each of your tweets aligns with in the creation flow, but it would provide more freedom for users to tweet about different things, without annoying their audience.
Communities, again, aligns with the same, and it may well be that Communities is the better solution on this front. But it’s interesting to note the alternate experiments that Twitter’s undertaking, which could offer more solutions to this problem.
The other experiment that Twitter continues to work on is ‘Circles’ (or ‘Flocks’), which would enable users to create personal groups of up to 150 people, with which they could then share private updates.
As recently noted by reverse engineering expert Jane Manchun Wong, the back-end code of Twitter’s in-development Circles option includes the capacity to create multiple Circles, which could eventually enable users to create topic-based groups of their own, with which to share subject-focused updates into.
Of course, they would be smaller groups, so it seems like a less optimal solution than Facets, which would enable you to potentially build large audiences around different topics. But it’s another consideration, and again, it’s interesting to see how Twitter is experimenting with different elements to allow more topic and community-focused sharing, as opposed to tweeting everything to all of your audience every time.
That is a valuable proposition for the app, though whether it can truly maximize tweeting activity in this respect remains to be seen. But it is working on it, and if Twitter can crack the code and establish a better way to tweet on variable subjects, that could change the game for the app, and for marketers moving forward.
There’s still a way to go, but it’s interesting to note Twitter’s progress.
YouTube Tests Disappearing Community Posts, Expands Access to Membership Gifting
YouTube is testing out a new post type within its Community Posts element, while it’s also expanding access to ‘Membership Gifting’, which provides another way for creators to boost their audience in the app.
First off, on disappearing posts – YouTube’s running a new experiment that will enable selected creators to set a time limit on their Community Posts in the app, which will see those updates disappear after 24 or 72 hours.
As you can see in this example, the new option will enable you to set an expiration date for a Community Post, which will then see it automatically erased from view after that time.
YouTube says that creators have been seeking more ways to enhance engagement within the Community Posts element:
“We’ve heard from creators that they would like the ability to share content that is only available for a short period of time – for example, a special time-limited discount on merch or a special message for fans that manage to catch it before it expires.”
YouTube’s Community Posts, which it opened up to all channels with over 500 subscribers in September last year (down from 1,000 subs previously), enable creators to share text-based posts – which can include polls, GIFs, images, and video – within their Community tab.
That provides another way to extend your community-building efforts beyond video content and subsequent comments, which is more aligned with the engagement that you’ll find on in other social apps.
And soon, you’ll also be able to share disappearing posts too – though the initial test is only running with selected creators on Android devices to begin with.
“Viewers will be able to see that a post will expire in x hours at the top of the post in the community tab, and creators will see their expired posts in the ‘Community’ tab under the ‘Archived’ chip once it has expired. Creators can’t re-share expired posts, but we are planning on adding that functionality in the future.”
On another front, YouTube’s also expanding access to its ‘Membership Gifting’ option, which enables Channel members to purchase gift memberships, which are then distributed to other viewers who are not subscribed to the channel.
Which may seem a little odd, but the idea is that this is a support measure for creators, not a gift for friends, as such, providing a means to both give the creator revenue (as they get the usual cut from gifted memberships), while also helping them to boost their audience in the app.
“Up until now, gifting memberships was in a limited beta stage only, and only accessible by a small number of creators. But with this launch, we’re expanding the number of creators that have access to gifting memberships. And as a creator, you can buy gift memberships for your community without becoming a member yourself.”
To be eligible for the program, Channels need to have memberships enabled at a level of $4.99. Viewers also need to opt in to receive gifts during a stream, which they can do by tapping on the ‘Allow Gifts’ prompt in the chat on an eligible broadcast.
It could be a handy option for building community in the app, and with many YouTubers inspiring legions of passionate fans, you can imagine that some will be more than happy to participate in helping to grow their favorite creators’ following.
How Should You Optimize Your Content?
YouTube Tests Disappearing Community Posts, Expands Access to Membership Gifting
Team RWBY is Making Its Way to the Realm in a New Paladins Patch
How To Create Your Instagram Content Plan
Google Product Grid Results Are Organic
Facebook Adds New Option to Assign Community Managers to Moderate Live Broadcasts
W3C Announces Major Change
B2B customer journeys that begin at review sites are significantly shorter
The Twitchification of marketing: Ed Craven, influencers and Stake.com
Relive the Classic Sonic Games That Defined a Generation
Why Google Doesn’t Like Some SEO Metrics
Google Bar & Pool Table Room
9 Creative Company Profile Examples to Inspire You [Templates]
How Software Systems Enhance the Performance of Gym Business?
How to Calculate Your Lead Generation Goals [Free Calculator]
Strategizing Your Instagram Marketing – DigitalMarketer
6 Tactics to Boost Ecommerce Sales [Without Discounting]
Google Single URL Inspection Tool Dog
24 questions to ask identity resolution vendors during a demo
Good Web Sites Are Good For SEO, Says Google